離岸風電支援船市場：按船舶類型、營運模式和租賃模式分類的全球預測，2026-2032年

預計到 2025 年，離岸風電支援船市場價值將達到 246.6 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 280.8 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 666.6 億美元，年複合成長率為 15.26%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025	246.6億美元
預計年份：2026年	280.8億美元
預測年份 2032	666.6億美元
複合年成長率 (%)	15.26%

這是一本實用指南，全面說明了離岸風電支援船在複雜海況下平衡技術、環境和後勤要求，從而實現計劃交付的作用。

離岸風電支援船在海洋工程、可再生能源部署和複雜的後勤協調方面發揮著至關重要的作用。這些船舶提供安裝、維護和保養風力渦輪機及海底基礎設施所需的實際操作能力，使開發商和營運商能夠將計劃設計轉化為可營運的資產。隨著計劃規模和技術複雜性的增加，對船舶性能、船員能力和遠端操作的要求也隨之提高，因此需要重新調整採購重點並重新思考生命週期管理方法。

快速電氣化、數位化營運、燃料柔軟性和供應鏈韌性正在共同重塑船舶設計、船員能力和合約簽訂方式。

離岸風電支援船領域正經歷重大變革，這主要得益於技術進步、政策趨勢和不斷演變的商業模式。在電池密度和電源管理軟體提升的推動下，電動和混合動力推進系統正從先導計畫走向主流改造和新建規範。同時，自動化和數據驅動系統減少了日常監控和診斷的人工干預，從而提高了安全性並降低了資產全生命週期的營運成本。這些趨勢正在重塑設計重點，模組化、燃料柔軟性和平台互通性成為設計重點。

2025年關稅如何推動採購結構調整、區域籌資策略和合約變更，以保護航運項目免受貿易波動的影響

2025年美國關稅政策對離岸風電支援船的採購、零件供應和戰略合作產生了直接和間接的影響。直接影響方面，關稅造成的成本差異促使買家重新評估供應商選擇標準，盡可能優先考慮國產零件或免稅選項。這影響了船廠的訂單分配和維修項目的先後順序。因此，採購計畫和合約談判中加入了關於關稅轉嫁條款、升級機制和原產地檢驗的新條款，以管控風險。

從綜合細分的觀點，將船舶推進和尺寸與營運角色、電纜處理特性和租船結構連結起來，以協助進行採購和船員規劃。

深入了解細分市場對於使船隊能力與營運需求和商業模式相匹配至關重要。此分析框架基於船舶類型考慮推進系統和船體尺寸，並進一步按燃油效率等級細分推進系統，同時將船舶尺寸與船員容量聯繫起來，以反映人為因素和任務持續時間。這種分層方法表明，推進系統的選擇與燃料物流和排放目標密切相關，而船舶尺寸和船員規模則直接影響營運持續時間、船上居住條件和任務柔軟性。

美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區不同的優先事項將如何導致船舶規格、基地戰略和產業支援模式的差異

區域趨勢將對整個離岸風電支援生態系統的船舶部署策略、基礎設施投資和監管合規產生決定性影響。在美洲，監管機構對國內供應鏈的關注，加上早期但快速成長的計劃儲備，正在刺激對多用途船舶和能夠提供更快交付週期的改裝專案的需求。該地區對發展本地製造能力的重視也影響培訓項目和維護基地的地理分佈，進而影響船舶的部署地點和備件庫存的管理方式。

船東、造船廠、設備供應商和服務提供者採取果斷的戰略舉措，優先考慮模組化、排放和全面的全生命週期支援服務，以確保長期合約的簽訂。

離岸風電支援船領域的競爭格局呈現出船東、船廠、設備供應商和服務供應商之間戰略重點各異的特徵。船東優先考慮船隊的多功能性和使用壽命，選擇性地投資於混合動力推進系統升級和模組化裝載系統，使單艘船舶即可完成安裝、維護和物流任務。同時，船廠則透過提供模組化建造技術和整合系統測試來滿足客戶對客製化的需求，從而降低試運行風險。

提供實用的管理指南，以最佳化船隊選擇、區域樞紐分配、船員能力和包機合約設計，同時利用數位化和風險規避籌資策略。

行業領導者必須採取積極主動的策略，將技術和商業性趨勢轉化為永續的優勢。首先，他們應優先考慮新採購和維修中採用靈活的推進系統和模組化有效載荷設計，確保安裝和服務任務之間的兼容性，並協商允許隨著燃料和電池系統的發展而進行技術升級的合約條款。這種方法可以降低過早過時的風險，並使資本配置與多用途作戰能力相符。

結合相關人員訪談、船舶遙測分析和監管審查的混合方法研究框架，能夠提供經實踐驗證的營運和採購洞察。

本調查方法結合了質性和定量技術，旨在得出切實可行的見解。透過與關鍵相關人員（營運商、船廠、設備供應商、租船人和船級社）的深入訪談，收集了有關營運重點、設計權衡和合約創新的第一手資訊。此外，也利用船舶遙測分析（包括基於AIS的航行模式和營運日誌）來檢驗運作概況和調動週期。

各方結論一致，強調了建構穩健的離岸風電支援服務體系的重要性，該體系應基於技術適應性、本地化應對力和合約條款的清晰度。

總而言之，離岸風電支援船產業正處於一個轉折點，技術創新、監管壓力和商業性整合正在匯聚，重新定義營運預期。強調模組化、燃料柔軟性和數位化營運的船隊策略將更有利於應對季節性限制、供應鏈中斷和不斷變化的排放法規要求。區域差異將繼續影響基地選址和服務基礎設施投資，因此需要根據當地的產業能力和法規環境制定相應的應對措施。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

• 研究設計
• 研究框架
• 市場規模預測
• 數據三角測量
• 調查結果
• 調查前提
• 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

• 首席主管觀點
• 市場規模和成長趨勢
• 2025年市佔率分析
• FPNV定位矩陣，2025
• 新的商機
• 下一代經營模式
• 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

• 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL 分析
• 市場展望
• 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

• 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
• 消費者體驗基準
• 機會地圖
• 分銷通路分析
• 價格趨勢分析
• 監理合規和標準框架
• ESG與永續性分析
• 中斷和風險情景
• 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 離岸風電支援船市場（依船舶類型分類）

• 推進方法
• 船舶尺寸

9. 離岸風電支援船市場（依營運方式分類）

• 電纜敷設
• 服務類別

第10章：離岸風電支援船市場（按租賃類型分類）

• 合約期限
• 收費系統

第11章 離岸風電支援船市場（按地區分類）

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 歐洲、中東和非洲
  • 歐洲
  • 中東
  • 非洲
• 亞太地區

第12章 離岸風電支援船市場（依組別分類）

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第13章：各國離岸風電支持船市場

• 美國
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英國
• 德國
• 法國
• 俄羅斯
• 義大利
• 西班牙
• 中國
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韓國

第14章：美國離岸風電支持船市場

第15章：中國離岸風電支援船市場

第16章 競爭格局

• 市場集中度分析，2025年
  • 濃度比（CR）
  • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
• 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
• 2025年產品系列分析
• 基準分析，2025 年
• Bourbon Offshore EMEA SAS
• Cadeler A/S
• DEME Group NV
• Jan De Nul NV
• Japan Marine United Corporation
• Royal Boskalis Westminster NV
• Royal Van Oord NV
• Seaway 7 Ltd
• Solstad Offshore ASA
• Subsea 7 SA
• Vroon Offshore Services Holding BV

The Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market was valued at USD 24.66 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 28.08 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 15.26%, reaching USD 66.66 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025]	USD 24.66 billion
Estimated Year [2026]	USD 28.08 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 66.66 billion
CAGR (%)	15.26%

An expansive operational primer that frames how offshore wind support vessels enable project delivery while balancing technical, environmental and logistical imperatives across complex sea states

Offshore wind support vessels occupy a pivotal role at the intersection of maritime engineering, renewable energy deployment and complex logistical orchestration. These vessels provide the hands-on capability required to install, maintain and service turbines and subsea infrastructure, enabling developers and operators to translate project designs into operational assets. As projects grow in scale and technical complexity, the demands on vessel performance, crew competency and remote operations escalate in parallel, requiring a recalibration of procurement priorities and lifecycle management practices.

Consequently, vessel operators and charterers face a shifting set of imperatives. Operational windows are narrowing due to concentrated seasonal constraints and greater environmental scrutiny, while asset owners are under pressure to demonstrate efficient, low-emission operations and resilient supply chains. Therefore, strategic planning for support vessels must integrate technical specifications, crew competency frameworks and service cadence harmonized with broader project timelines. In this context, stakeholders must anticipate both near-term operational frictions and longer-term structural changes that will shape vessel utilization, retrofit needs and contractual relationships.

How rapid electrification, digital operations, fuel flexibility and supply chain resilience are collectively reshaping vessel design, crew competency and contracting practices

The landscape for offshore wind support vessels is undergoing substantive transformation driven by technological advances, policy signals and evolving commercial models. Electrification and hybrid propulsion systems are moving from pilot projects into mainstream retrofits and newbuild specifications, supported by improvements in battery density and power-management software. In parallel, automation and data-driven systems are reducing routine human intervention for monitoring and diagnostics, which enhances safety while compressing operating costs over the asset lifecycle. These trends are reshaping design priorities, with a premium placed on modularity, fuel flexibility and platform interoperability.

Moreover, decarbonization imperatives are interacting with regulatory and financing expectations to accelerate adoption of low-emission technologies. Shipyards and equipment vendors are now designing vessels with electrified auxiliary systems, shore-power connectivity and architectures amenable to future fuel substitution. At the same time, digital operations such as remote monitoring, predictive maintenance and digital twins are extending asset visibility ashore, enabling more efficient scheduling and fewer mobilizations. As a result, the conventional dichotomy between installation and service vessels is softening as multi-role designs that can adapt to installation, inspection, repair and logistics tasks gain traction.

Additionally, supply chain resilience has become a core strategic priority. Stakeholders are diversifying sourcing, investing in localized maintenance hubs and redefining contract terms to buffer against component shortages and lead-time variability. This supply-side reconfiguration interacts with labor dynamics, as specialized crew and technicians with combined maritime and renewables expertise become critical bottlenecks. Consequently, training pipelines, certification frameworks and crew retention strategies are now integral to fleet planning and operational continuity. Taken together, these transformative shifts demand a systems-level response where technical innovation, commercial contracting and workforce development are aligned to sustain reliable, low-carbon offshore support services.

How 2025 tariff actions are prompting procurement realignment, regional sourcing strategies and contractual adaptations to insulate vessel programs from trade volatility

Tariff measures enacted by the United States in 2025 have created immediate and secondary effects for offshore wind support vessel procurement, component sourcing and strategic alliances. In direct terms, tariff-induced cost differentials have prompted buyers to revisit supplier selection criteria and to prioritize domestic or tariff-exempt options where possible, which has influenced shipyard allocation and the sequencing of retrofit programs. As a result, procurement calendars and contract negotiations have incorporated new clauses addressing tariff pass-through, escalation mechanisms and origin verification to manage exposure.

In a broader sense, these trade measures have accelerated localization efforts and fostered new partnerships between domestic yards, component manufacturers and service providers. Stakeholders are increasingly evaluating total-cost-of-ownership implications that include tariff impacts, lead-time risk and maintenance logistics, and are therefore more likely to favor procurement models that reduce cross-border dependency for critical spares and specialized assemblies. This trend is changing the composition of supplier panels and is motivating investment in forward-stocking strategies at regional hubs to preserve availability during tight weather windows.

Furthermore, tariff dynamics are influencing fleet deployment choices and charter economics. Operators are assessing whether to retain certain retrofit and fabrication activities in-house or to establish long-term alliances with regional yards to mitigate repeated tariff exposure. Insurers and financiers are likewise adjusting underwriting frameworks to account for procurement risk and the potential for project schedule slippage driven by trade-related delays. Consequently, strategic responses have included contingency contracting, more conservative procurement milestones and the insertion of flexible scope options in newbuild contracts to allow for alternative sourcing pathways should tariff barriers persist or expand.

Integrated segmentation perspectives that link vessel propulsion and size with operational roles, cable handling characteristics and charter structures to inform procurement and crew planning

A granular understanding of segmentation is critical to align fleet capabilities with operational demands and commercial models. Based on vessel type, the analytical frame examines propulsion type and vessel size, and further differentiates propulsion across fuel-efficiency classifications while linking vessel size to crew capacity to reflect human factors and mission duration. This layered approach highlights that propulsion choices intersect with fuel logistics and emissions targets, whereas size and crew complement directly influence operational endurance, on-board accommodations and task flexibility.

From an operational standpoint, segmentation evaluates activity profiles across cable laying and service categories, then drills into cable laying by cable type and into service categories by frequency of intervention. This axis demonstrates that cable-laying missions place distinct demands on precision positioning, cable handling systems and dynamic stability, whereas service operations are shaped by inspection cycles, maintenance intensity and access to specialized tooling. Moreover, frequency categorizations expose cost drivers related to mobilization cadence and spare-parts provisioning.

Charter-model segmentation completes the picture by mapping contract duration and rate structure, and subsequently clarifying renewal options and incentive mechanisms embedded within rate structures. Contracts with longer durations typically favour certain capital-intensive vessel designs, while shorter, more flexible arrangements incentivize modularity and interoperability. Incentive mechanisms further align operator performance with owner objectives, creating shared accountability for availability, safety outcomes and emissions performance. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide an operationally actionable taxonomy that supports procurement optimization, fleet modernization and contract design decisions.

How diverging regional priorities across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific drive distinct vessel specifications, basing strategies and industrial support models

Regional dynamics exert a decisive influence on vessel deployment strategies, infrastructure investments and regulatory compliance across the offshore wind support ecosystem. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on domestic supply chains, coupled with nascent but rapidly scaling project pipelines, has stimulated demand for multi-role vessels and retrofit programs that shorten delivery timeframes. This region's emphasis on developing local fabrication capacity is also shaping training programs and the geographic distribution of maintenance hubs, which in turn affects where vessels are based and how spare parts inventories are managed.

In contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of mature markets with dense service networks alongside emerging markets seeking to accelerate deployment. Established jurisdictions have prioritized technical standards, low-emission operations and integrated port infrastructure, creating opportunities for vessels with advanced station-keeping, emission-reduction systems and compatibility with shore-power facilities. At the same time, adjacent markets are attracting investment in regional repair yards and logistics centers to serve cross-border projects, producing a layered service economy that supports both installation and long-term O&M activities.

Asia-Pacific combines macro-scale manufacturing capability with intensifying project activity, resulting in an emphasis on competitive newbuild programs and rapid deployment cycles. Shipyards in the region are increasingly offering scalable production lines and aggressive delivery schedules, which appeal to developers seeking cost-effective vessel options. However, long-term service reliability requires augmentation with regional bases and specialized crew training to sustain complex maintenance regimes. Across all regions, emergent patterns show that proximity to repair infrastructure, workforce availability and regulatory alignment remain central to fleet basing and operational resilience.

Decisive strategic moves by shipowners, yards, equipment vendors and service operators that prioritize modularity, emissions reduction and bundled lifecycle support to secure long-term contracts

Competitive activity in the offshore wind support vessel arena is defined by differentiated strategic priorities among shipowners, shipyards, equipment suppliers and service operators. Shipowners are prioritizing fleet versatility and longevity, investing selectively in hybrid propulsion upgrades and modular payload systems that allow a single hull to address installation, maintenance and logistics missions. Concurrently, shipyards are adapting to the demand for bespoke configurations by offering modular construction techniques and integrated systems testing to reduce commissioning risk.

Equipment suppliers are advancing niche capabilities such as dynamic positioning enhancements, specialized cable handling systems and low-emission auxiliary solutions, often pairing hardware upgrades with predictive maintenance software to create integrated value propositions. Service operators are responding by developing bundled offerings that combine vessel time, specialized technicians and managed spare parts inventories, thereby simplifying commercial arrangements for developers and operators. Financial players and classification societies are increasingly involved early in design stages to ensure compliance with evolving standards and to structure capital solutions that accommodate both newbuilds and extensive retrofits.

Strategic alliances and selective consolidation are also shaping the competitive landscape. Partnerships that combine shipbuilding capacity, technical know-how and local service networks are enabling entrants to scale rapidly while mitigating single-point supply risks. Ultimately, competitive success will hinge on the ability to deliver demonstrable reliability, comply with increasingly stringent environmental standards, and provide coherent life-cycle support packages that align with project timelines and operational contingencies.

Actionable executive guidance to optimize fleet selection, regional basing, crew capability and charter design while leveraging digitalization and risk-mitigating procurement strategies

Industry leaders must adopt a proactive posture to translate technological and commercial trends into durable advantage. First, prioritize flexible propulsion and modular payload design in new acquisitions and retrofits to ensure compatibility across installation and service missions, while simultaneously negotiating contract terms that allow for technology upgrades as fuel and battery systems evolve. This approach reduces the risk of premature obsolescence and aligns capital allocation with multi-role utility.

Second, establish regional service hubs and forward-stock critical spares to minimize weather-driven downtime and to reduce reliance on long-haul logistics for urgent repairs. Combine this with targeted investments in crew training programs that blend maritime competence with renewable-specific skills to secure operational continuity and reduce turnover. Third, embed supplier diversification and contingency clauses into procurement frameworks to mitigate trade-related shocks and to preserve schedule integrity when cross-border sourcing is disrupted.

Fourth, structure charter agreements to balance stability and flexibility by incorporating performance-based incentives tied to availability and emissions metrics, while preserving options for renewal or scope adjustment as project phases evolve. Fifth, accelerate digital adoption by deploying predictive maintenance platforms, remote monitoring and digital-twin simulations that inform proactive maintenance and reduce unnecessary mobilizations. Lastly, engage early with insurers, financiers and classification bodies to align technical specifications with underwriting criteria, thereby smoothing financing pathways and ensuring insurance coverage is matched to operational realities.

A mixed-methods research framework combining stakeholder interviews, vessel telemetry analysis and regulatory review to deliver validated operational and procurement insights

The research approach combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to yield robust, actionable insights. Primary stakeholder interviews were conducted with a cross-section of operators, shipbuilders, equipment suppliers, charterers and classification authorities to capture first-hand perspectives on operational priorities, design trade-offs and contractual innovations. These interviews were complemented by vessel telemetry analysis, including AIS-derived movement patterns and operational day logs, to validate utilization profiles and mobilization cycles.

Regulatory and policy reviews were undertaken to assess the evolving compliance landscape and its implications for vessel specifications, emissions strategies and port infrastructure. Technical product reviews and supplier capability assessments provided clarity on propulsion options, cable-handling systems and digital maintenance platforms. Scenario-based analysis integrated these inputs to explore plausible responses to trade disruptions, fuel transitions and varying operational cadences, enabling stakeholders to appraise contingency options and procurement pathways with greater confidence.

Convergent conclusions emphasizing technical adaptability, regional readiness and contractual clarity as the foundation for resilient offshore wind support services

In summary, the offshore wind support vessel sector is at an inflection point where technical innovation, regulatory pressure and commercial realignment converge to redefine operational expectations. Fleet strategies that emphasize modularity, fuel flexibility and digital operations will be better positioned to navigate seasonal constraints, supply-chain disruptions and evolving emissions requirements. Regional variations will continue to influence basing decisions and service infrastructure investments, requiring tailored approaches that reflect local industrial capacity and regulatory climates.

Industry participants that proactively integrate these trends into procurement, crew development and contractual design will secure meaningful operational advantages. By aligning vessel capabilities with realistic service cadences and by embedding contingency measures into supply and charter arrangements, stakeholders can enhance resilience and capture value across the asset lifecycle. Ultimately, a disciplined focus on technical adaptability, regional readiness and contractual clarity will underpin sustainable offshore wind support services in the years ahead.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market, by Vessel Type

• 8.1. Propulsion Type
• 8.2. Vessel Size

9. Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market, by Operation

• 9.1. Cable Laying
• 9.2. Service Category

10. Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market, by Charter Model

• 10.1. Contract Duration
• 10.2. Rate Structure

11. Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market, by Region

• 11.1. Americas
  • 11.1.1. North America
  • 11.1.2. Latin America
• 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 11.2.1. Europe
  • 11.2.2. Middle East
  • 11.2.3. Africa
• 11.3. Asia-Pacific

12. Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market, by Group

• 12.1. ASEAN
• 12.2. GCC
• 12.3. European Union
• 12.4. BRICS
• 12.5. G7
• 12.6. NATO

13. Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market, by Country

• 13.1. United States
• 13.2. Canada
• 13.3. Mexico
• 13.4. Brazil
• 13.5. United Kingdom
• 13.6. Germany
• 13.7. France
• 13.8. Russia
• 13.9. Italy
• 13.10. Spain
• 13.11. China
• 13.12. India
• 13.13. Japan
• 13.14. Australia
• 13.15. South Korea

14. United States Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market

15. China Offshore Wind Support Vessels Market

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 16.5. Bourbon Offshore EMEA SAS
• 16.6. Cadeler A/S
• 16.7. DEME Group NV
• 16.8. Jan De Nul NV
• 16.9. Japan Marine United Corporation
• 16.10. Royal Boskalis Westminster NV
• 16.11. Royal Van Oord NV
• 16.12. Seaway 7 Ltd
• 16.13. Solstad Offshore ASA
• 16.14. Subsea 7 SA
• 16.15. Vroon Offshore Services Holding BV

LIST OF FIGURES

• FIGURE 1. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 2. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
• FIGURE 3. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
• FIGURE 4. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 5. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 6. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 7. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 8. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 9. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 10. UNITED STATES OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 11. CHINA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

• TABLE 1. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 2. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 3. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY PROPULSION TYPE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 4. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY PROPULSION TYPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 5. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY PROPULSION TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 6. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 7. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 8. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 9. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 10. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CABLE LAYING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 11. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CABLE LAYING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 12. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CABLE LAYING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 13. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE CATEGORY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 14. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE CATEGORY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 15. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE CATEGORY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 16. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 17. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CONTRACT DURATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 18. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CONTRACT DURATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 19. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CONTRACT DURATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 20. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY RATE STRUCTURE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 21. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY RATE STRUCTURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 22. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY RATE STRUCTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 23. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 24. AMERICAS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 25. AMERICAS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 26. AMERICAS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 27. AMERICAS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 28. NORTH AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 29. NORTH AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 30. NORTH AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 31. NORTH AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 32. LATIN AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 33. LATIN AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 34. LATIN AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 35. LATIN AMERICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 36. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 37. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 38. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 39. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 40. EUROPE OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 41. EUROPE OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 42. EUROPE OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 43. EUROPE OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 44. MIDDLE EAST OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 45. MIDDLE EAST OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 46. MIDDLE EAST OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 47. MIDDLE EAST OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 48. AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 49. AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 50. AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 51. AFRICA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 52. ASIA-PACIFIC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 53. ASIA-PACIFIC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 54. ASIA-PACIFIC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 55. ASIA-PACIFIC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 56. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 57. ASEAN OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 58. ASEAN OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 59. ASEAN OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 60. ASEAN OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 61. GCC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 62. GCC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 63. GCC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 64. GCC OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 65. EUROPEAN UNION OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 66. EUROPEAN UNION OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 67. EUROPEAN UNION OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 68. EUROPEAN UNION OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 69. BRICS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 70. BRICS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 71. BRICS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 72. BRICS OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 73. G7 OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 74. G7 OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 75. G7 OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 76. G7 OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 77. NATO OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 78. NATO OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 79. NATO OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 80. NATO OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 81. GLOBAL OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 82. UNITED STATES OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 83. UNITED STATES OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 84. UNITED STATES OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 85. UNITED STATES OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 86. CHINA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 87. CHINA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY VESSEL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 88. CHINA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY OPERATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 89. CHINA OFFSHORE WIND SUPPORT VESSELS MARKET SIZE, BY CHARTER MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)