![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1827564
雲端存取安全仲介市場(按服務類型、部署方式、組織規模和產業)—2025-2032 年全球預測Cloud Access Security Brokers Market by Service Type, Deployment Model, Organization Size, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
預計到 2032 年,雲端存取安全仲介市場將成長至 698.3 億美元,複合年成長率為 19.84%。
主要市場統計數據 | |
---|---|
基準年2024年 | 164.1億美元 |
預計2025年 | 196.4億美元 |
預測年份:2032年 | 698.3億美元 |
複合年成長率(%) | 19.84% |
雲端存取安全仲介(CASB) 已成為現代安全架構中的關鍵技術,在用戶和雲端服務之間提供控制和可見性。雲端應用和監管審查力度加大的雙重壓力推動了 CASB 的採用。本介紹將 CASB 定位為不僅僅是點工具,更是一個戰略控制平面,它與身份系統、資料保護框架和威脅檢測工作流程整合,以確保在 SaaS、IaaS 和自訂 API 之間實現一致的策略執行。
現代 CASB 市場的特點是功能快速融合,並融合了諸如安全存取服務邊際(SASE)、零信任網路存取(ZTNA) 和雲端多重雲端安全控制等互補架構。相關人員優先考慮能夠提供強大資料保護控制、情境感知存取策略以及與身分識別提供者和安全資訊平台原生整合的解決方案。這種轉變反映了營運需求,即在混合雲端和多雲環境中減少安全摩擦,同時提高執行力的準確性。
這意味著 CASB 正在從利基閘道器設備轉向支援企業雲端管治的可程式策略平台。在評估 CASB 選項時,您應該考慮整合的廣度、延遲接受度、資料保護原語以及跨分散式團隊和服務模型運行策略的能力。
過去幾年,企業在雲端安全方面的處理方式發生了翻天覆地的變化,CASB 正處於幾個趨勢交匯的十字路口。首先,API 驅動型應用程式的快速普及要求企業能夠深度保護 API。現代 CASB 不再僅僅關注 Web 代理,而是強調 API 發現、行為分析和運行時保護,以減少資料外洩和 API 濫用。因此,產品藍圖和採購標準也在不斷發展,除了傳統的基於代理的控制措施外,還優先考慮 API 的可見性和保護。
其次,監管的複雜性和隱私要求推動了對整合執行機制的強大合規控制的需求。跨多個司法管轄區營運的企業需要在公有雲和私有雲之間實施一致且審核的策略,並期望 CASB 能夠提供符合監管義務的策略編配和合規報告。第三,加密和私有雲端技術的進步正在將資料保護策略從以邊界為中心的防禦轉變為自適應的、以資料為中心的控制,無論資料位於何處,這些控制都能持續有效。
此外,威脅情勢的演變加速了對即時分析和自適應策略響應的需求。 CASB 內建的機器學習主導的威脅防禦功能與終端和網路遙測技術協同工作,提供情境感知的干涉措施。企業正在尋求符合雲端優先策略的方案,同時應對混合部署和本地部署的限制。這些綜合性轉變要求安全領導者不僅要評估其 CASB 解決方案的當前覆蓋範圍,還要評估其隨著雲端架構和威脅向量的不斷變化而演進的能力。
美國2025年的關稅環境為雲端安全供應商及其客戶的採購和營運規劃帶來了額外的複雜性。關稅可能會擾亂供應商的供應鏈,增加硬體和設備成本,並改變本地部署和混合部署的總擁有成本 (TCO) 計算。依賴實體設備或專用硬體加速器實現內聯 CASB 功能的架構可能會對採購計劃和資本支出產生影響,可能需要製定應急計劃並進行架構調整。
除了硬體因素外,關稅還可能間接影響供應商的定價策略和合約結構。面對不斷上漲的進口成本,供應商可能會調整授權模式,轉向基於訂閱的雲端原生服務,或加快功能向 SaaS 的遷移,以保護客戶免受關稅波動的影響。對於最終用戶而言,這再次強調了評估雲端交付的 CASB 方案,並檢驗與本地投資相比的長期營運成本影響。
在營運方面,關稅也會影響全球部署策略。跨國公司必須評估區域採購和部署決策,考慮跨境成本差異,最佳化財務彈性,同時確保資料駐留、延遲和合規性要求不受影響。採購團隊、安全架構師和財務相關人員必須協作,模擬關稅敏感度場景,在必要時優先考慮雲端原生和軟體前向選項,並確保合約靈活性以適應宏觀經濟政策的變化。
細分層面的動態揭示了不同服務類型、部署方式、組織規模和垂直產業的不同優先級,了解這些差異對於制定有針對性的產品和打入市場策略至關重要。按服務類型分類,隨著企業應對高級自動化和惡意 API互動,我們看到重點轉向 API 保護和威脅防護,而合規性管理對於尋求審核和策略統一性的管治團隊來說仍然至關重要。資料保護仍然是一項基本要求,並且擴大透過加密和令牌化策略來實現,這些策略可在雲端服務之間實現可可攜式且持久的保護措施。
在考慮部署模型時,對於追求可擴展性和降低營運開銷的企業來說,雲端原生交付顯然是更好選擇,但當遺留系統或敏感工作負載需要本地管理時,混合架構也同樣適用。在雲端策略中,私有雲端和公有雲部署之間的差異會影響整合路徑、延遲考慮以及保全行動團隊所需的身分和網路互通性。
組織規模進一步影響買家的優先順序。大型企業尋求全面的功能集、企業級整合以及適用於全球營運的集中式策略編配,而中小企業則優先考慮能夠簡化部署、可預測定價並限制營運團隊的解決方案組件。最後,BFSI、政府、醫療保健、IT 和電信以及零售和電子商務等垂直行業由於其獨特的監管、性能和資料保護特性而優先考慮功能。提供行業特定模板、預先映射合規性控制和行業特定遠端檢測的解決方案在滿足垂直行業需求方面具有競爭優勢。
區域動態持續影響組織機構採用和運作 CASB 功能的方式,每個地區都呈現出獨特的監管、商業和基礎設施特徵。在美洲,雲端應用的日趨成熟以及對資料隱私框架的日益重視,正在推動對能夠支援跨國營運的強大合規控制和資料保護功能的需求。該地區的供應商生態系統正優先考慮與成熟的身份提供者和企業安全堆疊整合,以滿足大型商業和金融服務客戶的需求。
在歐洲、中東和非洲,監管環境更加分散,資料居住、跨境傳輸規則和區域合規框架需要靈活的部署選項和精細的資料管治控制。提供本地資料處理、詳細審核追蹤和靈活策略範本的解決方案可以滿足這些市場的多樣化需求。此外,本地服務供應商和系統整合商在實施和託管服務交付模式中發揮關鍵作用。
亞太地區正經歷雲端運算的快速普及,這主要得益於商業和公共部門的數位轉型舉措,尤其注重可擴展的雲端原生交付模式。該地區的市場需求通常優先考慮效能、本地雲端供應商整合和快速實施。在所有地區,與本地雲端平台的互通性、語言和政策在地化以及與本地系統整合商的夥伴關係仍然是決定成功採用和持續採用的關鍵因素。
市場上的現有和新興供應商正透過深度平台整合、專用資料保護原語以及減少客戶營運摩擦的託管服務來脫穎而出。領先的供應商正在大力投資 API安全功能,將行為分析功能整合到其偵測引擎中,並擴展與身分和終端平台的原生整合。這些投資反映了市場普遍的預期,即 CASB 將充當編配層,而不是孤立的執行點。
同時,致力於滿足即時標記化、隱私保護分析和行業特定合規自動化等細分需求的創新公司也日益受到關注。這些公司通常優先考慮快速部署、低延遲部署以及與知名雲端服務供應商的承包整合。策略夥伴關係和通路生態系統在供應商競爭力中發揮重要作用,使公司能夠將 CASB 功能與更廣泛的安全和雲端轉型服務捆綁在一起。
對於買家而言,供應商的選擇越來越受到成熟整合成功案例、營運支援和透明技術藍圖的驅動。能夠清楚展示事件偵測、策略執行時間和營運成本方面顯著改善的供應商,更有可能獲得採購委員會和安全營運中心的青睞,他們希望將安全工具與業務發展速度保持一致。
行業領導者應優先考慮幾個可行的步驟,使其安全策略與不斷變化的雲端風險和商業性現實保持一致。首先,採取以資料為中心的安全態勢,強調加密和令牌化作為跨平台和跨轄區資料遷移的基礎控制措施。這可以減少對薄弱邊界假設的依賴,並提供持久的保護,從而簡化跨境合規工作。
第二,加速對雲端原生 CASB 的評估,並推薦模組化、API 優先的解決方案,以便與身分識別提供者、終端遙測來源和 SIEM 平台無縫整合。這可以減少部署阻力,並加快檢測和回應用例的實現。第三,在供應商合約中納入資費敏感度和採購彈性,以緩解供應鏈成本衝擊。
第四,投資跨職能管治論壇,將安全、法律、採購和雲端架構師聚集在一起,確保政策框架可執行並與業務目標保持一致。第五,在高價值雲環境中試行高階威脅防禦和行為分析用例,以檢驗營運改進並完善調整實踐,然後再廣泛推廣。將以數據為中心的控制與策略採購和跨職能管治相結合,可以幫助領導者滿懷信心地推進雲端優先舉措,並降低風險。
本研究採用混合方法,整合了初步訪談、供應商技術文件和二手公開訊息,從而對 CASB 格局形成嚴謹而均衡的視角。主要資訊包括與多個行業的安全架構師、雲端工程負責人和採購專家進行結構化訪談,以了解營運優先事項、整合挑戰和部署偏好。供應商簡報和產品白皮書則提供了藍圖方向、功能和整合模型的見解。
我們利用二級資訊來源來檢驗行業趨勢、監管發展和技術關聯性,並專注於將聲明與可觀察的產品行為和案例研究進行配對。定性研究結果與技術演示相匹配,並在可能的情況下,與從業人員描述的匿名實施結果相匹配。本調查方法強調假設的透明度、基於訪談資料的合理推論以及對供應商聲明的保守解讀,以確保研究結果的實際相關性和操作適用性。
這種方法的局限性包括供應商功能命名的多樣性、產品開發的快速發展以及需要對高度戰術性的採購決策進行持續檢驗。為了緩解這些問題,建議著重於持久功能和架構契合度,而不是暫時的功能差距。
隨著雲端採用趨勢的深化和威脅行為者的不斷演變,CASB 將繼續成為企業策略的核心,用於維護敏感資料的控制並在異質雲端環境中實施一致的策略。該技術的作用正在從執行閘道器擴展到與身分、端點和分析平台整合的可程式策略層。青睞以資料為中心的管理、API 感知保護和靈活部署模式的組織將能夠更好地管理監管複雜性和營運規模。
領導者必須在快速採用雲端技術與嚴謹的管治之間取得平衡,同時選擇既符合其技術架構又符合組織能力的解決方案。雲端原生功能與本地部署限制之間的相互作用將繼續驅動採購決策,而市場將獎勵那些提供可組合、可整合且營運高效的產品的供應商。在這種環境下,嚴格的評估標準、跨職能管治以及對持久資料保護的關注,是實現安全永續雲端轉型的最可靠途徑。
The Cloud Access Security Brokers Market is projected to grow by USD 69.83 billion at a CAGR of 19.84% by 2032.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 16.41 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 19.64 billion |
Forecast Year [2032] | USD 69.83 billion |
CAGR (%) | 19.84% |
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) have emerged as a linchpin technology in modern security architectures, mediating control and visibility between users and cloud services. Organizations are increasingly adopting CASB capabilities to address the twin pressures of pervasive cloud consumption and amplified regulatory scrutiny. This introduction frames CASBs not simply as a point tool but as a strategic control plane that integrates with identity systems, data protection frameworks, and threat detection workflows to deliver consistent policy enforcement across SaaS, IaaS, and custom APIs.
The contemporary CASB market is defined by rapid functional convergence with complementary architectures such as secure access service edge (SASE), zero trust network access (ZTNA), and cloud-native security controls. Stakeholders are prioritizing solutions that offer strong data protection controls, context-aware access policies, and native integrations with identity providers and security information platforms. This shift reflects an operational imperative to reduce security friction while increasing enforcement fidelity across hybrid and multi-cloud estates.
In short, CASBs are transitioning from niche gateway appliances toward programmable policy platforms that underpin enterprise cloud governance. The introduction here sets expectations for leaders: evaluating CASB options must account for integration breadth, latency tolerances, data protection primitives, and the ability to operationalize policy across dispersed teams and service models.
The last several years have witnessed transformative shifts in how organizations approach cloud security, with CASBs positioned at the intersection of several converging trends. First, the rapid proliferation of API-driven applications has driven demand for deep API protection capabilities. Rather than focusing solely on web proxies, modern CASBs now emphasize API discovery, behavior analytics, and runtime protection to mitigate data exfiltration and API misuse. Consequently, product roadmaps and procurement criteria have evolved to prioritize API visibility and protection alongside classic proxy-based controls.
Second, regulatory complexity and privacy mandates have increased the need for robust compliance management integrated into enforcement mechanisms. Enterprises operating across multinational jurisdictions require consistent, auditable policy enforcement across public and private clouds, and they expect CASBs to provide policy orchestration paired with compliance reporting that maps to regulatory obligations. Third, advances in encryption and tokenization technologies have shifted data protection strategies from perimeter-focused prevention toward adaptive data-centric controls that persist regardless of where data resides.
Additionally, threat landscapes have accelerated the need for real-time analytics and adaptive policy responses. Machine learning-driven threat protection capabilities within CASBs now operate in concert with endpoint and network telemetry to deliver contextually aware interventions. Finally, deployment flexibility has become a decisive factor: organizations seek options that align with cloud-first strategies while accommodating hybrid and on-premises constraints. Taken together, these shifts compel security leaders to evaluate CASB solutions not only for present coverage but for their ability to evolve as cloud architectures and threat vectors continue to change.
The tariff environment introduced in 2025 in the United States has added an additional layer of complexity to procurement and operational planning for cloud security vendors and their customers. Tariffs can disrupt vendor supply chains, increase hardware and appliance costs, and alter total cost of ownership calculations for on-premises and hybrid deployments. Organizations that rely on physical appliances or specialized hardware accelerators for inline CASB functions may find procurement timelines and capital expenditures affected, requiring contingency planning and potential architecture adjustments.
Beyond hardware considerations, tariffs can indirectly influence vendor pricing strategies and contractual structures. Vendors facing increased import costs may adjust licensing models, pivot toward subscription-based cloud-native services, or accelerate migration of functionality to software-as-a-service delivery to insulate customers from tariff-driven fluctuations. For end users, this means a renewed emphasis on evaluating cloud-delivered CASB options and validating long-term operational expenditure implications relative to on-premises investments.
Operationally, tariffs also affect global deployment strategies. Multinational organizations must assess regional procurement and deployment decisions in light of cross-border cost differentials, ensuring that data residency, latency, and compliance requirements remain intact while optimizing for fiscal resilience. Procurement teams, security architects, and finance stakeholders should collaborate to model tariff sensitivity scenarios, prioritize cloud-native and software-forward options where appropriate, and ensure contractual flexibility to adapt to evolving macroeconomic policies.
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated priorities across service types, deployment models, organization sizes, and industry verticals, and understanding these distinctions is essential for crafting targeted product and go-to-market strategies. For service type, emphasis has shifted toward API Protection and Threat Protection as enterprises contend with sophisticated automation and hostile API interactions, while Compliance Management remains critical for governance teams seeking auditability and policy uniformity. Data Protection continues to be a foundational requirement and is increasingly instantiated through Encryption and Tokenization strategies that enable portable, persistent safeguards across cloud services.
When considering deployment model, cloud-native delivery is the clear preference for organizations seeking scalability and reduced operational overhead, yet hybrid architectures persist where legacy systems and sensitive workloads necessitate on-premises control. Within cloud strategies, distinctions between Private Cloud and Public Cloud deployments influence integration paths, latency considerations, and the nature of identity and network interoperability required by security operations teams.
Organization size further influences buyer priorities: Large Enterprises demand comprehensive feature sets, enterprise-grade integrations, and centralized policy orchestration that can be applied across global estates, whereas Small and Medium Enterprises prioritize simplified deployment, predictable pricing, and solution components that map to constrained operational teams. Finally, industry verticals such as BFSI, Government, Healthcare, IT and Telecom, and Retail and Ecommerce present distinct regulatory, performance, and data protection profiles that drive feature prioritization. Solutions that offer verticalized templates, pre-mapped compliance controls, and industry-specific telemetry will have a competitive edge in meeting sectoral requirements.
Regional dynamics continue to shape how organizations adopt and operationalize CASB capabilities, with each geography presenting unique regulatory, commercial, and infrastructure characteristics. In the Americas, maturity in cloud adoption and a strong focus on data privacy frameworks have driven demand for robust compliance management and data protection features that can be tailored to multinational operations. The vendor ecosystem in this region emphasizes integration with established identity providers and enterprise security stacks to meet the demands of large commercial and financial services customers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a more fragmented regulatory landscape, where data residency, cross-border transfer rules, and regional compliance frameworks necessitate flexible deployment options and granular data governance controls. Solutions that offer local data processing, detailed audit trails, and adaptable policy templates are positioned to meet the diverse requirements across these markets. In addition, regional service providers and system integrators play a significant role in implementation and managed service delivery models.
Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid cloud adoption driven by digital transformation initiatives across commercial and public sectors, with special emphasis on scalable, cloud-native delivery models. Market needs here often prioritize performance, regional cloud provider integrations, and fast time-to-value implementations. Across all regions, interoperability with local cloud platforms, language and policy localization, and partnerships with regional systems integrators remain key determinants of successful deployments and sustained adoption.
Market incumbents and emerging vendors are differentiating through a mix of deep platform integrations, specialized data protection primitives, and managed service offerings that reduce operational friction for customers. Leading vendors are investing heavily in API security capabilities, embedding behavior analytics into their detection engines, and broadening native integrations with identity and endpoint platforms. These investments reflect a broader market expectation that CASBs will act as orchestration layers rather than isolated enforcement points.
At the same time, a cohort of focused innovators is gaining traction by addressing niche needs such as real-time tokenization, privacy-preserving analytics, and vertical-specific compliance automation. These companies often prioritize rapid deployment, low-latency enforcement, and turnkey integrations with prominent cloud service providers. Strategic partnerships and channel ecosystems play an outsized role in vendor competitiveness, enabling firms to bundle CASB capabilities with broader security and cloud transformation services.
For buyers, vendor selection increasingly hinges on demonstrated integration outcomes, operational support offerings, and the ability to provide transparent technical roadmaps. Vendors that can articulate measurable improvements to incident detection, policy enforcement times, and operational overhead will find stronger resonance with procurement committees and security operations centers seeking to align security tooling with business velocity.
Industry leaders should prioritize several actionable moves to align security strategy with evolving cloud risks and commercial realities. First, adopt a data-centric security posture that emphasizes encryption and tokenization as foundational controls that travel with data across platforms and jurisdictions. This reduces reliance on brittle perimeter assumptions and delivers persistent protections that simplify cross-border compliance efforts.
Second, accelerate the evaluation of cloud-native CASB offerings and favor modular, API-first solutions that integrate cleanly with identity providers, endpoint telemetry sources, and SIEM platforms. This reduces deployment friction and enables faster realization of detection and response use cases. Third, incorporate tariff sensitivity and procurement flexibility into vendor contracts to mitigate supply chain cost shocks; prioritize subscription and cloud-delivered models where appropriate to preserve operational predictability.
Fourth, invest in cross-functional governance forums that bring together security, legal, procurement, and cloud architects to ensure policy frameworks are enforceable and aligned with business objectives. Fifth, pilot advanced threat protection and behavioral analytics use cases in high-value cloud environments to validate operational improvements and refine tuning practices before wider rollout. By combining data-centric controls with strategic procurement and cross-functional governance, leaders can reduce risk while enabling cloud-first initiatives to proceed with confidence.
This research applies a mixed-methods approach that synthesizes primary interviews, vendor technical documentation, and secondary public sources to create a rigorous and balanced view of the CASB landscape. Primary inputs included structured interviews with security architects, cloud engineering leads, and procurement specialists across multiple industries to capture operational priorities, integration challenges, and deployment preferences. Vendor briefings and product whitepapers provided insight into roadmap direction, feature capabilities, and integration models.
Secondary sources were used to validate industry trends, regulatory developments, and technology adjacencies, with attention paid to cross-referencing claims against observable product behavior and implementation case studies. Qualitative findings were triangulated with technical demonstrations and where possible with anonymized implementation outcomes described by practitioners. The methodology emphasizes transparency of assumptions, defensible inferences from interview data, and conservative interpretation of vendor-forward claims to ensure practical relevance and operational applicability.
Limitations of the approach include variability in vendor feature nomenclature and the rapid pace of product development, which necessitates ongoing verification for highly tactical procurement decisions. To mitigate this, recommendations focus on durable capabilities and architectural fit rather than transient feature differentials.
As cloud adoption trends deepen and threat actors evolve, CASBs will remain central to enterprise strategies for preserving control over sensitive data and enforcing consistent policy across heterogeneous cloud environments. The technology's role is expanding from enforcement gateways to programmable policy layers that integrate with identity, endpoint, and analytics platforms. Organizations that orient toward data-centric controls, API-aware protections, and flexible deployment models will be better positioned to manage regulatory complexity and operational scale.
Leaders must balance rapid cloud adoption with disciplined governance, selecting solutions that align with both technical architecture and organizational capacity. The interplay between cloud-native capabilities and on-premises constraints will continue to shape procurement decisions, and the market will reward vendors that deliver composable, integrable, and operationally efficient offerings. In this context, rigorous evaluation criteria, cross-functional governance, and an emphasis on persistent data protection provide the most reliable path to secure and sustainable cloud transformation.