查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1853687

依系統類型、最終用途、處理器類型和架構分類的天基運算平台市場－2025-2032年全球預測

Space On-board Computing Platform Market by System Type, End Use, Processor Type, Architecture - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 188 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2032 年，太空運算平台市場規模將達到 70.8 億美元，複合年成長率為 20.01%。

關鍵市場統計數據
基準年2024年 16.4億美元
預計年份：2025年 19.7億美元
預測年份 2032 70.8億美元
複合年成長率（%） 20.01%

模組化、彈性以及邊緣處理重新定義了系統工程和採購的預期，為現代車載運算奠定了基礎。

隨著專案對更高效能、更強韌性和更具適應性的架構提出更高要求，以應對長期任務，機載運算平台領域正迅速走向成熟。本文將探討影響當前策略規劃的核心主題：計算子系統與有效載荷子系統之間更緊密的整合、對抗輻射加固設計的日益重視，以及在數據生成地點附近進行數據處理的需求不斷成長。這些因素共同作用，正在重新定義民用、商業和國防航太專案的採購標準、系統工程優先順序和供應商選擇框架。

此外，業界正逐漸達成共識：軟體定義能力、模組化硬體堆疊和標準化介面能夠降低整合風險並加速任務進度。隨著專案轉向多任務衛星群和在軌服務模式轉變，星載電腦必須在原始吞吐量、確定性運作、能源效率和優雅降級模式之間取得平衡。從這個角度來看，專案經理和設計人員必須將運算平台視為策略推動因素，而不僅僅是組件，它們將塑造下游運行概念、與地面系統的互動以及全生命週期保障計劃。

因此，相關人員必須重新評估關於集中式處理、溫度控管和資料下行鏈路依賴性的傳統假設。過渡計畫應納入技術準備評估、供應鏈視覺性和跨域檢驗策略，以使預期效能與任務保障要求保持一致。本引言為深入分析近期變化、政策影響、分段訊號的解讀以及共同影響採購和整合選擇的區域特定動態奠定了基礎。

異質處理器、模組化架構和增強的彈性方面的進步如何重塑在軌系統的設計範式和運行預期？

處理器效能、軟體架構和任務概念的進步正在改變星載運算格局，進而影響技術藍圖和商業性合作。高吞吐量有效載荷和分散式衛星群正日益推動著從單體大型主機向異構處理架構的轉變，這種架構融合了抗輻射商用現成組件（COTS）、加固子系統和專用加速器。這種轉變能夠提昇在軌自主性和即時資料處理能力，從而減少對稀缺下行鏈路容量的依賴，並加速可操作情報的交付。

同時，強調模組化和標準介面的設計理念使得主整合商和二級供應商能夠解耦開發進度，並引入迭代升級，而無需對平台進行徹底的重新設計。因此，生命週期管理更加重視可重構性、軟體修補程式策略以及檢驗架構，這些架構能夠檢驗增量變更，同時最大限度地降低任務風險。這種轉變也有利於利用邊緣處理來在局部決策迴路的分散式架構模式，從而改善延遲並提高系統彈性。

最後，供應鏈韌性和網路安全已提升至與供應鏈韌性同等重要的績效指標地位。日益加劇的地緣政治不確定性和威脅因素要求設計團隊從一開始就將溯源追蹤、安全發射機制和故障偵測分析納入考量。總而言之，這些變革趨勢需要現代化的採購框架、更完善的系統工程管治以及硬體、軟體和任務運作團隊之間的跨學科協作。

應對新的貿易政策現實和重組供應鏈的壓力，將提高採購韌性和零件溯源性性作為關鍵的計畫優先事項。

近期影響技術進口和零件流通的關稅政策變化，為依賴全球供應鏈建構計算子系統的規劃人員帶來了新的考量。適用於特定電子元件、處理器和子系統組件的關稅調整，凸顯了供應鏈映射和供應商多元化的重要性。因此，專案團隊現在需要在採購生命週期的早期階段檢驗替代籌資策略，以降低交貨前置作業時間的不確定性以及跨境物流和海關手續帶來的成本增加。

為此，許多系統整合商正透過加快對替代供應商的資格認證和最佳化材料清單清單合理化來降低單一來源風險。採購團隊正在將關稅敏感性分析納入合約談判，工程團隊則在設計支援替代的介面，以便在無需大量重新驗證的情況下進行臨時零件替換。作為一項過渡措施，具有自主權要求的組織也在探索本地組裝和最終測試方案，以避免觸發某些關稅並縮短物流鏈。

此外，關稅主導的供應商重新評估與同期技術變革的雙重影響，更加凸顯了文件、可追溯性和合規性工作流程的重要性。因此，設計機構應計劃擴大配置管理工作，並加強供應商審核，以確保替代產品保持抗輻射能力、熱性能和電磁相容性。簡而言之，關稅變化已將供應鏈策略從後勤部門提升為核心專案風險因素，需要在採購、工程和專案管治等各個環節進行綜合應對。

解讀系統級和基於用例的細分，以使處理器選擇和架構模式與任務保障和運行要求保持一致。

分段式分類揭示了技術選擇和專案優先順序之間的交集，進而影響架構選擇和供應商參與。通訊子系統著重於衛星間鏈路、遙控和遙測能力，而導航子系統則優先考慮全球導航衛星系統 (GNSS) 解決方案、慣性測量單元和星敏感器，以滿足精確的姿態和定位需求。這些功能領域決定了認證機制和軟體分類策略，並決定了在關鍵任務運行​​期間如何分配和優先排序計算資源。

從最終用途的角度來看，火箭、衛星、太空站和無人探勘各自對環境、延遲和維護提出了獨特的要求。火箭需要高抗衝擊性和短開發週期，衛星需要長期的熱穩定性和抗輻射能力，太空站優先考慮模組化可維護性和載人運行的運作，而無人探勘需要強大的自主性和節能處理能力。這些不同的應用場景決定了處理器和系統結構的選擇。

在處理器類型方面，現成處理器和抗輻射處理器之間的權衡取決於效能、軟體生態系統和可靠性等級。現成處理器可以實現高運算密度和成本效益，但需要糾錯碼和冗餘等緩解策略。另一方面，抗輻射組件雖然單位成本較高，但通常原始吞吐量較低，卻能提供確定性效能。而強調雲端整合和邊緣處理的分散式架構則提供了更高的容錯性和擴充性，但需要先進的同步和分區方案。總而言之，將分區選擇與任務概況和生命週期約束相匹配，可以最佳化系統設計並明確採購路徑。

區域產業佈局、法規環境和夥伴關係模式如何影響全球市場的採購決策和整合路徑

區域動態影響供應鏈的可用性、監管壓力和夥伴關係機會，進而影響平台設計和整合策略。在美洲，強勁的商業活動和大量的國防投資推動了對先進機載運算的需求，成熟的供應商體系為快速原型製作和迭代開發提供了支援。該地區還強調供應商的透明度和風險共擔的合作協議，從而加速了模組化架構和基於商用現貨（COTS）的高速開發策略的採用。

歐洲、中東和非洲：在歐洲、中東和非洲，政府主導的專案需求與商業主導的衛星群結合，使得監管合規和跨國產業夥伴關係成為兩大重點。這些市場參與企業的採購通常需要在產業參與要求和績效目標之間取得平衡，從而導致關鍵子系統的選擇性國產化，並更加依賴聯盟模式來完成複雜的整合任務。在這種環境下，可驗證的過往業績、認證準備情況以及在軌安全合規性成為採購簡報的優先考慮因素。

亞太地區私營和政府部門都在快速提升能力，並專注於可擴展的製造和整合吞吐量。儘管該地區的供應鏈具備具有競爭力的組裝和測試能力，但整合商在採購高效能處理器時必須密切注意組件可追溯性和出口管制問題。在所有地區，互通性標準、網路安全預期和生命週期保障模式正逐漸成為影響合作夥伴選擇和長期專案論證的跨領域考量。

在專案選擇過程中，供應商差異化評估（包括輻射設計經驗、模組化產品策略和整合檢驗）是關鍵因素。

機載運算領域的主要企業由專業子系統供應商、垂直整合的主承包商和創新軟體公司組成。這些公司憑藉其在抗輻射加固設計方面的深厚積累、支持自主運行的軟體框架以及降低整合風險的成熟測試制度而脫穎而出。一些供應商也專注於提供垂直整合的解決方案，將硬體、中介軟體和檢驗服務捆綁在一起，從而簡化系統整合商的供應商管理，並減少整合過程中的介面交接次數。

其他公司則採用模組化、開放標準的方法來競爭，這些方法能夠加快升級週期並促進第三方創新。保守型專案通常傾向於選擇擁有豐富飛行經驗和正式認證的供應商，而快速發展的商業專案則優先考慮能夠展現快速迭代、強大的軟體工具鏈和雲端支援模式的供應商。此外，處理器供應商和子系統整合商之間的夥伴關係也日益普遍，共同設計的模組能夠加快認證速度並減少介面不匹配的情況。

因此，採購團隊在評估供應商時，不僅要檢視其技術效能，還要檢視其供應鏈透明度、軟體生命週期支援以及嚴格的檢驗和整合測試實務。最具競爭力的供應商將是那些能夠提供端到端可追溯性、清晰的升級路徑以及與客戶任務概況和維護預期相符的協作藍圖的供應商。

將模組化設計、供應鏈彈性和軟體保障整合到專案採購中以加快任務準備的實用執行路徑

為了將策略意圖轉化為可執行的計劃，產業領導者應優先考慮以下四個核心行動，以應對技術、商業性和計劃風險：首先，將模組化和介面標準化納入早期需求，以便在不進行災難性翻新的情況下實現供應商替換和迭代維修，從而降低長期維修成本並加速採用新的製程技術。

第二，實施全面的供應鏈風險管理，結合雙源籌資策略、本地最終組裝方案以及以零件來源和合規性為重點的高階供應商審核。整合商還應將關稅敏感性和物流應急計劃納入採購里程碑，以避免後期中斷。第三，透過採用安全的開發生命週期、加密啟動鍊和邊緣異常偵測框架，加強軟體保障和網路安全。這將有助於維護任務完整性，同時實現先進的在軌自主性。

最後，透過協商達成支援分階段交付、韌體更新路徑和聯合檢驗活動的協議，使商業模式與產品生命週期實際情況相符。此類合約安排能實現風險共用，促進創新，同時確保專案課責交付。

結合技術資料、專家訪談和場景分析的嚴謹多源調查方法，檢驗了系統級設計見解和籌資策略。

本研究綜合了開放原始碼技術文獻、專利申請、標準文件、供應商產品簡介和權威政策聲明，並輔以對系統工程師、採購負責人和供應鏈專業人員的結構化訪談。主要數據與技術測試報告和已發布的項目披露資訊進行交叉核對，以確保一致性並突出聲明功能與實際性能之間的差距。在條件允許的情況下，數據還通過檢驗的認證記錄和供應商提供的整合案例研究檢驗，以評估其在實際應用中的適用性。

我們的分析方法強調各細分市場之間的相關性，並共同評估系統類型、處理器選擇和架構選擇，以得出可操作的見解。我們運用情境分析技術，探索在各種物流和關稅壓力下不同的供應商路徑，並使用設計權衡框架來量化集中式架構與分散式架構在營運上的影響。本研究始終秉持保守的推斷方法。結論是基於已記錄的證據和專家支持，而非推測性的外推。

最後，該調查方法還包括與獨立專家進行嚴格的審查，以發現盲點並對輻射緩解、軟體分區和生命週期維護等方面的假設進行壓力測試。這種多層次的方法確保了建議是基於技術實際情況，並適用於各種專案類型和採購環境。

綜合各項結論，強調計算平台作為策略資產，並制定綜合技術和採購規範以實現任務目標。

綜上所述，上述分析為專案設計者和採購機構提供了清晰的策略啟示。機載計算已從以組件為中心的考量演變為影響作戰概念、保障模式和國際夥伴關係動態的關鍵任務定義領域。因此，相關人員必須將運算平台視為策略資產，需要系統工程、網路安全和供應鏈管理等跨職能團隊的早期參與。

實現高吞吐量和低延遲絕不能以犧牲可靠的效能、可追溯性和可維護性為代價。此外，投資於模組化介面和穩健檢驗路徑的組織能夠快速採用技術進步，並降低長期整合風險。因此，架構選擇、供應商合作和生命週期合約的合理組合將決定哪些專案能夠在滿足不斷變化的任務需求的同時，保持可接受的風險和成本控制。

總而言之，將前瞻性的技術選擇與嚴格的供應鍊和合約框架相結合的嚴謹方法，將使該專案能夠最好地利用現代機載計算的優勢，同時應對長期任務和國際分散式開發生態系統帶來的複雜性。

目錄

第1章：序言

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場概覽

第5章 市場洞察

  • 用於深空探勘的人工智慧驅動的自主星載導航和任務規劃能力
  • 採用抗輻射加強的多核心處理器，並具備動態工作負載管理功能，以應用於衛星任務
  • 實現具有在軌重配置和更新功能的軟體定義衛星架構
  • 整合高吞吐量光星間通訊鏈路以實現即時資料中繼
  • 開發結合CPU、GPU和FPGA的低功耗異構運算平台，用於邊緣處理
  • 客製化輻射緩解策略加速商用現成組件的採用
  • 加強機載網路安全框架，以抵禦太空網路中新出現的威脅和入侵
  • 神經型態和量子啟發式處理器在先進空間資料分析和人工智慧任務的應用
  • 利用模組化、即插即用的硬體和軟體框架加速衛星有效載荷部署

第6章：美國關稅的累積影響，2025年

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 依系統類型分類的星載計算平台市場

  • 通訊系統
    • 衛星間鏈路
    • 遙控
    • 遙測
  • 飛行控制系統
  • 導航系統
    • GNSS
    • 慣性測量單元
    • 星體追蹤器
  • 機載資料處理
  • 電源管理系統

9. 以最終用途分類的星載計算平台市場

  • 發射火箭
  • 衛星
  • 太空站
  • 無人探測車

10. 依處理器類型分類的星載運算平台市場

  • 市售現成處理器
  • 耐輻射處理器

11. 依架構分類的星載運算平台市場

  • 集中式架構
    • 基於大型主機
    • 單一單元
  • 分散式架構
    • 雲端整合
    • 邊緣處理

12. 按地區分類的天基計算平台市場

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第13章 依組別分類的天基計算平台市場

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各國天基計算平台市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第15章 競爭格局

  • 2024年市佔率分析
  • FPNV定位矩陣，2024
  • 競爭分析
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • Thales SA
    • Airbus SE
    • Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • The Boeing Company
    • Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • BAE Systems plc
    • RUAG Space AG
    • Moog Inc.
    • Cobham plc
Product Code: MRR-8C74ADFC0D4B

The Space On-board Computing Platform Market is projected to grow by USD 7.08 billion at a CAGR of 20.01% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.64 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 1.97 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 7.08 billion
CAGR (%) 20.01%

Framing the modern on-board computing imperative where modularity, resilience, and edge processing redefine systems engineering and procurement expectations

The on-board computing platform space is undergoing rapid maturation as programs demand higher performance, greater resilience, and more adaptable architectures for extended missions. This introduction frames the central themes that shape current strategic planning: tighter integration between compute and payload subsystems, intensified attention to radiation-tolerant design, and the rising imperative to process data closer to where it is generated. These drivers combine to redefine procurement criteria, systems engineering priorities, and supplier selection frameworks across civil, commercial, and defense space initiatives.

Moreover, the industry is converging on a consensus that software-defined functionality, modular hardware stacks, and standardized interfaces will reduce integration risk and accelerate mission timelines. As programs pivot toward multi-mission constellations and on-orbit servicing concepts, on-board compute must balance raw throughput with deterministic behavior, power efficiency, and graceful degradation modes. In this context, program managers and architects should treat compute platforms not merely as components but as strategic enablers that shape downstream operational concepts, ground segment interactions, and lifecycle sustainment plans.

Consequently, stakeholders must reassess legacy assumptions about centralized processing, thermal management, and data downlink dependency. Transition planning should incorporate technology readiness assessments, supply chain visibility, and cross-domain verification strategies to align expected performance with mission assurance requirements. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper analysis of recent shifts, policy impacts, segmentation signal interpretation, and region-specific dynamics that together shape procurement and integration choices.

How advances in heterogeneous processors, modular architectures, and hardened resilience are reshaping design paradigms and operational expectations for in-orbit systems

The landscape for on-board computing is shifting in ways that alter technical roadmaps and commercial interactions, driven by advances in processor performance, software architectures, and mission concepts. Increasingly, high-throughput payloads and distributed constellations propel a move from monolithic mainframes toward heterogeneous processing fabrics that combine radiation-aware COTS, hardened subsystems, and specialized accelerators. This transition enables higher levels of autonomy and real-time data reduction on orbit, which in turn reduces reliance on scarce downlink capacity and accelerates actionable intelligence delivery.

Concurrently, a design philosophy that emphasizes modularity and standard interfaces allows prime integrators and secondary suppliers to decouple development timelines and introduce iterative upgrades without wholesale platform redesign. As a result, life-cycle management will emphasize reconfigurability, software patching strategies, and verification architectures that can validate incremental changes with minimal mission risk. This shift also favors distributed architectural patterns that leverage edge processing to localize decision loops, improving latency and fault tolerance.

Finally, supply chain resiliency and cybersecurity have ascended to near-equal priority with performance metrics. With geopolitical uncertainty and increased threat vectors, design teams must embed provenance tracking, secure boot mechanisms, and fault-detection analytics from the earliest stages. Taken together, these transformative trends necessitate updated acquisition frameworks, tighter systems engineering governance, and cross-disciplinary collaboration among hardware, software, and mission operations teams.

Navigating new trade policy realities and supply chain reconfiguration pressures that elevate procurement resilience and component provenance as program-critical priorities

Recent tariff policy changes affecting technology imports and component flows have introduced new considerations for planners who rely on global supply chains for compute subsystems. Tariff adjustments applied to certain electronic components, processors, and subsystem assemblies increase the importance of supply chain mapping and supplier diversification. Consequently, program teams must now validate alternate sourcing strategies earlier in the acquisition lifecycle to mitigate lead-time uncertainty and cost escalation associated with cross-border logistics and customs processing.

In response, many integrators are accelerating qualification of alternative suppliers and optimizing bill-of-materials rationalization to reduce exposure to single-source risks. This strategic pivot has operational implications: procurement teams are embedding tariff sensitivity analyses into contract negotiation, while engineering teams are designing substitution-ready interfaces that allow last-minute parts swaps without extensive requalification. As a transitional measure, organizations with sovereign requirements are also exploring localized assembly and final test options to circumvent certain tariff triggers and shorten logistics chains.

Moreover, the combined effect of tariff-driven supplier re-evaluation and concurrent technology shifts is amplifying the emphasis on documentation, traceability, and compliance workflows. Design authorities should therefore plan for expanded configuration management efforts and enhanced supplier audits to ensure that substitutions maintain radiation tolerance, thermal behavior, and electromagnetic compatibility. In short, tariff changes have elevated supply chain strategy from a back-office concern to a central program risk factor requiring integrated mitigation across sourcing, engineering, and program governance.

Interpreting system-level and use-case driven segmentation to align processor choices and architectural patterns with mission assurance and operational demands

Segment-level distinctions reveal where technology choices and program priorities intersect, influencing architecture selection and supplier engagement. Based on system type, communication systems, flight control systems, navigation systems, onboard data handling, and power management systems present distinct engineering demands; communication subsystems emphasize inter-satellite links, telecommand, and telemetry capabilities, while navigation subsystems prioritize GNSS solutions, inertial measurement units, and star trackers to meet precise attitude and positioning needs. These functional domains shape qualification regimes and software partitioning strategies, and they dictate how compute resources are allocated and prioritized during mission-critical operations.

From an end-use perspective, launch vehicles, satellites, space stations, and unmanned rovers each impose unique environmental, latency, and maintenance constraints. Launch vehicles require high shock tolerance and short development cycles, satellites demand long-term thermal stability and radiation resilience, space stations prioritize modular maintainability and uptime for crewed operations, and unmanned rovers require rugged autonomy and energy-aware processing. These use-case distinctions drive divergent choices in processor selection and systems architecture.

Regarding processor types, the tradeoff between commercial off-the-shelf processors and radiation-hardened processors centers on performance, software ecosystem, and assurance levels. COTS devices can deliver higher compute density and cost efficiency but necessitate mitigation strategies such as error-correcting codes and redundancy, while radiation-hardened parts provide deterministic behavior at higher per-unit cost and often reduced raw throughput. In architecture terms, centralized and distributed patterns present clear trade-offs; centralized configurations-either mainframe-based or single-unit approaches-simplify orchestration but can create single points of failure, whereas distributed architectures that are cloud-integrated or emphasize edge processing improve resilience and scalability but require sophisticated synchronization and partitioning schemes. Overall, aligning segmentation choices with mission profiles and lifecycle constraints yields optimized system designs and clearer procurement pathways.

How regional industrial footprints, regulatory environments, and partnership models influence procurement decisions and integration pathways across global markets

Regional dynamics influence supply chain availability, regulatory pressure, and partnership opportunities, which in turn affect platform design and integration strategies. In the Americas, strong commercial activity and significant defense investments drive demand for advanced on-board computing, supported by a mature supplier base that enables rapid prototyping and iterative development. This region also emphasizes vendor transparency and collaborative risk-sharing agreements, which facilitates accelerated adoption of modular architectures and COTS-based acceleration strategies.

Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibit a mix of sovereign program requirements and commercially driven constellations, prompting a dual focus on regulatory compliance and cross-border industrial partnerships. Procurement in these markets often balances industrial participation requirements with performance objectives, leading to selective indigenization of critical subsystems and increased reliance on consortium approaches for complex integration tasks. This environment prioritizes demonstrable provenance, certification readiness, and orbital safety compliance as part of the procurement narrative.

Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid capacity building across both commercial and government sectors, with an emphasis on scalable manufacturing and integration throughput. Supply chains in this region offer competitive assembly and test capabilities, but integrators must remain vigilant about component traceability and export-control implications when sourcing high-performance processors. Across all regions, interoperability standards, cybersecurity expectations, and lifecycle sustainment models are emerging as cross-cutting concerns that shape partner selection and long-term program affordability.

Assessing vendor differentiation where heritage in radiation design, modular product strategies, and integrated verification prove decisive for program selection

Leading companies in the on-board computing domain reflect a blend of specialized subsystem suppliers, vertically integrated primes, and innovative software houses. These organizations differentiate through combinations of heritage in radiation-tolerant design, software frameworks for autonomy, and proven test regimes that reduce integration risk. Some suppliers emphasize vertically integrated offerings that bundle hardware, middleware, and verification services, which simplifies supplier management for system integrators and reduces the number of discrete interface handoffs during integration.

Other firms compete on modular, open-standards approaches that enable faster upgrade cycles and third-party innovation. This diversity in supplier strategies enables program offices to select partners aligned with their risk posture: conservative programs often favor suppliers with extended flight heritage and formal certification practices, while fast-moving commercial ventures prioritize vendors who can demonstrate rapid iteration, robust software toolchains, and cloud-enabled support models. Moreover, partnerships between processor vendors and subsystem integrators are increasingly common, with co-designed modules that accelerate time-to-qualification and reduce interface mismatches.

As a consequence, procurement teams should evaluate vendors not only on technical performance but also on supply chain transparency, software lifecycle support, and evidence of rigorous verification-integration-test practices. The most competitive suppliers will be those that offer end-to-end traceability, clear upgrade pathways, and collaborative roadmaps that align with customer mission profiles and sustainment expectations.

Practical execution pathways to integrate modular design, supply resilience, and software assurance into program procurements to accelerate mission readiness

To convert strategic intent into executable program plans, industry leaders should prioritize four core actions that address technical, commercial, and programmatic risk. First, embed modularity and interface standardization into early requirements to enable supplier substitution and iterative upgrades without catastrophic requalification. Doing so reduces long-term sustainment cost and accelerates the adoption of emergent processing technologies.

Second, implement comprehensive supply chain risk management that combines dual-sourcing strategies, localized final assembly options, and advanced supplier audits focused on component provenance and compliance. Integrators should also incorporate tariff sensitivity and logistics contingency planning into procurement milestones to avoid late-stage disruptions. Third, strengthen software assurance and cybersecurity by adopting secure development lifecycles, encrypted boot chains, and anomaly detection frameworks that operate at the edge. This will preserve mission integrity while enabling advanced on-orbit autonomy.

Finally, align commercial models with lifecycle realities by negotiating contracts that support phased deliveries, firmware update pathways, and joint verification activities. These contractual constructs will enable shared risk and foster innovation while maintaining programmatic accountability. Taken together, these actions equip organizations to navigate technical complexity, regulatory friction, and supplier volatility with greater confidence and clearer decision levers.

A rigorous multi-source methodology integrating technical artifacts, expert interviews, and scenario analysis to validate system-level design insights and procurement strategies

This research synthesizes open-source technical literature, patent filings, standards documentation, supplier product briefs, and authoritative policy statements, augmented by structured interviews with systems engineers, procurement leads, and supply chain specialists. Primary inputs underwent triangulation against technical test reports and public program disclosures to ensure consistency and to highlight divergence between stated capabilities and demonstrable performance. Where possible, data were validated against verified qualification records and vendor-provided integration case studies to assess real-world applicability.

Analytical methods emphasized cross-segmentation correlation, wherein system type, processor selection, and architecture choices were evaluated together to develop actionable insights. Scenario analysis techniques were applied to explore supplier substitution pathways under varying logistics and tariff stressors, while design-trade frameworks helped quantify the operational implications of centralized versus distributed architectures. Throughout the study, a conservative approach to inference was maintained: conclusions rest on documented evidence and expert corroboration rather than speculative extrapolation.

Finally, the methodology included a rigorous review cycle with independent subject-matter experts to surface blind spots and to stress-test assumptions about radiation mitigation, software partitioning, and lifecycle sustainment. This multi-layered approach ensures that recommendations are grounded in technical reality and are applicable across a range of program types and procurement environments.

Concluding synthesis that underscores compute platforms as strategic assets and prescribes integrated technical and procurement discipline to realize mission objectives

Synthesis of the preceding analysis leads to clear strategic implications for program architects and procurement authorities. On-board computing has evolved from a component-centric consideration to a mission-defining domain that influences operational concepts, sustainment models, and international partnership dynamics. Stakeholders must therefore treat compute platforms as strategic assets that warrant early involvement from cross-functional teams spanning systems engineering, cybersecurity, and supply chain management.

Looking ahead, success will hinge on the ability to reconcile performance ambitions with pragmatic assurance measures: achieving high throughput and low latency must not come at the expense of provenance, traceability, or maintainability. Additionally, organizations that invest in modular interfaces and robust verification pathways will unlock faster insertion of technological advances and reduce long-term integration risk. In this way, the right mix of architecture selection, supplier engagement, and lifecycle contracting will determine which programs can meet evolving mission profiles while maintaining acceptable risk and cost trajectories.

In conclusion, a disciplined approach that couples forward-looking technical choices with rigorous supply chain and contractual frameworks will best position programs to exploit the benefits of modern on-board computing while managing the attendant complexities of long-duration missions and internationally distributed development ecosystems.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. AI-driven autonomous onboard navigation and mission planning capabilities for deep space exploration
  • 5.2. Adoption of radiation-hardened multicore processors with dynamic workload management for satellite missions
  • 5.3. Implementation of software-defined satellite architectures with in-orbit reconfiguration and updates
  • 5.4. Integration of high-throughput optical inter-satellite communication links for real-time data relay
  • 5.5. Development of low-power heterogeneous computing platforms combining CPUs, GPUs and FPGAs for edge processing
  • 5.6. Adoption of commercial off-the-shelf components accelerated by custom radiation mitigation strategies
  • 5.7. Enhancement of onboard cybersecurity frameworks to protect against emerging space network threats and intrusions
  • 5.8. Emergence of neuromorphic and quantum-inspired processors for advanced spaceborne data analysis and AI tasks
  • 5.9. Use of modular plug-and-play hardware and software frameworks to accelerate satellite payload deployment

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by System Type

  • 8.1. Communication Systems
    • 8.1.1. Inter Satellite Links
    • 8.1.2. Telecommand
    • 8.1.3. Telemetry
  • 8.2. Flight Control Systems
  • 8.3. Navigation Systems
    • 8.3.1. G N S S
    • 8.3.2. Inertial Measurement Units
    • 8.3.3. Star Trackers
  • 8.4. Onboard Data Handling
  • 8.5. Power Management Systems

9. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by End Use

  • 9.1. Launch Vehicles
  • 9.2. Satellites
  • 9.3. Space Stations
  • 9.4. Unmanned Rovers

10. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Processor Type

  • 10.1. Commercial Off The Shelf Processors
  • 10.2. Radiation Hardened Processors

11. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Architecture

  • 11.1. Centralized Architecture
    • 11.1.1. Mainframe Based
    • 11.1.2. Single Unit
  • 11.2. Distributed Architecture
    • 11.2.1. Cloud Integrated
    • 11.2.2. Edge Processing

12. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 15.3.2. Thales S.A.
    • 15.3.3. Airbus SE
    • 15.3.4. Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • 15.3.5. The Boeing Company
    • 15.3.6. Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • 15.3.7. BAE Systems plc
    • 15.3.8. RUAG Space AG
    • 15.3.9. Moog Inc.
    • 15.3.10. Cobham plc

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. ASIA-PACIFIC SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASEAN SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GCC SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. EUROPEAN UNION SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. BRICS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. G7 SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. NATO SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 28. SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 267. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 268. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 269. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 270. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 271. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 272. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 273. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 274. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 275. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 276. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 277. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 278. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM M