查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1864039

流體化媒裂市場按組成、成分、原料類型、裝置產能和最終用戶分類－2025-2032年全球預測

Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market by Components, Configuration, Feedstock Type, Unit Capacity, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 185 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2032 年，流體化媒裂(FCC) 市場將成長至 124 億美元，複合年成長率為 5.54%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年 2024 80.5億美元
預計年份：2025年 84.8億美元
預測年份 2032 124億美元
複合年成長率 (%) 5.54%

本文全面闡述了催化劑組成、反應器設計和原料選擇如何共同塑造現代流體化媒裂競爭格局。

流體化媒裂是煉油過程中的關鍵轉化途徑，使煉油廠能夠將較重的烴類餾分轉化為一系列較輕、高價值的產品。此製程整合了複雜的催化劑系統、反應器/再生器結構以及多種原料，這些因素共同決定了產品的靈活性和經濟效益。隨著煉油廠追求更高的利潤率和更低的排放，授權合作夥伴、催化劑配方商和營運商正致力於開發兼顧催化劑活性和選擇性、運作穩定性和脫碳路徑的解決方案。

技術發展主要集中在沸石基催化劑上，旨在提高汽油和低碳烯烴的產率，同時維持催化劑的循環壽命和污染物耐受性。反應器內件、熱整合和製程控制系統的同步進步提高了裝置的可靠性和檢修的可預測性。此外，煉油廠也越來越重視各種配置方案的權衡，例如並聯式與堆疊式配置，以及它們對產能靈活性和維護複雜性的影響。

在此背景下，策略性相關人員必須將從真空瓦斯油到重質殘渣油和脫瀝青油等原料的多樣性與催化劑的選擇和裝置產能規劃相符。粘合劑、填料和基質的選擇，以及沸石種類（例如Y型沸石和ZSM-5沸石）的選擇，不僅影響轉化率和選擇性，還會影響催化劑的損耗和廢催化劑的處理。因此，對於尋求永續營運優勢的煉油廠管理者和技術投資者而言，將催化劑組分設計與裝置配置、原料特性和最終用戶產品目標聯繫起來的整體觀點至關重要。

技術、數位化和永續性的整合需求正在重塑流體化媒裂中的催化劑設計、單元操作和夥伴關係模式。

流體化媒裂（FCC）領域正經歷變革性的轉變，面臨排放法規、產品需求結構和原料經濟性這三大同時存在的壓力。為了應對日益嚴格的燃料品質和排放氣體法規，煉油廠正在重新最佳化其產品結構，轉向低硫燃料和提高低碳烯烴的產量，這促使催化劑庫存和反應器策略進行重組。為此，催化劑開發商正致力於開發多功能沸石結構和穩健的基質，以平衡催化活性和抗金屬及碳基結垢的能力。

技術變革不僅限於催化化學，還延伸至數位化和自動化領域。先進的製程控制系統、用於預測裝置性能的機器學習模型以及即時原料表徵，能夠實現對反應條件的精確控制和對故障的快速響應。這些能力減少了非計畫性停機時間，並提高了循環壽命預測的準確性，而隨著煉油廠不斷延長運作，循環壽命預測的重要性也日益凸顯。

供應鏈中同步發生的結構性變化正在重塑採購模式和夥伴關係。授權人、催化劑製造商和下游石化產品承購商之間的策略聯盟日益普遍，促進了對製程改進的聯合投資，從而提高乙烯和丙烯等特定產品的產量。此外，對永續性重視推動了低碳氫化合物整合、餘熱回收以及廢催化劑循環利用等試點計畫的發展。因此，那些將化學創新與數位技術和卓越營運相結合的行業參與者，正在為在產品品質和環境合規性共同決定競爭優勢的市場中脫穎而出做好準備。

美國貿易措施變化對催化劑採購、計劃經濟效益和原料採購的實際影響：對策略規劃和供應鏈韌性的啟示

近期關稅政策的變化進一步加劇了在美國營運或與美國進行貿易的企業在採購、資本計劃和原料籌資策略的複雜性。關稅可能會影響催化劑組分的相對投入成本，尤其是那些從擁有專業沸石技術或專有基質的國際供應商處採購的催化劑成分。隨著採購負責人重新審視其供應鏈，一些煉油企業正優先考慮與國內或免稅合作夥伴簽訂長期供應協議，以確保催化劑的穩定供應並降低成本波動。

關稅也會影響設備採購以及裝置維修和新建設的EPC合約決策。進口的反應器內件、熱交換器和催化處理系統需繳納額外關稅，這會增加總安裝成本和計劃前置作業時間，迫使業者考慮在地化生產或重新安排資本投資。在許多情況下，監管成本的變化會促使人們重新審視生命週期成本，包括催化劑壽命、再生頻率和廢催化劑的處置成本。

從市場互動角度來看，關稅引發的價格差異可能會加速採用替代原料混合物和催化劑等級，從而減少對關稅敏感型進口產品的依賴；同時，一體化石化煉廠可能會重新評估產品路線和合約條款以維持利潤率。轉型策略將日益強調靈活的產品組合，能夠根據不斷變化的商業性訊號在柴油、汽油和輕烯烴生產之間靈活切換，從而降低供應鏈中斷和政策驅動的成本波動所帶來的風險。

基於詳細細分的洞察，將催化劑組成、配置選擇、原料變化、裝置產能規模和最終用戶產品優先順序與營運結果連結起來。

細緻的細分分析揭示了組件選擇、裝置結構、原料選擇、產能規劃和最終用戶目標如何共同影響營運優先事項和投資決策。組件維度突顯了黏合劑、填料、基質材料和沸石催化劑類型之間的相互作用。 Y型沸石通常用於高轉化率、以汽油為主的生產目標，而ZSM-5則用於低碳烯烴的生產和提高烯烴與芳烴的選擇性。這些組件層級之間的權衡會影響損耗行為和廢催化劑管理義務，進而影響總擁有成本。

配置方式（例如並聯式與堆疊式配置）會影響溫度控管、反應器-再生器相互作用以及維護計劃。並聯式配置在簡化循環系統和提高可維護性方面具有優勢，而堆疊式配置則可能提高佔地面積效率並提供不同的熱整合方案。原料類型仍然是決定操作策略的關鍵因素。雖然真空瓦斯油通常表現出可預測的裂化行為，但較重的殘渣油和脫瀝青油的污染物含量和焦炭生成傾向則表現出更大的變異性，因此需要具有更高金屬耐受性和基質穩定性的催化劑。

將裝置產能分類為大型、中型和小型，決定了資本配置、產能靈活性和檢修經濟性。大型裝置享有規模經濟效益，但需要更複雜的物流和催化劑庫存管理。而小型裝置則受惠於可根據區域需求趨勢靈活調整產品組合。最後，終端用戶細分——從柴油生產到汽油生產再到輕質烯烴（包括乙烯和丙烯）生產——驅動著有針對性的催化劑設計和運行策略。以柴油生產為主的煉油廠會最佳化氫氣管理和十六烷值提升策略，而以低碳烯烴為主的煉油廠則會採用富ZSM-5催化劑體系和有利於提高烯烴產率的反應器條件。因此，基於細分市場的策略能夠幫助煉油廠將技術選擇與商業目標和監管限制相匹配。

區域原料狀況、監管壓力和石化產品需求趨勢如何驅動美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區的不同戰略路徑。

區域趨勢將對原料供應、監管壓力和投資前景產生重大影響，從而在各區域形成不同的策略方針。美洲地區原油成分多樣化，國內需求結構也在不斷變化（運輸燃料和石化原料需求之間的平衡日益增強），因此，隨著石化一體化的加深，該地區將更傾向於採用靈活的催化劑體系和改進措施，以推動產品結構轉向低碳烯烴。

在歐洲、中東和非洲地區，日益嚴格的監管和脫碳要求在各種煉油技術水準和原料類型中並存。一些煉油廠正在推進數位化和能源效率升級，而另一些煉油廠則優先考慮在原料供應受限的情況下提高產能韌性，並有選擇地投資於能夠耐受高金屬和硫含量的觸媒技術。在中東，豐富的重質原料和接近性石化聯合企業的地理優勢推動了烯烴收率的最大化，而非洲部分地區則專注於模組化或小規模維修，以滿足區域燃料需求和燃料品質標準。

亞太地區正經歷石化產品需求快速成長、大規模煉油廠現代化計畫以及區域性環境法規差異等多重挑戰。亞太多個市場對低碳烯烴的強勁需求推動了針對乙烯和丙烯最佳化的催化劑配方的應用。同時，該地區的產能擴張計劃促進了授權人、催化劑供應商和當地工程公司之間的夥伴關係，以縮短前置作業時間並根據區域原料特性調整設計。總體而言，區域策略體現了在當地原料條件、法規結構以及工業和石化產品需求成長速度之間取得的平衡。

不斷變化的競爭動態：以結果為導向的夥伴關係、供應鏈多元化和整合服務平台將決定供應商的選擇和長期合作價值。

催化劑和技術供應生態系統內的競爭動態正朝著基於平台的差異化、更深入的服務以及合作商業化模式轉變。領先的催化劑開發商和授權商正日益將專有配方技術與性能保證、擴展技術支援和以分析主導的生命週期服務相結合，從而幫助煉油廠最佳化生產週期和產品收率。這一趨勢正在加速從一次性催化劑銷售向以結果為導向的夥伴關係關係的轉變，其中技術支援、現場故障排除和共同資助的示範計劃是核心。

供應鏈韌性正逐漸成為一種競爭優勢，供應商正透過多元化製造地和尋找替代原料來源來降低貿易中斷帶來的風險。此外，催化劑製造商、化學品承購商和設備製造商之間的跨行業合作，正在推動整合解決方案的開發，從而加快資本部署並降低性能風險。智慧財產權策略也反映了這一演變，企業擴大保護其沸石和基質技術，同時選擇性地授權相關製程改進技術以擴大市場覆蓋範圍。

併購、策略聯盟以及對數位化能力的定向投資正在重塑競爭格局。那些能夠有效結合深厚的材料科學專業知識、先進的製程分析技術和強大的售後服務能力的公司，正在贏得長期的業務。同時，提供特種催化劑和快速檢測服務的利基企業，透過解決特定的污染物難題並幫助新配方快速放大生產，正在開闢獨特的市場地位。對於採購者而言，這些趨勢意味著更多的選擇，但也意味著供應商選擇更加複雜，需要進行嚴格的技術實質審查和基於情境的供應商評估。

為煉油廠和供應商制定可操作的、優先的策略，以增強韌性、最佳化催化劑性能，並使資本配置與不斷變化的產品需求和永續性目標保持一致。

產業領導者應採取多管齊下的策略方法，整合催化劑選擇、運作彈性和商業性靈活性，以確保其流體化媒裂裝置面向未來。首先，應優先考慮能夠有效平衡活性和選擇性，同時允許金屬和焦炭沉積的催化劑策略，並在全面部署前投資進行中初步試驗，以具有代表性的重質原料混合物檢驗其性能。透過迭代式進度管理，他們可以在控制技術風險的同時，收穫產品收率提升帶來的益處。

第二，透過與多元化供應商簽訂多年期契約，並對關鍵催化劑組分和反應器內件的區域製造合作夥伴進行認證，增強供應鏈韌性。同時，建立模組化採購機制，實現供應商的快速更換和品質檢驗，從而減輕關稅和貿易中斷的影響。第三，投資於數位雙胞胎、預測性維護演算法和即時原料表徵，以減少非計劃性停機時間並最佳化再生計畫。這些工具能夠顯著提高運轉率和催化劑利用率。

第四，考慮維修方案，允許在柴油、汽油和輕烯烴生產之間進行切換，以使資本配置與產品需求的靈活性相匹配。盡可能與石化合作夥伴建立承購協議和與承購相關的融資，以共用風險並從烯烴成長中獲取價值。最後，推動旨在降低排放強度和提高廢催化劑循環利用率的永續性舉措。這些努力將有助於建立監管信心並實現長期成本節約。綜上所述，這些措施共同構成了一種具有韌性和適應性的方法，既能平衡短期營運效益，又能為不斷變化的市場動態提供策略定位。

我們採用透明的多來源調查方法，結合一手技術訪談、營運資料三角驗證、供應鏈評估和情境分析，以確保獲得可靠、可操作的見解。

本研究整合了多種技術和商業性證據來源，流體化媒裂（FCC）領域進行了系統性分析。調查方法結合了來自技術經理、製程工程師和採購主管的定性資訊、技術文獻、授權人揭露文件以及非專有營運案例研究等二手資料。資料三角驗證確保研究結果既反映了實際工廠運作情況，也反映了供應商報告的性能特徵；同時，專家檢驗環節則用於消除資料差異，並揭示實際應用中需要考慮的因素。

製程層面的評估是基於催化劑表徵、失活曲線分析以及反應器/再生器動態，並輔以運行數據（如有），例如循環週期分佈和檢修記錄。供應鏈分析結合採購前置作業時間研究、採購強度指標和關稅影響評估，以了解商業性脆弱性。情境分析用於探索原料價格波動、關稅制度和終端用戶需求調整的敏感性，從而能夠在不同的運行環境下提出可靠的建議。

本研究始終強調技術的可重複性和透明度。關於原料性質、催化劑損耗機制和特定配置性能的假設均已記錄並經過壓力測試。凡涉及專有資訊之處，均由獨立技術專家進行交叉檢驗，以確保研究結果的客觀性和對決策者的實際意義。

本文對策略要務進行了簡潔扼要的總結，重點在於基於系統的催化劑選擇、供應鏈韌性和數位化賦能的營運績效，以實現永續的競爭優勢。

綜合分析表明，流體化媒裂領域的競爭優勢日益依賴一種綜合方法，該方法融合了先進的催化劑化學、穩健的供應鏈以及數位化賦能的卓越運作。營運商若將催化劑選擇視為系統決策——結合配置、原料和最終用戶的優先級，評估黏合劑、填料、基質的選擇以及沸石變體——將獲得更可預測的結果並降低生命週期成本。此外，營運商還需要製定靈活的策略，充分考慮區域特徵和貿易政策趨勢，以適應原料供應和關稅波動導致的成本結構變化。

與技術供應商建立以結果為導向的夥伴關係，並利用預測分析進行維護和原料最佳化，這些公司更有可能維持更高的運轉率和更優的產品產量。最終，實現價值的關鍵在於平衡短期營運效益與中期永續性和循環經濟投資，從而保障業務永續營運的權利，並為更高價值的石化一體化鋪路。因此，決策者應優先考慮模組化升級、穩健的供應商多元化以及有針對性的試驗計畫，以便在廣泛應用之前檢驗創新成果。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場概覽

第5章 市場洞察

  • 採用新型沸石基催化劑可最大限度地提高FCC裝置中丙烯的產率。
  • 實施人工智慧驅動的製程控制系統，以實現FCC反應器的即時最佳化
  • 將碳捕獲技術整合到FCC裝置中，以減少二氧化碳排放和環境影響。
  • 利用殘餘改質催化劑對現有FCC裝置進行改造，以處理重質原油混合物
  • 在FCC中對可再生和生物基原料進行共加工，以實現脫碳目標
  • 開發脫硫添加劑以減少FCC再生器廢氣中的SOx排放
  • 最佳化催化劑循環速率，以提高轉化效率並延長循環時間
  • 引入線上粒徑分析儀，用於監測FCC裝置中催化劑的損耗和活性。

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

第8章流體化媒裂市場：按組分分類

  • 活頁夾
  • 填料
  • 基材
  • 沸石催化劑
    • Y型沸石
    • ZSM-5沸石

第9章流體化媒裂市場：依組成

  • 平行型
  • 堆疊式

第10章 依原料類型流體化媒裂市場

  • 瀝青油
  • 殘留物
  • 真空瓦斯油

第11章 依產能分類的流體化媒裂市場

  • 大容量
  • 中等容量
  • 小容量

第12章流體化媒裂市場（依最終用戶分類）

  • 柴油生產
  • 汽油產量
  • 輕烯烴生產
    • 乙烯
    • 丙烯

第13章流體化媒裂市場區域分析

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章流體化媒裂市場：依組別分類

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第15章 各國流體化媒裂市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章 競爭格局

  • 2024年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2024
  • 競爭分析
    • Axens Joint Stock Company
    • BASF SE
    • CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
    • Chevron Lummus Global
    • DuPont de Nemours, Inc
    • Emerson Electric Co.
    • Evonik Industries AG
    • Exxon Mobil Corporation
    • Flour Corporation
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
    • Johnson Matthey Group.
    • Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation
    • Kuwait Catalyst Company.
    • Magma Group
    • NE CHEMCAT Corporation
    • Naugra
    • Shell PLC
    • Sulzer Ltd.
    • WR Grace Company
    • Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD
    • Zeopore Technologies NV
Product Code: MRR-F3183FD1489B

The Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market is projected to grow by USD 12.40 billion at a CAGR of 5.54% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 8.05 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 8.48 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 12.40 billion
CAGR (%) 5.54%

Comprehensive context on how catalyst formulation, reactor design, and feedstock choices converge to shape modern fluid catalytic cracking competitiveness

Fluid catalytic cracking remains a cornerstone conversion route within refining, enabling refiners to convert heavier hydrocarbon fractions into lighter, higher-value streams. The process integrates complex catalyst systems, reactor/regenerator architectures, and a broad range of feedstocks, which together determine product slate flexibility and economic performance. As refineries pursue higher margins and lower emissions footprints, licensing partners, catalyst formulators, and operating companies are aligning around solutions that combine catalyst activity and selectivity with operational resilience and decarbonization pathways.

The technology trajectory has emphasized zeolite-based catalysts to enhance gasoline and light olefins yields while maintaining catalyst cycle length and contaminant tolerance. Parallel advances in reactor internals, heat integration, and process control systems have improved unit reliability and turnaround predictability. Moreover, refiners are increasingly evaluating the trade-offs between configuration choices such as side-by-side versus stacked arrangements, and their implications for throughput flexibility and maintenance complexity.

Against this backdrop, strategic stakeholders must reconcile feedstock variability, from vacuum gas oil to heavier residues and deasphalted oils, with catalyst selection and unit capacity planning. Decisions around binder, filler, matrix choices and zeolite variants like Zeolite Y and ZSM-5 affect not only conversion and selectivity but also catalyst attrition and spent catalyst handling. Consequently, a holistic view that links catalyst component design to configuration, feedstock characteristics, and end-user product targets is essential for refining managers and technology investors seeking sustained operational advantage.

How converging technical, digital, and sustainability imperatives are reshaping catalyst design, unit operations, and partnership models in fluid catalytic cracking

The landscape of fluid catalytic cracking is undergoing transformative shifts driven by simultaneous pressures on emissions, product demand composition, and feedstock economics. Refiners are responding to stricter fuel quality and emissions expectations by re-optimizing product slates toward lower-sulfur fuels and increased light olefins output, prompting reconfiguration of catalyst inventories and reactor strategies. In turn, catalyst developers are placing greater emphasis on multi-functional zeolite architectures and robust matrices that balance activity with resistance to metals and carbonaceous fouling.

Technological shifts extend beyond catalyst chemistry to encompass digitalization and automation. Advanced process control systems, machine learning models for unit performance prediction, and real-time feedstock characterization are enabling tighter control of reaction conditions and faster responses to disturbances. These capabilities reduce unplanned downtime and enhance cycle-life prediction, which matters increasingly as refiners push for longer on-stream periods between major turnarounds.

Concurrent structural changes in the supply chain are reshaping procurement and partnership models. Strategic alliances between licensors, catalyst manufacturers, and downstream petrochemical off-takers are becoming more common, facilitating co-investment in process upgrades that increase yields of targeted products such as ethylene and propylene. Additionally, rising emphasis on sustainability is driving trials of lower-carbon hydrogen integration, waste heat recovery, and circular approaches for spent catalyst management. As a result, industry participants that integrate chemical innovation with digital and operational excellence are differentiating themselves in a market where both product quality and environmental compliance increasingly determine competitive positioning.

Practical implications of changing US trade measures on catalyst procurement, project economics, and feedstock sourcing that influence strategic planning and supply-chain resilience

Recent tariff activity has introduced added complexity to procurement, capital projects, and feedstock sourcing strategies for entities operating within and trading with the United States. Tariff measures can alter relative input costs for catalyst components sourced from international suppliers, particularly those with specialized zeolite technologies and proprietary matrices. As procurement respondents reassess supply chains, some refiners are favoring longer-term supply agreements with domestic or tariff-exempt partners to stabilize catalyst availability and mitigate cost volatility.

Tariffs also influence decisions around equipment sourcing and EPC contracting for unit revamps or new builds. When imported reactor internals, heat exchangers, or catalyst handling systems become subject to additional duties, the total installed cost and project lead times can increase, prompting operators to revisit whether to localize manufacturing or re-sequence capital investments. In many cases, regulatory-induced cost shifts encourage greater scrutiny of lifecycle costs, including catalyst longevity, regeneration frequency, and spent catalyst disposal expenses.

From a market interaction perspective, tariff-induced price differentials may accelerate the adoption of alternative feedstock blends or catalyst grades that reduce dependence on tariff-sensitive imports. Meanwhile, refiners with integrated petrochemical off-takes may re-balance product routing and contractual terms to preserve margins. Transition strategies increasingly emphasize flexible configurations that allow shifting between diesel, gasoline, and light olefins production as commercial signals evolve, thereby reducing exposure to supply-chain shocks and policy-driven cost swings.

Detailed segmentation-driven insights linking catalyst components, configuration choices, feedstock variability, unit capacity scales, and end-user product priorities to operational outcomes

A nuanced segmentation analysis reveals how component choices, unit architecture, feedstock selection, capacity planning, and end-user objectives collectively shape operational priorities and investment decisions. The components dimension highlights the interplay between binder, filler, matrix materials and zeolite catalyst varieties, where Zeolite Y often addresses high-conversion gasoline-leaning targets while ZSM-5 is deployed to enhance light olefins production and olefin-to-aromatics selectivity. These component-level trade-offs influence attrition behavior and spent catalyst management obligations, which in turn affect total cost of ownership.

Configuration considerations such as side-by-side versus stacked types affect heat management, reactor-regenerator interactions, and maintenance scheduling. Side-by-side configurations can offer simpler circulation and accessibility advantages, whereas stacked architectures may provide footprint efficiencies and different heat integration opportunities. Feedstock type remains a central determinant of operational strategy; vacuum gas oil typically yields predictable cracking behavior, while heavier residues and deasphalted oil introduce greater variability in contaminant load and coke propensity, requiring catalysts with enhanced metals tolerance and matrix robustness.

Unit capacity segmentation into large, medium, and small scales informs capital allocation, throughput flexibility, and turnaround economics. Large-capacity installations benefit from economies of scale but demand more sophisticated logistics and catalyst inventory management, whereas smaller units can offer nimbleness to shift product slates for regional demand signals. Finally, end-user segmentation-ranging from diesel production and gasoline production to light olefins production, the latter encompassing ethylene and propylene-drives targeted catalyst designs and operating philosophies. Refiners prioritizing diesel will optimize for hydrogen management and cetane-enhancing strategies, while those oriented to light olefins will deploy ZSM-5-enriched systems and reactor conditions that favor olefin yields. Consequently, a segmentation-aware strategy enables operators to align technological choices with commercial objectives and regulatory constraints.

How regional feedstock realities, regulatory pressures, and petrochemical demand trajectories create distinct strategic pathways across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on feedstock availability, regulatory pressures, and investment horizons, shaping distinct strategic approaches in each geography. In the Americas, refiners contend with diverse crude slates and a shifting domestic demand profile that increasingly balances transportation fuels with petrochemical feedstock needs; this environment favors flexible catalyst systems and retrofits that can pivot product slates toward light olefins as petrochemical integration intensifies.

Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory and decarbonization imperatives co-exist with a wide range of refining sophistication and feedstock types. Some refiners are advancing digital and energy-efficiency upgrades while others prioritize resilience amid feedstock limitations, prompting selective investments in catalyst technologies that tolerate higher metals and sulfur burdens. In the Middle East, abundant heavier feedstocks and close proximity to petrochemical complexes create incentives for maximizing olefin yields, whereas parts of Africa focus on modular or smaller-capacity retrofits to meet local fuel demand and fuel quality standards.

The Asia-Pacific region presents a heterogeneous mix of rapid petrochemical demand growth, expansive refinery modernization programs, and varying environmental regulations. High demand growth for light olefins in several Asia-Pacific markets has driven adoption of catalyst formulations optimized for ethylene and propylene. Simultaneously, capacity expansion projects in the region are prompting partnerships between licensors, catalyst suppliers, and local engineering firms to reduce lead times and adapt designs to regional feedstock profiles. Taken together, regional strategies reflect a balance between local feedstock realities, regulatory frameworks, and the pace of industrial and petrochemical demand growth.

Evolving competitive dynamics where outcome-focused partnerships, supply-chain diversification, and integrated service platforms determine supplier selection and long-term collaboration value

Competitive dynamics within the catalytic and technology supply ecosystem are shifting towards platform-based differentiation, deeper service offerings, and collaborative commercialization models. Leading catalyst developers and licensors are increasingly coupling proprietary formulations with performance guarantees, extended technical support, and analytics-driven lifecycle services that help refiners optimize cycle lengths and product yields. This trend is accelerating the transition from transactional catalyst sales to outcome-oriented partnerships where technical support, on-site troubleshooting, and co-funded demonstration projects play a central role.

Supply chain resilience has emerged as a competitive axis, prompting suppliers to diversify manufacturing footprints and to qualify alternate raw material sources to reduce vulnerability to trade disruptions. Furthermore, cross-sector collaborations-linking catalyst manufacturers with chemical off-takers and equipment fabricators-are facilitating integrated solutions that accelerate capital deployment and de-risk performance. Intellectual property strategies also reflect this evolution, with firms protecting zeolite innovations and matrix technologies while selectively licensing adjacent process improvements to expand market reach.

Mergers, strategic alliances, and targeted investments in digital capability are reshaping the competitive map. Companies that successfully combine deep materials science expertise with advanced process analytics and strong aftermarket service capabilities are winning longer-term engagements. At the same time, niche players offering specialist catalyst grades or rapid testing services are carving out roles by addressing specific contaminant challenges or by enabling faster scale-up of new formulations. For purchasers, these dynamics mean greater choice but also greater complexity in vendor selection, requiring rigorous technical due diligence and scenario-based supplier evaluations.

Actionable, prioritized strategies for refiners and suppliers to enhance resilience, optimize catalyst performance, and align capital deployment with evolving product demand and sustainability goals

Industry leaders should adopt a multifaceted strategic approach that aligns catalyst selection, operational resilience, and commercial flexibility to future-proof fluid catalytic cracking assets. First, prioritize catalyst strategies that explicitly balance activity and selectivity with robustness against metals and carbonaceous deposition; invest in pilot trials that validate performance on representative heavier feedstock blends before full-scale implementation. By proceeding iteratively, operators can manage technical risk while capturing upside in product yield improvements.

Second, strengthen supply-chain resilience by negotiating multi-year agreements with diversified suppliers and by qualifying regional manufacturing partners for critical catalyst components and reactor internals. Simultaneously, build modular procurement playbooks that allow for rapid supplier substitution and expedited quality validation, thereby mitigating tariffs or trade disruptions. Third, invest in digital twins, predictive maintenance algorithms, and real-time feedstock characterization to reduce unplanned downtime and to optimize regeneration schedules; these tools materially enhance uptime and catalyst utilization efficiency.

Fourth, align capital allocation with product demand flexibility by considering retrofit options that enable shifting between diesel, gasoline, and light olefins production. Where possible, structure off-take and offtake-linked financing with petrochemical partners to share risk and capture value from olefins growth. Finally, pursue sustainability initiatives that reduce emissions intensity and improve spent catalyst circularity, as these efforts can yield regulatory goodwill and long-term cost savings. Together, these steps create a resilient, adaptable approach that balances near-term operational gains with strategic positioning for evolving market dynamics.

Transparent multi-source research methodology combining primary technical interviews, operational data triangulation, supply-chain assessment, and scenario analysis to ensure robust actionable insights

This research synthesizes multi-source technical and commercial evidence to deliver a coherent analysis of the fluid catalytic cracking domain. The methodology integrates primary qualitative inputs from technical managers, process engineers, and procurement leads with secondary technical literature, licensor disclosures, and non-proprietary operational case studies. Data triangulation ensures that insights reflect both observed plant behavior and vendor-reported performance characteristics, while expert validation sessions reconcile discrepancies and surface practical implementation considerations.

Process-level evaluation relies on catalyst characterization, deactivation profiling, and reactor-regenerator thermodynamics, complemented by operational data such as cycle length distributions and turnaround records where available. Supply-chain analysis combines procurement lead-time studies, sourcing concentration metrics, and tariff impact assessments to capture commercial vulnerabilities. Scenario analysis was used to explore sensitivity to feedstock shifts, tariff regimes, and end-user demand rebalancing, enabling robust recommendations under alternative operating environments.

Throughout the research, emphasis was placed on technical reproducibility and transparency. Assumptions surrounding feedstock properties, catalyst attrition mechanisms, and configuration-specific performance were documented and stress-tested. Where proprietary information was relied upon, findings were corroborated through cross-validation with independent technical experts to preserve objectivity and practical relevance for decision-makers.

Concise synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing systems-based catalyst decisions, supply-chain resilience, and digital-enabled operational performance for sustainable competitive advantage

The collective analysis underscores that competitive advantage in fluid catalytic cracking increasingly stems from integrated approaches that combine advanced catalyst chemistries, resilient supply chains, and digital operational excellence. Operators that treat catalyst selection as a systems decision-where binder, filler, matrix choices and zeolite variants are evaluated in concert with configuration, feedstock, and end-user priorities-achieve more predictable outcomes and lower lifecycle costs. Moreover, regional nuances and trade-policy developments mandate flexible strategies that can adapt to shifting feedstock availability and tariff-imposed cost structures.

Companies that invest in outcome-oriented partnerships with technology providers and that harness predictive analytics for maintenance and feedstock optimization are likely to sustain higher on-stream factors and better product yield alignment. Ultimately, the path to value involves balancing short-term operational gains with medium-term investments in sustainability and circularity, thereby preserving license to operate and opening avenues for higher-value petrochemical integration. Decision-makers should therefore prioritize modular upgrades, robust supplier diversification, and targeted pilot programs to validate innovations before broad deployment.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Adoption of novel zeolite-based catalysts for maximizing propylene yields in FCC units
  • 5.2. Implementation of AI-driven process control systems for real-time FCC reactor optimization
  • 5.3. Integration of carbon capture technologies into FCC units to reduce CO2 emissions and footprint
  • 5.4. Retrofitting existing FCC units with residue upgrading catalysts to process heavy crude blends
  • 5.5. Co-processing of renewable and bio-based feedstocks in FCC to support decarbonization goals
  • 5.6. Development of sulfur-scavenging additives to mitigate SOx emissions from FCC regenerator flue gas
  • 5.7. Optimization of catalyst circulation rates to enhance conversion efficiency and extend cycle length
  • 5.8. Deployment of inline particle size analyzers for monitoring catalyst attrition and activity in FCC units

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Components

  • 8.1. Binder
  • 8.2. Filler
  • 8.3. Matrix
  • 8.4. Zeolite Catalyst
    • 8.4.1. Zeolite Y
    • 8.4.2. ZSM-5 Zeolite

9. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Configuration

  • 9.1. Side by Side Type
  • 9.2. Stacked Type

10. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Feedstock Type

  • 10.1. Deasphalted Oil
  • 10.2. Residue
  • 10.3. Vacuum Gas Oil

11. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Unit Capacity

  • 11.1. Large Capacity
  • 11.2. Medium Capacity
  • 11.3. Small Capacity

12. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by End User

  • 12.1. Diesel Production
  • 12.2. Gasoline Production
  • 12.3. Light Olefins Production
    • 12.3.1. Ethylene
    • 12.3.2. Propylene

13. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Axens Joint Stock Company
    • 16.3.2. BASF SE
    • 16.3.3. CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
    • 16.3.4. Chevron Lummus Global
    • 16.3.5. DuPont de Nemours, Inc
    • 16.3.6. Emerson Electric Co.
    • 16.3.7. Evonik Industries AG
    • 16.3.8. Exxon Mobil Corporation
    • 16.3.9. Flour Corporation
    • 16.3.10. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 16.3.11. JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
    • 16.3.12. Johnson Matthey Group.
    • 16.3.13. Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation
    • 16.3.14. Kuwait Catalyst Company.
    • 16.3.15. Magma Group
    • 16.3.16. N.E. CHEMCAT Corporation
    • 16.3.17. Naugra
    • 16.3.18. Shell PLC
    • 16.3.19. Sulzer Ltd.
    • 16.3.20. W.R. Grace Company
    • 16.3.21. Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD
    • 16.3.22. Zeopore Technologies NV

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. G7 FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. NATO FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 28. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 29. FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 30. FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 267. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 268. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 269. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 270. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 271. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 272. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 273. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 274. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 275. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 276. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 277. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 278. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 279. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 280. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 281. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 282. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 283. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 284. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 285. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 286. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 287. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 288. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 289. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 290. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 291. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 292. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 293. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 294. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 295. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 296. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 297. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 298. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 299. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 300. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 301. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 302. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 303. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 304. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 305. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 306. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 307. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 308. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 309. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 310. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 311. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 312. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 313. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 314. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 315. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 316. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET