![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1808587
國防領域 5G 市場按組件、頻率、網路類型、部署環境、平台類型、頻譜存取模型、技術、應用和最終用戶分類 - 2025-2030 年全球預測5G in Defense Market by Component, Frequency, Network Type, Deployment Environment, Platform Type, Spectrum Access Model, Technology, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2030 |
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
預計國防 5G 市場規模在 2024 年將達到 16.6 億美元,2025 年將成長至 19.5 億美元,複合年成長率為 17.35%,到 2030 年將達到 43.6 億美元。
主要市場統計數據 | |
---|---|
基準年2024年 | 16.6億美元 |
預計2025年 | 19.5億美元 |
預測年份 2030 | 43.6億美元 |
複合年成長率(%) | 17.35% |
第五代無線技術的出現徹底改變了國防通訊、感測器融合和分散式指揮架構的基本假設。在對抗性和容忍度較高的環境中,5G 融合了延遲、頻寬和可編程性,能夠支援新的任務線程,同時要求對作戰理論、訓練和採購進行同步變革。本簡介概述了 5G 將如何改變作戰能力的關鍵方向,指出了國防機構必須應對的伴隨挑戰,並為將蜂窩原生功能整合到軍事平台和基礎設施中所產生的戰略選擇提供了一個框架。
在5G能力、作戰需求訊號和不斷演變的威脅載體的推動下,國防通訊格局正在經歷多項同步且相互強化的變革。其中一項重大變革是邊緣運算和連接的融合,使即時分析和決策更接近感測器和平台。這種轉變減少了端到端延遲,並改變了關鍵任務處理在雲端、邊緣和平台節點之間的分配方式,需要新的軟體生命週期管理和分散式安全方法。
2025年美國關稅對國防5G專案產生了多方面的影響,其累積效應涵蓋採購、供應鏈和產業戰略。為此,國防部採購團隊審查了其籌資策略,以減少對集中供應商的依賴,並維持能力交付的連續性。此次重新評估加速了多元化策略,並促進了對替代供應商、本地化策略和合格分包商網路的更多使用,以確保關鍵零件(例如無線電前端模組、天線子系統和基於半導體的元件)的可預測供應。
細分主導的觀點闡明了國防 5G 生態系統中投資、風險和機會的交匯點。組件細分區分硬體、服務和軟體。在硬體方面,關注點集中在核心網路元素、承載運算和儲存功能的邊緣設備以及無線存取網路硬體。無線存取網路本身聚合了天線、廣域基地台、MIMO 單元、RF 前端模組和小型基地台,每個都有自己的效能、認證和維護注意事項。服務細分區分託管服務和專業服務,反映了持續營運支援與單獨整合或諮詢工作之間的差異。軟體細分著重於關鍵堆疊,包括異常和入侵偵測系統、網路管理和編配平台、RAN 智慧控制器應用程式、安全框架以及與網路功能虛擬相結合的軟體定義網路。
區域動態正在塑造戰略重點和採購模式,導致美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲地區以及亞太地區在5G部署方面採取不同的策略。在美洲,重點往往在於快速部署安全、自主可控的系統,並盡可能利用國內工業能力。採購決策通常由與現有聯盟夥伴的互通性以及在維護機密和非機密領域的同時整合商業創新的需求所驅動。過渡路徑傾向於模組化架構,以便隨著能力和法規的發展進行替換和迭代升級。
國防5G競爭格局融合了成熟的國防主承包商、通訊供應商、專業整合商以及新興的以軟體為中心的公司,形成了一個充滿活力的競爭與協作生態系統。現有的國防承包商帶來系統工程專業知識、整合規模和成熟的機密部署路徑,而商業通訊公司則提供尖端的無線電和核心網路功能以及大規模部署的營運經驗。專業整合商和軟體供應商透過提供支援軍事特定使用案例的編配、安全性和分析層,連接這些領域。
產業領導者和國防利害關係人必須採取一系列切實可行的、相互關聯的行動,以實現5G的作戰承諾,同時降低風險。首先,他們應優先採用開放介面和標準主導的架構,以最大限度地提高模組化和供應商相容性。這將加速技術採用,同時降低單一供應商鎖定的風險,並實現具競爭力的持續保障策略。同時,將嚴格的供應鏈風險管理納入採購決策,將有助於驗證關鍵零件的來源,並事先確定緊急供應商。
該研究整合了技術文獻、開放原始碼監管格局、供應商技術白皮書和公開的國防採購記錄,以全面了解國防 5G 格局。調查方法強調三角測量,將供應商聲明與已記錄的互通性測試、頻譜政策公告和營運案例進行交叉引用,以確保研究結果既能反映能力願景,又能體現已展示的性能。分析師對通訊、國防採購和系統整合領域的專家進行了結構化訪談,以了解從業者對整合風險、持續性挑戰和專案權衡的觀點。
摘要,國防領域向 5G 的過渡代表著一個戰略曲折點,它將更高的整合度、更高的安全複雜性與顯著的營運優勢相結合。該技術能夠實現低延遲、高吞吐量通訊和可編程網路行為,從而實現從分散式感測器融合到彈性物流和高階指揮與控制等一系列功能。然而,要充分發揮其潛力,需要對架構、供應鏈彈性和網路強化系統設計進行嚴謹的關注。因此,相關人員必須追求均衡的投資組合,在實現短期營運效益的同時,為中長期向軟體原生架構的過渡做好準備。
The 5G in Defense Market was valued at USD 1.66 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.95 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 17.35%, reaching USD 4.36 billion by 2030.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 1.66 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 1.95 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 4.36 billion |
CAGR (%) | 17.35% |
The arrival of fifth-generation wireless technologies has shifted the foundational assumptions that govern defense communications, sensor fusion, and distributed command architectures. Across contested and permissive environments, 5G introduces a combination of latency, bandwidth, and programmability that enables new mission threads while demanding concurrent changes to doctrine, training, and acquisition. This introduction outlines the principal vectors by which 5G alters operational capability, highlights the attendant challenges that defense organizations must address, and frames the strategic choices that follow from embedding cellular-native capabilities in military platforms and infrastructure.
First, 5G is not solely a radio upgrade; it is an architectural change. Network functions virtualization and software-defined networking extend programmability into domains historically dominated by hardware-centric solutions, allowing capability providers to iterate more rapidly and to deploy mission-specific profiles. Consequently, planners must balance the benefits of modularity and agility against the operational need for assured performance and security. Second, the operational envelope extends from fixed installations to highly mobile and austere environments, compelling a reevaluation of how resilience, spectrum access, and node trustworthiness are assured under strain.
Finally, the introduction of 5G into defense contexts catalyzes cross-domain integration-from airborne ISR to logistics-creating both opportunity and complexity. As a result, stakeholders must adopt a systems-level perspective that integrates technical, regulatory, and vendor management elements into cohesive acquisition and fielding strategies. This report begins by establishing that perspective and then examines how shifts in technology, policy, and supply chains influence strategic choices across defense organizations.
The landscape for defense communications is experiencing several concurrent and reinforcing shifts driven by 5G capabilities, operational demand signals, and evolving threat vectors. One major transformation is the convergence of compute and connectivity at the edge, which enables real-time analytics and decision-making closer to the sensor or platform. This shift reduces end-to-end latency and changes how mission-critical processing is allocated across cloud, edge, and platform nodes, requiring new approaches to software lifecycle management and distributed security.
Another notable change is the increasing reliance on modular and software-defined architectures; these architectures permit rapid updates and capability insertion but also expand the attack surface and increase dependency on supply chain integrity. In parallel, the growing emphasis on private and government-allocated spectrum reforms procurement behavior and encourages investments in dedicated, sovereign-capable networks that can operate with assured performance in degraded or denied environments. Interoperability pressures are also driving new models of vendor collaboration, with systems integrators and commercial providers forming ecosystems that deliver end-to-end solutions rather than discrete components.
Operational doctrine is adapting to emphasize network resiliency, graceful degradation, and multi-path communications. Training and tactics evolve to exploit persistent connectivity for distributed command and control and for collaborative autonomy across platforms. These transformative shifts collectively reframe how defense organizations prioritize investments, manage risk, and structure partnerships to extract operational advantage from 5G while mitigating emergent vulnerabilities.
Tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 have exerted a multifaceted influence on defense 5G programs, with cumulative consequences across procurement, supply chains, and industrial strategy. In response, defense acquisition teams have reassessed sourcing strategies to reduce exposure to concentrated vendor dependencies and to maintain continuity of capability delivery. This reassessment has accelerated diversification efforts, catalyzing increased use of alternative suppliers, local content strategies, and qualified subcontractor networks to ensure predictable availability of critical components such as radio front-end modules, antenna subsystems, and semiconductor-based elements.
From a programmatic perspective, tariffs have prompted program managers to factor in greater procurement lead times and to emphasize modularity so that affected modules can be substituted or upgraded with reduced systemic impact. In tandem, some prime contractors have absorbed short-term cost increases to preserve program schedules, while others have renegotiated supplier contracts or adjusted configuration baselines to maintain interoperability with allied systems. These behaviors have reinforced the importance of open interfaces and standards-based approaches; when modules conform to established specifications, substitutions become less disruptive.
Strategically, tariffs have influenced industrial policy discussions, encouraging closer collaboration with allied partners to coordinate procurement and to align industrial base incentives. They have also sharpened the focus on domestic capability development in areas deemed critical for national security, including secure baseband processing, trusted boot chains, and tamper-resistant hardware. While the cumulative effect has been to increase emphasis on supply chain resilience and sovereign capability, it has also raised near-term programmatic trade-offs between cost, schedule, and capability that defense organizations continue to navigate.
A segmentation-driven perspective clarifies where investments, risk, and opportunity concentrate across defense 5G ecosystems. Component segmentation distinguishes Hardware, Services, and Software; within Hardware, attention centers on Core Network elements, Edge Devices that host compute and storage functions, and Radio Access Network hardware. The Radio Access Network itself aggregates Antennas, Macro Base Stations, Massive MIMO Units, RF Front-End Modules, and Small Cells, each with distinct performance, certification, and sustainment considerations. Services segmentation differentiates Managed Services from Professional Services, reflecting a split between ongoing operational support and discrete integration or advisory work. Software segmentation highlights critical stacks such as Anomaly Detection and Intrusion Detection Systems, Network Management and Orchestration platforms, RAN Intelligent Controller applications, Security frameworks, and Software-Defined Networking coupled with Network Functions Virtualization, all of which are central to operational agility and cyber resilience.
Frequency segmentation further refines technical trade-offs by distinguishing High-Band spectrum above 24 GHz, Mid-Band spectrum spanning the 1 GHz to 6 GHz range, and Low-Band spectrum under 1 GHz; each band imposes different propagation, coverage, and platform integration constraints that directly influence architecture choices. Network Type segmentation differentiates Non-Standalone deployments that overlay existing networks from Standalone architectures that provide end-to-end, cloud-native capabilities, with implications for latency, control plane autonomy, and lifecycle management. Deployment Environment classification-Fixed Installations, Tactical Deployable, and Urban Operations-captures the logistical and environmental constraints of fielded systems, and Fixed Installations are further considered across Airfields, Bases and Garrisons, and Ports and Shipyards, where permanence enables different infrastructure investments.
Platform Type segmentation frames integration complexity and mission assurance questions across Aircraft, Ground Vehicles, Naval Vessels, Soldier Systems, and Space Systems; Aircraft split into Manned and Unmanned Aerial Systems, Ground Vehicles include Armored Vehicles, Robotic Ground Vehicles, and Tactical Trucks, Naval Vessels encompass Submarines, Surface Ships, and Unmanned Surface and Underwater Vehicles, and Space Systems separate Ground Stations from Satellites. Spectrum Access Model segmentation contrasts Exclusive Licensed regimes with Government-Allocated, Shared Licensed, and Unlicensed models, shaping access certainty, interference management, and regulatory risk. Technology segmentation highlights service profiles such as Enhanced Mobile Broadband, Massive Machine Type Communications, Network Slicing, Positioning, Sidelink, and Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication, which inform capability baselines and test regimes. Application segmentation ties capabilities to mission outcomes across Base Security and Protection, Command and Control Systems, Cybersecurity and Network Resilience, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, and Training and Simulation. End User segmentation distinguishes operational requirements and procurement behavior between Air Force, Army, and Navy stakeholders. By synthesizing these intersecting axes, program teams can prioritize investments that align with operational imperatives and decompose risk at a granular level.
Regional dynamics shape strategic priorities and acquisition models, producing differentiated approaches to 5G adoption across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, the emphasis tends to be on rapid fielding of secure, sovereign-capable systems and on leveraging domestic industrial capacity where possible; procurement decisions are often influenced by interoperability with established allied partners and by the need to integrate commercial innovation while maintaining classified and unclassified domains. Transition pathways favor modular architectures that permit substitution and iterative upgrades as capabilities and regulations evolve.
In Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, a mosaic of regulatory regimes and alliance structures creates both complexity and opportunity. European defense programs often emphasize harmonization with NATO standards and coordinated procurement to achieve economies of scale, while Middle Eastern and African partners prioritize adaptable solutions that can be configured for a wide range of climatic and infrastructural conditions. Across this region, spectrum policy and national security considerations drive a careful balancing of commercial partnerships and sovereign capability investments.
The Asia-Pacific region shows a strong orientation toward large-scale infrastructure development, dual-use innovation, and integration of space and maritime domains with terrestrial networks. This orientation encourages experiments in high-band deployments, integrated satellite-terrestrial architectures, and accelerated adoption of network slicing for platform-specific performance guarantees. Across all regions, however, common themes persist: the drive for operational resilience, the prioritization of cyber-hardened deployments, and the need for collaborative procurement models that align technological innovation with sovereign security considerations. These regional distinctions inform where capabilities are deployed first and how acquisition strategies should be tailored to local operational and industrial realities.
The competitive landscape in defense 5G blends incumbent defense primes, telecommunications vendors, specialist integrators, and emerging software-centric firms, producing a dynamic ecosystem of competition and collaboration. Established defense contractors bring systems engineering expertise, integration scale, and proven pathways for classified deployments, while commercial telecommunications companies contribute leading-edge radio and core network capabilities as well as operational experience in large-scale rollouts. Specialist integrators and software providers bridge these domains by delivering tailored orchestration, security, and analytics layers that enable military-specific use cases.
Partnership models are evolving to emphasize co-development and risk-sharing. In many cases, prime contractors and telecom vendors form consortia that pair sovereign assurance with rapid innovation, and these consortia frequently include smaller software firms responsible for critical functions such as anomaly detection, dynamic network slicing, or RAN intelligence applications. This multi-tiered supplier structure accelerates capability delivery but also requires robust contractual frameworks to preserve intellectual property, ensure cybersecurity, and manage unexpected obsolescence.
Competitive differentiation increasingly rests on the ability to demonstrate end-to-end mission performance under contested conditions, to support long-term sustainment in harsh operational environments, and to provide transparent supply chain provenance. Vendors that can couple domain expertise with modular, standards-based solutions and evidenced cyber-hardened architectures are positioned to capture priority programs. Equally important, strategic alliances with allied industrial bases and participation in interoperability testbeds serve as differentiators that reduce integration risk and strengthen long-term procurement relationships.
Industry leaders and defense stakeholders must pursue a series of pragmatic, interlocking actions to realize the operational promise of 5G while containing risk. First, they should prioritize the adoption of open interfaces and standards-driven architectures to maximize modularity and supplier interchangeability. This reduces single-vendor lock-in risk and accelerates technology insertion while enabling competitive sustainment strategies. In parallel, integrating rigorous supply chain risk management into procurement decisions will ensure that critical components have validated provenance and that contingency suppliers are identified ahead of schedule.
Second, organizations should invest in layered security strategies that combine hardware roots of trust with software attestation, runtime anomaly detection, and robust orchestration controls. Coupling security-by-design principles with continuous validation and red-teaming exercises will harden deployments against sophisticated adversaries. Third, leaders should implement phased fielding approaches that begin with low-risk, high-impact use cases-such as base security and logistics optimization-and progressively expand into more complex mission-critical applications as operational confidence grows.
Finally, forging closer collaboration between planners, operators, and industry through joint experimentation, interoperability events, and allied coalitions will accelerate learning cycles and reduce integration surprises. By sequencing investments to deliver near-term operational value while preserving long-term upgrade paths, organizations can manage trade-offs between cost, capability, and resilience in a disciplined way that supports sustained mission advantage.
This research synthesizes technical literature, open-source regulatory documents, vendor technical white papers, and publicly available defense procurement records to build a comprehensive view of the defense 5G landscape. The methodology emphasizes triangulation: cross-referencing vendor claims with documented interoperability tests, spectrum policy pronouncements, and operational case studies to ensure that findings reflect both capability aspirations and demonstrated performance. Analysts conducted structured interviews with domain experts across telecommunications, defense acquisition, and systems integration to capture practitioner perspectives on integration risk, sustainment challenges, and program trade-offs.
Analytical rigor is maintained through modular evidence hierarchies that separate primary technical artifacts-such as interface specifications and test reports-from secondary syntheses, ensuring that operational recommendations are traceable to verifiable sources. Scenario analysis was applied to examine programmatic responses to supply chain perturbations and regulatory shifts, and stress-testing exercises helped surface vulnerabilities and mitigation pathways. Where possible, findings were benchmarked against interoperability testbed outcomes and field trials to avoid undue reliance on vendor projections.
Limitations are acknowledged: classified program details and proprietary performance data constrain the granularity of some assessments, and evolving policy environments mean that certain regulatory variables may shift rapidly. To mitigate these limitations, the research incorporates sensitivity narratives and prescriptive pathways that decision-makers can adapt as new information emerges. Overall, the methodology balances breadth of coverage with depth in critical technical and operational domains to produce actionable insights.
In summary, the transition to 5G within defense contexts presents a strategic inflection point that combines significant operational upside with elevated integration and security complexity. The technology's capacity for low-latency, high-throughput communications and for programmable network behavior enables capabilities that range from distributed sensor fusion to resilient logistics and advanced command and control. Yet achieving that potential requires disciplined attention to architecture, supply chain resilience, and cyber-hardened system design. Stakeholders must therefore pursue a balanced portfolio of investments that yield near-term operational benefits while preparing for medium- and long-term transitions to software-native architectures.
As defense programs adapt, the most successful organizations will be those that emphasize open standards, rigorous supplier vetting, and phased fielding strategies that permit iterative learning. Cross-domain collaboration-between air, land, maritime, and space communities-and coordinated engagement with allied partners will be essential to preserve interoperability and to share the burden of capability development. Ultimately, the path to operationalized 5G is not a single technical project but a sustained transition in how defense organizations design, acquire, and sustain networked capabilities. The conclusion reiterates that careful governance, continuous validation, and adaptive procurement practices are the cornerstones of a successful transition to pervasive, mission-ready 5G capabilities.