一次性安全袋市場按產品類型、材料、最終用戶和分銷管道分類，全球預測（2026-2032年）

預計到 2025 年，一次性安全袋市場價值將達到 25.8 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 27.2 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 37.8 億美元，年複合成長率為 5.59%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025	25.8億美元
預計年份：2026年	27.2億美元
預測年份 2032	37.8億美元
複合年成長率 (%)	5.59%

一份簡明策略概述，闡述了一次性安全袋在保護資產、保存證據和維護商業誠信方面發揮的關鍵作用。

一次性安全袋看似簡單，卻在銀行、醫療保健、執法機關、物流和零售等行業的營運誠信中發揮著至關重要的作用。這些低調的消耗品功能關鍵：它們提供清晰、防篡改的視覺證據，確保監管鏈（CoC）文件的完整性，並幫助機構滿足監管和內部控制標準。設計和規格得當的安全袋能夠減少損失、保護證據，並維護企業和機構的誠信。

重塑安全包產業的新趨勢包括材料創新、先進的採購方式以及推動策略採購的永續性需求。

一次性安全袋的市場格局正在發生變化，其變化遠不止於簡單的產品替代。材料科學的進步、採購慣例的轉變以及日益嚴格的監管要求，共同改變了企業對防篡改和歸檔通訊協定的思考方式。以往主要關注價格和基本功能的決策，如今已納入生命週期性能、與數位追蹤技術的兼容性以及處置等因素。

2025年持續的關稅壓力將如何重塑籌資策略，推動價值鏈供應商多元化與物流韌性？

關稅政策和貿易措施對一次性安全袋的成本基礎和籌資策略產生直接影響，尤其是在聚合物和造紙業高度集中於特定區域的情況下。到2025年，關稅的累積影響將迫使許多買家和供應商重新評估其供應商所在地和庫存策略，以降低成本波動並保障供應的連續性。對於進口原料或成品徵收關稅的情況，企業正透過近岸外包、供應商多元化和合約避險等方式應對。

從詳細的細分觀點，揭示產品類型、材料選擇、最終用戶需求和分銷管道如何共同決定規格和採購行為。

要了解市場趨勢，就需要清楚了解買家如何評估產品屬性，以及供應商如何從相關維度定位其產品。按產品類型分類，押金袋、物證袋和防篡改袋之間的差異導致了規格的差異：押金袋往往優先考慮易於操作和結帳流程，物證袋強調污染控制和法律效力，而防篡改袋則在防篡改可見性和存儲控制之間取得平衡。這些功能差異會影響設計選擇、封口機制以及與標籤技術的兼容性。

區域市場動態揭示了美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區在採購、供應韌性和監管預期方面的不同優先事項。

區域趨勢對一次性安全袋品類的採購決策、供應商選擇和創新應用有顯著影響。在美洲，買家往往優先考慮交貨速度、供應商應對力以及對北美法規結構的合規性。該地區的供應商則更重視服務水準、靈活的訂單數量以及與現有物流網路的整合解決方案。國內製造能力和近岸外包方案可在國際貿易中斷時提供替代方案。

競爭和策略性的商業行為正在影響供應商的選擇，其中既有規模龐大的現有企業，也有專業的創新者，還有以服務主導的差異化企業。

一次性安全袋產業的競爭格局複雜多樣，既有傳統的包裝材料供應商，也有專業的安全產品製造商，還有將材料技術與數位追蹤能力結合的新興企業。現有製造商通常在規模經濟、產品系列廣度以及滿足受監管終端用戶嚴格品質標準的能力方面展開競爭，並受益於對檢驗供應鏈、長期客戶關係和生產穩定性方面的投資。

為採購領導者提供切實可行的、優先排序的建議，以提高韌性、推動創新試點項目，並使規範與營運成果保持一致。

對於希望獲得競爭優勢的領導者，我們提案切實可行的步驟，將洞察轉化為可衡量的營運改善。首先，將採購規範與關鍵最終用戶風險概況和工作流程相匹配，並將產品績效指標與「減少事故」和「審核應對力」等可衡量的結果明確關聯起來。這種匹配消除了供應商提案中的歧義，並明確了績效課責。

一種透明、以證據為基礎的調查方法，結合了對關鍵相關人員的訪談、供應商技術評估和輔助性二手資訊。

本研究結合一手訪談、供應商文件審查和二手文獻，整合了定性和定量資訊，重點關注行業出版物、監管指南和標準文件。一手訪談對象包括來自不同終端使用者產業的採購主管、營運經理和產品工程師，旨在了解實際的規範實務、挑戰和供應商選擇標準。此外，還評估了供應商的技術簡報和品質保證數據，以比較材料特性和密封機制。

綜合分析結果強調了跨部門協作的重要性，它將安全袋採購從單純的商品採購提升到可控的風險緩解層面。

一次性安全袋處於成本敏感型耗材和關鍵安全控制的戰略交匯點。隨著企業面臨日益嚴格的監管審查、不斷變化的供應鏈風險以及不斷成長的環保責任期望，該品類正從普通商品轉向需要嚴格規範管理和供應商夥伴關係的領域。最成功的企業將是那些將這些產品納入綜合管理框架而非視為孤立採購的企業。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

• 研究設計
• 研究框架
• 市場規模預測
• 數據三角測量
• 調查結果
• 調查前提
• 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

• 首席體驗長觀點
• 市場規模和成長趨勢
• 2025年市佔率分析
• FPNV定位矩陣，2025
• 新的商機
• 下一代經營模式
• 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

• 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL 分析
• 市場展望
• 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

• 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
• 消費者體驗基準
• 機會地圖
• 分銷通路分析
• 價格趨勢分析
• 監理合規和標準框架
• ESG與永續性分析
• 中斷和風險情景
• 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章：一次性安全袋市場（依產品類型分類）

• 托運行李
• 物證袋
• 防篡改袋

第9章 按材料分類的一次性安全袋市場

• 高密度聚苯乙烯
• 低密度聚乙烯
• 紙

第10章 以最終用戶分類的一次性安全袋市場

• 銀行與金融
• 衛生保健
• 執法機關
• 物流/運輸
• 零售

第11章 一次性安全袋市場（按分銷管道分類）

• 離線
• 線上

第12章：按地區分類的一次性安全袋市場

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 歐洲、中東和非洲
  • 歐洲
  • 中東
  • 非洲
• 亞太地區

第13章 一次性安全袋市場（按類別分類）

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第14章 各國一次性安全袋市場

• 美國
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英國
• 德國
• 法國
• 俄羅斯
• 義大利
• 西班牙
• 中國
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韓國

第15章：美國一次性安全袋市場

第16章 中國一次性安全袋市場

第17章 競爭格局

• 市場集中度分析，2025年
  • 濃度比（CR）
  • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
• 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
• 2025年產品系列分析
• 基準分析，2025 年
• ADVANTAGE
• American Corrugated & Packaging Corp.
• Burrows Paper Corporation
• Coveris Holdings SA
• Dynaric, Inc.
• Impak Corporation
• Kartridg Pak Co.
• Nefab Group
• PAC Worldwide
• PAK 2000
• Perlen Packaging
• Pro-Pack Materials Ltd.
• Rexam PLC
• Riverside Paper Co.
• Safeguard Security Bag Co.
• Sealed Air Corporation
• Securit-Pak
• Transguard Industries
• TydenBrammall
• Tyvek

The Single-use Security Bags Market was valued at USD 2.58 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.72 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.59%, reaching USD 3.78 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 2.58 billion
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 2.72 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 3.78 billion
CAGR (%)	5.59%

A concise strategic overview framing the critical role of single-use security bags in protecting assets, preserving evidence, and maintaining operational trust

Single-use security bags are a deceptively simple category that plays an outsized role in operational integrity across banking, healthcare, law enforcement, logistics, and retail environments. These discreet consumables perform vital functions: they provide clear visual tamper evidence, ensure chain-of-custody documentation, and help organizations meet regulatory and internal control standards. When designed and specified correctly, they reduce loss, protect evidence, and preserve corporate and institutional credibility.

This executive summary distills the key dynamics shaping the single-use security bag landscape, focusing on product characteristics, material choices, end-user needs, distribution channels, and regional variances. Readers will find a structured narrative that links technical drivers such as material performance and tamper mechanisms with strategic pressures including operational cost control, sustainability expectations, and heightened regulatory scrutiny. The intent is to arm decision-makers with a pragmatic understanding of where value is created, where risks are concentrated, and which tactical moves can yield the most reliable returns.

Throughout the analysis, we emphasize actionable perspective over abstraction. That means connecting innovation trends like material substitution and integrated labeling solutions to specific operational outcomes, such as reduced evidence contamination, faster audit readiness, and lower total cost of custody. By synthesizing cross-functional considerations, this section provides the foundation for targeted investments and operational changes that materially improve security outcomes and customer trust.

Emerging forces reshaping the security bag sector include material innovation, procurement sophistication, and sustainability demands that elevate strategic procurement

The landscape for single-use security bags is shifting in ways that transcend simple product substitution. Advances in materials science, changes in procurement practices, and an increase in regulatory expectations are converging to transform how organizations think about tamper evidence and chain-of-custody protocols. Where historically decisions centered on price and basic functionality, they now incorporate lifecycle performance, compatibility with digital tracking technologies, and end-of-life considerations.

Manufacturers are responding to buyer demand for more robust tamper indicators and for materials that balance durability with recyclability. At the same time, buyers are integrating specifications into broader risk management frameworks, requiring proof of supply chain transparency and demanding consistent performance across global operations. These shifts are prompting a new breed of suppliers to emphasize certification, traceability, and service levels, creating a competitive environment where capabilities and assurances matter as much as unit economics.

Operational teams are increasingly working alongside procurement and sustainability functions to align bag specifications with organizational goals. This multidisciplinary approach is driving pilots for alternative materials, trials of serialized labeling for evidence tracking, and assessments of vendor-managed inventory models that reduce administrative burden. As a result, the category is evolving from a commodity purchase to a strategically managed component of asset protection and compliance infrastructure.

How evolving tariff pressures in 2025 are reshaping sourcing strategies, encouraging supplier diversification and logistical resilience across the value chain

Tariff policy and trade measures have a direct influence on the cost base and sourcing strategies for single-use security bags, particularly given the concentration of polymer and paper manufacturing in specific global regions. In 2025, cumulative tariff effects are prompting many buyers and suppliers to reassess their supplier footprints and inventory strategies to mitigate cost volatility and protect continuity of supply. Where tariffs affect inbound materials or finished goods, organizations are responding with a mix of nearshoring, supplier diversification, and contractual hedges.

These adjustments are not merely about cost management. They also reflect risk management principles: organizations are prioritizing suppliers with demonstrated logistical resilience and the ability to provide regulatory-compliant documentation that supports cross-border movement. Consequently, procurement teams are placing greater emphasis on transparency in supplier bills of materials, proofs of origin, and the flexibility to shift volumes across a network of qualified manufacturers when trade conditions change.

In parallel, some suppliers are recalibrating their product portfolios to reduce exposure to tariff-sensitive inputs, experimenting with alternative polymers or higher-value finished goods that incorporate serialization and integrated security features. The net effect is a more dynamic sourcing environment in which contractual agility, inventory intelligence, and the ability to demonstrate compliance become differentiators that influence both price realization and long-term supplier relationships.

In-depth segmentation perspective revealing how product type, material choice, end-user requirements, and distribution channels jointly determine specification and procurement behavior

Understanding market behavior requires a clear lens on how buyers evaluate product attributes and how suppliers position offerings across relevant dimensions. When segmented by product type, differences among deposit bags, evidence bags, and tamper-evident bags drive specification variance: deposit bags tend to prioritize ease of handling and cashier workflows, evidence bags emphasize contamination control and legal defensibility, and tamper-evident bags balance visibility of tampering with chain-of-custody controls. These functional distinctions inform design choices, closure mechanisms, and compatibility with labeling technologies.

Material choice is equally influential. High density polyethylene provides superior puncture resistance and is often selected where tensile strength is essential, while low density polyethylene values conformability and cost efficiency for routine operations. Paper-based constructions appeal when recyclability or specific regulatory framing is paramount, though they require careful consideration of moisture barriers and handling requirements. Decision-makers increasingly balance performance metrics with environmental criteria, pushing suppliers to innovate on coatings, additives, and recycling pathways.

End-user needs create another layer of differentiation. Banking and finance users focus on transaction integrity and tamper resistance in high-volume environments. Healthcare buyers prioritize contamination control, traceability, and compatibility with biohazard protocols. Law enforcement agencies demand evidentiary robustness, clear chain-of-custody features, and legal defensibility. Logistics and transportation stakeholders look for theft deterrence coupled with ease of audit, while retail buyers require solutions that integrate with point-of-sale processes and customer-facing workflows. These distinct operational imperatives shape specification language and contract terms.

Finally, distribution channel behavior affects accessibility and service expectations. Direct sales relationships often enable customization and volume discounts, distributors provide regional reach and inventory buffering, online sales emphasize transactional convenience and rapid replenishment, and retailers cater to smaller end-users and secondary markets. The interplay between channel and end-user needs influences lead times, minimum order quantities, and the degree of after-sale support that organizations can expect from their suppliers.

Regional market dynamics reveal contrasting priorities in procurement, supply resilience, and regulatory expectations across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on procurement decisions, supplier selection, and innovation adoption across the single-use security bag category. In the Americas, buyers often prioritize speed of fulfillment, supplier responsiveness, and compliance with North American regulatory frameworks. The supply base here tends to emphasize service levels, flexible order sizes, and solutions that integrate with existing logistics networks. Domestic manufacturing capacity and nearshore options provide alternatives when global trade disruptions occur.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory diversity and varied infrastructure maturity create a patchwork of requirements that suppliers must navigate. Buyers in this region increasingly demand certified materials and demonstrable environmental credentials, prompting suppliers to invest in traceability and cross-border documentation. Meanwhile, logistics networks in the Middle East and parts of Africa present unique distribution challenges that favor partners capable of regional inventory deployment and robust channel management.

Asia-Pacific is characterized by a broad spectrum of supplier capabilities and a high degree of manufacturing density for polymers and paper products. Buyers here can often access a wide range of material and design options at competitive cost, but they also face variability in lead times and quality consistency across suppliers. Rapid urbanization and expanding retail and healthcare infrastructure are accelerating demand for standardized security bag solutions that support large-scale operational rollouts, creating opportunities for suppliers with scalable manufacturing and quality assurance systems.

Competitive and strategic company behaviors show a blend of scale-driven incumbents, specialist innovators, and service-led differentiation shaping supplier selection

Competitive dynamics in the single-use security bag sector reflect a mix of traditional packaging suppliers, specialized security-product manufacturers, and emergent players that combine materials expertise with digital tracking capabilities. Established manufacturers often compete on scale, breadth of product portfolio, and the ability to meet rigorous quality standards for regulated end users. Their strengths include validated supply chains, long-term customer relationships, and investments in manufacturing consistency.

Smaller specialized players and innovative entrants differentiate through product features and service models. They may introduce enhanced tamper-evidence mechanisms, integrated labeling or serialization, or novel material blends that respond to sustainability mandates. These capabilities can be particularly compelling for niche end users such as forensic units or biocontainment facilities that require tailored solutions. Strategic partnerships between material innovators and security specialists are becoming more common as companies seek to bundle physical tamper evidence with digital traceability.

From a go-to-market perspective, leading companies are investing in channel enablement and after-sales support. They provide specification guidance, on-site training, and contractual structures that include quality guarantees. Companies that can couple product innovation with consultative selling are better positioned to secure long-term agreements with large institutional buyers. Finally, M&A and strategic alliances remain viable routes to acquire complementary capabilities, broaden geographic reach, or internalize key material production to reduce exposure to upstream volatility.

Actionable and prioritized recommendations for procurement leaders to improve resilience, drive innovation pilots, and align specifications with operational outcomes

For leaders seeking to strengthen their position, a set of pragmatic moves can convert insight into measurable operational improvements. Begin by aligning procurement specifications with the risk profiles and operational workflows of core end users, ensuring that product performance metrics are explicitly tied to measurable outcomes such as incident reduction or audit readiness. This alignment reduces ambiguity in supplier proposals and creates clearer accountability for performance.

Next, prioritize supply chain resilience through a combination of supplier diversification, strategic safety stocks, and contractual flexibility. Where tariff exposure or single-source dependence exists, evaluate nearshore alternatives and establish contingency plans that include secondary qualified vendors. Investing in supplier qualification processes and regular performance audits will yield steady improvements in reliability and quality.

Innovation should be approached through targeted pilot programs that validate claims around tamper-evidence, material recyclability, or integrated serialization before broader rollouts. Engage end users in pilot design to ensure solutions meet operational realities. Finally, embed sustainability criteria into procurement decisions in a way that balances environmental objectives with functional requirements. Specify end-of-life pathways, recycling compatibility, and any required certifications to avoid trade-offs that compromise performance or safety.

A transparent, evidence-based research methodology integrating primary stakeholder interviews, supplier technical evaluation, and corroborating secondary sources

This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs gathered through a mix of primary interviews, supplier documentation reviews, and secondary literature that emphasizes trade publications, regulatory guidance, and standards documentation. Primary interviews included procurement leads, operations managers, and product engineers across a range of end-user industries to capture real-world specification practices, pain points, and vendor selection criteria. Supplier technical briefs and quality assurance data were evaluated to compare material properties and closure mechanisms.

Secondary sources were selectively reviewed to validate trends in materials innovation, trade policy impacts, and distribution channel evolution. These sources were cross-checked against interview findings to ensure consistency and to surface divergences that warranted deeper inquiry. Where possible, technical claims from suppliers were corroborated by independent test data or third-party certification statements. The objective was to build a defensible narrative that connects supplier capabilities with buyer requirements and regulatory realities.

Analytical techniques included comparative feature mapping across products and materials, synthesis of procurement decision drivers, and scenario analysis to explore the implications of trade disruptions and policy shifts. Findings were subjected to peer review among industry analysts and practitioners to strengthen the interpretation of results and to identify practical implications for decision-makers. The methodology emphasizes transparency, triangulation of evidence, and practical relevance to procurement, operations, and compliance stakeholders.

A decisive synthesis emphasizing cross-functional coordination to elevate security bag procurement from commodity buying to controlled risk mitigation

Single-use security bags occupy a strategic intersection between cost-sensitive consumables and mission-critical security controls. As organizations confront greater regulatory scrutiny, evolving supply chain risks, and heightened expectations for environmental responsibility, the category is transitioning from commodity status to one requiring disciplined specification management and supplier partnerships. The most successful organizations will be those that treat these products as part of an integrated control framework rather than as isolated purchases.

Operational leaders should focus on three themes: aligning specifications with measurable outcomes, building sourcing resilience, and piloting innovations that address both security and sustainability objectives. By doing so, organizations reduce operational risk, enhance the defensibility of evidence handling, and achieve better alignment between procurement choices and enterprise risk management. Companies that proactively adapt procurement processes and supplier engagement models will realize improved performance and reduced incidence of loss or noncompliance.

In short, the path forward requires deliberate coordination across procurement, operations, legal, and sustainability functions. This cross-functional approach yields more robust product specifications, clearer supplier accountability, and a more resilient control environment that supports both daily operations and long-term strategic goals.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Single-use Security Bags Market, by Product Type

• 8.1. Deposit Bags
• 8.2. Evidence Bags
• 8.3. Tamper Evident Bags

9. Single-use Security Bags Market, by Material

• 9.1. High Density Polyethylene
• 9.2. Low Density Polyethylene
• 9.3. Paper

10. Single-use Security Bags Market, by End User

• 10.1. Banking And Finance
• 10.2. Healthcare
• 10.3. Law Enforcement
• 10.4. Logistics And Transportation
• 10.5. Retail

11. Single-use Security Bags Market, by Distribution Channel

• 11.1. Offline
• 11.2. Online

12. Single-use Security Bags Market, by Region

• 12.1. Americas
  • 12.1.1. North America
  • 12.1.2. Latin America
• 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 12.2.1. Europe
  • 12.2.2. Middle East
  • 12.2.3. Africa
• 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Single-use Security Bags Market, by Group

• 13.1. ASEAN
• 13.2. GCC
• 13.3. European Union
• 13.4. BRICS
• 13.5. G7
• 13.6. NATO

14. Single-use Security Bags Market, by Country

• 14.1. United States
• 14.2. Canada
• 14.3. Mexico
• 14.4. Brazil
• 14.5. United Kingdom
• 14.6. Germany
• 14.7. France
• 14.8. Russia
• 14.9. Italy
• 14.10. Spain
• 14.11. China
• 14.12. India
• 14.13. Japan
• 14.14. Australia
• 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Single-use Security Bags Market

16. China Single-use Security Bags Market

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 17.5. ADVANTAGE
• 17.6. American Corrugated & Packaging Corp.
• 17.7. Burrows Paper Corporation
• 17.8. Coveris Holdings S.A.
• 17.9. Dynaric, Inc.
• 17.10. Impak Corporation
• 17.11. Kartridg Pak Co.
• 17.12. Nefab Group
• 17.13. PAC Worldwide
• 17.14. PAK 2000
• 17.15. Perlen Packaging
• 17.16. Pro-Pack Materials Ltd.
• 17.17. Rexam PLC
• 17.18. Riverside Paper Co.
• 17.19. Safeguard Security Bag Co.
• 17.20. Sealed Air Corporation
• 17.21. Securit-Pak
• 17.22. Transguard Industries
• 17.23. TydenBrammall
• 17.24. Tyvek

LIST OF FIGURES

• FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
• FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
• FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 12. CHINA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

• TABLE 1. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 2. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 3. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DEPOSIT BAGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 4. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DEPOSIT BAGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 5. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DEPOSIT BAGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 6. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY EVIDENCE BAGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 7. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY EVIDENCE BAGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 8. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY EVIDENCE BAGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 9. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY TAMPER EVIDENT BAGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 10. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY TAMPER EVIDENT BAGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 11. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY TAMPER EVIDENT BAGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 12. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 13. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 14. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 15. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 16. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 17. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 18. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 19. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PAPER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 20. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PAPER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 21. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PAPER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 22. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 23. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING AND FINANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 24. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING AND FINANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 25. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING AND FINANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 26. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 27. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 28. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 29. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LAW ENFORCEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 30. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LAW ENFORCEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 31. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LAW ENFORCEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 32. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 33. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 34. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 35. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 36. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 37. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 38. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 39. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 40. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 41. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 42. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 43. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 44. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 45. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 46. AMERICAS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 47. AMERICAS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 48. AMERICAS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 49. AMERICAS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 50. AMERICAS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 51. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 52. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 53. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 54. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 55. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 56. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 57. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 58. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 59. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 60. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 61. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 62. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 63. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 64. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 65. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 66. EUROPE SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 67. EUROPE SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 68. EUROPE SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 69. EUROPE SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 70. EUROPE SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 71. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 72. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 73. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 74. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 75. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 76. AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 77. AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 78. AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 79. AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 80. AFRICA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 81. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 82. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 83. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 84. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 85. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 86. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 87. ASEAN SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 88. ASEAN SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 89. ASEAN SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 90. ASEAN SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 91. ASEAN SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 92. GCC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 93. GCC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 94. GCC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 95. GCC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 96. GCC SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 97. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 98. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 99. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 100. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 101. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 102. BRICS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 103. BRICS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 104. BRICS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 105. BRICS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 106. BRICS SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 107. G7 SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 108. G7 SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 109. G7 SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 110. G7 SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 111. G7 SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 112. NATO SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 113. NATO SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 114. NATO SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 115. NATO SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 116. NATO SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 117. GLOBAL SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 118. UNITED STATES SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 119. UNITED STATES SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 120. UNITED STATES SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 121. UNITED STATES SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 122. UNITED STATES SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 123. CHINA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 124. CHINA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 125. CHINA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 126. CHINA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 127. CHINA SINGLE-USE SECURITY BAGS MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)