查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1918948

全身塑身衣市場按產品類型、材質、最終用戶、分銷管道和應用分類－2026-2032年全球預測

Full Body Shapewear Market by Product Type, Material, End User, Distribution Channel, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，全身塑身衣市場價值將達到 1.8654 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 1.9558 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 3.4276 億美元，複合年成長率為 9.08%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 1.8654億美元
預計年份：2026年 1.9558億美元
預測年份 2032 3.4276億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 9.08%

權威分析了不斷發展的全身塑身衣市場，重點關注消費者習慣、材料創新和全通路商務的融合。

隨著消費者偏好、材料創新和全通路商務的交匯融合，全身塑身衣市場正在迅速發展，重新定義產品開發和市場定位。在服裝和健康領域，塑身衣不再是局限於特定類別的利基產品，而是擴大融入日常穿搭、產後恢復計劃和功能性服裝。這種轉變造就了一個更為複雜的競爭格局，成熟的內衣品牌、數位化新興企業和垂直整合的製造商都在透過差異化的合身技術、永續材料和具成本效益的定價策略來爭取客戶忠誠度。

材料科學、分銷管道轉型和不斷發展的消費者應用如何從根本上重塑產品設計、籌資策略和競爭優勢

過去幾年，塑身衣的設計、生產和銷售方式發生了顯著變化。布料混紡技術的創新，例如先進的尼龍-氨綸複合材料和特殊的編織工藝，在提升舒適度的同時又不犧牲支撐力，使其適用於日常穿著、產後護理和運動等多種場合。同時，永續性考量正從行銷差異化因素轉變為採購的必要條件，各大品牌紛紛嘗試使用再生纖維和更環保的生產流程，以滿足具有環保意識的消費者的期望和採購策略。

檢驗2025年關稅對整個價值鏈的採購、定價和彈性供應鏈設計的營運和策略影響

美國2025年實施的新關稅對全身塑身衣價值鏈產生了一系列累積的營運影響，波及供應鏈、籌資策略和零售定價結構。最近的影響是受影響地區進口商品的到岸成本增加，促使許多品牌重新評估其供應商組合併加快供應商多元化進程。隨著企業做出應對，策略採購決策越來越依賴單位成本、與終端市場的接近性以及全身服飾所需的塑形、縫紉和後整理等技術能力之間的權衡。

將終端使用者畫像、通路行為、產品設計、材料和價格點連結起來的可操作細分訊息，有助於做出精準的產品組合和市場推廣決策。

細分市場分析揭示了消費者需求和商業性動態在各個維度上的差異，以及策略選擇應如何與這些差異化的需求細分市場相符。以最終用戶分類，男性和女性的市場動態有所不同，每個細分市場對合身度、覆蓋範圍和舒適度的重視程度也不同。根據這些差異調整產品概念和尺寸對於市場滲透和客戶維繫至關重要。基於分銷管道，線上和線下零售在購買行為和轉換機制方面有顯著差異。線下零售包括百貨公司、多品牌商店、專賣店和超級市場/大賣場，實體店的體驗、專業的銷售協助和即時供貨是影響購買決策的關鍵因素。而線上零售則包括電子商務平台、公司網站和社交電商，數位內容、試穿工具和可靠的配送服務是推動選擇和復購的主要動力。

美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的區域特徵和營運因素驅動著採購優先事項、產品偏好和分銷策略。

區域趨勢對產品偏好、供應鏈選擇和市場進入策略有顯著影響。有效的區域策略能夠使全球能力與當地消費者的期望相符。在美洲，強調多功能性和身體自信的生活方式趨勢推動了對兼具舒適性和功能性的日常穿著混合型產品的強勁需求。分銷管道在大型零售商的覆蓋範圍和強大的直銷（D2C）滲透率之間取得了平衡。在歐洲、中東和非洲，市場偏好正在分化。西方市場優先考慮永續性和精準合身度，而該地區的新興市場則優先考慮成本績效、在地採購和快速的產品更新換代。不同地區的法規結構和進口規則也存在顯著差異，影響合規時間和籌資策略。在亞太地區，製造生態系統仍然是全球供應鏈的關鍵，而當地消費者趨勢則擁抱布料科技創新和全通路零售模式。都市化和不斷壯大的中產階級推動了對高級產品和中端產品需求的成長，本土品牌往往憑藉快速的產品更新周期和與當地文化相關的行銷策略展開競爭。

策略競爭模式揭示了為什麼合適的技術、垂直整合、直接面對消費者的模式和永續性舉措是關鍵參與者之間的重要差異化因素。

全身塑身衣市場的競爭格局由一系列企業組成，包括成熟的內衣品牌、數位化新興企業、契約製造製造商以及在版型設計、材料技術和配銷通路方面各具優勢的垂直整合供應商。主要企業正投資於差異化的版型技術、專有布料配方和數據驅動的尺寸系統，以降低退貨率並提升客戶終身價值。一些企業優先考慮垂直整合，以確保關鍵產能並加快創新週期；而另一些企業則利用與專業製造商的策略合作關係，獲取無縫針織技術和高壓縮貼合加工等尖端技術。

產業領導者必須立即實施切實可行的策略行動和營運重點，以確保供應鏈韌性、產品差異化和客戶價值的持續提升。

在營運轉型加速的時期，產業領導者應採取一系列切實可行的措施來保護利潤率、加速創新並加強客戶關係。首先，應實現採購來源的地理和供應商類型多元化，以降低關稅和物流風險的集中敞口，同時建立靈活的柔軟性，以實現產能的快速調整。其次，應優先投資於能夠提升特定用途（例如產後支撐或運動性能）的舒適性和功能性的材料和設計，並在大規模推廣前透過試驗計畫檢驗技術聲明。

採用透明的混合方法研究途徑，結合一手訪談、零售審核、貿易資料三角驗證和情境測試，以檢驗策略洞察和限制。

本執行摘要的研究整合了第一手資料和第二手資料，從而得出切實可行的洞見。第一手資料包括對品牌主管、產品設計師、委託製造製造商、零售採購員和物流業者的結構化訪談，並輔以商店和線上零售審核，以觀察商品組合策略、定價機制和消費者觸點。二級資訊來源提供了原料趨勢、貿易流量和監管發展方面的背景資訊，並透過與海關記錄和公開的進出口管道進行數據三角驗證，檢驗採購模式。

對產品創新、通路敏捷性和供應鏈韌性進行整合策略觀點，將塑造全身塑身衣領域的競爭格局。

全身塑身衣產業正處於轉折點，產品創新、通路執行力和供應鏈韌性將決定企業的成敗。材料創新和以功能為導向的產品設計正在將該品類從美容領域拓展到醫療、產後護理和運動應用領域，從而提高了臨床檢驗、合身系統和消費者教育的標準。同時，通路的兩極化——實體店的觸感體驗和功能豐富的線上生態系統——要求品牌採取雙管齊下的策略，既要滿足線下門市的體驗需求，又要兼顧以數位化為先導的個人化服務。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章 全身塑身衣市場（依產品類型分類）

  • 連體服
  • 連體衣
  • 大腿塑形器
  • 束腰帶

第9章 依材質分類的全身塑身衣市場

  • 尼龍
  • 尼龍/氨綸混紡
  • 聚酯纖維

第10章 以最終用戶分類的全身塑身衣市場

  • 男性
  • 女士

第11章 全身塑身衣市場（依通路分類）

  • 線下零售
    • 百貨公司
    • 多品牌商店
    • 專賣店
    • 超級市場和大賣場
  • 線上零售
    • 電子商務平台
    • 公司網站
    • 社群電商

第12章 依應用分類的全身塑身衣市場

  • 日常穿著
  • 醫療的
  • 產後
  • 運動的

第13章 各地區全身塑身衣市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章 全身塑身衣市場（依群體分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第15章 各國全身塑身衣市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章美國全身塑身衣市場

第17章 中國全身塑身衣市場

第18章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • Bali, Inc.
  • Body Wrap International, Inc.
  • Cosabella SpA
  • Flexees
  • Hanesbrands Inc.
  • Intimissimi SpA
  • Jockey International, Inc.
  • Leonisa Inc.
  • Lytess International SA
  • MeMoi International, Inc.
  • Olga Company, Inc.
  • Playtex Products, LLC
  • Shapermint, LLC
  • ShaperX, Inc.
  • Skims Inc.
  • Spanx Europe Limited
  • Squeem, Inc.
  • Vedette SA
  • Wacoal America, Inc.
  • Wolford AG
  • Yummie Apparel, LLC
Product Code: MRR-F14BA1B340DE

The Full Body Shapewear Market was valued at USD 186.54 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 195.58 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.08%, reaching USD 342.76 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 186.54 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 195.58 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 342.76 million
CAGR (%) 9.08%

An authoritative orientation to the evolving full-body shapewear sector, highlighting convergence of consumer habits, material innovation, and omnichannel commerce

The full-body shapewear landscape is evolving at pace as consumer preferences, fabric innovation, and omnichannel commerce intersect to redefine product development and market positioning. Across apparel and wellness portfolios, shapewear is no longer a niche offering confined to specialty categories; instead it is increasingly integrated into everyday wardrobes, postpartum recovery regimens, and performance-oriented apparel. This shift has created a more complex competitive environment where established intimates brands, digitally native challengers, and vertically integrated manufacturers compete for loyalty through differentiated fit technologies, sustainable materials, and value-driven pricing.

As a result, stakeholders from product designers to retail merchandisers must reconcile legacy supply chains with rapid product iteration cycles demanded by e-commerce. In addition, regulatory and trade developments are shaping sourcing decisions and cost structures, prompting many players to reassess manufacturing footprints and partner networks. The introduction frames why a nuanced, operationally grounded understanding of end-user segmentation, distribution channels, material science, and regional demand patterns is essential for executives seeking to translate trends into commercially viable strategies. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis of transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, competitive actions, and pragmatic recommendations that follow.

How material science, channel disruption, and evolving consumer applications are fundamentally reshaping product design, sourcing strategy, and competitive advantage

The last several years have ushered in transformative shifts that are reshaping how full-body shapewear is designed, manufactured, and distributed. Innovations in fabric blends, such as advanced nylon-spandex composites and engineered weaves, have enhanced comfort without sacrificing control, enabling products that are suitable for daily wear, postpartum recovery, and athletic applications. Concurrently, sustainability considerations are moving from marketing differentiator to sourcing imperative, with brands experimenting with recycled fibers and lower-impact production processes to address conscious-consumer expectations and procurement policies.

Channel dynamics have also transformed; digital-first brands have established direct lines to consumers, shortening feedback loops and accelerating product iteration, while omnichannel retailers deploy hybrid strategies that combine fitting-room experiences with rich online content to reduce return rates and build fit confidence. Supply chains have responded to these pressures by adopting more flexible manufacturing arrangements and nearshoring pilots, especially for garments that require specialized sewing and shaping capabilities. Meanwhile, technical advancements in sizing tools, 3D simulation, and virtual try-on are enabling higher initial-fit accuracy, which reduces returns and increases conversion rates.

Importantly, consumer behavior is fragmenting across purpose-driven applications: shapewear that was once primarily a cosmetic category is now positioned as a performance and wellness product, with applications in sports and medical wear driving cross-disciplinary innovation and certification pathways. In consequence, brands and suppliers that can combine ergonomic design, clinically informed construction, and compelling consumer communication are best placed to capture expanded use cases. These cumulative shifts have intensified the need for strategic agility, compelling organizations to prioritize modular product platforms, data-driven merchandising, and collaborative supplier relationships to sustain competitiveness.

Examining the operational and strategic consequences of 2025 tariff measures on sourcing, pricing architecture, and resilient supply chain design across the value chain

The implementation of new tariff measures by the United States in 2025 has produced a cumulative set of operational effects that ripple through supply chains, procurement strategies, and retail pricing structures across the full-body shapewear value chain. Immediate consequences include elevated landed costs for imports originating in affected jurisdictions, which has prompted many brands to reassess supplier portfolios and to accelerate supplier diversification efforts. As companies respond, strategic sourcing decisions increasingly weigh the trade-offs between unit cost, proximity to end markets, and the technical capabilities required for shaping, seaming, and finishing critical to full-body garments.

Downstream, distribution strategies are adapting as retailers evaluate assortment rationalization and private-label opportunities to protect margin. Some retailers have shifted inventory toward domestically produced ranges or moved high-complexity SKUs to contract manufacturers located in tariff-neutral regions. These adjustments are not solely cost-driven; they are also informed by lead-time considerations and the need to maintain quality standards for products that materially affect comfort and fit.

In parallel, manufacturers and brands are pursuing product-level mitigation tactics such as optimizing fabric yields, reevaluating trim and hardware specifications, and redesigning packaging to reduce freight costs. Pricing strategies vary by channel, with direct-to-consumer brands using targeted promotions and membership pricing to retain loyalty, while mass-channel players leverage private-label assortments to offer price-stable alternatives. For many players, the cumulative impact of tariffs has catalyzed longer-term strategic moves: developing geographically diversified manufacturing networks, investing in automation where feasible to offset wage and tariff pressures, and negotiating forward-looking supplier contracts that include contingency clauses for trade volatility. These adaptations underscore that tariffs function not just as an input cost shock but as a structural force accelerating resiliency planning and operational redesign.

Actionable segmentation intelligence linking end-user profiles, channel behaviors, product engineering, materials, and price tiers to support precise assortment and go-to-market decisions

Segmentation insights reveal how consumer needs and commercial dynamics vary across distinct axes, and how strategic choices must align to those differentiated pockets of demand. Based on End User, market dynamics differ between Men and Women, with each cohort demonstrating different priorities for fit, concealment, and comfort; tailoring product narratives and sizing systems to those differences is essential for penetration and retention. Based on Distribution Channel, the dichotomy between Offline Retail and Online Retail manifests in shopper behavior and conversion mechanics: Offline Retail includes Departmental Stores, Multi Brand Stores, Specialty Stores, and Supermarkets Hypermarkets where tactile evaluation, expert sales assistance, and immediate availability shape purchase decisions, while Online Retail comprises E Commerce Platforms, Own Websites, and Social Commerce where digital content, fit tools, and fulfillment reliability drive choice and repurchase.

Based on Product Type, differentiation among All In One Suits, Bodysuits, Thigh Shapers, and Waist Cinchers requires distinct product engineering approaches; each type demands specific seam placement, paneling, and compression mapping to meet performance expectations and regulatory considerations for medical or postpartum applications. Based on Application, the split across Daily Wear, Medical, Postpartum, and Sports indicates divergent design priorities: Daily Wear emphasizes breathability and invisibility under garments, Medical requires certification and clinical evidence, Postpartum necessitates gentle graduated support combined with nursing compatibility or incision-friendly construction, and Sports underscores moisture management and dynamic compression profiles that support movement without chafing. Based on Material, common choices among Nylon, Nylon Spandex Blend, and Polyester reflect trade-offs between stretch recovery, hand-feel, durability, and dyeing capabilities; material selection also influences sustainability narratives and recycling pathways. Based on Price Range, differentiation among Budget, Mid Range, and Premium tiers shapes expectations for finishing, packaging, warranty policies, and omnichannel support investments; premium segments often bear the cost of R&D and unique fit systems, while budget tiers compete on accessible pricing, high SKU turnover, and efficient distribution.

Together, these segmentation dimensions create a multidimensional decision matrix for product planning, inventory allocation, and marketing investment. For effective category management, companies must integrate segmentation insights into assortment planning, aligning product attributes and communication strategies to the needs and purchasing contexts of each segment. This alignment enables more precise merchandising, reduces returns through improved fit matching, and optimizes lifecycle management for each SKU cluster.

Regional dynamics and operational levers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine sourcing priorities, product preferences, and distribution strategies

Regional dynamics exert a pronounced influence on product preferences, supply chain choices, and go-to-market tactics, and an effective regional strategy harmonizes global capabilities with local consumer expectations. In the Americas, demand patterns reflect a strong appetite for daily-wear comfort and performance hybrids, driven by lifestyle trends that favor multifunctional garments and body-positive positioning; distribution here often balances big-box retail assortments with robust direct-to-consumer penetration. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the market exhibits heterogeneous preferences where western European markets emphasize sustainability credentials and fit precision, while emerging markets within the region prioritize value, local sourcing, and rapid assortment turnover; regulatory frameworks and import rules also vary widely, affecting compliance timelines and sourcing strategies. In the Asia-Pacific region, manufacturing ecosystems remain critical to global supply chains, while local consumption trends embrace innovation in fabric science and omnichannel retail models; urbanization and a growing middle class underpin increased demand for both premium and mid-range products, and local brands frequently compete on rapid product cycles and culturally attuned marketing.

Across these regions, logistics networks, tariff regimes, and labor dynamics shape where and how companies invest in capacity and partnerships. For companies that serve multiple regions, adopting a hub-and-spoke production model or regional distribution centers can reduce lead times and increase responsiveness to local fashion cycles. Equally important is tailoring marketing messages to reflect regional attitudes toward body image, performance, and medical endorsement, ensuring that product claims and imagery resonate while remaining compliant with local advertising standards. In sum, regional insights should inform not only supply-side decisions but also localized product development, channel mix, and pricing architecture to maximize relevance and operational efficiency.

Strategic competitive patterns illuminating why fit technology, vertical integration, DTC models, and sustainability initiatives are decisive differentiators among leading players

Competitive dynamics across the full-body shapewear arena are shaped by a mix of legacy intimate apparel brands, digitally native challengers, contract manufacturers, and vertically integrated suppliers who bring complementary strengths in fit engineering, materials expertise, and channel reach. Leading companies are investing in differentiated fit technologies, proprietary fabric formulations, and data-driven sizing systems that reduce returns and enhance lifetime customer value. Some players prioritize vertical integration to secure critical production capabilities and to accelerate innovation cycles, while others leverage strategic partnerships with specialized manufacturers to access niche techniques such as seamless knitting or high-compression laminates.

Another notable trend is the rise of direct-to-consumer brands that meld content-rich customer education with membership and subscription models to drive repeat purchase and build first-party data assets. Retailers are responding by strengthening private-label assortments and hybrid omnichannel experiences that blend personalization with scale. Additionally, collaborations between apparel brands and clinical or sports institutions are emerging as a means to substantiate performance and medical claims, thereby unlocking new channels such as healthcare providers and physiotherapy networks.

Sustainability and traceability initiatives are also becoming competitive differentiators. Organizations that can demonstrate third-party certifications, supply-chain transparency, and credible end-of-life pathways for synthetic fibers gain advantage with institutional buyers and ethically-minded consumers. Finally, M&A and strategic alliances remain active as companies seek to acquire complementary capabilities, expand geographic reach, or consolidate manufacturing capacity; such moves tend to accelerate innovation diffusion and reshape competitive clusters within the sector.

Practical strategic moves and operational priorities that leaders must implement now to secure supply resilience, product differentiation, and durable customer value

Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic set of actions that protect margin, accelerate innovation, and strengthen customer relationships in a period of heightened operational change. First, diversify sourcing across geographies and supplier types to reduce exposure to concentrated tariff or logistical risks, while establishing contractual flexibility that enables rapid capacity shifts. Second, prioritize materials and design investments that enhance comfort and function for targeted applications such as postpartum support or sports performance, using pilot programs to validate technical claims before large-scale rollout.

Third, optimize channel strategies by aligning SKU depth and price architecture to each distribution context; ensure that online platforms offer rich fit tools and augmented content while in-store assortments emphasize touch, try-on support, and immediate availability. Fourth, improve margin resilience through product-level cost engineering: revisit paneling, trim specifications, and packaging to reduce landed costs without compromising perceived value. Fifth, accelerate digital capabilities for demand sensing and inventory orchestration to reduce overstocks and improve fulfillment reliability, thereby lowering return rates and boosting customer satisfaction.

Sixth, embed sustainability and compliance into procurement choices, prioritizing suppliers with transparent supply chains and credible certifications, and develop clear end-of-life or recycling propositions that align with brand positioning. Seventh, cultivate strategic partnerships with clinical bodies, sports organizations, or influencer communities to authenticate product claims and to open non-traditional channels. Finally, build a phased investment roadmap that aligns innovation spend with measurable commercial milestones, ensuring that R&D and marketing expenditures deliver quantifiable improvements in conversion, retention, or unit economics.

A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, retail audits, trade data triangulation, and scenario testing to validate strategic insights and limitations

The research underpinning this executive summary integrates both primary and secondary methods to produce robust, actionable insights. Primary inputs include structured interviews with brand executives, product designers, contract manufacturers, retail buyers, and logistics providers, supplemented by in-store and online retail audits to observe assortment strategies, pricing mechanics, and consumer touchpoints. Secondary sources provide context on raw material trends, trade flows, and regulatory developments, with data triangulated against customs records and publicly available import-export pipelines to validate sourcing patterns.

Analytical frameworks applied during the research included segmentation mapping, channel economics analysis, and scenario-based supply chain stress testing. Segmentation mapping reconciled end-user needs, product types, applications, materials, and price tiers to create a decision matrix for assortment planning. Channel economics analysis compared cost-to-serve across offline and online retail models, factoring in returns, fulfillment costs, and promotional elasticity. Scenario-based stress testing examined the operational effects of tariff shifts, lead-time disruptions, and material availability on procurement and pricing strategies. Throughout the study, findings were validated through expert review sessions and cross-checked with multiple data sources to ensure coherence and reliability.

Limitations include variability in proprietary retail data access and the evolving nature of trade regulations, which require continuous monitoring. To mitigate these constraints, the methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions, sensitivity checks where data is limited, and an iterative approach that incorporates new evidence as it becomes available. Ethical considerations around supplier anonymity and interviewee confidentiality were upheld, with aggregated findings reported to preserve source anonymity while maintaining analytical rigor.

Consolidated strategic perspective on why product innovation, channel agility, and supply resilience will determine competitive outcomes in the full-body shapewear sector

The full-body shapewear sector stands at an inflection point where product ingenuity, channel execution, and supply-chain resilience will determine winners and laggards. Material innovations and purpose-driven product design have expanded the category beyond cosmetic use into medical, postpartum, and sports applications, raising the bar for clinical validation, fit systems, and consumer education. Meanwhile, channel bifurcation between tactile retail environments and feature-rich online ecosystems requires brands to operate dual playbooks that reconcile in-store experiential needs with digital-first personalization.

Trade dynamics and tariff actions have accelerated strategic sourcing reassessments and cost-engineering initiatives, underscoring the importance of supplier diversification and flexible manufacturing partnerships. Competitively, organizations that integrate advanced fit technologies, sustainable materials, and credible third-party endorsements will better capture value across premium and mid-range segments. Operational best practices-such as improved demand sensing, inventory orchestration, and targeted assortment curation-will be essential to contain returns, protect margins, and sustain customer loyalty. In closing, executives should treat these insights as a call to align product innovation, commercial execution, and supply-chain architecture so that strategic choices are resilient, customer-centered, and economically defensible.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. All In One Suits
  • 8.2. Bodysuits
  • 8.3. Thigh Shapers
  • 8.4. Waist Cinchers

9. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Material

  • 9.1. Nylon
  • 9.2. Nylon Spandex Blend
  • 9.3. Polyester

10. Full Body Shapewear Market, by End User

  • 10.1. Men
  • 10.2. Women

11. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 11.1. Offline Retail
    • 11.1.1. Departmental Stores
    • 11.1.2. Multi Brand Stores
    • 11.1.3. Specialty Stores
    • 11.1.4. Supermarkets Hypermarkets
  • 11.2. Online Retail
    • 11.2.1. E Commerce Platforms
    • 11.2.2. Own Websites
    • 11.2.3. Social Commerce

12. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Daily Wear
  • 12.2. Medical
  • 12.3. Postpartum
  • 12.4. Sports

13. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Full Body Shapewear Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. United States Full Body Shapewear Market

17. China Full Body Shapewear Market

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 18.5. Bali, Inc.
  • 18.6. Body Wrap International, Inc.
  • 18.7. Cosabella S.p.A.
  • 18.8. Flexees
  • 18.9. Hanesbrands Inc.
  • 18.10. Intimissimi S.p.A.
  • 18.11. Jockey International, Inc.
  • 18.12. Leonisa Inc.
  • 18.13. Lytess International S.A.
  • 18.14. MeMoi International, Inc.
  • 18.15. Olga Company, Inc.
  • 18.16. Playtex Products, LLC
  • 18.17. Shapermint, LLC
  • 18.18. ShaperX, Inc.
  • 18.19. Skims Inc.
  • 18.20. Spanx Europe Limited
  • 18.21. Squeem, Inc.
  • 18.22. Vedette S.A.
  • 18.23. Wacoal America, Inc.
  • 18.24. Wolford AG
  • 18.25. Yummie Apparel, LLC

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ALL IN ONE SUITS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ALL IN ONE SUITS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ALL IN ONE SUITS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY BODYSUITS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY BODYSUITS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY BODYSUITS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY THIGH SHAPERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY THIGH SHAPERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY THIGH SHAPERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY WAIST CINCHERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY WAIST CINCHERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY WAIST CINCHERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY NYLON, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY NYLON, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY NYLON, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY NYLON SPANDEX BLEND, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY NYLON SPANDEX BLEND, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY NYLON SPANDEX BLEND, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY POLYESTER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY WOMEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY WOMEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY WOMEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DEPARTMENTAL STORES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DEPARTMENTAL STORES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DEPARTMENTAL STORES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI BRAND STORES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI BRAND STORES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI BRAND STORES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SUPERMARKETS HYPERMARKETS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SUPERMARKETS HYPERMARKETS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SUPERMARKETS HYPERMARKETS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY E COMMERCE PLATFORMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY E COMMERCE PLATFORMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY E COMMERCE PLATFORMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OWN WEBSITES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OWN WEBSITES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OWN WEBSITES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SOCIAL COMMERCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SOCIAL COMMERCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SOCIAL COMMERCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DAILY WEAR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DAILY WEAR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DAILY WEAR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MEDICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MEDICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MEDICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY POSTPARTUM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY POSTPARTUM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY POSTPARTUM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SPORTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SPORTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SPORTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AMERICAS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. NORTH AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. LATIN AMERICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. MIDDLE EAST FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. AFRICA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASIA-PACIFIC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASEAN FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GCC FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. EUROPEAN UNION FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. BRICS FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. G7 FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. NATO FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. GLOBAL FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. UNITED STATES FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY OFFLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. CHINA FULL BODY SHAPEWEAR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)