查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1909194

生物基凝聚劑市場按產品類型、應用、最終用戶和分銷管道分類－2026-2032年全球預測

Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market by Product Type, Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 196 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2025 年，生物基凝聚劑市場價值將達到 10.7 億美元，到 2026 年將成長至 11.4 億美元，到 2032 年將達到 18.2 億美元，複合年成長率為 7.82%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2025 10.7億美元
預計年份：2026年 11.4億美元
預測年份 2032 18.2億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 7.82%

本文權威概述了永續性、監管和性能要求如何重塑生物基凝聚劑的優先事項和配方策略。

隨著環境、監管和性能方面的要求日益趨同，生物基凝聚劑領域正在經歷根本性的變革。凝聚劑在塗料系統中發揮著至關重要的作用，它們能夠促進成膜、改善流動性和光滑度，並調控蒸發特性。然而，隨著永續性成為配方師和製造商的首要考慮因素，該行業正逐步從傳統的溶劑型化學品轉向可再生、低毒性的替代品，以維持或提升最終用戶的性能。

生物基化學的進步、監管壓力和買家偏好如何融合，將加速凝聚劑生態系統的轉型？

近年來，技術、法規和市場行為的變革性變化重新調整了整個塗料價值鏈的優先事項。在技​​術方面，生物基原料轉化和綠色溶劑設計的進步使得凝聚劑的開發成為可能，這些絮凝劑在水性和溶劑型系統中均具有相近的蒸發速率、溶解度和相容性，同時也能減少有害成分。同時，毒性篩檢和環境歸趨分析技術的普及應用，也促進了產品開發的快速改善和風險降低。

近期關稅正在重組供應鏈，鼓勵製造業回流，並引導籌資策略朝向更具韌性和本地化的在地採購。

美國的政策和關稅措施對凝聚劑生產商和下游混煉企業的原料流動和策略採購決策產生了重大影響。關稅不僅影響進口中間體的到岸成本，也獎勵將某些生產過程遷回國內、推動垂直整合，並加強供應商與本地生產商之間的合作。因此，籌資策略變得更加多元化，風險意識也更強。

本文從綜合細分觀點，闡述了產品化學性質、應用需求、終端用戶需求和分銷管道趨勢如何相互作用，從而影響凝聚劑的開發和應用。

了解市場動態需要理解產品、應用、終端用戶和分銷管道細分如何相互作用，從而影響需求推動要素和創新重點。從產品觀點來看，乙二醇醚和丙二醇醚具有不同的性質。乙二醇醚通常具有更強的溶解性，並提供更快的揮發窗口，適用於某些溶劑型系統；而丙二醇醚揮發性較低，通常具有更好的健康和安全特性，與水性塗料和低VOC目標相兼容。這些固有的差異會影響配方師的選擇標準以及針對特定最終用途的塗料技術最佳化。

分析區域差異，重點闡述美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太市場在管理體制、供應鏈和終端用戶優先事項方面的差異

區域趨勢對生物基凝聚劑產業的技術應用、監管合規性和供應鏈結構有著深遠的影響。在美洲，需求模式反映了先進的工業塗料基礎設施和消費者對室內空氣品質的高度關注，這兩者共同推動了對低毒性、高性能凝聚劑的需求。政策環境和州級措施進一步影響採購慣例和供應商選擇，而北美和南美原料生產商的接近性也會影響原物料採購決策。

現有化學品供應商、專業創新企業和合作夥伴關係如何透過永續性、規模和技術差異化創造競爭優勢

競爭格局的特點是既有傳統化學品製造商，也有特種溶劑製造商，以及新興的生物基創新企業。傳統企業利用其規模、全球供應鏈網路和深厚的技術專長，維持廣泛的產品系列，不斷改進產品以降低危害，並確保向大規模配方商持續供應產品。他們通常會投資於中試規模的生物基成分計劃和內部測試能力，以檢驗其性能優於傳統化學品。

為製造商和供應商提供實際的策略行動，以檢驗技術、實現供應鏈多元化，並透過有針對性的商業化和監管應對措施加速技術普及。

為了充分利用向生物基凝聚劑轉型帶來的機遇，產業領導者應採取協作策略，並專注於技術檢驗、供應鏈韌性和市場教育。首先，應投資進行嚴格的應用測試和毒性篩檢，以支持性能和安全性聲明。在成膜性、黏附性和耐久性等關鍵指標上證明其等效性或優越性，將加速專業配方師的接受度；而檢驗的危害降低，則能引起相關人員和眼光獨到的消費者的共鳴。

我們多方面的研究框架結合了專家訪談、監管審查、供應鏈映射和技術檢驗，以支持可靠的見解和可操作的結果。

我們的研究途徑結合了定性和定量方法，以全面了解產品、應用、終端用戶和分銷管道的動態。主要研究包括對多個地區的配方科學家、採購經理和分銷合作夥伴進行結構化訪談，以獲取有關性能要求、採購限制和決策標準的第一手資訊。此外，我們還與化學專家進行了技術訪談，檢驗基於化學的性能指標和毒性考慮。

一份簡潔的綜合分析強調了透過檢驗績效、穩健採購和有針對性的商業化，將永續性轉化為競爭優勢的必要性。

向生物基凝聚劑的轉型反映了塗料產業更廣泛的變革，永續性、安全性和性能正融合成為產品策略的核心決定因素。將技術創新與嚴格的檢驗、靈活的採購和清晰的溝通相結合的相關人員，將更有利於掌握監管變化和消費者偏好轉變帶來的機會。同時，那些延遲投資於替代技術研發和供應鏈韌性的企業，則可能面臨更長的認證週期和更高的轉型成本。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

  • 研究設計
  • 研究框架
  • 市場規模預測
  • 數據三角測量
  • 調查結果
  • 調查前提
  • 調查限制

第3章執行摘要

  • 首席主管觀點
  • 市場規模和成長趨勢
  • 2025年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2025
  • 新的商機
  • 下一代經營模式
  • 產業藍圖

第4章 市場概覽

  • 產業生態系與價值鏈分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市場展望
  • 上市策略

第5章 市場洞察

  • 消費者洞察與終端用戶觀點
  • 消費者體驗基準
  • 機會地圖
  • 分銷通路分析
  • 價格趨勢分析
  • 監理合規和標準框架
  • ESG與永續性分析
  • 中斷和風險情景
  • 投資報酬率和成本效益分析

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 生物基凝聚劑市場（依產品類型分類）

  • 乙二醇醚
  • 丙二醇醚

9. 生物基凝聚劑市場（依應用領域分類）

  • 建築塗料
    • 溶劑型
    • 水溶液
  • 汽車修理漆
  • 工業塗料
  • 木器漆
    • 戶外木漆
    • 室內木漆

第10章 生物基凝聚劑市場（依最終用戶分類）

  • DIY
  • 專業的

第11章 生物基凝聚劑市場（依通路分類）

  • 直銷
  • 經銷商
  • 線上零售

第12章 生物基凝聚劑市場（依地區分類）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 生物基凝聚劑市場（依類別分類）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第14章 各國生物基凝聚劑市場概況

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第15章美國生物基凝聚劑市場

第16章：中國生物基凝聚劑市場

第17章 競爭格局

  • 市場集中度分析，2025年
    • 濃度比（CR）
    • 赫芬達爾-赫希曼指數 (HHI)
  • 近期趨勢及影響分析，2025 年
  • 2025年產品系列分析
  • 基準分析，2025 年
  • ADDAPT Chemicals BV
  • Arkema Group
  • BASF SE
  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Celanese Corporation
  • Chemoxy International Limited
  • Croda International Plc
  • Dow Inc.
  • Eastman Chemical Company
  • Elementis Plc
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Hallstar Company
  • Patcham Limited
  • Stepan Company
  • Synthomer Plc
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13920

The Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market was valued at USD 1.07 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.14 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.82%, reaching USD 1.82 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 1.07 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 1.14 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 1.82 billion
CAGR (%) 7.82%

An authoritative overview of how sustainability, regulation, and performance demands are reshaping bio-based coalescing agent priorities and formulation strategies

The bio-based coalescing agent landscape is undergoing a fundamental redefinition driven by converging environmental, regulatory, and performance imperatives. Coalescing agents play a critical role in coating systems by enabling film formation, improving flow and leveling, and balancing evaporation profiles; however, as formulators and manufacturers place greater emphasis on sustainability, the industry is shifting from traditional solvent-based chemistries toward renewable, low-toxicity alternatives that preserve or enhance end-use performance.

In practice, this means that researchers, R&D teams, and procurement professionals are evaluating ethylene glycol ethers and propylene glycol ethers not only for their functional properties but also for life-cycle attributes, toxicity profiles, and compatibility with waterborne formulations. The transition is spurred by tighter regulatory scrutiny on volatile organic compounds and worker exposure, as well as by customer demand for greener coatings solutions. Consequently, product development roadmaps increasingly prioritize bio-derived feedstocks, reduced hazard classifications, and improved biodegradability while maintaining critical performance metrics for architectural, industrial, and wood coatings.

Transition pathways are complex and require coordinated action across formulation scientists, raw material suppliers, and distributors. As stakeholders navigate these challenges, understanding the technical trade-offs, supply chain constraints, and end-user expectations becomes essential to making informed decisions that reconcile sustainability targets with operational realities.

How converging advances in bio-feedstock chemistry, regulatory pressure, and buyer preferences are accelerating transformation across the coalescing agent ecosystem

Recent years have seen transformative shifts across technology, regulation, and market behavior that are realigning priorities across the coatings value chain. On the technology front, advances in bio-feedstock conversion and green solvent design are enabling coalescing agents that reduce hazardous constituents while delivering comparable evaporation rates, solvency, and compatibility with both waterborne and solventborne systems. In parallel, analytical techniques for toxicity screening and environmental fate are more accessible, allowing faster iteration and risk mitigation in product development.

Regulatory momentum is reinforcing these technological shifts. Heightened focus on worker safety, indoor air quality, and life-cycle impacts has accelerated restrictions on certain glycol ethers and solvent classes, prompting suppliers to reformulate or withdraw high-risk products. Manufacturers are responding by prioritizing compliance-ready chemistries that facilitate market access in jurisdictions with stringent chemical policies.

Market behavior is evolving as well. End users are increasingly sensitive to product labels and ingredient transparency, and professional applicators are seeking products that balance health considerations with application performance. Distribution ecosystems are adapting, with direct-sales models growing alongside traditional distributor networks and digital channels, enabling more rapid introduction of new bio-based options and direct engagement with buyers. Collectively, these shifts are driving faster cycles of innovation and raising the bar for demonstrable sustainability outcomes.

How recent tariff implementations are reshaping supply chains, prompting reshoring initiatives, and driving procurement strategies toward resilience and local sourcing

Policy actions and tariff measures in the United States have exerted significant influence on raw material flows and strategic sourcing decisions for coalescing agent manufacturers and downstream formulators. Tariffs affect not only the landed cost of imported intermediates but also incentivize reshoring of certain production steps, vertical integration, and closer partnerships between suppliers and regional manufacturers. As a result, procurement strategies are becoming more diversified and risk-aware.

In response, some manufacturers are expanding domestic production capacity or qualifying alternative feedstocks to reduce exposure to tariff-induced volatility. These adjustments can lead to greater supply chain resilience, but they also create transitional costs as contracts are renegotiated and logistics are reconfigured. Furthermore, the tariff landscape catalyzes innovation in product design that prioritizes locally sourced inputs and modular process technologies which are less susceptible to cross-border trade disruption.

At the same time, the tariffs have prompted downstream players, including architectural and industrial coatings producers, to reassess formulation baselines and cost structures. Increased attention to supplier relationships and long-term agreements has emerged as a stabilizing tactic, alongside investments in substitution research to identify bio-based coalescers that can be procured through unaffected channels. These strategic adaptations underscore a broader industry emphasis on balancing cost control, regulatory compliance, and continuity of supply.

An integrated segmentation perspective explaining how product chemistries, application demands, end-user needs, and channel dynamics jointly inform coalescing agent development and adoption

Understanding market dynamics requires an appreciation of how product, application, end-user, and distribution segmentation interact to shape demand drivers and innovation priorities. From a product perspective, ethylene glycol ethers and propylene glycol ethers present distinct property profiles: ethylene variants generally offer stronger solvency and faster evaporation windows suitable for specific solventborne systems, whereas propylene glycol ethers often provide lower volatility and a more favorable health and safety profile that aligns with waterborne formulations and lower-VOC objectives. These intrinsic differences influence formulators' selection criteria and the technical optimization of coatings across end uses.

Application segmentation further clarifies performance expectations and regulatory constraints. Architectural coatings demand coalescing agents that balance appearance, durability, and indoor air quality; within that space, solventborne architectural finishes prioritize rapid film formation where solvent-handling infrastructure exists, while waterborne architectural products emphasize low-odor and low-toxicity solutions compatible with modern building standards. Automotive refinish coatings require rapid film set, excellent flow and leveling, and compatibility with diverse substrate pretreatments, placing high demands on coalescing agent selection. Industrial coatings focus on long-term durability under varying environmental and chemical exposures, while wood coatings distinguish between exterior products that must resist weathering and interior formulations that must meet indoor air quality expectations.

End-user segmentation-DIY versus professional-introduces different tolerance thresholds for application complexity and product labeling. DIY consumers frequently prioritize ease of use, low odor, and clear labeling, which drives demand for waterborne and low-VOC options with simplified application instructions. Professional applicators, in contrast, place a premium on performance consistency, speed of cure, and compatibility with established processes, often accepting trade-offs that favor productivity and durability.

Distribution channel segmentation also shapes market access and adoption timing. Direct sales enable closer collaboration between suppliers and large formulators, facilitating custom development and volume contracting. Distributors expand reach to small and medium formulators and regional coaters, providing logistical support and technical advisory services. Online retail opens new avenues for DIY-targeted formulations and small-batch specialty products, accelerating market feedback loops and enabling rapid testing of novel bio-based coalescing agent claims. Together, these segmentation lenses provide an integrated framework for anticipating product development trajectories and commercial strategies.

A nuanced regional analysis highlighting how regulatory regimes, supply chains, and end-user priorities differ across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets

Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on technology adoption, regulatory compliance, and supply chain configuration across the bio-based coalescing agent landscape. In the Americas, demand patterns reflect a strong mix of advanced industrial coatings infrastructure and consumer sensitivity to indoor air quality, which together drive interest in low-toxicity, high-performance coalescers. Policy environments and state-level initiatives further shape procurement practices and supplier selection, and proximity to feedstock producers in North and South America can influence raw material sourcing decisions.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex regulatory mosaic with some of the most rigorous chemical management regimes globally. Compliance requirements and sustainability mandates encourage rapid adoption of bio-derived chemistries and comprehensive hazard assessments, and there is a pronounced emphasis on circularity and reporting transparency. Market fragmentation across the region requires nuanced go-to-market strategies that account for varying application preferences and distribution networks.

The Asia-Pacific region combines large-scale production capacity with rapidly evolving demand, particularly in construction and industrial sectors. Growth in urbanization and infrastructure projects sustains robust consumption of architectural and industrial coatings, while regulatory frameworks in various economies are increasingly prioritizing emissions reductions and worker safety. Local manufacturing ecosystems and proximity to feedstock suppliers influence competitive dynamics, and the region is a hotspot for formulation innovation and cost-driven product differentiation.

Across these regions, supply chain topology, regulatory priorities, and end-user expectations interact to form distinct market archetypes. For stakeholders, this means that product positioning, compliance strategies, and partnership choices must be tailored to regional realities to achieve effective market penetration and operational resilience.

How incumbent chemical suppliers, specialty innovators, and collaborative partnerships are shaping competitive differentiation through sustainability, scale, and technical differentiation

The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established chemical manufacturers, specialty solvent producers, and emerging bio-based innovators. Established players leverage scale, global supply networks, and deep technical expertise to maintain broad product portfolios, drive incremental improvements in hazard reduction, and ensure continuity of supply for large formulators. They often invest in pilot-scale bio-feedstock projects and in-house testing capabilities to validate performance against legacy chemistries.

Specialty producers and startups, on the other hand, focus on differentiated value propositions such as novel green chemistries, lower toxicity profiles, and rapid time-to-market for niche applications. These companies frequently pursue strategic partnerships with coatings formulators to co-develop application-specific solutions and to accelerate adoption through targeted field trials. Collaboration with contract manufacturers and toll processors is also common as a means of scaling production without large capital outlays.

Across the spectrum, leading companies are increasingly emphasizing transparency, certification, and evidence-based claims. They invest in third-party testing, publish material safety and environmental data, and engage in joint development agreements with downstream customers. Intellectual property around specific bio-conversion processes, solvent blends, and formulation compatibilizers represents key competitive differentiation, and companies that combine robust R&D pipelines with flexible manufacturing and responsive distribution channels tend to achieve greater traction in the market.

Practical strategic actions for manufacturers and suppliers to validate technology, diversify supply chains, and accelerate adoption through targeted commercialization and regulatory engagement

To capitalize on the transition toward bio-based coalescing agents, industry leaders should pursue a coordinated strategy that emphasizes technology validation, supply chain resilience, and market education. First, invest in rigorous application testing and toxicological screening to substantiate performance and safety claims. Demonstrated equivalence or superiority in key metrics such as film formation, adhesion, and durability will accelerate acceptance among professional formulators, while validated reductions in hazard profiles will resonate with regulatory stakeholders and discerning consumers.

Second, diversify sourcing and consider nearshoring or multi-source contracts to reduce exposure to trade disruptions and tariff volatility. Building strategic partnerships with regional feedstock producers and leveraging toll manufacturing can provide flexibility without excessive capital commitment. Third, prioritize transparency and documentation: publish detailed technical dossiers, environmental fate studies, and guidance for formulators to shorten qualification cycles.

Fourth, tailor go-to-market approaches by customer segment. For DIY channels, emphasize ease of use, odor reduction, and clear labeling through e-commerce platforms and retail partnerships. For professional and industrial accounts, offer technical support, formulation services, and volume-based agreements that reduce adoption friction. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and standards bodies to shape pragmatic compliance frameworks and to gain early insight into evolving requirements. Collectively, these actions will enable organizations to convert sustainability intent into commercially viable product portfolios and resilient operations.

A multi-method research framework combining expert interviews, regulatory review, supply chain mapping, and technical validation to underpin robust insights and actionable findings

The research approach combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to deliver a holistic understanding of product, application, end-user, and channel dynamics. Primary research involved structured interviews with formulation scientists, procurement leaders, and distribution partners across multiple regions to capture first-hand perspectives on performance requirements, sourcing constraints, and decision criteria. These conversations were supplemented with technical interviews with subject-matter experts to validate chemistry-specific performance metrics and toxicity considerations.

Secondary research encompassed a thorough review of regulatory documentation, patent literature, technical bulletins, and publicly available environmental and safety data sheets to triangulate product claims and identify shifts in compliance expectations. Supply chain analysis mapped typical raw material flows, logistics considerations, and potential points of friction, while case study analysis examined recent reformulation efforts and successful market introductions to identify replicable best practices.

Data validation relied on cross-referencing multiple independent sources, reconciling discrepancies through follow-up expert consultation, and performing sensitivity checks on qualitative interpretations. Segmentation mapping ensured that product performance attributes were linked to specific application needs, end-user tolerances, and distribution channel requirements. Throughout, the methodology prioritized transparency and traceability so that conclusions are grounded in verifiable evidence and practitioner insight.

A concise synthesis underscoring the imperative for validated performance, resilient sourcing, and targeted commercialization to convert sustainability into competitive advantage

The shift toward bio-based coalescing agents reflects a broader evolution in the coatings industry where sustainability, safety, and performance converge as core determinants of product strategy. Stakeholders who align technical innovation with rigorous validation, adaptable sourcing, and clear communication will be best positioned to capture the opportunities created by changing regulation and buyer preferences. At the same time, those who delay investments in substitution research and supply chain resilience risk facing longer qualification cycles and higher transition costs.

Strategic differentiation will come from the ability to demonstrate measurable reductions in hazard profile without sacrificing key application performance metrics, and from the agility to tailor solutions across architectural, automotive, industrial, and wood coating segments. Success will also depend on channel strategy: brands that effectively match product attributes to end-user expectations and distribution mechanics will accelerate adoption and build durable market advantage.

In summary, the road ahead requires a balanced approach that integrates scientific rigor, commercial pragmatism, and proactive regulatory engagement. Organizations that adopt this perspective can transform sustainability imperatives into competitive strengths and drive the next generation of high-performance, lower-risk coating solutions.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Ethylene Glycol Ethers
  • 8.2. Propylene Glycol Ethers

9. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Application

  • 9.1. Architectural Coatings
    • 9.1.1. Solventborne
    • 9.1.2. Waterborne
  • 9.2. Automotive Refinish Coatings
  • 9.3. Industrial Coatings
  • 9.4. Wood Coatings
    • 9.4.1. Exterior Wood Coatings
    • 9.4.2. Interior Wood Coatings

10. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by End User

  • 10.1. DIY
  • 10.2. Professional

11. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 11.1. Direct Sales
  • 11.2. Distributors
  • 11.3. Online Retail

12. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market

16. China Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ADDAPT Chemicals B.V.
  • 17.6. Arkema Group
  • 17.7. BASF SE
  • 17.8. Cargill, Incorporated
  • 17.9. Celanese Corporation
  • 17.10. Chemoxy International Limited
  • 17.11. Croda International Plc
  • 17.12. Dow Inc.
  • 17.13. Eastman Chemical Company
  • 17.14. Elementis Plc
  • 17.15. Evonik Industries AG
  • 17.16. Hallstar Company
  • 17.17. Patcham Limited
  • 17.18. Stepan Company
  • 17.19. Synthomer Plc

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENTBORNE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENTBORNE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENTBORNE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WATERBORNE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WATERBORNE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WATERBORNE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY EXTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY EXTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY EXTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)