查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1919401

半導體自動管理儲存系統 (AMHS) 市場按系統類型、晶圓尺寸、自動化程度、連接埠類型、應用和最終用戶分類 - 全球預測 2026-2032 年

AMHS for Semiconductor Market by System Type, Wafer Size, Automation Level, Port Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 188 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，半導體 AMHS 市場價值將達到 48.1 億美元，到 2026 年將成長到 51.1 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 84.4 億美元，複合年成長率為 8.36%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 48.1億美元
預計年份：2026年 51.1億美元
預測年份 2032 84.4億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 8.36%

半導體製造廠自動化物料搬運系統（AMHS）的策略方法：確定技術基礎、營運目標和整合需求

現代動態半導體製造廠依賴一套運輸和儲存技術生態系統，該系統連接設備、物流和工廠控制層，從而在複雜的製程流程中實現確定性的物料流。過去十年，機器人技術、感測器套件和工廠軟體的成熟，已將物料搬運從單純的輔助功能轉變為最佳化產能和降低風險的戰略槓桿。

新的技術和營運轉折點正在重塑自動化物料搬運系統設計、以軟體為中心的最佳化以及供應鏈彈性策略。

由於技術、供應鏈和製造策略的融合，半導體製造領域的自動化物料搬運系統 (AMHS) 格局正在經歷變革性變化。工業自主性和機器學習的進步正在加速從基於規則的路徑規劃向動態的、最佳化主導的物料流的轉變，後者能夠適應即時約束和設備狀況。同時，晶圓直徑的不斷增大和設備叢集的增加，使得低延遲傳輸和精確排序變得愈發重要，迫使供應商改進機器設計和軟體架構，以滿足更嚴格的公差要求。

近期關稅變化對採購計算、供應鏈本地化、庫存策略以及自動化物料搬運系統實施的資本規劃的影響。

美國當局宣布的2025年累積關稅措施，為半導體自動化物料搬運系統（AMHS）的採購、製造地選擇和供應商策略帶來了新的動態。關稅帶來的成本壓力加劇，促使採購決策受到嚴格審查，採購團隊重新評估總到岸成本、供應商多元化以及近岸外包和雙重採購安排的潛在效益。為此，一些全球供應商正在加速組裝和配置能力的在地化，以降低關稅風險，同時保持進入關鍵市場的機會。

將系統拓撲結構、最終用戶優先權、晶圓處理尺寸和介面配置與實際應用路徑和效能權衡連結起來的定向細分分析

這種細分方法為分析不同系統類型、最終用戶、晶圓尺寸、自動化程度、連接埠配置和應用範圍的自動化儲存和儲存系統 (AMHS) 效能和採用模式提供了一個聚焦視角。在評估系統類型時，應考慮自動導引車 (AGV)、自動化倉庫系統、輸送機網路和高架運輸解決方案，並認知到 AGV 的各種類型（例如雷射導引和磁感應）在導航精度、基礎設施要求和無塵室整合方面存在固有差異。從最終用戶的觀點來看，代工廠、專注於邏輯和記憶體的整合設備製造商以及外包半導體組裝和測試服務供應商的營運重點各不相同，各自側重於吞吐量、處理能力和污染控制標準。

區域採用模式和策略差異化因素將影響美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區製造業生態系統中自動化物料搬運系統的採用。

區域因素透過勞動力可用性、資本密集度、管理體制和生態系統成熟度來影響先進製造和儲存系統 (AMHS) 的策略。在美洲，半導體投資正朝著回流、採用整合生產力計畫的晶圓廠以及更加注重先進封裝的方向發展，這推動了對適應不同產品環境的靈活晶圓廠內運輸和自動化解決方案的需求。該地區的供應鏈多元化努力也推動了部署模式的轉變，這些模式優先考慮模組化升級和強大的本地服務網路，以最大限度地降低停機風險。

供應商如何從硬體供應商轉型為解決方案合作夥伴：整合編配軟體、預測服務和經認證的互通性解決方案

領先的供應商和整合商正在拓展其價值主張，不再局限於硬體，而是透過以軟體為中心的編配、分析和全生命週期服務模式，降低部署風險並加快價值實現速度。許多供應商現在將邊緣控制系統、工廠整合中間件和機器健康分析打包到其託管服務提案中，使客戶能夠從資本支出模式轉向可預測的營運支出模式。隨著企業尋求提供檢驗的解決方案堆疊以降低整合複雜性並加快部署速度，機器人專家、控制軟體供應商和系統整合商之間的策略聯盟正變得越來越普遍。

為製造商和供應商提供切實可行的、優先排序的建議，以增強韌性、加快整合並最大限度地提高AMHS投資回報。

產業領導者應制定一套切實可行的優先事項，在短期產能提升與長期柔軟性和風險規避之間取得平衡。優先採用模組化自動物料搬運系統（AMHS）架構，以便逐步擴展產能和更換零件，從而降低關稅衝擊、供應商中斷和設計過時帶來的風險。投資於標準化軟體介面數位雙胞胎，以便在資本支出決策之前驗證佈局變更、離線檢驗路由邏輯並預測產能影響。這種方法可以降低試運行風險並加快投資回報的實現。

結合專家訪談、技術綜合、案例分析和交叉檢驗等多種方法，採用穩健的混合研究途徑，確保研究結果具有可操作性和檢驗。

本分析所依據的研究採用了嚴謹的一手研究和二手研究結合的方法，旨在檢驗技術趨勢、實施方法和策略性應變措施。一手研究包括對晶圓廠營運商、系統整合商、自動化工程師和元件供應商進行深度訪談，以收集關於實施挑戰、效能優先順序和未來發展藍圖的一線觀點。這些訪談為情境建構提供了依據，並闡明了不同系統拓撲結構和連接埠標準相關的營運權衡。

簡要概述模組化、標準化和運作準備就緒性為何是決定晶圓廠自動化物料搬運系統成功與否的關鍵因素

在半導體製造領域，自動化物料搬運系統已從輔助角色發展成為策略基礎設施。先進機器人技術、軟體定義控制和供應鏈重組的整合正在重塑晶圓廠管理產能、污染控制以及應對製程切換複雜性的方式。決策者若能整合模組化硬體、互通軟體和穩健的籌資策略，將更有能力應對監管變化、關稅趨勢和不斷變化的製程需求。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 半導體自動管理儲存系統市場（依系統類型分類）

  • 自動導引車
    • 雷射導引運輸車
    • 磁感應運輸車
  • 自動化倉庫系統
  • 輸送機系統
  • 高架運輸系統

9. 依晶圓尺寸分類的半導體AMHS市場

  • 200mm
  • 300mm

第10章 依自動化程度分類的半導體自動管理儲存系統市場

  • 全自動
  • 半自動

第11章 半導體AMHS市場按連接埠類型分類

  • FOSB
  • FOUP
  • 敞開式前門
  • SMIF

第12章 半導體AMHS市場依應用領域分類

  • 工廠間運輸
  • 進程內的運輸

第13章：半導體AMHS市場（以最終用戶分類）

  • 鑄造廠
  • IDM邏輯
  • IDM記憶體
  • OSAT

第14章 半導體AMHS市場（按地區分類）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第15章 半導體AMHS市場（依組別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第16章：各國半導體AMHS市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第17章美國半導體市場

第18章：中國半導體AMHS市場

第19章 競爭情勢

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Applied Materials, Inc.
  • ASM Pacific Technology Ltd.
  • Brooks Automation, Inc.
  • Daifuku Co., Ltd.
  • Fanuc Corporation
  • Hitachi High-Tech Corporation
  • Intel Corporation
  • JTEKT Corporation
  • KION Group AG
  • KLA Corporation
  • KUKA AG
  • Lam Research Corporation
  • Micron Technology, Inc.
  • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • Murata Machinery, Ltd.
  • NSK Ltd.
  • Panasonic Holdings Corporation
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • SK hynix Inc.
  • Teradyne, Inc.
  • Tokyo Electron Limited
  • TSMC
  • Yaskawa Electric Corporation
Product Code: MRR-F14BA1B34306

The AMHS for Semiconductor Market was valued at USD 4.81 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.11 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 8.36%, reaching USD 8.44 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 4.81 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 5.11 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 8.44 billion
CAGR (%) 8.36%

A strategic orientation to automated material handling systems in semiconductor fabs clarifying the technological building blocks, operational objectives, and integration imperatives

The semiconductor industry's relentless push for yield improvement, throughput gains, and contamination control places automated material handling systems (AMHS) at the center of operational planning. Modern fabs rely on an ecosystem of transport and storage technologies that bridge equipment, logistics, and factory control layers, enabling deterministic material flow across complex process sequences. Over the past decade, the maturation of robotics, sensor suites, and factory software has reframed material handling from a utility function into a strategic lever for capacity optimization and risk reduction.

Early adopters moved from manual cassette transfers to deterministic automated guided vehicles and overhead transport networks designed for cleanroom compliance, and today the conversation centers on interoperability, predictive maintenance, and software-defined material routing. As wafer diameters, tool densities, and process steps evolve, engineers and process owners must align AMHS architectures with both tool throughput and the broader production control stack. This introduction lays the groundwork for understanding how system topologies, interface standards, and operational policies together influence fab agility and long-term capital efficiency.

Emerging technological and operational inflection points reshaping automated material handling system design, software-centric optimization, and supply chain resilience strategies

The landscape for AMHS in semiconductor manufacturing is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces across technology, supply chains, and manufacturing strategy. Advances in industrial autonomy and machine learning have accelerated the move from rule-based routing to dynamic, optimization-driven material flow that adapts to real-time constraints and equipment states. Concurrently, the push toward higher wafer diameters and denser tool clusters increases the importance of low-latency transport and precise sequencing, compelling suppliers to refine mechanical designs and software architectures for tighter tolerances.

Supply chain resilience initiatives and rising labor costs are prompting fabs to reconsider the balance between capital investment in automation and operational flexibility, while digital twin technology and high-fidelity simulation enable planners to validate layout alternatives and contingency plans before committing to hardware changes. Environmental and energy-performance targets are also reshaping system specifications, with energy-efficient drives, materials, and power management strategies becoming differentiators. As a result, the industry is shifting toward modular, service-oriented AMHS platforms that combine scalable hardware, cloud-enabled analytics, and standardized interfaces to support faster adoption and incremental modernization.

How recent tariff shifts have reshaped procurement calculus, supply chain localization, inventory strategy, and capital planning for automated material handling deployments

Cumulative tariff actions announced by United States authorities in 2025 have introduced new dynamics that influence procurement, manufacturing footprint decisions, and supplier strategy for semiconductor AMHS. Tariff-driven cost pressures have increased the scrutiny of sourcing decisions, prompting procurement teams to reevaluate total landed cost, supplier diversification, and the potential benefits of nearshoring or dual-sourcing arrangements. In response, some global suppliers have accelerated the localization of assembly and configuration capabilities to mitigate tariff exposure while preserving access to critical markets.

Operational teams have responded by revisiting inventory policies, buffer strategies, and spare-parts provisioning to reduce vulnerability to cross-border supply interruptions. Longer lead times for specific components have emphasized the value of modular designs and interchangeable subsystems that allow incremental upgrades without major capital expenditure. Meanwhile, capital planners have adjusted project timetables to accommodate potential customs delays and to optimize cash flow under revised duty structures. Regulators and corporate compliance functions now play a more active role, working with engineering and procurement to ensure that equipment certifications, country-of-origin documentation, and contractual terms reflect a more complex trade environment. Consequently, AMHS investment decisions increasingly factor in trade policy risk as a determinant of vendor selection and deployment phasing.

Targeted segmentation analysis linking system topologies, end-user priorities, wafer handling dimensions, and interface configurations to practical adoption pathways and performance trade-offs

Segmentation offers a focused lens for analyzing AMHS performance and adoption patterns across system types, end users, wafer sizes, automation levels, port configurations, and application scopes. When evaluating system type, consider automated guided vehicles alongside automated storage and retrieval systems, conveyor networks, and overhead transport solutions, and recognize that AGV variants such as laser-guided and magnetic-guided vehicles differ materially in navigation precision, infrastructure requirements, and cleanroom integration. From the end-user perspective, operational priorities diverge between foundries, integrated device manufacturers focused on logic and memory, and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers, each of which emphasizes different throughput, handling, and contamination control criteria.

Wafer size segmentation between 200 mm and 300 mm influences mechanical handling tolerances, carrier capacities, and throughput economics, while automation level choices between fully automated and semi-automated deployments reflect differing labor models, flexibility needs, and changeover expectations. Port type decisions-whether to specify front-opening shipping boxes, front-opening unified pods, open-front interfaces, or SMIF carriers-affect tool interface design, cleanroom handling procedures, and cross-equipment compatibility. Finally, application distinctions between inter-fab transportation and intra-fab sequencing highlight differences in route optimization, trackability requirements, and SLA-driven prioritization. Together, these segmentation dimensions enable stakeholders to align technology roadmaps with specific operational constraints and strategic objectives.

Regional deployment patterns and strategic differentiators that influence automated material handling system adoption across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific manufacturing ecosystems

Regional factors shape AMHS strategy through labor availability, capital intensity, regulatory regimes, and ecosystem maturity. In the Americas, semiconductor investment tends to emphasize reshoring, fabs with integrated capacity plans, and a growing emphasis on advanced packaging, which drives demand for flexible intra-fab transport and automation solutions adapted to high-mix environments. Supply chain diversification efforts in the region also encourage deployment models that prioritize modular upgrades and strong local service networks to minimize downtime risk.

In Europe, the Middle East and Africa, regulatory focus on sustainability and energy efficiency informs procurement criteria, and manufacturers often combine automation upgrades with retrofits that reduce facility energy footprints. The region's heterogeneous industrial base favors interoperable AMHS platforms that can adapt to diverse fab configurations and legacy equipment. In Asia-Pacific, established manufacturing clusters and high-volume foundry operations continue to push for throughput maximization, where 300 mm fab expansion and advanced packaging hubs drive demand for low-latency transport, deterministic routing, and high-reliability storage solutions. Across regions, differing capital cycles, workforce dynamics, and policy incentives determine the pace and form of AMHS adoption, making geographic strategy a central component of supplier go-to-market planning.

How suppliers are transitioning from hardware vendors to solution partners by integrating orchestration software, predictive services, and certified interoperability offerings

Leading suppliers and integrators are evolving their offerings beyond hardware to provide software-centric orchestration, analytics, and lifetime service models that de-risk installations and accelerate time-to-value. Many vendors now bundle edge control systems, factory integration middleware, and machine health analytics as part of a managed service proposition, enabling customers to shift from capital expenditure toward predictable operational expenditure models. Strategic partnerships between robotics specialists, control software providers, and systems integrators are increasingly common, as companies aim to deliver validated solution stacks that reduce integration complexity and shorten deployment timelines.

Innovation is also visible in aftermarket services where predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, and parts-as-a-service reduce unplanned downtime and extend equipment life. Competitive differentiation is emerging from firms that invest in open APIs, standards-aligned interfaces, and certified interoperability suites, which lower the technical risk for fabs with mixed-vendor toolsets. Additionally, firms that provide strong program management, migration planning, and training services tend to achieve higher long-term client retention, since successful AMHS deployments require organizational change management in addition to technical excellence.

Practical and prioritized recommendations for manufacturers and suppliers to strengthen resilience, accelerate integration, and maximize return on AMHS investments

Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable priorities that balance near-term throughput improvements with long-term flexibility and risk mitigation. Prioritize modular AMHS architectures that allow incremental capacity expansion and component substitution, thereby reducing exposure to tariff shocks, supplier disruptions, and design obsolescence. Invest in standardized software interfaces and digital twins to validate layout changes, test routing logic offline, and forecast throughput impacts before committing to capital expenditure. This approach reduces commissioning risk and accelerates ROI realization.

Operational teams should reexamine spare parts strategies and service contracts to improve resilience against extended lead times while negotiating vendor terms that include localization options for high-impact components. Engineering groups should pilot AI-driven routing and predictive maintenance on non-critical lines to build internal competency and demonstrate value before scaling across production. From a procurement perspective, diversify the supplier base to include regional assembly partners and certified integrators, and structure contracts to incentivize uptime and rapid spares fulfillment. Finally, align cross-functional governance-bringing together process engineering, operations, IT, and procurement-to ensure that AMHS projects are properly scoped, measured, and maintained over their lifecycle.

A robust mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, technical synthesis, case analysis, and cross-validation to ensure actionable and verifiable insights

The research underpinning this analysis combined a rigorous blend of primary and secondary inquiry, structured to validate technical trends, deployment modalities, and strategic responses. Primary research included in-depth interviews with fab operations leaders, systems integrators, automation engineers, and component suppliers to capture first-hand perspectives on implementation challenges, performance priorities, and future roadmaps. These conversations informed scenario development and clarified the operational trade-offs associated with different system topologies and port standards.

Secondary research synthesized publicly available technical literature, standards documentation, patent filings, and product specifications to map technology trajectories and supplier capabilities. In addition, case studies of recent AMHS implementations were examined to extract best practices for commissioning, integration, and scaling. Findings were cross-validated through expert workshops and peer review with independent automation specialists to ensure robustness. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on verifiable technical factors and operational impact rather than speculative market sizing, and limitations related to evolving trade policy and regional incentives are noted as contextual variables that may influence adoption pathways.

Concise synthesis of why modularity, standards, and operational readiness determine successful automated material handling system outcomes in fabs

Automated material handling systems have moved from supporting cast to strategic infrastructure within semiconductor manufacturing. The convergence of advanced robotics, software-defined control, and supply chain realignment is reshaping how fabs manage throughput, contamination control, and changeover complexity. Decision-makers who integrate modular hardware, interoperable software, and resilient sourcing strategies will be better positioned to navigate regulatory shifts, tariff dynamics, and evolving process demands.

Looking ahead, the most successful deployments will pair clear operational objectives with phased implementation plans that mitigate risk through simulation, pilot testing, and vendor certification. Organizational readiness-training, governance, and cross-disciplinary alignment-remains a critical determinant of program success. In sum, AMHS investments that emphasize flexibility, standards-based integration, and predictive operations will unlock sustained performance improvements and provide a platform for future technology adoption in semiconductor fabs.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by System Type

  • 8.1. Automated Guided Vehicles
    • 8.1.1. Laser Guided Vehicles
    • 8.1.2. Magnetic Guided Vehicles
  • 8.2. Automated Storage And Retrieval Systems
  • 8.3. Conveyor Systems
  • 8.4. Overhead Transport

9. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Wafer Size

  • 9.1. 200 Mm
  • 9.2. 300 Mm

10. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Automation Level

  • 10.1. Fully Automated
  • 10.2. Semi-Automated

11. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Port Type

  • 11.1. Fosb
  • 11.2. Foup
  • 11.3. Open Front
  • 11.4. Smif

12. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Inter-Fab
  • 12.2. Intra-Fab

13. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Foundry
  • 13.2. Idm Logic
  • 13.3. Idm Memory
  • 13.4. Osat

14. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States AMHS for Semiconductor Market

18. China AMHS for Semiconductor Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. ABB Ltd.
  • 19.6. Applied Materials, Inc.
  • 19.7. ASM Pacific Technology Ltd.
  • 19.8. Brooks Automation, Inc.
  • 19.9. Daifuku Co., Ltd.
  • 19.10. Fanuc Corporation
  • 19.11. Hitachi High-Tech Corporation
  • 19.12. Intel Corporation
  • 19.13. JTEKT Corporation
  • 19.14. KION Group AG
  • 19.15. KLA Corporation
  • 19.16. KUKA AG
  • 19.17. Lam Research Corporation
  • 19.18. Micron Technology, Inc.
  • 19.19. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • 19.20. Murata Machinery, Ltd.
  • 19.21. NSK Ltd.
  • 19.22. Panasonic Holdings Corporation
  • 19.23. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • 19.24. SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • 19.25. SK hynix Inc.
  • 19.26. Teradyne, Inc.
  • 19.27. Tokyo Electron Limited
  • 19.28. TSMC
  • 19.29. Yaskawa Electric Corporation

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY LASER GUIDED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY LASER GUIDED VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY LASER GUIDED VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MAGNETIC GUIDED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MAGNETIC GUIDED VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MAGNETIC GUIDED VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OVERHEAD TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OVERHEAD TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OVERHEAD TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 200 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 200 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 200 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 300 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 300 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 300 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FULLY AUTOMATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FULLY AUTOMATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FULLY AUTOMATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-AUTOMATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-AUTOMATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-AUTOMATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOSB, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOSB, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOSB, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUP, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUP, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUP, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN FRONT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN FRONT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN FRONT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SMIF, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SMIF, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SMIF, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTER-FAB, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTER-FAB, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTER-FAB, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTRA-FAB, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTRA-FAB, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTRA-FAB, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM LOGIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM LOGIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM LOGIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM MEMORY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM MEMORY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM MEMORY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OSAT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OSAT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OSAT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)