查看購物車
  • English
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1914450

零信任身分管理平台市場按組件、部署模式和垂直行業分類 - 全球預測 2026-2032

Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market by Component, Deployment Model, Vertical - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，零信任身分管理平台市場價值將達到 352.3 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 401.1 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 903.8 億美元，年複合成長率為 14.40%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 352.3億美元
預計年份：2026年 401.1億美元
預測年份 2032 903.8億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 14.40%

一個權威的身份框架，作為戰略控制平面，在現代混合雲原生環境中平衡網路風險緩解和業務賦能。

本執行摘要概述了零信任模式下身分管理的策略輪廓，並重點闡述了身分為何是現代網路防禦的基礎控制手段。各組織機構日益意識到，基於邊界的防禦不足以應對高階威脅行為者和複雜的混合IT環境。因此，涵蓋客戶身分、員工存取、多因素身分驗證和特權存取等以身分為中心的控制措施已成為安全和業務賦能的核心。

雲端原生架構、不斷演變的威脅模式和監管要求如何推動身分和存取管理向可配置、注重隱私的方向轉型

隨著技術、營運和監管要求的融合，身分和存取管理領域正經歷著變革性的轉變。雲端原生應用架構和 API 的激增正在侵蝕傳統的網路邊界，並要求身分控制能夠跟隨工作負載和使用者在不同環境之間的遷移而運作。同時，服務網格、容器編排管理和無伺服器運算的普及也要求身分解決方案能夠原生整合到 CI/CD 管線和執行時間平台中。

評估關稅波動和貿易政策變化對身分平台採購、架構和部署策略的營運和採購影響

關稅政策的變化與技術供應鏈之間的相互作用會對籌資策略和部署計劃產生重大影響，尤其對於那些採購結構地域分散且軟硬體一體化的組織而言更是如此。關稅波動可能會改變企業對本地部署設備、硬體安全模組或包含專用認證設備的捆綁系統的採購選擇。因此，採購團隊正在重新評估整體擁有成本，以應對潛在的貿易相關關稅、物流複雜性和供應商多元化等因素，從而降低供應鏈風險。

策略性細分洞察將元件功能、部署模式、組織規模和特定產業需求與實際的身分架構和採購方案相匹配。

關鍵細分洞察揭示了技術選擇、採購標準和實施策略在組件、部署模型、組織規模和產業維度上的差異。考慮到整體情況元件（客戶身分存取管理、身分存取管理、多因素身分驗證、特權存取管理），每個類別都針對獨特的風險因素和使用者體驗目標。 CIAM 投資優先考慮外部使用者的可擴展身分驗證和授權管理，IAM 專注於員工生命週期和目錄整合，MFA 為交易和會話提供自適應保障，而 PAM 則保護高風險系統中的管理憑證和會話活動。

區域因素和實施細節會影響美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的供應商選擇、資料駐留決策和身分計畫管治。

區域特徵塑造了技術採納模式、監管壓力和打入市場策略，並對策略和執行產生重大影響。在美洲，企業通常優先考慮快速採用雲端運算、高度重視數位化客戶體驗以及詐欺偵測方面的創新，同時法規結構鼓勵採取強力的資料保護和事件揭露措施。在歐洲、中東和非洲地區，監管的複雜性和跨境資料保護機制要求企業認真考慮資料駐留和同意管理。此外，許多公共部門專案優先考慮公民服務的互通性和身分保證。

企業平台、雲端原生新興參與企業、專業身分驗證供應商和整合商的組合將影響身分認證專案的供應商選擇和長期整合風險。

身分管理領域的競爭格局由成熟的企業平台、雲端原生新興企業、專業身分驗證供應商以及將產品功能轉化為實際營運方案的系統整合商共同構成。成熟的平台通常提供涵蓋員工身分和存取管理 (IAM)、多因素身分驗證 (MFA) 以及特權存取控制等廣泛功能，對尋求統一管治、完善整​​合生態系統和成熟支援的組織而言，仍然極具吸引力。雲端原生供應商則透過 API 優先架構、快速功能交付以及與主流公共雲端供應商的原生整合，為奉行雲優先策略的組織帶來敏捷性，簡化了部署流程。

為領導者提供具體的策略和採購建議，以透過分階段採用、互通標準和管治治理來實現身分管理的現代化。

產業領導者應採取分階段、有計畫的身份現代化方法，在快速取得成效的同時，建構穩固的基礎架構。首先，明確定義具體的用例和預期業務成果，以便儘早展現價值，例如減少特權帳戶的蔓延、消除高風險的共用憑證以及簡化消費者註冊流程。然後，將這些成果與可衡量的關鍵績效指標 (KPI) 和管治查核點掛鉤。優先考慮 OAuth、OpenID Connect 和 SCIM 等互通性標準，並確保您的客戶身分和存取管理 (CIAM)、身分和存取管理 (IAM)、多因素身分驗證 (MFA) 和特權存取管理 (PAM) 元件能夠無縫整合，避免供應商鎖定。

我們嚴謹、多方面的調查方法結合了從業者訪談、技術簡報、監管分析和案例研究檢驗，以確保提供實用、中立的見解。

本研究以多角度整合定性和定量訊息，確保研究結果的三角驗證，並使其與實踐者和決策者息息相關。主要資訊來源包括對企業、公共部門以及中小企業 (SMB) 安全和身分管理負責人進行的結構化訪談，以及與已完成跨雲端、混合和本地環境遷移的解決方案架構師和整合商進行的技術簡報。這些對話提供了關於營運限制、供應商績效和整合權衡的第一手觀點。

總之，本文全面探討了身分現代化，強調實用、分段和位置感知的身份現代化，平衡了安全性、合規性和使用者體驗要求。

總之，身分管理處於安全、合規和使用者體驗的交匯點，是建立可靠的零信任計畫的關鍵。朝向雲端原生、API驅動架構的演進以及以身分為中心的攻擊手法的興起，要求解決方案必須具備可配置性、隱私保護意識和永續營運的特性。因此，決策者在評估身分平台時，不僅要考慮其功能是否一致，還要考慮其整合、擴展和適應不斷變化的監管和營運限制的能力。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 零信任身分管理平台市場（按組件分類）

  • 客戶身分存取管理
  • 身分和存取管理
  • 多因素身份驗證
  • 特權存取管理

9. 依部署模式分類的零信任身分管理平台市場

  • 雲
  • 混合雲端
  • 本地部署

第10章：依垂直產業分類的零信任身分管理平台市場

  • 銀行、金融服務和保險
  • 政府
  • 衛生保健
  • 資訊科技與通訊
  • 零售

11. 各區域零信任身分管理平台市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第12章：按組別分類的零信任身分管理平台市場

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

13. 各國零信任身分管理平台市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第14章：美國零信任身分管理平台市場

第15章：中國零信任身分管理平台市場

第16章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • Broadcom Inc
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • CyberArk Software Ltd.
  • Delinea Corporation
  • Forcepoint
  • ForgeRock, Inc.
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Okta, Inc.
  • Ping Identity Holding Corp.
  • SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13C89

The Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market was valued at USD 35.23 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 40.11 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 14.40%, reaching USD 90.38 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 35.23 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 40.11 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 90.38 billion
CAGR (%) 14.40%

An authoritative framing of identity as the strategic control plane that balances cyber risk reduction with business enablement in modern hybrid and cloud-native environments

This executive summary introduces the strategic contours of identity management within a Zero Trust paradigm, emphasizing why identity is the control plane for modern cyber defense. Organizations increasingly recognize that perimeter-based defenses are insufficient against sophisticated threat actors and complex hybrid IT environments. Consequently, identity-centric controls-spanning customer identity, workforce access, multifactor authentication, and privileged access-are now central to both security and business enablement.

The introduction outlines the forces driving adoption, the principal technology domains involved, and the organizational imperatives for tighter identity governance. It situates identity solutions as integral to operational resilience, regulatory compliance, and user experience optimization. Starting from this vantage point, subsequent sections parse how technological shifts, policy environments, and procurement models are reshaping requirements and vendor selection criteria.

A clear throughline of this analysis is the interplay between risk reduction and business enablement. Identity solutions are evaluated not just for their ability to stop breaches but for how they enable frictionless user journeys, support cloud-native architectures, and provide auditable trails for regulators and auditors. This framing sets expectations for leaders seeking to align security investments with measurable business outcomes.

How cloud-native architectures, evolving threat patterns, and regulatory expectations are driving a composable and privacy-aware transformation of identity and access management

The landscape of identity and access management is experiencing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, operational, and regulatory imperatives. Cloud-native application architectures and the proliferation of APIs have eroded traditional network perimeters, necessitating identity controls that travel with workloads and users across environments. Concurrently, the adoption of service mesh, container orchestration, and serverless computing demands identity solutions that integrate natively into CI/CD pipelines and runtime platforms.

Operational models are changing as well: security and identity teams are moving from monolithic appliance-based architectures toward modular, composable services that can be consumed from multiple deployment models. This enables organizations to adopt phased Zero Trust journeys, where identity federation, adaptive authentication, and granular authorization policies are introduced incrementally yet remain interoperable. At the same time, threat landscapes are evolving; identity-based attacks such as credential stuffing, account takeover, and lateral movement via compromised privileged accounts require a combination of behavioral analytics, continuous authentication, and robust privileged access controls.

Regulatory scrutiny and privacy expectations are also influencing architecture and data handling choices. Cross-border data transfer rules, sector-specific compliance obligations, and evolving consumer privacy regimes are prompting organizations to reconsider where identity data is stored, how consent is captured, and how identity signals are correlated for fraud detection without violating privacy constraints. These transformative shifts collectively push architects and security leaders to prioritize extensible, privacy-preserving, and context-aware identity platforms.

Assessing the operational and procurement implications of tariff volatility and trade policy changes on identity platform sourcing, architecture, and deployment strategies

The interplay between tariff policy changes and the technology supply chain can materially affect procurement strategies and implementation scheduling, particularly for organizations with geographically distributed procurement or integrated hardware and software stacks. Tariff shifts may alter sourcing choices for on-premise appliances, hardware security modules, or bundled systems that include specialized authentication devices. Procurement teams are therefore reassessing total cost of ownership by factoring in potential trade-related duties, logistics complexity, and supplier diversification to mitigate supply-chain exposure.

Moreover, tariffs can prompt accelerated migration to cloud or hybrid models when cross-border hardware acquisition becomes less predictable or more expensive. Cloud-based delivery reduces the need for physical hardware shipments and can provide a buffer against tariff volatility, though it introduces other operational considerations such as data residency and vendor lock-in. In addition, tariffs that increase costs for specific components may intensify the market focus on software-defined and platform-agnostic identity capabilities that can be deployed across heterogeneous environments without dependency on proprietary hardware.

For technology strategy leaders, the cumulative effect of tariff changes in 2025 underscores the importance of flexible architecture choices, contractual protections with suppliers, and contingency planning. Risk-managed sourcing and an emphasis on cloud-native and software-centric identity components can reduce exposure to trade-related disruptions while preserving the ability to meet security, compliance, and performance objectives.

Strategic segmentation insights that match component capabilities, deployment models, organizational scale, and vertical demands to practical identity architecture and procurement choices

Key segmentation insights illuminate where technology choices, procurement criteria, and implementation tactics diverge across component, deployment model, organization size, and vertical dimensions. When examining the component landscape-Customer Identity Access Management, Identity Access Management, Multi Factor Authentication, and Privileged Access Management-each category addresses distinct risk vectors and user experience goals; CIAM investments prioritize scalable authentication and consent management for external users, IAM centers on workforce lifecycle and directory integration, MFA provides adaptive assurance for transactions and sessions, and PAM secures administrative credentials and session activity for high-risk systems.

Deployment choices-Cloud, Hybrid Cloud, and On Premise-directly influence integration velocity and operational overhead. Cloud-native deployments accelerate time to value and offload infrastructure management, hybrid models enable phased transitions while preserving legacy investments, and on-premise options remain relevant where data residency, latency, or regulatory constraints mandate local control. Organization size also shapes needs: Large Enterprises require extensive role-based governance, complex federation, and fine-grained segregation of duties across global business units, while Small and Medium Businesses often prioritize turnkey solutions with simplified administration and predictable operational costs.

Vertical-specific requirements further refine product fit and prioritization. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance demand strong auditability, transaction-level fraud detection, and regulatory alignment. Government agencies emphasize identity assurance levels, strong credentialing, and interoperability with national identity frameworks. Healthcare organizations balance patient privacy with care-team collaboration workflows, necessitating secure, auditable access patterns. Information Technology and Telecom customers focus on scale and API security to support developer ecosystems, whereas Retail emphasizes consumer experience, rapid onboarding, and fraud mitigation during high-volume transactional periods. Synthesizing these segmentation vectors helps leaders select architectures and vendors that align with their operational constraints and risk tolerance.

Regional considerations and deployment nuances that influence vendor selection, data residency decisions, and identity program governance across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics shape technology adoption patterns, regulatory pressures, and go-to-market approaches in ways that materially affect strategy and execution. In the Americas, organizations frequently prioritize rapid cloud adoption, a strong emphasis on digital customer experiences, and innovation in fraud detection, while regulatory frameworks encourage robust data protection and incident disclosure practices. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and cross-border data protection regimes drive careful attention to data residency and consent management, and many public-sector programs emphasize interoperability and identity assurance for citizen services.

In Asia-Pacific, the market is characterized by a blend of advanced cloud adoption in some markets and pronounced on-premise or hybrid preferences in others; regional diversity leads to a wide variation in deployment models and vendor selection criteria. Asia-Pacific also demonstrates high mobile-first adoption patterns and large-scale consumer identity challenges in retail and fintech verticals, encouraging flexible CIAM architectures capable of handling massive concurrent authentication events. Across regions, channel strategies, partner ecosystems, and local compliance expectations influence implementation timelines and vendor partnerships, with multinational organizations typically opting for modular, multi-region architectures that balance global standards with localized controls.

Understanding these regional nuances enables security and procurement leaders to align vendor selection, data residency strategies, and operational governance with the legal and cultural expectations of each geography, thereby reducing friction during deployment and ensuring sustainable program governance.

How a mix of enterprise platforms, cloud-native entrants, specialized authentication vendors, and integrators shape vendor selection and long-term integration risk in identity programs

The competitive landscape in identity management is defined by a mix of established enterprise platforms, cloud-native challengers, specialized authentication providers, and systems integrators that translate product capabilities into operational programs. Established platforms typically offer breadth across workforce IAM, MFA, and privileged access capabilities, and they remain attractive to organizations seeking consolidated governance, extensive integration ecosystems, and mature support frameworks. Cloud-native providers bring agility through API-first architectures, rapid feature delivery, and native integrations with major public-cloud providers, which can simplify adoption for organizations pursuing cloud-first strategies.

Specialized vendors play an essential role by focusing on high-assurance authentication, behavioral analytics, or privileged session management; these niche capabilities are often consumed alongside broader platforms to fill capability gaps or to provide enhanced controls for critical use cases. Systems integrators and managed service providers are equally important, particularly where organizations require help with identity strategy, complex migration, or ongoing operations such as identity lifecycle management and managed PAM services.

For procurement and architecture teams, the key insight is to prioritize interoperability, open standards, and a clear roadmap for extensibility. Evaluating vendors through the lens of integration APIs, data portability, and support for flexible deployment models reduces long-term risk and preserves the ability to incorporate best-of-breed capabilities as requirements evolve.

Actionable strategic and procurement recommendations for leaders to modernize identity controls through phased adoption, interoperable standards, and governance automation

Industry leaders should adopt a deliberate, phased approach to identity modernization that balances quick wins with foundational architecture work. Begin by articulating desired business outcomes and the specific use cases that will demonstrate value early-such as reducing privileged account sprawl, eliminating high-risk shared credentials, or streamlining consumer onboarding-then map those outcomes to measurable KPIs and governance checkpoints. Prioritize interoperable standards, such as OAuth, OpenID Connect, and SCIM, to ensure that components for CIAM, IAM, MFA, and PAM can be integrated without vendor lock-in.

Adopt a hybrid-first mindset for migration pathways: leverage cloud-native services where governance and data residency permit, but maintain hybrid or on-premise options for systems with strict latency or regulatory constraints. Elevate identity governance by formalizing role and entitlement reviews, implementing least-privilege policies, and automating lifecycle processes to reduce manual errors. Invest in adaptive authentication that uses contextual signals to minimize user friction while raising assurance where risk indicators are present.

Finally, develop procurement strategies that include contractual protections for supply-chain changes, including tariff and trade volatility, while specifying integration SLAs and data portability clauses. Combine vendor evaluations with proof-of-concept pilots that verify integration with critical toolchains and measure operational overhead. By aligning technical modernization with governance, procurement flexibility, and measurable outcomes, leaders reduce implementation risk and accelerate the realization of security and business benefits.

A rigorous multi-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical briefings, regulatory analysis, and case-study validation to ensure practical, vendor-neutral insights

This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs through a multi-method approach designed to triangulate findings and ensure relevance to practitioners and decision-makers. Primary inputs include structured interviews with security and identity leaders across enterprise, public-sector, and SMB contexts, as well as technical briefings with solution architects and integrators that have executed migrations across cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments. These conversations provide first-hand perspectives on operational constraints, vendor performance, and integration trade-offs.

Secondary research draws on publicly available regulatory texts, technology whitepapers, product documentation, and peer-reviewed academic literature to ground technical claims in verifiable standards and best practices. The analysis also incorporates case-study validation, where anonymized deployment experiences are synthesized to highlight lessons learned, common pitfalls, and success factors. Across all inputs, findings are validated through cross-referencing and peer review by practitioners to reduce bias and enhance applicability.

Methodologically, the research emphasizes reproducibility and transparency: segmentation criteria are applied consistently across component, deployment model, organization size, and vertical dimensions, and the implications of regional regulatory environments are explicitly documented. Where applicable, technical evaluations focus on standards compliance, integration capabilities, and operational requirements rather than promotional claims, ensuring that recommendations remain vendor-neutral and actionable.

A concluding synthesis emphasizing pragmatic, segmented, and regionally aware identity modernization that balances security, compliance, and user experience imperatives

In conclusion, identity management sits at the nexus of security, compliance, and user experience, and it is indispensable for any credible Zero Trust program. The evolution toward cloud-native, API-driven architectures and the rise of identity-centric threat vectors require solutions that are composable, privacy-conscious, and operationally sustainable. Decision-makers must therefore evaluate identity platforms not only on feature parity but on their ability to integrate, scale, and adapt alongside evolving regulatory and operational constraints.

Segmentation considerations-across component specializations, deployment models, organization size, and vertical needs-should drive tailored strategies rather than one-size-fits-all buys. Regional nuances further demand that leaders balance global controls with localized implementation to meet jurisdictional requirements and customer expectations. By following a staged modernization approach, emphasizing interoperability and governance automation, organizations can strengthen their security posture while minimizing disruption to business operations.

Ultimately, the most effective path forward is a pragmatic one: combine targeted pilots and proof-of-concepts with clear governance and procurement guardrails, and maintain an architecture that is flexible enough to incorporate emerging capabilities without sacrificing control or compliance.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Customer Identity Access Management
  • 8.2. Identity Access Management
  • 8.3. Multi Factor Authentication
  • 8.4. Privileged Access Management

9. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Deployment Model

  • 9.1. Cloud
  • 9.2. Hybrid Cloud
  • 9.3. On Premise

10. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Vertical

  • 10.1. Banking Financial Services And Insurance
  • 10.2. Government
  • 10.3. Healthcare
  • 10.4. Information Technology And Telecom
  • 10.5. Retail

11. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Region

  • 11.1. Americas
    • 11.1.1. North America
    • 11.1.2. Latin America
  • 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 11.2.1. Europe
    • 11.2.2. Middle East
    • 11.2.3. Africa
  • 11.3. Asia-Pacific

12. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Group

  • 12.1. ASEAN
  • 12.2. GCC
  • 12.3. European Union
  • 12.4. BRICS
  • 12.5. G7
  • 12.6. NATO

13. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Country

  • 13.1. United States
  • 13.2. Canada
  • 13.3. Mexico
  • 13.4. Brazil
  • 13.5. United Kingdom
  • 13.6. Germany
  • 13.7. France
  • 13.8. Russia
  • 13.9. Italy
  • 13.10. Spain
  • 13.11. China
  • 13.12. India
  • 13.13. Japan
  • 13.14. Australia
  • 13.15. South Korea

14. United States Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market

15. China Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 16.5. Broadcom Inc
  • 16.6. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 16.7. CyberArk Software Ltd.
  • 16.8. Delinea Corporation
  • 16.9. Forcepoint
  • 16.10. ForgeRock, Inc.
  • 16.11. International Business Machines Corporation
  • 16.12. Microsoft Corporation
  • 16.13. Okta, Inc.
  • 16.14. Ping Identity Holding Corp.
  • 16.15. SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CUSTOMER IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CUSTOMER IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CUSTOMER IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVILEGED ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVILEGED ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVILEGED ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID CLOUD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID CLOUD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID CLOUD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ON PREMISE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ON PREMISE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ON PREMISE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)