查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1925520

按元件類型、額定電壓、應用和最終用戶產業分類的碳化矽分立元件市場－2026-2032年全球預測

Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market by Device Type, Voltage Rating, Applications, End-User Industries - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 197 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

2025 年碳化矽分立元件市場規模為 81.8 億美元，預計 2026 年將成長至 89.5 億美元，預計到 2032 年將達到 158.5 億美元，複合年成長率為 9.90%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 81.8億美元
預計年份：2026年 89.5億美元
預測年份 2032 158.5億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 9.90%

本文對碳化矽分立元件的核心技術優勢及其為何正在重塑電力電子應用領域進行了策略性介紹。

碳化矽分立元件代表了電力電子材料和結構的變革，它將半導體物理學與系統級最佳化相結合，從而實現了比傳統矽元件更高的效率、更高的工作溫度和更高的開關頻率。本文概述了這項技術的關鍵特徵，闡明了它對汽車、工業和能源產業決策者的重要性，並展望了技術選擇如何轉化為商業性成果。

對推動碳化矽在電力電子領域應用的產業變革性技術、供應鏈與應用轉變進行全面分析

技術、法規和終端市場需求等變革性力量正迅速改變碳化矽分立元件的格局。外延生長、裝置設計和封裝技術的進步降低了高性能組件的進入門檻。同時，交通運輸和能源產業的原始設備製造商（OEM）正在重新思考其架構，以充分利用碳化矽優異的熱性能和開關特性。因此，傳統上以矽基設計為中心的產品藍圖正在重新評估，以追求寬能能隙半導體所帶來的更高效率和功率密度。

對2025年美國關稅如何重塑整個價值鏈的籌資策略、供應商關係和產能決策進行詳細評估。

2025年美國政策調整和關稅政策為碳化矽分立元件價值鏈上的企業帶來了新的挑戰。關稅帶來的成本壓力不斷增加，加速了企業對籌資策略的重新評估，並加劇了國內產能的討論。相關人員正在認真權衡短期成本影響和長期供應穩定性之間的利弊。為此，許多企業優先考慮供應商多元化，並加強合約條款，以降低自身受貿易政策突發變化的影響。

詳細的細分分析揭示了設備類型、電壓等級、應用和最終用戶產業如何獨特地影響選擇標準和認證流程。

細分市場分析揭示了驅動元件選擇、籌資策略和產品開發優先順序的獨特技術和商業動態。基於裝置類型的關鍵考量區分了絕緣柵雙極電晶體(IGBT) 的選擇（其穩健性和高電流能力至關重要）和金屬氧化物半導體場效場效電晶體(MOSFET) 的選擇（其優先考慮開關速度和效率）。同時，功率模組具有熱設計和整合方面的複雜性，而肖特基二極體因其在整流階段的低正向電壓特性而被選中。每種裝置類別都有其獨特的認證通訊協定和供應鏈限制，產品團隊必須使其與系統級效能目標保持一致。

區域情報摘要：說明美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區將如何影響供應鏈韌性、認證流程和戰略重點。

區域趨勢正對碳化矽分立元件的供應鏈、認證流程和商業策略產生重大影響。在美洲，相關人員致力於加強國內組裝和測試基礎設施以及技術生態系統，以支持汽車電氣化和工業現代化項目。這些努力與提高關鍵應用領域供應韌性和降低前置作業時間風險的更廣泛目標一致，同時也影響採購週期和資金配置。

主要企業的企業策略概述，這些策略優先考慮晶圓品質、封裝創新、夥伴關係主導的設計採納和卓越運營，以確保系統級採納。

碳化矽分立元件領域的企業策略通用關注材料技術、系統級夥伴關係以及規模化生產整合。主要企業優先投資於晶圓品質、後端封裝和溫度控管，以減少故障模式並提高裝置一致性，從而實現系統整合。與逆變器供應商和原始設備製造商 (OEM) 建立策略聯盟正成為設計方案被採納的主要途徑，因為共同開發契約能夠加快產品上市速度，並將產品規格嵌入車輛和電網級架構中。

透過技術投資、供應鏈多元化和與原始設備製造商 (OEM) 合作，為加速碳化矽舉措的推廣應用和降低相關風險提供切實可行的建議。

產業領導者應採取協作方式，整合技術投資、供應鏈策略和客戶參與，以充分發揮碳化矽分立元件的潛力。應優先進行跨職能項目，連接元件開發和系統整合團隊，確保晶粒級改進能夠直接轉化為可衡量的效率提升和系統成本降低。這種協作方式縮短了設計迭代和現場檢驗的回饋週期，加快了認證流程，同時保持了產品的可靠性。

研究採用透明的調查方法，結合了初步訪談、技術表徵、專利和政策審查以及專家檢驗，以確保研究結果可操作且檢驗。

本報告的調查方法結合了初步技術檢驗、相關人員訪談和多學科資料檢驗，從而得出可靠且以應用為導向的見解。我們對電力電子設計師、採購主管和研發經理進行了初步訪談，以了解實際決策標準和認證限制。此外，我們也透過實驗室層級的裝置特性分析和失效模式分析，檢驗了裝置在典型工作條件下的性能特性。

簡要總結了實現碳化矽系統級效益所需的技術機會、策略挑戰和協作行動。

碳化矽分立元件正處於一個轉折點，材料創新、工業能力和不斷變化的應用需求正在融合，重塑電力電子策略。這項技術的固有優勢為交通運輸、工業和能源應用領域帶來了更高的效率、更低的熱負荷和更高密度的功率設計機會。然而，要實現這些優勢，裝置製造商、系統整合商和採購機構需要攜手合作，共同應對認證流程、複雜的供應鏈以及區域政策差異。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 市場進入策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 依元件類型分類的碳化矽分立元件市場

  • 絕緣柵雙極電晶體
  • 金屬氧化物半導體場場效電晶體
  • 電源模組
  • 肖特基二極體

9. 依額定電壓分類的碳化矽分立元件市場

  • 高壓
  • 低電壓
  • 中壓

10. 按應用分類的碳化矽分立元件市場

  • 電動車
  • 工業電機
  • 功率轉換
  • 太陽能發電

11. 依終端用戶產業分類的碳化矽分立元件市場

  • 航太/國防
  • 車
  • 家用電子電器
  • 能源與電力

12. 各地區碳化矽分立元件市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 碳化矽分立元件市場（依類別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各國碳化矽分立元件市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

15. 美國碳化矽分立元件市場

第16章 中國碳化矽分立元件市場

第17章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
  • CISSOID SA
  • Coherent Corp.
  • Diodes Incorporated
  • Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
  • General Electric Company
  • GeneSiC Semiconductor Inc. by Navitas Semiconductor, Inc.
  • Infineon Technologies AG
  • Littelfuse, Inc.
  • Micro Commercial Components, Corp.
  • Microchip Technology Incorporated
  • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • ON Semiconductor Corporation
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • ROHM Co., Ltd.
  • Semikron Danfoss Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG.
  • Solitron Devices Inc.
  • STMicroelectronics NV
  • SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.
  • Toshiba Corporation
  • Vishay Intertechnology inc.
  • WeEn Semiconductors Co., Ltd
  • Wolfspeed, Inc.
Product Code: MRR-7A380DA7C681

The Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market was valued at USD 8.18 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 8.95 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.90%, reaching USD 15.85 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 8.18 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 8.95 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 15.85 billion
CAGR (%) 9.90%

A strategic introduction explaining the core technological benefits of silicon carbide discrete devices and why they are reshaping power electronics applications

Silicon carbide discrete devices represent a material and architectural shift in power electronics, blending semiconductor physics with system-level optimization to enable higher efficiency, higher temperature operation, and higher switching frequencies than traditional silicon counterparts. This introduction frames the technology's defining traits, clarifies why it matters to decision-makers across automotive, industrial, and energy sectors, and sets expectations for how technical choices translate into commercial outcomes.

At the device level, silicon carbide enables lower conduction losses and faster switching, which together reduce thermal management burdens and allow denser power conversion designs. At the system level, these characteristics unlock smaller passive components, reduced cooling infrastructure, and higher power density in inverter and converter assemblies. Consequently, product teams and procurement organizations must evaluate devices not only for die-level performance but for the system-level implications on reliability, manufacturability, and total cost of ownership.

Beyond intrinsic device advantages, adoption is being shaped by an evolving ecosystem that includes specialized wafer fabs, power module assemblers, and tier-one OEMs optimizing inverter architectures for electric vehicles and renewable integration. Understanding the interplay between materials, device architecture, and system design is essential for framing strategic investments and aligning product roadmaps with emergent application requirements.

An integrative analysis of industry-altering technological, supply chain, and application shifts that are driving silicon carbide adoption across power electronics sectors

The landscape for silicon carbide discrete devices is changing rapidly under a set of transformative forces that span technology, regulation, and end-market demand. Advances in epitaxial growth, device design, and packaging have lowered barriers to entry for higher-performance parts, while OEMs in transportation and energy are rethinking architectures to leverage silicon carbide's thermal and switching advantages. As a result, product roadmaps that were once centered on silicon-based designs are being revisited to exploit the efficiency and power-density gains afforded by wide-bandgap semiconductors.

Concurrently, industry players are responding to supply chain imperatives and policy drivers that accelerate domestic capability building and diversify sourcing footprints. Investment in larger-diameter silicon carbide wafers and upgrading back-end assembly capacity are enabling higher throughput and improved yield curves, which in turn influence product cost structures and qualification cycles. In parallel, design-in cycles are shortening as converter and inverter suppliers standardize reference platforms that ease integration of discrete devices into modules.

Taken together, these shifts favor firms that can combine deep device-level expertise with system integration capabilities and agile supply chain strategies. Early adopters that coordinate cross-functional teams-spanning materials science, power electronics design, and procurement-are best positioned to convert technical advantages into sustained commercial differentiation.

A detailed assessment of how United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 have reshaped sourcing strategies, supplier relationships, and capacity decisions across the value chain

Policy adjustments and tariff measures implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for companies operating in the silicon carbide discrete device value chain. Tariff-led cost pressures have amplified scrutiny of sourcing strategies and accelerated conversations around onshore capacity, as stakeholders weigh the trade-offs between short-term cost impacts and longer-term supply resilience. In response, many organizations have prioritized supplier diversification and contractual provisions that mitigate exposure to sudden trade-policy changes.

The cumulative effect of these trade measures is visible across multiple decision vectors. Purchasing teams are increasingly leveraging multi-sourcing agreements and near-shoring to reduce single-country dependency, while engineering and operations groups are recalibrating qualification timelines to accommodate alternative suppliers and packaging partners. Meanwhile, component assemblers and OEMs are re-evaluating total cost of ownership frameworks to account for the operational and logistical implications of tariff-driven cost differentials.

Importantly, tariff dynamics have also influenced capital allocation decisions. Firms with strategic mandates for vertical integration have accelerated investments in domestic assembly and testing capabilities to insulate critical programs from trade disruptions. At the same time, international suppliers are enhancing direct engagement with key customers through joint development agreements and localized support to preserve market access and minimize the friction caused by the new trade landscape.

In-depth segmentation insights revealing how device types, voltage classes, applications, and end-user industries uniquely shape selection criteria and qualification pathways

Segmentation analysis reveals distinct technical and commercial dynamics that inform device selection, procurement strategies, and product development priorities. Based on Device Type, key considerations differentiate Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor decisions-where ruggedness and high-current capability matter-from Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor choices that prioritize switching speed and efficiency, while power modules introduce complexity around thermal design and integration, and Schottky diodes are selected for their low forward-voltage characteristics in rectification stages. Each device category imposes unique qualification protocols and supply chain constraints that product teams must align with system-level performance targets.

Based on Voltage Rating, design trade-offs vary markedly across high voltage, medium voltage, and low voltage classes; high-voltage devices emphasize robustness under stress and insulation strategies, medium-voltage solutions balance switching losses with package parasitics, and low-voltage components optimize for minimal conduction losses and compact form factors. Application-driven segmentation shows that Electric Vehicles demand high-power, thermally efficient solutions suitable for automotive qualification cycles, Industrial Motors require devices tolerant of harsh operating conditions and long service life, Power Conversion systems prioritize high-frequency switching and electromagnetic compatibility, and Solar Power applications focus on reliability and wide ambient temperature performance.

Based on End-User Industries, adoption pathways diverge: Aerospace & Defense programs demand rigorous qualification and traceability; Automobile OEMs emphasize cost, space, and integration with battery systems; Consumer Electronics prioritize miniaturization and thermal management for compact power adapters; and Energy & Power players focus on grid compatibility, long-term reliability, and system-level efficiency. Understanding how these segmentation axes overlap enables stakeholders to target investments and technical roadmaps that align device selection with application-specific constraints and regulatory expectations.

A regional intelligence summary that explains how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific each influence supply chain resilience, qualification, and strategic priorities

Regional dynamics have a profound impact on supply chains, qualification practices, and commercial strategy for silicon carbide discrete devices. In the Americas, stakeholders are focusing on strengthening domestic assembly, testing infrastructure, and technical ecosystems that support automotive electrification and industrial modernization programs. These efforts are tied to broader objectives around supply resilience and reducing lead-time risk for mission-critical applications, which in turn influence procurement cycles and capital deployment.

Europe, Middle East & Africa present a differentiated landscape where regulatory emphasis on energy efficiency, grid stability, and automotive decarbonization drives demand for high-performance devices. Regional policy incentives and industrial programs have encouraged collaboration between device manufacturers and systems integrators, resulting in localized design-in activities and higher expectations for environmental compliance and sustainable manufacturing practices.

Asia-Pacific continues to be a hub for wafer production and component assembly, with a dense supplier base and well-established electronics manufacturing ecosystems. However, recent strategic shifts are prompting diversification within the region, with suppliers and OEMs balancing cost advantages against evolving geopolitical and trade considerations. Each region's unique blend of policy, industrial capability, and end-market demand requires tailored commercial strategies and careful alignment of qualification and logistics frameworks.

A corporate strategy overview highlighting how leading players prioritize wafer quality, packaging innovation, partnership-driven design wins, and operational excellence to secure system-level adoption

Company strategies in the silicon carbide discrete device space reveal a common emphasis on integrating materials expertise with system-level partnerships and manufacturing scale. Leading manufacturers are prioritizing investments in wafer quality, back-end packaging, and thermal management to reduce failure modes and improve device consistency for system integration. Strategic partnerships with inverter suppliers and OEMs are becoming a primary route to design wins, as co-development agreements accelerate time-to-market and embed product specifications into vehicle and grid-scale architectures.

Operationally, firms are concentrating on yield improvement programs and expanded testing capability to shorten qualification cycles while meeting stringent industry standards. Intellectual property in epitaxial processes, die layout, and packaging is being defended through targeted patent portfolios, and talent recruitment is emphasizing cross-disciplinary engineers who can bridge physics, power electronics design, and supply chain management. In parallel, some companies are pursuing selective acquisitions to acquire capabilities in module assembly, thermal interface materials, or high-voltage packaging, thereby reducing integration friction for large customers.

Commercially, firms are differentiating through reliability programs, long-term service agreements, and localized support to large OEMs. These initiatives reduce perceived adoption risk and create deeper customer relationships that extend beyond component sales to include technical integration support, warranty frameworks, and aftermarket service planning.

Actionable recommendations that align technology investment, supply chain diversification, and OEM collaboration to accelerate adoption and reduce risk for silicon carbide initiatives

Industry leaders should adopt a coordinated approach that aligns technology investment, supply chain strategy, and customer engagement to capture the full potential of silicon carbide discrete devices. Prioritize cross-functional programs that couple device development with system integration teams so that die-level improvements translate directly into demonstrable efficiency gains and reduced system costs. This alignment will shorten feedback loops between design iterations and field validation, accelerating qualification while preserving product reliability.

Diversification of the supply base and investment in localized assembly and testing capabilities can materially reduce geopolitical and tariff exposure. Establish multi-year supplier engagements with configurable volume commitments and shared yield-improvement targets to secure capacity without forfeiting flexibility. At the same time, expand partnerships with OEMs through co-development contracts that lock in early design wins and create entry barriers for competitors.

Operational recommendations include enhancing test coverage and accelerated life testing to meet stringent application requirements and to support warranty propositions. Invest in talent development programs that cultivate hybrid expertise in wide-bandgap device physics and power systems engineering. Finally, engage proactively with standards bodies and regulatory stakeholders to shape qualification frameworks and to ensure that product roadmaps anticipate compliance needs across major regions.

A transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, technical characterization, patent and policy review, and expert validation to ensure actionable and verifiable insights

The research methodology underpinning this report combines primary technical validation, stakeholder interviews, and multi-source data triangulation to produce robust, application-focused insights. Primary interviews were conducted with power electronics architects, procurement leads, and R&D managers to capture real-world decision criteria and qualification constraints. These qualitative inputs were complemented by laboratory-level device characterization and failure-mode analysis to verify performance attributes under representative operating conditions.

Secondary research included peer-reviewed technical literature, standards documentation, patent landscapes, and public company disclosures to contextualize technology trajectories and to map capability clusters across regions. Data synthesis emphasized cross-validation between independent information sources to reduce bias and to ensure that findings are reproducible and relevant to engineering and commercial audiences. Scenario analysis was used to evaluate how supply chain and policy variables influence strategic choices, and sensitivity checks were applied to ensure conclusions are robust to plausible changes in supply dynamics.

Finally, expert panels reviewed draft conclusions to validate technical assumptions and to refine recommendations, ensuring that the research outputs are actionable for stakeholders involved in procurement, product development, and strategic planning.

A concise conclusion summarizing the technological promise, strategic challenges, and the coordinated actions required to realize silicon carbide's system-level benefits

Silicon carbide discrete devices are at an inflection point where materials innovation, industrial capability, and shifting application demands are converging to reshape power electronics strategy. The technology's intrinsic advantages create opportunities for higher efficiency, reduced thermal burden, and denser power designs across transportation, industrial, and energy applications. Yet realizing these benefits requires coordinated action across device manufacturers, systems integrators, and procurement organizations to address qualification cycles, supply chain complexity, and regional policy variations.

Leadership in this space will be determined by the ability to integrate device-level improvements with system design, to manage geopolitical and tariff-related risks through diversified and localized supply chains, and to build enduring partnerships with OEMs that translate technical differentiation into embedded design wins. By focusing on cross-functional alignment, reliability engineering, and targeted investments in manufacturing capability, organizations can convert silicon carbide's technical promise into sustainable competitive advantage.

The path forward demands disciplined execution: align R&D priorities to system outcomes, secure resilient sourcing arrangements, and embed customer-centric collaboration into commercial models to ensure that silicon carbide solutions deliver measurable benefits at scale.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Device Type

  • 8.1. Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
  • 8.2. Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors
  • 8.3. Power Modules
  • 8.4. Schottky Diodes

9. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Voltage Rating

  • 9.1. High Voltage
  • 9.2. Low Voltage
  • 9.3. Medium Voltage

10. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Applications

  • 10.1. Electric Vehicles
  • 10.2. Industrial Motors
  • 10.3. Power Conversion
  • 10.4. Solar Power

11. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by End-User Industries

  • 11.1. Aerospace & Defense
  • 11.2. Automobile
  • 11.3. Consumer Electronics
  • 11.4. Energy & Power

12. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market

16. China Silicon Carbide Discrete Devices Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ABB Ltd.
  • 17.6. Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
  • 17.7. CISSOID S.A.
  • 17.8. Coherent Corp.
  • 17.9. Diodes Incorporated
  • 17.10. Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
  • 17.11. General Electric Company
  • 17.12. GeneSiC Semiconductor Inc. by Navitas Semiconductor, Inc.
  • 17.13. Infineon Technologies AG
  • 17.14. Littelfuse, Inc.
  • 17.15. Micro Commercial Components, Corp.
  • 17.16. Microchip Technology Incorporated
  • 17.17. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • 17.18. ON Semiconductor Corporation
  • 17.19. Robert Bosch GmbH
  • 17.20. ROHM Co., Ltd.
  • 17.21. Semikron Danfoss Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG.
  • 17.22. Solitron Devices Inc.
  • 17.23. STMicroelectronics N.V.
  • 17.24. SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.
  • 17.25. Toshiba Corporation
  • 17.26. Vishay Intertechnology inc.
  • 17.27. WeEn Semiconductors Co., Ltd
  • 17.28. Wolfspeed, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INSULATED GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MODULES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MODULES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MODULES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SCHOTTKY DIODES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SCHOTTKY DIODES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SCHOTTKY DIODES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH VOLTAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH VOLTAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH VOLTAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY LOW VOLTAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY LOW VOLTAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY LOW VOLTAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM VOLTAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM VOLTAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM VOLTAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL MOTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER CONVERSION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER CONVERSION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY POWER CONVERSION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLAR POWER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLAR POWER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLAR POWER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOBILE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOBILE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOBILE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY & POWER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY & POWER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY & POWER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. LATIN AMERICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. MIDDLE EAST SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AFRICA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. ASIA-PACIFIC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASEAN SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GCC SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPEAN UNION SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. BRICS SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. G7 SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. NATO SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. UNITED STATES SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY DEVICE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY VOLTAGE RATING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. CHINA SILICON CARBIDE DISCRETE DEVICES MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRIES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)