查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1931155

食品磷酸鹽市場依產品類型、功能、形態和應用分類，全球預測（2026-2032）

Food-Grade Phosphate Market by Product Type, Function, Form, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 198 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，食品磷酸鹽市場價值將達到 23.1 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 24.1 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 34 億美元，複合年成長率為 5.68%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 23.1億美元
預計年份：2026年 24.1億美元
預測年份 2032 34億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 5.68%

權威概述了食品級磷酸鹽如何在不斷變化的配方、監管和永續性壓力下支持產品性能和商業策略。

食品級磷酸鹽是多功能成分，具有重要的緩衝、乳化、螯合、膨鬆和保濕功能，因此在各種加工食品和飲料中都不可或缺。這些化學鹽有助於生產者獲得穩定的質地、較長的保存期限和理想的感官特性，同時也有助於加工商滿足監管和食品安全要求。消費者期望的改變和監管力度的加大，顯著提高了人們對原料來源、純度等級和供應鏈可追溯性的關注，迫使生產商重新評估其配料規格和供應商關係。

不斷變化的消費者需求、日益嚴格的監管、供應鏈的韌性以及配料創新正在共同重塑全球食品磷酸鹽市場。

食品磷酸鹽市場環境正經歷著變革，這主要歸因於多種因素的共同作用：消費者偏好的轉變、監管力度的加強、確保供應鏈韌性的需求以及配料科學的創新。消費者對更清晰的標籤和更天然的配料的需求日益成長，這給配方師帶來了挑戰：如何在不犧牲產品功能的前提下，減少人工添加劑的痕跡。因此，供應商正增加對特定應用技術支援的投入，並探索將低磷酸鹽配方與功能性替代配料相結合的混合解決方案，以保持產品質地並延長保存期限。

關稅環境變化對食品磷酸鹽相關人員籌資策略、促進國內產能和供應鏈韌性的影響

關稅和貿易壁壘的實施對磷酸鹽原料產生連鎖反應，波及整個食品加工價值鏈，影響籌資策略、供應商組合和配方決策。當進口關稅推高原料成本時，製造商通常會審查供應商契約，加快替代供應商的資格認證，並在某些情況下調整產品配方，以減少對受關稅影響原料的依賴。這些因應措施需要時間和技術檢驗，因此，擁有靈活採購結構和強大研發能力的公司更能適應變化。

詳細的細分市場分析揭示了應用特定需求、產品化學成分、功能作用和外形如何決定技術需求和供應商差異化。

細分市場趨勢分析透過應用、產品類型、功能和形態，識別技術需求和商業性機會領域。在應用方面，需求涵蓋動物飼料、烘焙食品、飲料、罐頭食品、糖果甜點、乳製品和肉品等多個領域。每個細分市場對純度、粒徑和溶解度都有獨特的要求，從而影響供應商的產品系列和技術支援服務。在產品類型方面，市場供應磷酸二鈉、磷酸二氫鈉、六偏磷酸鈉和磷酸三鈉，選擇依據是pH控制需求、螯合強度以及與蛋白質和礦物質的相互作用。從功能性角度來看，磷酸鹽作為膨鬆劑、乳化劑、螯合劑、膨鬆劑和保濕劑的作用，決定了配方師的優先事項以及供應商在加工和儲存條件下必須滿足的技術性能標準。在形態方面，顆粒狀、液體狀和粉末狀的供應方式會影響劑量精度、操作便利性以及是否適用於自動化生產線或人工配料。

區域趨勢和合規複雜性將影響美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的籌資策略、技術要求和供應鏈模式。

區域趨勢對採購風險狀況、監管合規義務、創新重點和客戶期望的影響方式截然不同。在美洲，供應鏈往往強調規模、價格競爭力和與大型食品加工企業的整合，而管理體制和標籤規範則要求製造商提供透明的文件和一致的技術等級。在歐洲、中東和非洲地區（EMEA），監管標準、消費者偏好和物流基礎設施的複雜組合導致了多元化的打入市場策略，這些策略強調可追溯性和減少摻假。某些次區域也往往更重視永續性指標。

供應商如何通過技術服務、品質系統、策略夥伴關係和永續性認證，在食品級磷酸鹽領域建立永續的競爭優勢

食品級磷酸鹽生產商和經銷商之間的競爭受多種因素驅動，包括產品純度、技術支援能力、嚴格的法規遵循和商業性靈活性。主要企業透過投資品質保證、可追溯性系統和應用實驗室來脫穎而出，這些投資有助於客戶解決配方難題並加快產品上市速度。與下游食品製造商建立策略夥伴關係和共同開發項目，正成為確保特種級磷酸鹽需求、並基於專有配方和檢驗的性能數據創造轉換成本的重要機制。

採取切實可行的策略步驟，透過加強技術合作、實現採購多元化和協調一致的永續性舉措，保持業務連續性並掌握業界的優質機會。

產業領導者應採取多管齊下的策略，平衡技術卓越性、供應鏈韌性和負責任的採購，以有效應對當前複雜的市場環境。首先，透過投資應用實驗室和合作研發項目，加強技術服務能力，實現快速配方調整和最佳化，從而降低客戶風險並深化商業性關係。其次，透過對多家地理分散的供應商進行資格認證並建立緊急庫存，實現籌資策略多元化，確保生產連續性，同時降低貿易政策變化和物流中斷帶來的風險。

我們採用混合方法研究，結合針對性的初步訪談、全面的二次分析和嚴格的檢驗，以提供可靠、可操作的研究結果。

調查方法結合了嚴謹的二手資料分析、有針對性的一手訪談和系統的資料三角驗證，以確保獲得可靠且可操作的洞見。二手資料分析查閱了技術文獻、監管文件、貿易通告和上市公司資訊披露，以梳理產品化學成分、功能角色和合規框架。一手訪談對象包括原料供應商和食品生產商的採購經理、研發人員和法規事務負責人，旨在檢驗運作環境中實施過程中遇到的挑戰、採購行為和績效標準。

在不斷變化的市場中，為了維持產品性能和合規性，相關人員需要整合技術要求、韌性需求和策略協調。

食品磷酸鹽仍是技術上至關重要的成分，其作用遠不止於成本，更關乎產品性能、保存期限和法規遵循。該行業正處於一個轉折點，消費者對潔淨標示的偏好不斷變化、監管審查日益嚴格以及供應鏈的不穩定性，迫使供應商和製造商在性能、透明度和韌性之間尋求平衡。投資於技術夥伴關係模式、強化品質系統和靈活採購安排的公司，將更有能力應對關稅衝擊、物流中斷和配方調整要求，同時確保產品完整性。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席體驗長觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 市場進入策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 依產品類型分類的食品磷酸鹽市場

  • 磷酸氫二鈉
  • 磷酸二氫鈉
  • 六偏磷酸鈉
  • 磷酸三鈉

9. 依功能分類的食品磷酸鹽市場

  • 緩衝劑和乳化劑
  • 螯合劑
  • 膨鬆劑
  • 保水劑

10. 食品磷酸鹽市場（依形式分類）

  • 顆粒
  • 液體
  • 粉末

第11章 食品磷酸鹽市場及其應用

  • 飼料
  • 麵包製作
  • 飲料
  • 罐頭食品
  • 糖果甜點
  • 乳製品
  • 肉類

12. 各地區食品磷酸鹽市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 食品磷酸鹽市場（依類別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各國食品磷酸鹽市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

15. 美國食品磷酸鹽市場

第16章：中國食品磷酸鹽市場

第17章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • Aditya Birla Chemicals
  • BK Giulini GmbH
  • Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG
  • Chengxing Group Co., Ltd.
  • EuroChem Group AG
  • FMC Corporation
  • Fosfa as
  • Guizhou Kailin Holdings（Group）Co., Ltd.
  • Haifa Group
  • Hubei Xingfa Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • ICL Group Ltd.
  • Innophos Holdings, Inc.
  • Israel Chemicals Ltd.
  • Ma'aden Phosphate Company
  • Nutrien Ltd.
  • OCP Group
  • PhosAgro
  • Prayon SA
  • Solvay SA
  • The Mosaic Company
  • Thermphos International BV
  • Tianjin Tiansheng Binhai Phosphorus Industry Co., Ltd.
  • Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-7B550E008D87

The Food-Grade Phosphate Market was valued at USD 2.31 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.41 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.68%, reaching USD 3.40 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 2.31 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 2.41 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 3.40 billion
CAGR (%) 5.68%

An authoritative overview of how food-grade phosphates underpin product performance and commercial strategy amid evolving formulation, regulatory, and sustainability pressures

Food-grade phosphates are multifunctional ingredients indispensable across a broad range of processed foods and beverages, where they perform critical roles such as buffering, emulsification, chelation, leavening, and moisture retention. These chemical salts enable manufacturers to achieve consistent texture, extended shelf life, and desirable sensory attributes while helping processors meet regulatory and food safety requirements. Given evolving consumer expectations and heightened regulatory scrutiny, awareness of raw material origins, purity grades, and supply chain traceability has risen significantly, prompting manufacturers to re-evaluate ingredient specifications and supplier relationships.

As product developers and procurement teams navigate reformulation pressures driven by clean-label trends and nutritional guidelines, food-grade phosphates remain a pragmatic tool, particularly when technical performance cannot be replicated by alternative natural ingredients without trade-offs. At the same time, sustainability considerations and upstream sourcing transparency are shaping commercial relationships and contract terms. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper exploration of structural shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation dynamics, regional variations, competitive behavior, and practical recommendations for industry leaders seeking to align technical performance with commercial and sustainability objectives.

How evolving consumer expectations, regulatory tightening, supply chain resilience, and ingredient innovation are collectively reshaping the global food-grade phosphate landscape

The landscape for food-grade phosphates is undergoing transformative shifts driven by intersecting forces: consumer preference evolution, regulatory tightening, supply chain resilience imperatives, and innovation in ingredient science. Consumers increasingly demand cleaner labels and natural-sounding ingredients, which pressures formulators to reduce perceived artificial additives without compromising functionality. Consequently, suppliers are investing in application-focused technical support and exploring hybrid solutions that combine reduced-phosphate recipes with functional alternatives to preserve texture and shelf life.

Regulatory bodies are also intensifying scrutiny around additive usage levels and labeling transparency, prompting manufacturers to refine use-level justifications and invest in compliance documentation. Meanwhile, global supply chain disruptions and logistics volatility have accelerated a move toward multi-sourcing strategies, localized production, and longer-term procurement contracts to mitigate exposure to raw material shocks. On the innovation front, research into more efficient phosphate production, purification methods, and low-impurity grades is enabling higher-value applications and differentiation based on technical service and quality assurance. Taken together, these shifts are reshaping supplier-customer relationships, elevating the importance of technical collaboration, and re-prioritizing resilience and sustainability alongside price and availability.

Strategic implications of shifting tariff landscapes on procurement, domestic capacity incentives, and supply chain resilience for food-grade phosphate stakeholders

The introduction of tariffs or trade barriers affecting phosphate inputs can have cascading effects throughout the food processing value chain, influencing procurement strategies, supplier portfolios, and formulation decisions. When import duties increase input costs, manufacturers often respond by revisiting supplier contracts, accelerating qualification of alternative vendors, and, in some cases, reformulating products to reduce reliance on tariff-impacted grades. These responses take time and technical validation, so businesses with flexible sourcing and robust R&D capabilities adapt more smoothly.

Tariffs also incentivize investment in domestic capacity where feasible, particularly for high-volume processors seeking to lock in supply and reduce exposure to cross-border volatility. In addition, compliance and administrative burdens increase as importers manage additional documentation, classification challenges, and customs processes; this often results in longer lead times and higher inventory holdings to buffer against delays. Trade policy shifts may also prompt strategic inventory rebalancing, with firms prioritizing core SKUs for onshore production and using tariff-affected imports for lower-priority or specialty applications. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of tariff measures is to raise the premium on operational flexibility, regulatory expertise, and collaborative supplier relationships that can absorb cost and lead-time shocks while preserving product quality and continuity.

Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how application-specific requirements, product chemistries, functional roles, and form factors determine technical demand and supplier differentiation

Segment-level dynamics illuminate where technical demand concentrates and where commercial opportunity resides across applications, product types, functions, and forms. Based on application, demand is distributed across Animal Feed, Bakery, Beverage, Canned Food, Confectionery, Dairy Products, and Meat Products, with each vertical imposing distinct purity, particle size, and solubility requirements that shape supplier portfolios and technical support services. Based on product type, markets are served by Disodium Phosphate, Monosodium Phosphate, Sodium Hexametaphosphate, and Trisodium Phosphate, with selection driven by pH control needs, chelation strength, and interaction with proteins and minerals. Based on function, the role of phosphates as Buffering Emulsifier, Chelating Agent, Leavening Agent, and Moisture Retention component determines formulators' priorities and the technical performance criteria vendors must meet under processing and storage conditions. Based on form, the availability of Granule, Liquid, and Powder presentations affects dosing accuracy, ease of handling, and suitability for automated production lines versus manual batching.

Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal that demand intensity and premium positioning are not uniform; they vary by the technical stringency of end-use, the cost-sensitivity of the customer base, and the degree to which performance is measured against natural-ingredient alternatives. Suppliers that can align product-type chemistry with application-specific protocols and deliver form-factor convenience-while supporting functional claims such as moisture retention or emulsification-are positioned to capture higher-value relationships. Moreover, the capacity to offer tailored grades and joint-development programs strengthens customer retention where reformulation risks are high.

Regional dynamics and compliance complexities that shape sourcing strategies, technical requirements, and supply chain models across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics influence procurement risk profiles, regulatory compliance obligations, innovation focus, and customer expectations in materially different ways. In the Americas, supply chains often emphasize scale, price competitiveness, and integration with large food processing operations, while regulatory regimes and labeling practices steer manufacturers toward transparent documentation and consistent technical grades. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, a complex mosaic of regulatory standards, consumer preferences, and logistics infrastructure leads to differentiated market entry strategies and an emphasis on traceability and containment of impurities, with certain subregions placing higher weight on sustainability metrics.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid urbanization and rising protein consumption drive strong technical demand across dairy, meat, and beverage sectors, even as supplier landscapes vary from highly consolidated local producers to import-dependent processors. Across regions, cross-border regulatory alignment, logistics reliability, and local processing technology maturity shape how manufacturers balance centralized versus decentralized sourcing. Consequently, firms operating across multiple regions must maintain adaptive commercial models, region-specific technical dossiers, and flexible supply chains to meet varying compliance and performance expectations while optimizing cost and continuity.

How suppliers build durable competitive advantage through technical service, quality systems, strategic partnerships, and sustainability certifications in the food-grade phosphate sector

Competitive dynamics among producers and distributors of food-grade phosphates are driven by a mix of factors including product purity, technical support capabilities, regulatory compliance rigor, and commercial agility. Leading firms differentiate through investments in quality assurance, traceability systems, and application laboratories that help customers bridge formulation challenges and shorten time-to-market. Strategic partnerships with downstream food manufacturers and co-development programs have emerged as important mechanisms to lock in demand for specialized grades and create switching costs based on proprietary formulations and validated performance data.

Other competitive vectors include vertical integration into raw material supply chains, capacity expansions targeted at liquid or powder form factors, and targeted investments in lower-impurity processing to serve sensitive dairy and beverage applications. Companies that actively publish technical guidance, provide hands-on on-site troubleshooting, and offer tailored supply agreements tend to secure longer contract tenures. In parallel, sustainability reporting and compliance certifications are increasingly table stakes; organizations that can demonstrate reduced environmental impact across production and logistics gain a reputational advantage with large food producers and retailers who have public sustainability commitments.

Actionable strategic steps to strengthen technical partnerships, diversify sourcing, and align sustainability efforts to preserve continuity and capture premium opportunities in the sector

Industry leaders should adopt a multi-dimensional approach that balances technical excellence, supply chain resilience, and responsible sourcing to navigate current market complexities effectively. First, strengthen technical-service offerings by investing in application labs and collaborative R&D programs that enable rapid reformulation and optimization, thereby reducing customer risk and deepening commercial relationships. Second, diversify sourcing strategies by qualifying multiple suppliers across geographies and by developing contingency inventories, which limits exposure to trade policy shifts and logistical disruptions while preserving production continuity.

Third, prioritize transparent traceability and environmental stewardship by implementing third-party verification where appropriate and by documenting impurity profiles and life-cycle impacts; these measures enhance trust with downstream customers and support compliance. Fourth, negotiate flexible commercial terms such as rolling contracts or index-linked pricing that distribute cost volatility fairly across supply chains. Fifth, pursue targeted investments in forms and grades aligned with high-growth or technically demanding applications-such as liquid formulations for automated lines or low-impurity grades for dairy-to capture premium positions. By integrating these strategic moves, firms can align technical differentiation with operational resilience and sustainability objectives, strengthening long-term competitiveness.

A mixed-method research approach combining targeted primary interviews, comprehensive secondary analysis, and rigorous triangulation to deliver credible, practice-oriented insights

The research methodology employed combined rigorous secondary analysis, targeted primary interviews, and systematic data triangulation to ensure robust and actionable findings. Secondary analysis reviewed technical literature, regulatory documents, trade notices, and publicly available company disclosures to map product chemistries, functional roles, and compliance frameworks. Primary interviews were conducted with procurement leaders, R&D specialists, and regulatory affairs professionals across ingredient suppliers and food manufacturers to validate implementation challenges, sourcing behaviors, and performance criteria under real-world processing conditions.

Data triangulation reconciled qualitative insights with observed supply chain behaviors and regulatory trends to reduce bias and strengthen the credibility of conclusions. Quality assurance protocols included cross-validation of technical claims, consistency checks across interview transcripts, and review of documentation supporting functional performance. Where appropriate, scenario analysis was used to explore the operational implications of trade policy shifts and supply chain disruptions. This mixed-method approach prioritized practical relevance for decision-makers while maintaining methodological transparency and repeatability.

Synthesis of technical importance, resilience needs, and strategic alignment required for stakeholders to sustain product performance and compliance in a changing market

Food-grade phosphates remain a technically essential set of ingredients whose role extends beyond simple cost considerations to encompass product performance, shelf life, and regulatory compliance. The industry is at an inflection point where evolving consumer preferences for cleaner labels, intensified regulatory scrutiny, and supply chain volatility require suppliers and manufacturers to balance functional performance with transparency and resilience. Firms that invest in technical partnership models, enhanced quality systems, and flexible sourcing arrangements will be better positioned to manage tariff shocks, logistics disruptions, and reformulation demands without compromising product integrity.

Looking ahead, the most successful organizations will be those that translate technical competence into commercial value by offering solution-oriented services, regionally adapted supply strategies, and credible sustainability narratives. Operational investments in traceability, application development, and contingency planning will increasingly distinguish market leaders from laggards. This conclusion reinforces the need for strategic alignment across procurement, R&D, and regulatory functions to ensure that product performance, compliance, and business continuity are optimized concurrently.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Disodium Phosphate
  • 8.2. Monosodium Phosphate
  • 8.3. Sodium Hexametaphosphate
  • 8.4. Trisodium Phosphate

9. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Function

  • 9.1. Buffering Emulsifier
  • 9.2. Chelating Agent
  • 9.3. Leavening Agent
  • 9.4. Moisture Retention

10. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Form

  • 10.1. Granule
  • 10.2. Liquid
  • 10.3. Powder

11. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Animal Feed
  • 11.2. Bakery
  • 11.3. Beverage
  • 11.4. Canned Food
  • 11.5. Confectionery
  • 11.6. Dairy Products
  • 11.7. Meat Products

12. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Food-Grade Phosphate Market

16. China Food-Grade Phosphate Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. Aditya Birla Chemicals
  • 17.6. BK Giulini GmbH
  • 17.7. Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG
  • 17.8. Chengxing Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.9. EuroChem Group AG
  • 17.10. FMC Corporation
  • 17.11. Fosfa a.s.
  • 17.12. Guizhou Kailin Holdings (Group) Co., Ltd.
  • 17.13. Haifa Group
  • 17.14. Hubei Xingfa Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.15. ICL Group Ltd.
  • 17.16. Innophos Holdings, Inc.
  • 17.17. Israel Chemicals Ltd.
  • 17.18. Ma'aden Phosphate Company
  • 17.19. Nutrien Ltd.
  • 17.20. OCP Group
  • 17.21. PhosAgro
  • 17.22. Prayon S.A.
  • 17.23. Solvay SA
  • 17.24. The Mosaic Company
  • 17.25. Thermphos International B.V.
  • 17.26. Tianjin Tiansheng Binhai Phosphorus Industry Co., Ltd.
  • 17.27. Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MONOSODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MONOSODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MONOSODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BUFFERING EMULSIFIER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BUFFERING EMULSIFIER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BUFFERING EMULSIFIER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CHELATING AGENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CHELATING AGENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CHELATING AGENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LEAVENING AGENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LEAVENING AGENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LEAVENING AGENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE RETENTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE RETENTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE RETENTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BAKERY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BAKERY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BAKERY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CANNED FOOD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CANNED FOOD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CANNED FOOD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CONFECTIONERY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CONFECTIONERY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CONFECTIONERY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DAIRY PRODUCTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DAIRY PRODUCTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DAIRY PRODUCTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MEAT PRODUCTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MEAT PRODUCTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MEAT PRODUCTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)