查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1832507

2025 年至 2032 年發電領域 CCS 市場（按技術類型、擷取方法、工廠類型、計劃規模和部署模型分類）全球預測

CCS in Power Generation Market by Technology Type, Capture Method, Plant Type, Project Scale, Deployment Model - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 182 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

預計到 2032 年，發電領域的 CCS 市場規模將成長至 374 億美元，複合年成長率為 10.28%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年2024年 170.9億美元
預計2025年 188.8億美元
預測年份：2032年 374億美元
複合年成長率（%） 10.28%

透過綜合觀點技術、政策和商業性推動因素，為發電領域採用碳捕獲奠定基礎

發電業正處於曲折點，脫碳需求、技術成熟度和法律規範交織在一起，影響著近期的投資和營運決策。碳捕集解決方案曾經是利基工程學科，如今正轉型成為公用事業公司、獨立電力生產商和工業電力消耗的策略能力。這種轉變反映出人們越來越普遍地認知到，減少排放需要採取一種組合方法，將可再生能源、能源效率措施、燃料轉換和碳捕集結合起來，以解決火力發電資產的殘餘排放。

在此背景下，相關人員必須應對複雜的情況，包括捕集技術、捕集方法、電廠類型和部署模式。為了降低進度和執行風險，人們越來越重視維修、與現有資產生命週期的兼容性以及模組化。同時，政策和企業對淨零排放的承諾，也使人們越來越認知到碳捕集是其他脫碳措施的補充，尤其是在電氣化不易實現或經濟上不可行的情況下，它是基本負載發電的必要組成部分。

引言構成了後續執行執行摘要，並為分析奠定了基調。本文強調了技術準備程度、供應鏈限制、管理體制和資金籌措結構之間的相互作用，這些因素將決定碳捕集技術在發電領域的應用速度和形態。讀者可以期待一個綜合的觀點，將各個技術領域與區域動態和商業性影響聯繫起來，同時為市場參與企業指明可行的路徑。

技術進步、政策動力與供應鏈演變如何重塑發電領域碳捕集技術的商業性路徑

隨著技術路徑、政策工具和商業性供應模式的不斷發展，發電領域的碳捕集格局正在改變。溶劑配方和製程整合的快速發展正在提高捕集效率並降低寄生負荷，而膜和吸附研究則為適用於小型發電廠的低成本模組化解決方案鋪平了道路。同時，混合捕集系統和熱電聯產整合等系統級創新，為回收廢棄能源和降低捕整合本（從整個電廠生命週期來看）創造了新的機會。

強化的獎勵、排放績效標準以及對低碳電力採購的偏好正在重塑計劃可行性和投資標準。伴隨這項政策勢頭，專案資金籌措結構也日趨成熟，優惠計劃融資和風險分擔機制擴大與商業債務和股權相結合，使規模更大、更複雜的計劃能夠從概念階段走向建設階段。

在工業領域，供應鏈的演變正在加速。零件製造商正在擴大薄膜、吸附劑和高可靠性壓力容器等關鍵投入的生產能力，而工程承包商則正在採用模組化製造和平行施工技術來加快進度。這些技術、政策和供應側的轉變共同縮短了執行時間，降低了感知風險，並擴大了碳捕集在不同電廠配置中具有經濟吸引力的用例。因此，計劃開發商和資產所有者正在從實驗性試點轉向策略部署計劃，將技術選擇與營運、財務和監管約束相結合。

檢驗2025 年美國關稅變化對供應鏈和採購的更廣泛影響，以及它們將如何重塑計劃風險分配和採購選擇

到2025年，美國關稅變化的累積影響將對發電工程的碳捕集供應鏈造成多方面壓力，並對籌資策略、供應商選擇和區域採購決策產生連鎖反應。進口鋼材和某些工程零件的關稅調整增加了承壓設備和大型加工模組的到岸成本，促使買家重新評估其總體擁有成本，並在條件允許的情況下考慮國內製造方案。同時，影響特種材料和催化劑的關稅也迫使供應商進行關鍵生產本地化或重新設計工藝流程，以減少對關稅敏感型投入品的依賴。

因此，計劃開發商正在延長採購週期，並優先考慮供應鏈的彈性。合約條款正在調整，以納入更明確的條款，例如關稅轉嫁、不可抗力以及與貿易政策波動相關的對沖策略。這提升了計劃開發組織內採購團隊的策略重要性，因為他們需要權衡短期價格影響與國內供應商夥伴關係、在地採購要求以及國內生產相關潛在獎勵帶來的長期利益。

此外，關稅環境正在加速關於模組化、小規模捕獲解決方案的討論，以減少對進口大宗設備的依賴。企業正在探索優先考慮標準化、工廠製造的模組的設計方法，這些模組可以在區域內運輸，從而最大限度地降低跨境關稅。政策回應和產業對策也正在湧現，包括聚合需求並協商優惠條款的供應商聯盟，以及將製造地遷至更靠近需求中心的合資企業。總而言之，這些調整反映了與關稅相關的供應鏈結構性變化如何改變風險分配、資本配置和技術選擇的計算方式。

按技術、擷取方法、工廠原型、計劃規模、部署模型等進行詳細細分，揭示差異化路徑和整合權衡

細緻的細分視角對於理解不同的技術路徑和計劃特徵如何影響發電領域中碳捕獲的適用性、成本促進因素和實施時間表至關重要。根據技術類型，捕獲方法分為燃燒後和燃燒前配置，每種配置都有不同的改造含義、整合複雜性和操作概況。根據捕獲方法，選項包括化學吸收、低溫分離、膜分離和物理吸附。化學吸收進一步分為鹼性和胺基溶劑；低溫分離包括液化和製冷循環方法；膜分離分為無機和聚合物膜化學；物理吸附包括活性碳和沸石介質。根據工廠類型，該領域包括生質能、整體煤氣化聯合循環、天然氣聯合循環、粉煤和垃圾焚化發電設施。 IGCC 工廠進一步透過氣流床和流體化床氣化技術進行區分，每種技術都會影響捕獲系統和二氧化碳純度曲線之間的協同作用。根據計劃規模，服務分為大型和小型部署，規模驅動圍繞模組化、資本密集度和資金籌措結構的選擇。最後，根據部署模型，計劃評估為棕地維修與待開發區整合，影響授權時間表、電氣整合和生命週期最佳化策略。

全面了解這些細分領域，有助於發現重要的交叉模式。例如，胺基後燃系統已成為粉煤電廠可靠的維修途徑，並注重溶劑管理和降低能耗；而無機膜技術則有望成為適用於小型天然氣複合迴圈電廠的低成本緊湊型裝置。與流體化床配置相比，配備氣流床氣化器的IGCC設施通常具有更高的二氧化碳分壓，更容易捕獲二氧化碳。同時，綠地計畫允許採用捕獲設計原則，以減少整合摩擦並最佳化蒸氣和熱量整合。棕地計劃通常優先考慮分階段實施，最大限度地減少工廠停機時間，以保持運作連續性。

透過這種細分獲得的見解使相關人員能夠將技術選擇與工廠特性、資金籌措目標和監管要求相結合，從而整體發電領域碳捕獲機會的策略契合度和執行信心。

亞太、歐洲、中東和非洲的區域動態和政策架構影響部署選擇和基礎設施調整

區域動態對全球發電領域碳捕獲的部署經濟性、政策獎勵和供應鏈選擇有著至關重要的影響。在美洲，聯邦獎勵、州級政策計劃以及大量私部門投資的結合，為示範計畫和早期商業計劃創造了良好的環境。該地區的政策框架也影響資金籌措結構和本地化決策，並傾向於優先考慮二氧化碳運輸和儲存的基礎設施安排。

在歐洲、中東和非洲，各國的脫碳目標、監管目標和碳定價機制正在塑造差異化的市場。一些國家正在迅速增加對碳捕獲和儲存的獎勵，而另一些國家則優先考慮替代性的低碳途徑。該地區先進的工程基礎設施以及某些司法管轄區靠近地質儲存潛力的地理位置，創造了有利於整合價值鏈的環境。然而，複雜的許可授權和跨境運輸挑戰需要謹慎的計劃規劃。在中東，強化的財政獎勵和豐富的二氧化碳儲存潛力相結合，正在推動具有產業協同效應的大型計劃。

亞太地區各國的能源結構、產業政策和可再生能源部署速度各不相同，因此採取了各種不同的方法。擁有大型燃煤電廠的國家正在探索維修途徑，將其視為更廣泛的能源轉型的一部分，而天然氣產能快速成長的國家則在評估捕集方案，以減少生命週期排放。該地區也正在加快本地供應商和工程公司的能力建設，從而為本地採購的設備節省潛在的成本和前置作業時間。在整個地區，政策制定者、公用事業公司和儲能開發商之間的協調對於實現可擴展部署和長期可行性仍然至關重要。

競爭和協作的商業行為將決定誰能在透過綜合技術、計劃交付和生命週期服務提供碳捕獲方面取得勝利。

電力碳捕集領域的關鍵公司層面動態反映了現有技術參與者、新興專業供應商以及彌合數位技術與製造能力之間差距的新參與企業的混合。現有的工程和建設公司擁有大型捕集工廠的系統整合經驗和計劃執行能力，而專業技術供應商則專注於核心捕集方法，例如先進溶劑、專有膜、低溫系統和高性能吸附劑。新參與企業通常專注於模組化工廠製造裝置或吸附劑化學或膜製造領域的利基改進，以降低資本支出並縮短試運行時間。

隨著計劃開發商尋求透過結合互補優勢（例如技術智慧財產權、EPC能力和計劃資金籌措）來降低執行風險並加快營運速度，策略夥伴關係和財團變得越來越普遍。許可和承購協議正在不斷發展，以反映長期營運支援和履約保證，這對於吸引建築金融機構和機構投資者至關重要。此外，企業正在透過超越設備供應的服務模式實現差異化，包括生命週期最佳化、透過數位雙胞胎進行預測性維護，以及將捕獲與運輸和儲存解決方案連接的綜合碳管理服務。

競爭態勢也將受到供應鏈決策和製造佈局的影響。那些將高價值零件生產策略性地定位在靠近需求中心的公司，將在應對力和降低電價方面獲得優勢。這種材料科學、製造、專案提供和數位服務能力的整合，將成為那些在電力產業碳捕集生態系統中佔據持久地位的公司的一個決定性特徵。

為行業領導者提供優先的實際行動，以降低執行風險、協調資金籌措並擴大多元化發電廠組合的碳捕獲

尋求加速碳捕集技術在發電領域應用的產業領導者應優先考慮一系列切實可行的舉措，以平衡短期成果和長期策略定位。首先，應根據電廠獨特的營運狀況和維修限制，優先選擇能夠最大限度減少停機時間並與現有蒸氣和熱系統整合的解決方案，以減少能源損失。其次，應尋求策略供應商夥伴關係和共同投資模式，以確保優先獲得關鍵零件，並實現關鍵製造的在地化，從而降低貿易政策風險並縮短前置作業時間。

第三，透過精心建構的擔保和獎勵機制，制定嚴格的合約策略，應對電價波動、供應鏈連續性和績效風險。第四，在適當情況下投資模組化和標準化，壓縮時間表，並在類似配置的工廠中釋放可重複的部署模式。第五，積極與政策制定者和區域基礎設施規劃人員合作，加速授權、二氧化碳運輸走廊建設和封存地點特性描述。最後，發展將公共風險緩解工具與私人資本結合的資金籌措結構，同時闡明清晰的績效指標和收益路徑，以吸引保守的貸款機構。透過實施這一系列行動，產業領導者可以將策略意圖轉化為可行的計劃，協調技術、資金和政策，實現可擴展的排放目標。

一種強大的多方法研究途徑，結合技術文獻、從業者訪談、案例研究和供應鏈映射，提供可行的見解

本調查方法基於多層面的方法，旨在整合與發電領域中碳捕集相關的技術、商業性和政策觀點。該方法結合了同行評審技術研究、公共文件和行業白皮書的系統性文獻綜述，以及與技術開發者、計劃發起人、EPC承包商和融資方進行的結構化訪談，以獲得關於整合挑戰和採購行為的實用見解。此外，透過對電廠原型和捕集方法的比較分析，評估了技術準備和部署特徵，以確定最適合的解決方案。

透過繪製零件流向、製造足跡和貿易政策變化圖，評估了供應鍊和關稅影響，以了解敏感點和採購影響。近期計劃的案例研究分析提供了經驗教訓，並推薦了有關執行順序、合約結構和營運外包的最佳實踐。為確保嚴謹性，研究結果透過多個資料來源進行三角測量，並透過與具有直接實施擷取計劃經驗的從業人員的專家評審會議檢驗。本調查方法強調資訊來源的透明度和交叉檢驗的穩健性，旨在為相關人員提供可靠且可操作的策略規劃見解。

簡要概述如何透過結合技術選擇、供應鏈彈性和政策參與的整合策略來實現可擴展的碳捕獲結果。

發電用碳捕獲有望在更廣泛的脫碳策略中發揮催化作用，但要充分發揮其潛力，需要切實協調技術選擇、政策獎勵和商業性供應機制。細分領域的選擇——技術類型、捕獲方法、電廠類型、計劃規模和部署模式——與區域動態相互作用，以確定捕獲解決方案在何處以及如何實現最大價值。對供應鏈壓力（包括關稅影響）的戰術性應對措施將在短期內影響採購和製造決策，而對模組化、標準化和本地製造的投資則可以降低長期執行風險。

從技術開發商到儲能業者再到金融機構，貫穿價值鏈的相關人員通力合作，最有能力將試點成功轉化為可擴展的計劃。嚴謹的合約簽訂、策略夥伴關係以及積極的政策參與相結合，可以幫助市場參與企業加快部署，同時管理資本和營運風險。最終，實現發電領域有效排放的途徑取決於如何利用互補優勢——技術創新、供應鏈韌性和有針對性的公眾支持——將碳捕獲納入均衡的脫碳組合。

目錄

第1章：前言

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場概況

第5章 市場洞察

  • 將碳捕獲技術整合到現有的燃煤發電廠和燃氣發電廠，以實現淨零目標
  • 在工業和發電廠擴大大規模捕碳封存叢集，以推動規模經濟
  • 引入模組化碳捕獲裝置，可在高需求時期靈活地改裝到峰值發電機上
  • 溶劑和吸附劑的進步正在提高 CCS 捕獲效率並降低發電廠的能源需求。
  • 創新資金籌措模式和官民合作關係關係加速電力產業公用事業規模CCS設施的企劃案融資
  • 開發海上二氧化碳運輸和儲存基礎設施，使沿海發電廠能夠利用遠處的地質儲存
  • 不斷發展的監管和稅收框架，以支持電力產業碳捕獲計劃的投資

第6章：2025年美國關稅的累積影響

第7章：人工智慧的累積影響，2025年

8. 發電領域CCS市場（依技術類型）

  • 燃燒後
  • 預燃

9. 捕集法發電中的CCS市場

  • 化學吸收
    • 鹼
    • 胺基
  • 深冷分離
    • 液化
    • 冷凍循環
  • 膜分離
    • 無機
    • 聚合物
  • 物理吸附
    • 活性碳
    • 沸石

第10章 發電廠 CCS 市場（以工廠類型）

  • 生質能
  • 整體煤氣化複合循環
    • 氣流床
    • 流體化床
  • 天然氣複合循環
  • 碎煤
  • 廢棄物能源化

第 11 章 發電領域 CCS 市場（依計劃規模）

  • 大規模
  • 小規模

第 12 章：發電領域 CCS 市場（依部署模式）

  • 棕地
  • 待開發區

第13章 發電領域CCS市場（按地區）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 歐洲、中東和非洲
    • 歐洲
    • 中東
    • 非洲
  • 亞太地區

第14章 發電業CCS市場（依類別）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第15章 各國發電領域CCS市場

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英國
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 俄羅斯
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韓國

第16章競爭格局

  • 2024年市佔率分析
  • 2024年FPNV定位矩陣
  • 競爭分析
    • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
    • Fluor Corporation
    • Shell plc
    • Linde plc
    • Aker Solutions ASA
    • Technip Energies NV
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • Siemens Energy AG
    • Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
    • Saipem SpA
Product Code: MRR-433AB1DC28C0

The CCS in Power Generation Market is projected to grow by USD 37.40 billion at a CAGR of 10.28% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 17.09 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 18.88 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 37.40 billion
CAGR (%) 10.28%

Setting the stage for carbon capture adoption in power generation through an integrated view of technology, policy, and commercial enablers

The power generation sector is at an inflection point where decarbonization imperatives, technology maturity, and regulatory frameworks intersect to shape near-term investment and operational decisions. Carbon capture solutions, once a niche engineering discipline, are transitioning into a strategic capability for utilities, independent power producers, and industrial power consumers. This transition reflects a broader recognition that emissions reductions will require a portfolio approach combining renewables, efficiency measures, fuel switching, and carbon capture to address residual emissions from thermal generation assets.

Against this backdrop, stakeholders must navigate a complex landscape of capture technologies, capture methods, plant types, and deployment models. There is an increasing focus on retrofitability, compatibility with existing asset lifecycles, and modularization to reduce schedule and execution risk. Meanwhile, policy and corporate net-zero commitments are raising the profile of carbon capture as a necessary complement to other decarbonization levers, particularly for baseload generation that cannot be easily or economically electrified.

This introduction frames the executive summary that follows and sets expectations for the analysis. It emphasizes the interplay between technology readiness, supply-chain constraints, regulatory regimes, and financing structures that collectively determine the pace and shape of carbon capture adoption in power generation. Readers should expect an integrated perspective that links technical segmentation to regional dynamics and commercial implications, while highlighting actionable pathways for market participants.

How converging technological advances, policy momentum, and supply-chain evolution are reshaping commercial pathways for carbon capture deployment in power generation

The landscape for carbon capture in power generation is undergoing transformative shifts driven by evolving technology pathways, policy instruments, and commercial delivery models. Rapid advances in solvent formulations and process integration are improving capture efficiency and reducing parasitic loads, while membrane and adsorption research is unlocking routes to lower-capex, modular solutions suitable for smaller-scale plants. Simultaneously, system-level innovations such as hybrid capture trains and combined heat and power integration are enabling new opportunities to reclaim waste energy and lower cost of capture when evaluated across the plant lifecycle.

Policy changes are exerting strong directional influence: enhanced incentives, emissions performance standards, and procurement preferences for low-carbon power are reshaping project viability and investment criteria. This policy momentum is matched by a maturation of project financing structures that increasingly pair concessional public finance and risk-sharing mechanisms with commercial debt and equity, allowing larger and more complex projects to move from concept to construction.

On the industrial front, supply-chain evolution is accelerating. Component manufacturers are scaling capacity for key inputs such as membranes, sorbents, and high-integrity pressure vessels, while engineering contractors are adopting modular fabrication and parallel construction techniques to compress schedules. Together, these technology, policy, and supply-side shifts are reducing execution timelines, lowering perceived risk, and broadening the set of economically attractive use cases for carbon capture across diverse power plant configurations. As a result, project developers and asset owners are moving from exploratory pilots to strategic deployment planning that aligns technology choice with operational, financial, and regulatory constraints.

Examining the broader supply-chain and procurement consequences of United States tariff shifts in 2025 and how they reshape project risk allocation and sourcing choices

The cumulative effects of United States tariff developments in 2025 have exerted multi-dimensional pressure on the carbon capture supply chain for power generation projects, with ripple effects for procurement strategies, vendor selection, and regional sourcing decisions. Tariff adjustments on imported steel and certain engineered components have increased landed costs for pressure-containing equipment and large fabricated modules, prompting buyers to reassess total cost of ownership and to consider domestic manufacturing options where available. In parallel, tariffs affecting specialty materials and catalysts have pressured suppliers to localize critical production or to reengineer processes to reduce exposure to tariff-sensitive inputs.

As a consequence, project developers are extending sourcing horizons and placing greater emphasis on supply-chain resilience. Contractual terms have adapted to include more explicit clauses for tariff pass-through, force majeure, and hedging strategies tied to trade policy volatility. This has increased the strategic importance of procurement teams within project development organizations, as they weigh the trade-offs between near-term price impacts and long-term benefits associated with domestic supplier partnerships, local content requirements, and potential incentives tied to in-country fabrication.

Moreover, the tariff environment has accelerated conversations around modularized, small-scale capture solutions that reduce dependence on imported oversized equipment. Companies are exploring design approaches that prioritize standardized, factory-built modules that can be transported regionally, thereby minimizing cross-border tariff exposure. Policy responses and industry countermeasures are also emerging, including supplier consortia that aggregate demand to negotiate favorable terms and joint ventures that relocate manufacturing footprints closer to demand centers. Taken together, these adaptations reflect a shifting calculus for risk allocation, capital deployment, and technology selection driven by tariff-related structural changes in the supply chain.

How detailed segmentation across technology, capture methods, plant archetypes, project scale, and deployment model reveals differentiated pathways and integration trade-offs

A granular segmentation lens is essential to understand how diverse technological pathways and project characteristics influence suitability, cost drivers, and deployment timelines for carbon capture in power generation. Based on technology type, capture approaches are distinguished between post combustion and pre combustion configurations, each presenting distinct retrofitting implications, integration complexity, and operational profiles. Based on capture method, options include chemical absorption, cryogenic separation, membrane separation, and physical adsorption; chemical absorption further branches into alkaline and amine-based solvents, cryogenic separation includes liquefaction and refrigeration-cycle approaches, membrane separation differentiates between inorganic and polymeric membrane chemistries, and physical adsorption spans activated carbon and zeolite media. Based on plant type, the sector encompasses biomass, integrated gasification combined cycle, natural gas combined cycle, pulverized coal, and waste-to-energy facilities, with IGCC plants further distinguished by entrained flow and fluidized bed gasification technologies, each affecting synergies with capture systems and CO2 purity profiles. Based on project scale, offerings diverge into large-scale and small-scale deployments, with scale driving choices around modularity, capital intensity, and financing structures. Finally, based on deployment model, projects are evaluated across brownfield retrofits and greenfield integrations, influencing permitting timelines, electrical integration, and lifecycle optimization strategies.

Understanding these segments in concert reveals important cross-cutting patterns. For example, amine-based post-combustion systems have established themselves as a reliable retrofit pathway for pulverized coal plants, albeit with attention to solvent management and energy penalty mitigation, while inorganic membranes show promise for lower-capex, compact units suitable for smaller natural gas combined cycle plants. IGCC facilities with entrained flow gasifiers often provide higher CO2 partial pressures that simplify capture compared with some fluidized bed configurations. Meanwhile, greenfield projects allow for design-for-capture principles that reduce integration friction and enable optimized steam and heat integration, whereas brownfield projects frequently prioritize minimized plant downtime and phased implementation to manage operational continuity.

These segmentation-driven insights enable stakeholders to align technology selection with plant characteristics, financing appetite, and regulatory obligations, thereby improving strategic fit and execution confidence across the spectrum of carbon capture opportunities in power generation.

Regional dynamics and policy architectures across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape deployment choices and infrastructure coordination

Regional dynamics materially shape the deployment economics, policy incentives, and supply-chain options for carbon capture in power generation across the globe. In the Americas, a combination of federal incentives, state-level policy initiatives, and significant private-sector investment has generated a fertile environment for demonstration and early commercial projects, with pronounced interest in retrofits for existing natural gas and coal-fired assets as well as in capacity built around large industrial clusters. Policy frameworks in this region also influence financing structures and local content decisions, and they tend to prioritize infrastructure coordination for CO2 transport and storage.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory ambition and carbon pricing mechanisms, alongside national decarbonization targets, are creating differentiated markets where some countries move rapidly to incentivize capture and storage while others prioritize alternative low-carbon pathways. The region's advanced engineering base and proximity to geological storage prospects in certain jurisdictions create an environment conducive to integrated value chains; however, permitting complexities and cross-border transport issues require careful project planning. In the Middle East, the intersection of enhanced fiscal incentives and abundant CO2 storage potential is advancing large-scale projects with industrial synergies.

Asia-Pacific presents a mosaic of approaches driven by national energy mixes, industrial policy, and the pace of renewable uptake. Countries with significant coal-fired fleets are investigating retrofit pathways as part of broader energy transitions, whereas jurisdictions with fast-growing natural gas capacity are evaluating capture options to mitigate lifecycle emissions. The region is also witnessing accelerated capacity building among local suppliers and engineering firms, which contributes to potential cost reductions and shorter lead times for regionally sourced equipment. Across all regions, coordination between policymakers, utilities, and storage developers remains a central enabler for scalable deployment and long-term viability.

Competitive and collaborative company behaviors that determine who wins in carbon capture provision through integrated technology, project delivery, and lifecycle services

Key company-level dynamics in the carbon capture for power generation space reflect a mix of technology incumbents, emerging specialist suppliers, and new entrants bridging digital and manufacturing capabilities. Established engineering and construction firms bring systems integration experience and project execution capacity for large-scale capture plants, while specialist technology providers focus on core capture methods such as advanced solvents, proprietary membranes, cryogenic systems, and high-performance adsorbents. Newer entrants often concentrate on modular, factory-built units or on niche improvements in sorbent chemistry and membrane fabrication that reduce capex and shorten commissioning timelines.

Strategic partnerships and consortiums are increasingly common, as project developers seek to combine complementary strengths-technology IP, EPC capacity, and project financing-to reduce execution risk and accelerate time to operation. Licensing and off-take agreements are evolving to reflect long-term operational support and performance guarantees, which are critical to attracting construction lenders and institutional investors. Additionally, companies are differentiating through service models that extend beyond equipment supply to include lifecycle optimization, predictive maintenance enabled by digital twins, and integrated carbon management services that connect capture to transport and storage solutions.

Competitive dynamics are also shaped by supply-chain decisions and manufacturing footprints. Firms that strategically locate production of high-value components closer to demand centers are gaining advantages in responsiveness and tariff exposure mitigation. This consolidation of capabilities-spanning material science, fabrication, project delivery, and digital services-will be a defining feature for companies that secure durable roles in the power-sector carbon capture ecosystem.

Prioritized, practical actions for industry leaders to reduce execution risk, align financing, and scale carbon capture delivery across diverse power plant portfolios

Industry leaders seeking to accelerate carbon capture deployment in power generation should prioritize a set of actionable moves that balance near-term deliverables with long-term strategic positioning. First, align technology selection with plant-specific operational profiles and retrofit constraints, favoring solutions that minimize downtime and integrate with existing steam and heat systems to reduce energy penalties. Second, pursue strategic supplier partnerships and co-investment models that secure preferential access to key components and enable localization of critical manufacturing to mitigate trade-policy risks and shorten lead times.

Third, embed rigorous contracting strategies that address tariff volatility, supply-chain continuity, and performance risk through carefully structured guarantees and incentives. Fourth, invest in modularization and standardization where appropriate to compress schedules and unlock repeatable deployment models across similarly configured plants. Fifth, proactively engage with policymakers and regional infrastructure planners to accelerate permitting, CO2 transport corridor development, and storage site characterization, because coordinated policy and infrastructure commitments materially reduce project execution risk. Finally, develop financing structures that combine public de-risking instruments and private capital, while articulating clear performance metrics and revenue pathways to attract conservative lenders. Implementing this set of actions will help industry leaders convert strategic intent into deliverable projects that align technology, financing, and policy to achieve scalable emissions reductions.

A robust, multi-method research approach combining technical literature, practitioner interviews, case studies, and supply-chain mapping to produce actionable insights

This research is grounded in a multi-pronged methodology designed to integrate technical, commercial, and policy perspectives relevant to carbon capture in power generation. The approach combined systematic literature synthesis of peer-reviewed technical studies, public policy documents, and industry white papers with structured interviews conducted across technology developers, project sponsors, EPC contractors, and financiers to capture practical insights into integration challenges and procurement behavior. Additionally, technology readiness and deployment characteristics were assessed through comparative analysis of plant archetypes and capture methods to identify where solutions deliver the greatest fit.

Supply-chain and tariff impacts were evaluated by mapping component flows, manufacturing footprints, and trade policy changes to understand sensitivity points and procurement implications. Case study analysis of recent projects provided lessons on execution sequencing, contractual structures, and operational commissioning that informed recommended best practices. To ensure rigor, findings were triangulated across multiple data sources and validated through expert review sessions with practitioners who have direct implementation experience in capture projects. The methodology emphasizes transparency in sources and robustness in cross-validation to provide stakeholders with reliable, actionable insights for strategic planning.

A concise synthesis of how integrated strategies combining technology selection, supply-chain resilience, and policy engagement enable scalable carbon capture outcomes

Carbon capture for power generation is poised to play a catalytic role in broader decarbonization strategies, but realizing that potential requires pragmatic alignment of technology selection, policy incentives, and commercial delivery mechanisms. The interplay between segmentation choices-technology type, capture method, plant type, project scale, and deployment model-and regional dynamics will determine where and how capture solutions deliver the most value. Tactical responses to supply-chain pressures, including tariff impacts, will shape procurement and manufacturing decisions in the near term, while investment in modularization, standardization, and local manufacturing can reduce long-term execution risk.

Stakeholders that coordinate across the value chain, from technology developers to storage operators and financiers, will be best positioned to translate pilot successes into scalable projects. By coupling disciplined contracting, strategic partnerships, and proactive policy engagement, market participants can accelerate deployment while managing capital and operational risk. Ultimately, the path to meaningful emissions reductions from power generation will hinge on integrating carbon capture into a balanced decarbonization portfolio, leveraging the complementary strengths of technology innovation, supply-chain resilience, and targeted public support.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Integration of carbon capture technology in existing coal and gas plants to meet net-zero targets
  • 5.2. Expansion of large-scale carbon capture and storage clusters across industrial and power hubs to drive economies of scale
  • 5.3. Deployment of modular carbon capture units for flexible retrofit on peak power generators during high demand periods
  • 5.4. Advances in solvent and sorbent materials improving capture efficiency and reducing energy requirements of power plant CCS
  • 5.5. Innovative financing models and public-private partnerships accelerating project finance for utility-scale CCS facilities in the power sector
  • 5.6. Development of offshore CO2 transport and storage infrastructure enabling coastal power plants to utilize distant geological reservoirs
  • 5.7. Regulatory and tax incentive frameworks evolving to support investment in carbon capture projects for the power industry

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Technology Type

  • 8.1. Post Combustion
  • 8.2. Pre Combustion

9. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Capture Method

  • 9.1. Chemical Absorption
    • 9.1.1. Alkaline
    • 9.1.2. Amine Based
  • 9.2. Cryogenic Separation
    • 9.2.1. Liquefaction
    • 9.2.2. Refrigeration Cycle
  • 9.3. Membrane Separation
    • 9.3.1. Inorganic
    • 9.3.2. Polymeric
  • 9.4. Physical Adsorption
    • 9.4.1. Activated Carbon
    • 9.4.2. Zeolite

10. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Plant Type

  • 10.1. Biomass
  • 10.2. Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
    • 10.2.1. Entrained Flow
    • 10.2.2. Fluidized Bed
  • 10.3. Natural Gas Combined Cycle
  • 10.4. Pulverized Coal
  • 10.5. Waste To Energy

11. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Project Scale

  • 11.1. Large Scale
  • 11.2. Small Scale

12. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Deployment Model

  • 12.1. Brownfield
  • 12.2. Greenfield

13. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. CCS in Power Generation Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
    • 16.3.2. Fluor Corporation
    • 16.3.3. Shell plc
    • 16.3.4. Linde plc
    • 16.3.5. Aker Solutions ASA
    • 16.3.6. Technip Energies N.V.
    • 16.3.7. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 16.3.8. Siemens Energy AG
    • 16.3.9. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
    • 16.3.10. Saipem S.p.A.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASIA-PACIFIC CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. ASEAN CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. GCC CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. EUROPEAN UNION CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. BRICS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. G7 CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. NATO CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 28. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 29. CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 30. CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POST COMBUSTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POST COMBUSTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POST COMBUSTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POST COMBUSTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POST COMBUSTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POST COMBUSTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PRE COMBUSTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PRE COMBUSTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PRE COMBUSTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PRE COMBUSTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PRE COMBUSTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PRE COMBUSTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ALKALINE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ALKALINE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ALKALINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ALKALINE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ALKALINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ALKALINE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY AMINE BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY AMINE BASED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY AMINE BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY AMINE BASED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY AMINE BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY AMINE BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUEFACTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUEFACTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUEFACTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUEFACTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUEFACTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUEFACTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATION CYCLE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATION CYCLE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATION CYCLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATION CYCLE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATION CYCLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REFRIGERATION CYCLE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INORGANIC, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERIC, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERIC, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERIC, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMERIC, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVATED CARBON, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVATED CARBON, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVATED CARBON, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVATED CARBON, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVATED CARBON, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ACTIVATED CARBON, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BIOMASS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BIOMASS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BIOMASS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BIOMASS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BIOMASS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BIOMASS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ENTRAINED FLOW, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ENTRAINED FLOW, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ENTRAINED FLOW, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ENTRAINED FLOW, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ENTRAINED FLOW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY ENTRAINED FLOW, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY FLUIDIZED BED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY FLUIDIZED BED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY FLUIDIZED BED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY FLUIDIZED BED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY FLUIDIZED BED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY FLUIDIZED BED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PULVERIZED COAL, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PULVERIZED COAL, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PULVERIZED COAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PULVERIZED COAL, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PULVERIZED COAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PULVERIZED COAL, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TO ENERGY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TO ENERGY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TO ENERGY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TO ENERGY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TO ENERGY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY WASTE TO ENERGY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE SCALE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE SCALE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE SCALE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE SCALE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE SCALE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE SCALE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL SCALE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL SCALE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL SCALE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL SCALE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL SCALE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL SCALE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BROWNFIELD, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BROWNFIELD, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BROWNFIELD, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BROWNFIELD, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BROWNFIELD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY BROWNFIELD, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GREENFIELD, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GREENFIELD, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GREENFIELD, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GREENFIELD, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GREENFIELD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY GREENFIELD, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. GLOBAL CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. AMERICAS CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. NORTH AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. LATIN AMERICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 267. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 268. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 269. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 270. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 271. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 272. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 273. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 274. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 275. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 276. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 277. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 278. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 279. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 280. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 281. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 282. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 283. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 284. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PROJECT SCALE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 285. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 286. EUROPE CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 287. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 288. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 289. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 290. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 291. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 292. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CAPTURE METHOD, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 293. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 294. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL ABSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 295. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 296. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY CRYOGENIC SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 297. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 298. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY MEMBRANE SEPARATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 299. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 300. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PHYSICAL ADSORPTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 301. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 302. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY PLANT TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 303. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 304. MIDDLE EAST CCS IN POWER GENERATION MARKET SIZE, BY INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)

TABLE