![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1864200
區塊儲存市場:2025-2032 年全球預測(按部署類型、元件、儲存媒體類型、通訊協定類型、應用、垂直產業和組織規模分類)Block Storage Market by Deployment Type, Component, Storage Media Type, Protocol Type, Application, Industry Vertical, Organization Size - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
預計到 2032 年,塊儲存市場規模將達到 772.6 億美元,複合年成長率為 18.28%。
| 關鍵市場統計數據 | |
|---|---|
| 基準年 2024 | 201.6億美元 |
| 預計年份:2025年 | 238.2億美元 |
| 預測年份 2032 | 772.6億美元 |
| 複合年成長率 (%) | 18.28% |
區塊儲存領域正處於不斷演變的應用需求、硬體創新和營運優先順序的交匯點,所有這些因素都在塑造企業的基礎架構策略。在最近的周期中,企業已不再局限於單一維度的儲存選擇,而是採用能夠平衡效能目標、成本控制和可管理性的架構。因此,儲存決策者越來越關注延遲、吞吐量、彈性以及總體擁有成本 (TCO) 之間的權衡,同時也會考慮與運算和網路領域的整合。
本報告整合了產業趨勢和實踐者的觀點,為經營團隊決策提供簡潔明了的基礎。報告重點闡述了虛擬化、事務處理和資料分析等現代工作負載如何對 I/O 模式和彈性提出細緻入微的要求。此外,報告還闡明了專業服務服務和託管服務對部署速度和營運風險的影響。透過圍繞實際優先順序和技術限制展開討論,報告引言部分有助於領導者優先考慮能夠使儲存能力與更廣泛的業務目標相契合的投資。
在軟體創新、硬體加速和應用架構變革的驅動下,區塊儲存正經歷一系列變革。軟體定義控制將管理與專有陣列解耦,從而實現策略驅動的自動化和更豐富的遙測數據,有助於容量規劃和效能調優。同時,基於 NVMe 的架構和 SSD 效能的進步不斷突破延遲和吞吐量的極限,迫使架構師重新設計資料路徑以應對高並發工作負載。
同時,雲端原生設計模式正使儲存更具彈性並更加 API 驅動,從而推動本地系統與公共雲端服務互通的混合模式。這種轉變有利於那些能夠實現無縫資料遷移和一致營運模式的解決方案。此外,儲存與簡介、複製和隨線分析等資訊服務之間更緊密的整合,為應用程式擁有者提供了降低複雜性並加快洞察獲取速度的機會。這些變化有利於那些提供模組化、以軟體為中心的堆疊和服務主導參與模式的供應商,同時也迫使買家重新思考採購方式、生命週期管理和技能發展。
2025年美國關稅浪潮正對採購、尋源和供應商供應鏈造成新的限制,並對倉儲專案產生連鎖反應。採購團隊正透過供應商多元化和加快替代零件及組件的認證來應對,以降低單一地點風險。這種轉變促使企業更加重視供應商在尋源、前置作業時間以及製造和組裝地點地理分佈方面的透明度。
從策略角度來看,各組織已重新審視合約條款和庫存策略,以因應關稅帶來的成本波動。這些措施包括盡可能協商長期價格保證、制定靈活的採購條款,以及尋找本地組裝和經紀合作夥伴,以減輕關稅的影響。營運團隊也在調整維護和備件策略,以確保在更換週期延長的情況下業務連續性。同時,研發和產品規劃團隊正在評估設計變更,透過最佳化材料清單和從免稅或受影響較小的地區採購零件來降低關稅風險。因此,關稅環境強化了加強供應鏈韌性和將採購風險納入倉儲投資決策的商業必要性。
細分市場分析揭示了不同供應商在部署類型、組件、介質、通訊協定、應用、垂直行業和組織規模等維度上的採用模式和獨特價值提案。部署選項涵蓋了從結合公共雲端雲和私有雲端的混合雲端方案,到優先考慮控制和合規性的本地部署和私有雲端環境,再到優先考慮彈性和託管服務的公共雲端模式。組件細分錶明,硬體採購通常與託管服務和專業服務服務相結合,而透過編配和資訊服務在軟體層面實現差異化正變得越來越重要。
儲存媒體仍然是重要的考慮因素。硬碟仍然廣泛應用於容量密集型應用,而固態硬碟則在效能密集型工作負載中佔據主導地位。從光纖通道、iSCSI、NVMe over Fabrics 到 SAS,通訊協定的選擇反映了工作負載對延遲、吞吐量和操作熟悉度的特定需求。應用需求同樣多種多樣,備份和復原、資料分析、線上交易處理、虛擬化和虛擬桌面基礎架構 (VDI) 等應用程式都各自具有獨特的 I/O 特性和彈性預期。銀行和金融、能源和公共產業、政府和公共部門、醫療保健、IT 和通訊、製造業以及零售等行業都有其特定的行業監管和營運限制,這些限制會影響架構和服務的選擇。最後,不同規模的組織在採購複雜性和風險接受度方面也存在差異。大型企業通常會採用多供應商、多站點架構,並配備內部團隊和廣泛的專業服務,而小型企業則傾向於選擇整合設備和完全託管的解決方案,以降低營運成本。
區域對美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的部署優先事項、監管限制和生態系統趨勢有著深遠的影響。在美洲,採購趨勢強調整體擁有成本和靈活的融資模式,從而推動了對託管服務的強勁需求,以加速遷移並減少人員配置。相較之下,在歐洲、中東和非洲地區,複雜的監管環境(包括資料居住、跨境傳輸考量和嚴格的隱私框架)促使企業選擇強調管治、加密和在地化營運控制的解決方案。
在亞太地區,受快速成長的數位服務和大規模通訊基礎設施部署的推動,對可擴展效能和雲端互通性的需求正在迅速成長。區域供應鏈因素也至關重要,製造地、零件供應和物流等因素都有利於本地化籌資策略。在所有地區,本地整合商與全球供應商之間的夥伴關係會影響採用速度,而區域人才的可用性則決定了高階本地部署的可行性。因此,供應商和買家必須制定能夠反映每個地區特有的監管、商業和生態系統因素相互作用的策略。
為了在競爭激烈的區塊儲存市場中脫穎而出,領先的廠商正著力推動多項策略舉措。這些舉措包括投資開發能夠實現策略驅動型自動化的軟體功能、建立以服務主導的銷售模式,以及拓展夥伴關係以提供整合解決方案。 NVMe 整合、統一控制平面以及簡介編配和複製等高階資訊服務在產品藍圖中的重要性日益凸顯。另一個值得關注的趨勢是將硬體與託管服務和專業服務服務捆綁銷售,以加速產品普及並降低買家風險。
從策略角度來看,在關稅不確定性和採購規範不斷變化的環境下,擁有透明供應鏈實務和靈活授權模式的供應商正在獲得競爭優勢。併購和夥伴關係仍然是快速獲取能力的有效途徑,尤其是在軟體、資料保護和雲端原生編配領域。從市場推廣的角度來看,差異化的通路策略,包括直接面向企業、拓展雲端市場以及增強通路夥伴的能力,將決定產品的覆蓋範圍和市場接受度。最後,能夠提供端到端檢驗、參考架構以及對混合營運模式的強大支援的供應商,在那些將整合和生命週期支援視為重中之重的企業客戶中,更有能力贏得客戶。
產業領導者應優先採取一系列切實可行的行動,將策略意圖轉化為可衡量的成果。首先,透過將工作負載對應到適當的媒體和通訊協定,使儲存採購與應用級需求保持一致。這種一致性既能減少過度配置,又能滿足效能服務等級協定 (SLA)。其次,透過選擇二級供應商、協商靈活的合約條款以及在適當位置維護策略組件庫存,在採購決策中建立供應鏈彈性。第三,透過投資管理和編配工具來簡化操作並提高視覺性,從而在本地和雲端環境中實現一致的策略執行。
領導者還應透過有針對性的培訓和供應商協助的知識轉移來加快技能發展,從而縮短複雜部署的價值實現時間。此外,還應評估從純粹的硬體採購轉向以結果為導向的商業模式(將軟體和服務捆綁在一起)的機會,這可以降低營運風險並協調獎勵。最後,應建立管治框架,包括效能監控、成本歸因和生命週期規劃,以確保儲存投資與不斷變化的業務優先順序和監管要求保持一致。
我們的研究途徑結合了結構化的初步研究和嚴謹的二手研究,以確保研究結果既有實證基礎,也與具體情境相關。初步研究包括對技術領導者、採購專業人員和服務供應商進行深度訪談,以收集有關營運挑戰、採購趨勢和技術優先事項的第一手資訊。這些定性資料輔以有針對性的從業人員調查和匿名案例研究,從而揭示實施模式和供應商選擇標準。
二手研究整合了技術白皮書、產品文獻和已發布的監管指南,以梳理技術能力和合規性限制。分析過程採用三角測量法來協調不同的資料點並檢驗反覆出現的主題,同時進行敏感度檢定以確保結論在各種假設下都具有穩健性。最後,透過反覆的同儕審查和專家檢驗,完善了主題敘述,並確保研究結果能夠反映實際決策情境。這些方法的整合最終形成了調查方法,該方法兼顧了深刻的洞察力和對技術和業務相關人員的實際應用性。
這項綜合分析表明,區塊儲存決策不再僅依賴簡單的容量或尖峰效能指標,而是綜合考慮了應用需求、營運成熟度、供應鏈因素和地理限制等多方面因素。採用以工作負載為中心的儲存架構方法(即根據特定用例選擇媒體、通訊協定和服務)的企業將獲得更高的效能和成本效益。同時,關稅趨勢和組件採購之間的相互作用將要求採購和工程部門更加緊密地合作,以減少中斷並保持戰略靈活性。
摘要,在當前環境下取得成功取決於現代軟體功能、規範的採購慣例和切實可行的營運管治的整合。能夠將可配置的、軟體豐富的平台與實施和生命週期支援服務相結合的供應商,將受到那些希望加速數位舉措並降低營運風險的組織的青睞。結論強調,領導者需要果斷行動,以優先考慮彈性、互通性和可衡量的業務成果的方式,實現儲存策略的現代化。
The Block Storage Market is projected to grow by USD 77.26 billion at a CAGR of 18.28% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 20.16 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 23.82 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 77.26 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 18.28% |
The block storage landscape sits at the intersection of evolving application demands, hardware innovation, and operational priorities that together shape enterprise infrastructure strategy. In recent cycles, organizations have moved beyond single-dimensional storage choices to embrace architectures that reconcile performance objectives with cost control and manageability. As a result, storage decision-makers increasingly weigh trade-offs among latency, throughput, resilience, and total cost of ownership while factoring in integration with compute and networking domains.
This report synthesizes industry developments and practitioner perspectives to provide a concise foundation for executive decision-making. It emphasizes how contemporary workloads such as virtualization, transaction processing, and data analytics drive nuanced requirements for I/O patterns and resiliency. Moreover, it highlights how professional services and managed offerings influence deployment velocity and operational risk. By framing the discussion around real-world priorities and technical constraints, the introduction equips leaders to prioritize investments that align storage capabilities with broader business goals.
Block storage is undergoing a series of transformative shifts driven by software innovation, hardware acceleration, and changing application architectures. Software-defined controls are decoupling management from proprietary arrays, enabling policy-driven automation and richer telemetry that inform capacity planning and performance tuning. At the same time, advances in NVMe-based fabrics and SSD performance have broadened the envelope of achievable latency and throughput, prompting architects to redesign data paths for high-concurrency workloads.
Concurrently, cloud-native design patterns are pushing storage to be more elastic and API-driven, encouraging hybrid models where on-premises systems and public cloud services interoperate. This transition favors solutions that facilitate seamless data mobility and consistent operational models. Additionally, tighter integration between storage and data services-such as snapshots, replication, and inline analytics-creates opportunities for application owners to reduce complexity and accelerate time-to-insight. Together, these shifts favor vendors that offer modular, software-centric stacks and service-led engagement models, while requiring buyers to rethink procurement, lifecycle management, and skills development.
The set of tariffs introduced in the United States in 2025 has introduced new constraints on procurement, component sourcing, and vendor supply chains that ripple through storage programs. Procurement teams have responded by diversifying supplier bases and accelerating qualification of alternative components or subassemblies to avoid single points of exposure. This shift has increased emphasis on vendor transparency around sourcing, lead times, and the geographic footprint of manufacturing and assembly.
From a strategic perspective, organizations have revisited contract terms and inventory strategies to buffer against tariff-driven cost volatility. In practice, this has meant negotiating longer-term pricing commitments where feasible, building flexible procurement clauses, and considering localized assembly or brokerage partners to mitigate tariff impact. Operational teams have also adjusted maintenance and spare-part strategies to ensure continuity amid longer replacement cycles. In parallel, R&D and product planning functions are assessing redesigns that reduce tariff exposure by optimizing bill-of-materials and by qualifying components from regions exempt from or less affected by tariff measures. Consequently, the tariff environment has reinforced the business case for supply chain resilience and for integrating procurement risk into storage investment decisions.
A granular segmentation view reveals differentiated adoption patterns and distinct vendor value propositions across deployment, component, media, protocol, application, industry, and organization size dimensions. Deployment choice ranges from hybrid cloud approaches that blend public and private infrastructure with on-premises and private cloud installations that emphasize control and compliance, to public cloud models that prioritize elasticity and managed services. Component breakdown shows that hardware acquisitions often occur in tandem with managed services and professional services engagements, while software layers increasingly determine differentiation through orchestration and data services.
Storage media remains a pivotal consideration: hard disk drives continue to serve capacity-focused tiers while solid state drives dominate performance-sensitive workloads. Protocol selection, spanning Fibre Channel, iSCSI, NVMe over Fabric, and SAS, reflects workload-specific demands for latency, throughput, and operational familiarity. Application requirements likewise vary, with backup and recovery, data analytics, online transaction processing, and virtualization and VDI each imposing unique I/O profiles and resilience expectations. Industry verticals such as banking and finance, energy and utilities, government and public sector, healthcare, IT and telecom, manufacturing, and retail bring sector-specific regulatory and operational constraints that shape architecture and service choices. Finally, organization size differentiates procurement complexity and risk tolerance: large enterprises typically pursue multi-vendor, multi-site architectures supported by internal teams and extensive professional services, whereas small and medium enterprises often prefer integrated appliances or fully managed offerings that reduce operational overhead.
Geography exerts a profound influence on adoption priorities, regulatory constraints, and ecosystem dynamics across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, procurement emphasis often centers on total cost of ownership and flexible financing models, with a strong appetite for managed services that accelerate migration and reduce staffing burdens. By contrast, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex regulatory landscape where data residency, cross-border transfer considerations, and stringent privacy frameworks steer organizations toward solutions that emphasize governance, encryption, and localized operational controls.
Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid demand for scalable performance and cloud interoperability, driven by high-growth digital services and large-scale telecommunications deployments. Regional supply-chain considerations also matter: manufacturing footprints, component availability, and logistics can favor regionalized sourcing strategies. Across all regions, partnerships between local integrators and global vendors influence adoption velocity, while regional talent availability impacts the feasibility of sophisticated on-premises operations. Consequently, vendors and buyers must tailor their strategies to reflect the interplay of regulatory, commercial, and ecosystem factors unique to each geography.
Leading vendors are converging on several strategic plays to differentiate in a competitive block storage market: they are investing in software capabilities that enable policy-driven automation, developing services-led go-to-market models, and expanding partnerships to deliver integrated solutions. Product road maps increasingly prioritize NVMe integration, unified management planes, and richer data services such as snapshot orchestration and replication. Additionally, a noticeable trend is the bundling of hardware with managed or professional services to accelerate adoption and reduce buyer risk.
Strategically, vendors that demonstrate transparent supply-chain practices and flexible licensing models gain a competitive edge in environments characterized by tariff uncertainty and shifting procurement norms. Mergers and partnerships remain active mechanisms to acquire capabilities quickly, particularly in software, data protection, and cloud-native orchestration. From a go-to-market perspective, differentiated channel strategies-ranging from direct enterprise engagements to cloud marketplace presence and channel partner enablement-determine reach and implementation success. Finally, vendors that can offer end-to-end validation, reference architectures, and robust support for hybrid operational models are better positioned to win enterprise accounts where integration and lifecycle support matter most.
Industry leaders should pursue a pragmatic set of prioritized actions to convert strategic intent into measurable outcomes. First, align storage procurement with application-class requirements by mapping workloads to the appropriate media and protocol choices; this alignment reduces overprovisioning while ensuring performance SLAs are met. Second, incorporate supply-chain resilience into procurement decisions by qualifying secondary suppliers, negotiating flexible contract terms, and maintaining strategic component inventories where appropriate. Third, invest in management and orchestration tooling that provides consistent policy enforcement across on-premises and cloud environments, thereby simplifying operations and improving visibility.
Leaders should also accelerate skills development through targeted training and vendor-assisted knowledge transfer to reduce time-to-value for complex deployments. Additionally, evaluate opportunities to shift from pure hardware buys to outcome-oriented commercial models that bundle software and services, which can lower operational risk and align incentives. Finally, establish a governance framework that includes performance monitoring, cost attribution, and lifecycle planning to ensure storage investments remain aligned with evolving business priorities and regulatory requirements.
The research approach combines structured primary engagement with rigorous secondary synthesis to ensure findings are both empirically grounded and contextually relevant. Primary research involved in-depth interviews with technical leaders, procurement specialists, and service providers to capture first-hand perspectives on operational challenges, procurement dynamics, and technology priorities. These qualitative inputs were complemented by targeted practitioner surveys and anonymized case studies that elucidated deployment patterns and vendor selection criteria.
Secondary research synthesized technical whitepapers, product literature, and public regulatory guidance to map technological capabilities and compliance constraints. The analysis process applied triangulation techniques to reconcile disparate data points and validate recurring themes, while sensitivity checks ensured conclusions remained robust against varying assumptions. Finally, iterative peer review and domain expert validation refined the thematic narrative and confirmed that insights reflect practical decision-making contexts. Together, these methods yielded a methodology that balances depth of insight with pragmatic applicability for technology and business stakeholders.
The synthesis emphasizes that block storage decisions no longer hinge solely on raw capacity or peak performance metrics; instead, they reflect a composite of application demands, operational maturity, supply-chain considerations, and regional constraints. Organizations that adopt a workload-centric approach to storage architecture-aligning media, protocol, and service choices to specific use cases-will realize better performance and cost outcomes. At the same time, the interplay of tariff dynamics and component sourcing requires procurement and engineering teams to collaborate more closely to mitigate disruption and preserve strategic flexibility.
In summary, success in the current environment depends on integrating modern software capabilities, disciplined procurement practices, and pragmatic operational governance. Vendors that offer configurable, software-rich platforms coupled with services for deployment and lifecycle support will find receptive customers among organizations seeking to reduce operational risk while accelerating digital initiatives. The conclusion underscores the need for leaders to act decisively to modernize storage strategies in ways that prioritize resilience, interoperability, and measurable business outcomes.