查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1952544

單級雙吸離心式幫浦浦市場：按類型、葉輪類型、材料、壓力範圍、流量、應用、最終用戶、銷售管道，全球預測，2026-2032年

Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market by Type, Impeller Type, Material, Pressure Range, Flow Rate, Application, End User, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 183 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，單級雙吸離心式幫浦市場價值將達到 12.9 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 13.8 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 21.7 億美元，複合年成長率為 7.68%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年 2025 12.9億美元
預計年份：2026年 13.8億美元
預測年份：2032年 21.7億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 7.68%

對單級雙吸離心式幫浦。

單級雙吸離心式幫浦在需要高流量、中高揚程和對稱水力負載的關鍵領域中佔有重要地位。這類幫浦的特點是採用單葉輪，兩側均有水流進給，從而平衡軸向推力，即使在高流量下也能平穩運轉。事實上，這種設計降低了軸承負載，並允許旋轉部件和固定部件之間更大的間隙，從而延長了維護週期，並確保在連續運行應用中可靠運行。

對效率的需求、資產管理的數位化以及供應鏈的模組化正在重塑泵浦設計服務模式和採購實踐。

在旋轉機械領域，一系列融合變革正在發生，其驅動力包括對能源效率的需求、資產管理的數位化以及材料創新。日益成長的監管壓力和企業對永續性的承諾正在推動液壓效率的提升和生命週期排放的降低，迫使原始設備製造商 (OEM) 和營運商重新思考葉輪配置、液壓剖面和機械密封解決方案。這些技術最佳化與耐腐蝕合金和表面處理技術的進步相輔相成，從而延長了平均維修間隔時間 (MTBR)。

為因應 2025 年關稅變動對零件和成品幫浦組件的影響，實施了策略供應鏈調整和成本控制措施。

2025年宣布並實施的關稅措施進一步加劇了全球供應鏈的現有壓力，促使泵浦產業的供應商和終端用戶重新評估其採購、庫存和合約框架。零件和成品組件進口關稅的提高推高了到岸成本，促使企業重新評估以往優先考慮最低單價採購的籌資策略。為此，許多買家正在進行服務交付成本分析，將關稅、物流波動和前置作業時間延長等因素考慮在內，導致供應商多元化，並盡可能將重點轉向近岸外包。

解讀詳細的細分維度，例如類型、葉輪配置、材料、銷售管道、壓力/流量特性、應用領域和最終用戶需求。

該分析概述了一個關鍵框架，將產品配置、運作效能、採購需求和售後市場策略連結起來。按類型分類，對水平式和垂直式配置的研究揭示了易於維護和最佳化占地面積之間的權衡。水平式裝置通常更便於檢查和檢修，而當最大限度地減少安裝面積是首要考慮因素時，則更傾向於選擇垂直裝置。依葉輪類型分類，封閉式、開放式和半開放式葉輪各自展現出不同的水力效率和固態處理能力。封閉式設計在潔淨環境中效率更高，而當需要抗顆粒性和易於維修時，則更傾向於選擇開放式或半開放式葉輪。

營運、監管和採購方面的區域差異影響著我們的產品和服務策略。

區域趨勢籌資策略、產品規格和售後服務模式有顯著影響。在美洲，監管機構對能源效率和永續性項目的重視，正在加速對高效機械和狀態監控維護解決方案的需求。同時，石化加工和水基礎設施領域的強勁工業活動，也維持了對重型幫浦配置的穩定需求。北美原始設備製造商 (OEM) 和服務供應商優先考慮快速回應網路和效能保證，以滿足各工業領域的運作要求。

技術差異化、售後市場生態系統和策略夥伴關係關係在決定供應商在競爭激烈的幫浦市場中的定位和韌性方面所扮演的角色。

主要供應商之間的競爭主要集中在技術差異化、售後服務深度和通路夥伴關係。投資液壓技術創新和嚴格檢驗測試的公司，往往能在發電、石油天然氣和海水淡化等高要求應用領域獲得更高的規格優先順序。同時，那些建構了包含診斷、快速備件供應和正式服務合約的完善售後市場生態系統的企業，能夠將現有客戶群轉化為持續的收入來源，並影響設備的更換週期。

製造商和營運商可採取的策略重點是提高服務能力、降低關稅風險和數位化維護服務貨幣化。

產業領導者應採取多管齊下的方法，平衡工程最佳化、採購彈性以及服務現代化，以保護利潤率並創造價值。首先，應優先考慮「服務設計」原則，該原則可簡化現場回應、縮短平均維修時間並提高關鍵零件的兼容性。透過標準化介面和採用模組化子組件，企業可以降低庫存持有成本，並縮短OEM和售後市場管道的回應時間。

穩健的混合方法調查通訊協定，結合專家訪談、供應鏈圖譜繪製、實地檢驗和技術文件審查，確保了可操作的見解。

本研究途徑採用定性和定量相結合的方法，以確保分析的嚴謹性和實證性。首先，我們對工程負責人、採購專家、售後市場經理以及部分最終用戶進行了訪談，以了解營運重點、規格決定因素和服務期望。隨後，我們將這些訪談結果與技術文件、產品資料表以及現有的法規指南進行交叉驗證，以檢驗工程聲明的準確性並確保不同應用情境下術語的一致性。

整合技術、商業性和供應鏈影響，優先考慮彈性採購、績效主導設計和服務主導的收入策略。

綜合分析表明，單級雙吸離心式幫浦仍然是一項核心技術，其發展得益於技術的不斷進步和智慧服務模式的顯著提升，從而顯著提高了營運價值。水力剖面分析、材料科學和預測診斷技術的進步共同作用，延長了關鍵工業和公共應用領域的使用壽命，降低了生命週期能耗，並提高了運轉率。這些發展趨勢有利於那些能夠將卓越技術與全面的售後支援相結合的供應商。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章：調查方法

  • 調查設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查的前提
  • 研究限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席體驗長觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 工業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會映射
  • 銷售管道分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依類型分類

  • 水平的
  • 垂直的

第9章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依葉輪類型分類

  • 封閉式
  • 打開
  • 半開放式

第10章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依材料分類

  • 合金鋼
  • 鑄鐵
  • 防鏽的

第11章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依壓力範圍分類

  • 高壓
  • 低壓
  • 中壓

第12章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依流量分類

  • 高流速
  • 低流量
  • 中等流速

第13章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依應用領域分類

  • 暖通空調建築
  • 工業的
  • 船
  • 石油和天然氣
  • 發電
  • 供水和水處理

第14章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依最終用戶分類

  • 化工/石油化工
  • 船
  • 石油和天然氣
  • 發電
  • 用水和污水

第15章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依銷售管道分類

  • 售後市場
  • OEM

第16章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦浦市場：依地區分類

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第17章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依組別分類

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第18章：單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場：依國家分類

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第19章：美國單級雙吸離心式幫浦市場

第20章：中國單級雙吸離心式幫浦幫浦市場

第21章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • Dalian Huanyou Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
  • Duchting Pumpen GmbH & Co. KG
  • Ebara Corporation
  • Flowserve Corporation
  • Fujian Nanfang Pump Co., Ltd.
  • Grundfos Holding A/S
  • Guangdong Lingxiao Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
  • ITT Inc.
  • KSB SE & Co. KGaA
  • Liancheng Group Co., Ltd.
  • Pentair plc
  • Ruhrpumpen Group
  • Shanghai Kaiquan Pump Group Co., Ltd.
  • Shimge Pump Industry Group Co., Ltd.
  • SPX Flow, Inc.
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.
  • Wilo SE
  • Xylem Inc.
  • Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-867BED9A9FF6

The Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market was valued at USD 1.29 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.38 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.68%, reaching USD 2.17 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 1.29 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 1.38 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 2.17 billion
CAGR (%) 7.68%

Foundational overview of single stage double suction centrifugal pump design principles, operational advantages, and application-driven selection criteria

Single stage double suction centrifugal pumps occupy an important niche where high flow, moderate to high head, and symmetrical hydraulic loads are required. These pumps are defined by a single impeller fed from both sides, which balances axial thrust and enables smooth operation at elevated flow rates. In practice, this design reduces bearing loads and permits larger clearances between rotating and stationary components, which supports extended service intervals and reliable operation in continuous-duty applications.

Performance drivers for these pumps include impeller geometry, suction and discharge nozzle orientation, bearing configuration, and seal type. The horizontal and vertical arrangements support distinct plant layouts and maintenance philosophies; horizontal machines typically offer easier access for overhaul while vertical designs can save floor space and reduce footprint in confined installations. Impeller types such as closed, open, and semi-open each offer trade-offs between hydraulic efficiency, solids handling, and susceptibility to wear, informing selection based on fluid characteristics and operational priorities.

Material selection and construction-ranging from alloy steel and cast iron to stainless steel-affect longevity, corrosion resistance, and total cost of ownership. Applications span HVAC and building services, industrial process circuits, marine ballast and cooling systems, oil and gas utilities, power generation condensate and cooling duties, and municipal water supply and treatment. With service and parts availability influencing lifecycle economics, consideration of aftermarket support and OEM channel strategies becomes central to procurement decisions and engineering specifications.

How efficiency mandates, digitalization of asset management, and supply chain modularity are reshaping pump design, service models, and procurement behaviors

The landscape for rotating equipment is undergoing a series of convergent shifts driven by energy efficiency imperatives, digitalization of asset operations, and materials innovation. Increasing regulatory pressure and corporate sustainability commitments are incentivizing higher hydraulic efficiencies and reduced lifecycle emissions, prompting OEMs and operators to revisit impeller geometry, hydraulic profiling, and mechanical sealing solutions. These engineering optimizations are complemented by material shifts toward corrosion-resistant alloys and surface treatments that extend mean time between repairs.

Parallel to physical design changes, digital monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities are transforming how these pumps are deployed and supported. Condition-based monitoring, enabled by vibration analytics, acoustic sensing, and real-time thermography, allows operators to move from calendar-based interventions to interventions driven by measured equipment health. Consequently, aftermarket services are evolving into integrated service offerings that combine parts, remote diagnostics, and outcome-based maintenance contracts. This transition reduces unplanned downtime while aligning service economics with operational performance.

Supply-chain strategies are also adapting. Manufacturers and end users are increasingly valuing modular designs and standardized interfaces that facilitate rapid field replacement and reduced inventory complexity. Additive manufacturing has accelerated prototyping and expedited delivery of low-volume, high-value components, while broader adoption of digital twins and simulation tools has shortened product development cycles. Taken together, these shifts emphasize resilience, lifecycle value, and the capacity to respond to changing operational and regulatory demands with agility.

Strategic supply chain adaptations and cost management responses prompted by tariff shifts affecting components and finished pump assemblies in 2025

Tariff measures announced and implemented in 2025 have compounded existing pressures on global supply chains, prompting suppliers and end users in the pump sector to reassess sourcing, inventory, and contractual frameworks. Increased import duties on components and finished assemblies have raised landed costs, incentivizing a rethink of procurement strategies that previously prioritized lowest-unit-price sourcing. In response, many buyers are conducting cost-to-serve analyses that factor in duties, logistics volatility, and expanded lead times, which has shifted emphasis toward supplier diversification and nearshoring where feasible.

Manufacturers facing higher input costs have adopted a range of mitigation tactics, including redesigns to reduce dependence on tariff-impacted materials, renegotiation of long-term supply agreements, and vertical integration of critical fabrication stages. At the same time, some OEMs are accelerating localization of final assembly to limit cross-border tariff exposure while maintaining centralized engineering to preserve design consistency. This relocation of assembly can yield advantages in responsiveness and service turn-around, but it also introduces new capital and labor considerations that must be managed carefully.

For service and aftermarket channels, tariffs have amplified the value of repairability and spare-part availability. Operators are increasingly evaluating the cost-benefit of stocking critical spares domestically versus relying on international shipments, mindful of potential duty escalations. The broader implication is a rising premium on supply-chain transparency, contractual flexibility, and the ability to adapt maintenance models rapidly as trade policy evolves. These dynamics underscore the need for scenario planning that anticipates tariffs as a persistent exogenous risk rather than a temporary disruption.

Interpreting detailed segmentation dimensions across type, impeller geometry, materials, sales channels, pressure and flow characteristics, application areas, and end-user needs

Segmentation-driven analysis provides an essential framework for linking product configuration to operational outcomes, procurement needs, and aftermarket strategies. Based on Type, study of horizontal and vertical arrangements highlights the trade-off between ease of maintenance and floor space optimization; horizontal units typically facilitate inspection and overhaul access while vertical units are favored where footprint minimization is paramount. Based on Impeller Type, closed, open, and semi-open impellers offer distinct hydraulic efficiencies and solids handling capabilities, with closed designs delivering higher efficiency in clean services and open or semi-open types preferred where particulate tolerance or ease of repair is required.

Based on Material, the choices among alloy steel, cast iron, and stainless steel have direct implications for corrosion resistance, mechanical strength, and total lifecycle costs; alloy steel and stainless solutions are prioritized in corrosive or sanitary environments while cast iron remains competitive in clear-water and general industrial services due to cost-effectiveness. Based on Sales Channel, differentiation between Aftermarket and OEM sales channels shapes revenue models and service expectations; the Aftermarket segment's service and maintenance and spare parts subcomponents demand robust logistics and diagnostic support, whereas OEM channels often emphasize integrated warranties and engineered solutions.

Based on Pressure Range, categorization into high, medium, and low pressure services affects casing design, impeller sizing, and bearing selection. Based on Flow Rate, high, medium, and low flow classifications influence impeller profile, shaft diameter, and cooling strategies. Based on Application, the range from HVAC & Building, Industrial, Marine, Oil & Gas, Power Generation, to Water Supply & Treatment defines operational duty cycles and regulatory interfaces that determine certification and material choices. Based on End User, the requirements of Chemicals & Petrochemical, Marine, Oil & Gas, Power Generation, and Water & Wastewater sectors inform specifications for corrosion control, redundancy, and service-level agreements. Integrating these segmentation dimensions into product roadmaps and aftermarket strategies enables suppliers and end users to align technical capability with commercial and regulatory demands.

Regional operational, regulatory, and procurement distinctions across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape product and service strategies

Regional dynamics significantly influence procurement strategies, product specification, and aftermarket service models. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on energy efficiency and sustainability programs has accelerated demand for high-efficiency machines and condition-based maintenance solutions, while robust industrial activity in petrochemical processing and water infrastructure maintains steady demand for heavy-duty pump configurations. North American OEMs and service providers are prioritizing rapid response networks and performance warranties to meet industrial uptime expectations.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, diverse regulatory environments and heterogeneous infrastructure maturity levels produce a wide spectrum of requirements. Western Europe often leads in stringent environmental standards and efficiency mandates, driving adoption of advanced hydraulics and emission-conscious manufacturing practices. The Middle East's continued investment in desalination, oil and gas, and utilities sustains demand for corrosion-resistant materials and heavy-duty designs, while parts of Africa present opportunities tied to water supply and treatment projects that prioritize reliability and cost-effective maintenance solutions.

Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid industrialization, expanding power generation capacity, and large-scale municipal water and wastewater projects, which collectively drive demand for scalable pump platforms and local manufacturing capacity. OEMs in the region emphasize competitive manufacturing costs, while service ecosystems are evolving to support lifecycle performance through local distribution networks and technical training programs. Across regions, differences in labor costs, regulatory expectations, and infrastructure investment priorities shape how suppliers position product families, aftermarket offerings, and strategic partnerships.

How engineering differentiation, aftermarket ecosystems, and strategic partnerships determine supplier positioning and resilience in competitive pump markets

Competitive dynamics among leading suppliers center on engineering differentiation, aftermarket service depth, and channel partnerships. Firms that invest in hydraulic innovation and rigorous validation testing tend to command higher specification preference in demanding applications such as power generation, oil and gas, and desalination. At the same time, organizations that build comprehensive aftermarket ecosystems-combining diagnostics, rapid spare-parts delivery, and formalized service agreements-are able to convert installed bases into recurring revenue streams and to influence replacement cycles.

Collaboration between OEMs and systems integrators is also a defining trend, enabling bundled solutions that integrate pumping equipment with control systems, monitoring platforms, and maintenance services. Strategic alliances, joint ventures, and localized manufacturing agreements are tools companies use to secure access to regional projects and to mitigate trade-related cost pressures. Intellectual property in specialized hydraulic designs and sealing technologies remains a valuable differentiator, and firms with strong engineering services often leverage these assets to support retrofits and performance upgrades.

Manufacturers that prioritize modularity and standardization can reduce part proliferation and improve interchangeability, which in turn simplifies spare parts logistics and shortens repair cycles. This operational advantage is amplified when combined with transparent warranty policies and responsive field service capabilities. Ultimately, companies that balance product innovation with robust aftermarket infrastructure and distribution reach are best positioned to meet complex end-user requirements while protecting revenue through service-led models.

Actionable strategic priorities for manufacturers and operators to improve serviceability, reduce tariff exposure, and monetize digital maintenance offerings

Industry leaders should adopt a multi-faceted approach that balances engineering optimization, procurement resilience, and service modernization to protect margins and capture value. First, prioritize design-for-service principles that simplify field intervention, reduce mean time to repair, and improve interchangeability of critical components. By standardizing interfaces and employing modular subassemblies, firms can lower inventory carrying costs and accelerate response times for both OEM and aftermarket channels.

Second, invest in condition-based monitoring and digital services to shift toward performance-based contracts that align vendor incentives with operational uptime. Integrating vibration, thermal, and flow analytics into service offerings allows providers to demonstrate measurable outcomes, enabling premium pricing for certified uptime guarantees. Third, reassess sourcing and tariff exposure through dual-sourcing strategies and regional assembly options to buffer against trade-policy volatility while preserving quality standards.

Fourth, expand aftermarket capabilities by formalizing training programs for channel partners, optimizing spare parts distribution, and offering bundled service contracts that include diagnostics and emergency response. Fifth, accelerate materials and hydraulic innovation to improve efficiency and wear life, but ensure that new designs are validated through accelerated life testing and field trials. Finally, cultivate partnerships with systems integrators and EPC firms to embed pumps into larger solution sets, thereby increasing the value captured across project lifecycles and reducing competitive pressure on standalone commodity pricing.

Robust mixed-methods research protocol combining expert interviews, supply-chain mapping, field validation, and technical documentation review to ensure actionable findings

The research approach combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure rigorous, evidence-based analysis. Primary interviews were conducted with engineering leaders, procurement specialists, aftermarket managers, and selected end users to capture operational priorities, specification drivers, and service expectations. These insights were triangulated with technical documentation, product datasheets, and available regulatory guidance to validate engineering assertions and to align terminology across applications.

Supply-chain mapping involved identification of key component flows, principal manufacturing hubs, and logistics choke points to assess vulnerability to trade policy shifts and transport disruptions. Where applicable, field validation and site visits were used to corroborate reported maintenance practices and to observe common retrofit strategies in situ. Competitive positioning analysis leveraged patent landscape reviews, product launch timelines, and recorded service models to identify patterns of innovation and aftermarket monetization.

Limitations of the methodology include variability in corporate transparency around maintenance cost structures and proprietary supply contracts. To mitigate this, the research emphasized cross-validation across multiple independent sources and applied conservative interpretation to anecdotal reports. The result is a structured synthesis that prioritizes operational relevance and practical implications for procurement, engineering, and aftermarket decision-makers.

Synthesis of technical, commercial, and supply-chain implications that prioritize resilient procurement, performance-driven design, and service-led revenue strategies

The cumulative narrative underscores that single stage double suction centrifugal pumps remain a core technology where incremental engineering improvements and smarter service models drive outsized operational value. Advancements in hydraulic profiling, materials science, and predictive diagnostics are converging to extend service life, reduce lifecycle energy consumption, and improve uptime for critical industrial and municipal applications. These developments favor suppliers who can couple technical excellence with comprehensive aftermarket support.

At the same time, external factors such as trade policy shifts and regional infrastructure priorities necessitate greater agility in sourcing and distribution. Organizations that proactively redesign their supply and service networks, while investing in condition-based maintenance and modular product architectures, will be better positioned to mitigate risk and capture long-term value. Decision-makers should therefore align procurement, engineering, and commercial strategies to ensure that design choices, sourcing decisions, and service models collectively support resilience and performance objectives.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Type

  • 8.1. Horizontal
  • 8.2. Vertical

9. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Impeller Type

  • 9.1. Closed
  • 9.2. Open
  • 9.3. Semi-Open

10. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Material

  • 10.1. Alloy Steel
  • 10.2. Cast Iron
  • 10.3. Stainless Steel

11. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Pressure Range

  • 11.1. High
  • 11.2. Low
  • 11.3. Medium

12. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Flow Rate

  • 12.1. High
  • 12.2. Low
  • 12.3. Medium

13. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Application

  • 13.1. HVAC & Building
  • 13.2. Industrial
  • 13.3. Marine
  • 13.4. Oil & Gas
  • 13.5. Power Generation
  • 13.6. Water Supply & Treatment

14. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by End User

  • 14.1. Chemicals & Petrochemical
  • 14.2. Marine
  • 14.3. Oil & Gas
  • 14.4. Power Generation
  • 14.5. Water & Wastewater

15. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Sales Channel

  • 15.1. Aftermarket
  • 15.2. OEM

16. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Region

  • 16.1. Americas
    • 16.1.1. North America
    • 16.1.2. Latin America
  • 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 16.2.1. Europe
    • 16.2.2. Middle East
    • 16.2.3. Africa
  • 16.3. Asia-Pacific

17. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Group

  • 17.1. ASEAN
  • 17.2. GCC
  • 17.3. European Union
  • 17.4. BRICS
  • 17.5. G7
  • 17.6. NATO

18. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Country

  • 18.1. United States
  • 18.2. Canada
  • 18.3. Mexico
  • 18.4. Brazil
  • 18.5. United Kingdom
  • 18.6. Germany
  • 18.7. France
  • 18.8. Russia
  • 18.9. Italy
  • 18.10. Spain
  • 18.11. China
  • 18.12. India
  • 18.13. Japan
  • 18.14. Australia
  • 18.15. South Korea

19. United States Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market

20. China Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market

21. Competitive Landscape

  • 21.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 21.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 21.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 21.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 21.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 21.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 21.5. Dalian Huanyou Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
  • 21.6. Duchting Pumpen GmbH & Co. KG
  • 21.7. Ebara Corporation
  • 21.8. Flowserve Corporation
  • 21.9. Fujian Nanfang Pump Co., Ltd.
  • 21.10. Grundfos Holding A/S
  • 21.11. Guangdong Lingxiao Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
  • 21.12. ITT Inc.
  • 21.13. KSB SE & Co. KGaA
  • 21.14. Liancheng Group Co., Ltd.
  • 21.15. Pentair plc
  • 21.16. Ruhrpumpen Group
  • 21.17. Shanghai Kaiquan Pump Group Co., Ltd.
  • 21.18. Shimge Pump Industry Group Co., Ltd.
  • 21.19. SPX Flow, Inc.
  • 21.20. Sulzer Ltd.
  • 21.21. Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.
  • 21.22. Wilo SE
  • 21.23. Xylem Inc.
  • 21.24. Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HORIZONTAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HORIZONTAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HORIZONTAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-OPEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-OPEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-OPEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HVAC & BUILDING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HVAC & BUILDING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HVAC & BUILDING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER SUPPLY & TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER SUPPLY & TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER SUPPLY & TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS & PETROCHEMICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS & PETROCHEMICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS & PETROCHEMICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)