![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1806514
液態切片市場按生物標記、樣本、類型、技術、適應症、最終用戶和應用分類——2025-2030 年全球預測Liquid Biopsy Market by Biomarkers, Sample, Type, Technology, Indication, End-User, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2030 |
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
預計液態切片市場規模到 2024 年將達到 67.2 億美元,到 2025 年將達到 75.2 億美元,複合年成長率為 12.24%,到 2030 年將達到 134.4 億美元。
主要市場統計數據 | |
---|---|
基準年2024年 | 67.2億美元 |
預計2025年 | 75.2億美元 |
預測年份 2030 | 134.4億美元 |
複合年成長率(%) | 12.24% |
液態切片代表了診斷醫學的模式轉移,透過分析體液中的循環生物標記物,為腫瘤生物學研究提供了一個微創的窗口。與需要手術切除且有操作風險的傳統組織切片檢查不同,液態切片利用循環腫瘤DNA、細胞和囊泡來即時捕獲動態分子資訊。這種方法與日益受到重視的精準腫瘤學相契合,精準腫瘤學可以透過根據個別分子譜量身訂做治療方法來顯著改善患者預後。
在次世代定序儀、數位PCR和新型生物資訊流程的突破推動下,液態切片領域正以前所未有的速度發展。這些技術進步顯著提高了分析物檢測的敏感度和特異性,使得在癌症早期階段就能辨識出稀有的循環腫瘤DNA片段。同時,主要市場的監管機構已開始宣布更簡化的伴隨診斷核准途徑,反映出人們對其臨床效用和可重複性的信心。
美國對進口診斷劑和設備徵收的新關稅於2025年1月1日生效,這為跨境供應鏈帶來了新的複雜性。額外的關稅增加了關鍵耗材的到岸成本,迫使製造商和實驗室合作夥伴重新評估籌資策略和庫存模式。對於依賴專用試劑的公司來說,尋找替代的國內供應商或談判長期合約已成為維持微薄利潤和避免服務中斷的關鍵目標。
依生物標記類別細分可揭示成熟分析物和新興分析物之間的相互作用。由於遊離DNA與腫瘤負荷和突變譜具有明確的相關性,因此它在臨床檢測中繼續發揮核心作用,而循環性腫瘤細胞則為表現型分析釋放了機會。循環腫瘤DNA技術的出現使得即時監測抗藥性突變成為可能,而對細胞外囊泡的探索則開闢了圍繞RNA貨物和蛋白質組學特徵的新研究前沿。
美洲憑藉先進的法律規範和大規模臨床應用繼續保持領先地位。政府推出的以癌症篩檢和價值導向醫療為重點的舉措正在加速報銷討論,並推動其在學術醫療中心和社區醫院的廣泛應用。此外,本地診斷公司與國際技術供應商之間的策略聯盟正在強化供應鏈,並擴大該地區獲得尖端檢測方法的管道。
領先的診斷和生物技術公司正透過差異化平台、策略性收購和廣泛的智慧財產權組合來定位自身。擁有成熟實驗室網路的傳統公司正在利用深度臨床檢驗數據來擴展其檢測菜單,而純粹的創新公司則透過專注於專有化學和先進的生物資訊學來搶佔早期市場准入。
為了應對不斷變化的液態切片格局,行業相關人員應優先投資於支援靶向和廣泛應用的靈活體組織切片測架構。這種方法將有助於我們靈活應對新興生物標記和監管變化。將多體學功能整合到現有工作流程中,將提高診斷準確性,並提供更深入的腫瘤異質性洞察。
本報告的調查方法嚴格結合二手資料和一手資料,以確保報告的穩健性和可靠性。首先,我們進行了廣泛的二手資料研究,涵蓋同行評審期刊、臨床試驗註冊中心、專利申請、監管出版物、白皮書等,以建立全面的技術和臨床理解基礎。
液態切片已成為現代診斷實踐的基石,彌合了分子診斷與個人化患者管理之間的差距。透過實現疾病檢測和監測的非侵入性採樣,液態切片正在為早期療育、治療最佳化和縱向監測開闢新的途徑。隨著技術平台的成熟,液態切片正從小眾研究應用走向主流臨床實踐。
The Liquid Biopsy Market was valued at USD 6.72 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.52 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.24%, reaching USD 13.44 billion by 2030.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2024] | USD 6.72 billion |
Estimated Year [2025] | USD 7.52 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 13.44 billion |
CAGR (%) | 12.24% |
Liquid biopsy represents a paradigm shift in diagnostic medicine by offering a minimally invasive window into tumor biology through the analysis of circulating biomarkers in bodily fluids. Unlike conventional tissue biopsies that necessitate surgical extraction and carry procedural risks, liquid biopsy harnesses circulating tumor DNA, cells, and vesicles to capture dynamic molecular information in real time. This approach aligns with the growing emphasis on precision oncology, where tailoring therapeutic regimens to individual molecular profiles can dramatically improve patient outcomes.
As cancer incidence continues to rise globally, healthcare systems are under pressure to deliver cost-effective, rapid diagnostics that minimize patient discomfort without compromising accuracy. Liquid biopsy addresses these demands by enabling serial monitoring of disease progression, early detection of minimal residual disease, and the identification of actionable mutations that guide targeted therapies. Moreover, its application extends beyond oncology into transplant medicine, prenatal screening, and infectious disease monitoring, positioning liquid biopsy as a versatile tool for modern clinical practice.
Stakeholders across pharmaceutical, diagnostic, and research sectors are now evaluating how to integrate liquid biopsy into existing workflows and regulatory pathways. With technological advances driving down assay time and costs, liquid biopsy is poised to become a standard component of patient management. In the following sections, we explore the transformative forces reshaping this landscape, the implications of recent policy changes, and the strategic insights that will guide industry leaders forward.
The liquid biopsy landscape is evolving at an unprecedented pace, propelled by breakthroughs in next-generation sequencing, digital PCR, and novel bioinformatics pipelines. These technological advancements have significantly increased the sensitivity and specificity of analyte detection, enabling the identification of rare circulating tumor DNA fragments at early stages of cancer. Concurrently, regulatory agencies across key markets have begun to issue more streamlined approval pathways for companion diagnostics, reflecting confidence in the clinical utility and reproducibility of liquid biopsy assays.
At the same time, strategic collaborations between diagnostic manufacturers, academic centers, and pharmaceutical firms are accelerating assay validation and broadening the scope of clinical studies. Such partnerships are fostering the co-development of targeted panels aligned with emerging targeted therapies, thereby integrating diagnostics directly into the drug development lifecycle. Meanwhile, decentralized testing models-ranging from point-of-care platforms to patient-collected sampling kits-are democratizing access and supporting remote monitoring initiatives.
Collectively, these forces are redefining the competitive dynamics of the liquid biopsy domain. Incumbent laboratory providers are investing in proprietary platforms to maintain differentiation, while nimble start-ups continue to innovate assay chemistries and data analytics. Looking ahead, convergence around multi-omics integration and standardized reporting frameworks will further solidify liquid biopsy's role as a cornerstone of personalized care.
On January 1, 2025, new U.S. tariffs on imported diagnostic reagents and instrumentation took effect, introducing a layer of complexity for cross-border supply chains. The added duties have increased landed costs for core consumables, prompting manufacturers and laboratory partners to reassess sourcing strategies and inventory models. For companies reliant on specialized reagents, securing alternative domestic suppliers or negotiating long-term contracts has become a critical objective to contain margins and avoid service disruptions.
The ripple effects extend into pricing structures, as laboratories pass incremental expenses to payers and patients, potentially impacting adoption rates in price-sensitive segments. To mitigate these pressures, several industry players have begun exploring localized manufacturing solutions, including establishing regional production hubs and partnering with contract development organizations. In parallel, increased collaboration with customs authorities and trade associations has enabled more efficient classification and duty minimization, offering relief to stakeholders navigating the evolving tariff landscape.
Despite these headwinds, many organizations view the 2025 tariffs as a catalyst to strengthen domestic supply resilience and foster innovation in reagent design. By investing in robust regional capabilities and diversifying supplier networks, the industry anticipates a more balanced cost structure over the long term, ultimately supporting sustainable growth and uninterrupted patient access.
Segmentation by biomarker class reveals the interplay between mature and emerging analytes. Cell-free DNA continues to anchor clinical assays due to its well-established correlation with tumor burden and mutational profiling, while circulating tumor cells unlock opportunities for phenotypic analysis. The advent of circulating tumor DNA technologies enables real-time monitoring of resistance mutations, and the exploration of extracellular vesicles is opening new research frontiers around RNA cargo and proteomic signatures.
When considering sample origin, blood-based tests dominate current workflows because of established venipuncture protocols and high analyte yield. However, urine-based assays are gaining traction as a noninvasive alternative for longitudinal screening, particularly in urological and genitourinary indications. Advances in sample stabilization and extraction methods are narrowing performance gaps, setting the stage for wider clinical adoption of diversified fluid matrices.
In terms of product taxonomy, assay kits form the backbone of commercial offerings by delivering standardized workflows that simplify laboratory implementation. Instruments add value through automation and throughput optimization, while services encompass bespoke assay development, data interpretation, and clinical reporting. On the technology front, multi-gene parallel analysis using next-generation sequencing is prized for its multiplexing capacity and depth of coverage, whereas single-gene analysis via PCR microarrays maintains a strong presence in targeted mutation detection due to rapid turnaround.
Indication-driven segmentation underscores the primacy of cancer applications, with breast, colorectal, lung, melanoma, and prostate cancers accounting for the majority of clinical validation studies. Non-cancer indications are expanding into areas such as organ transplant rejection monitoring and prenatal aneuploidy screening. Among end-users, academic and research centers spearhead exploratory studies, while clinical diagnostic laboratories, hospitals, and physician office labs drive routine testing volumes. Finally, application segmentation reveals a balanced portfolio of early cancer screening initiatives, recurrence monitoring protocols, therapy selection assays, and treatment monitoring programs, reflecting the multifaceted utility of liquid biopsy in patient management.
The Americas continue to lead with advanced regulatory frameworks and high-volume clinical adoption. Government initiatives focusing on cancer screening and value-based care have accelerated reimbursement discussions, enabling broader uptake in both academic medical centers and community hospitals. Moreover, strategic partnerships between local diagnostic companies and international technology providers have fortified supply chains and expanded regional access to cutting-edge assays.
Europe, Middle East, and Africa present a heterogeneous landscape marked by diverse regulatory regimes and reimbursement environments. In Western Europe, centralized health technology assessments and national screening programs drive standardization, whereas emerging markets in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa are gradually integrating liquid biopsy into oncology networks through pilot projects and center-of-excellence collaborations. Cross-border data sharing and harmonized clinical guidelines remain key enablers of sustainable growth across these jurisdictions.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid market expansion underpinned by significant public health investments and rising cancer incidence. Government funding for cancer genomics and domestic manufacturing incentives have catalyzed indigenous assay development. Collaborative research between regional academic institutions and global diagnostic firms is intensifying, while the rollout of digital pathology and telemedicine platforms supports remote sample collection and result dissemination, extending the reach of liquid biopsy solutions.
Leading diagnostic and biotechnology companies are positioning themselves through differentiated platforms, strategic acquisitions, and expansive intellectual property portfolios. Legacy players with established laboratory networks are leveraging deep clinical validation data to extend their assay menus, while pure-play innovators focus on proprietary chemistries and advanced bioinformatics to achieve early market entry.
Collaborative alliances between pharmaceutical companies and diagnostic developers are accelerating the co-development of companion diagnostics tailored to specific targeted therapies. Start-ups are forging partnerships with contract research organizations to streamline multicenter clinical trials, ensuring robust evidence generation and regulatory alignment. At the same time, instrument manufacturers are integrating connectivity features and cloud-based data analytics into their platforms, enhancing operational efficiency and facilitating seamless integration with laboratory information systems.
Beyond technology differentiation, corporate strategies are increasingly oriented toward geographic expansion through regional sales networks and production hubs. By aligning global R&D pipelines with localized commercialization strategies, leading companies are building scalable models that address diverse regulatory requirements and market access challenges.
To navigate the evolving liquid biopsy environment, industry stakeholders should prioritize investment in flexible assay architectures that support both targeted and broad-panel applications. This approach ensures agility in responding to emerging biomarkers and regulatory shifts. Integrating multi-omics capabilities into existing workflows will enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide richer insights into tumor heterogeneity.
Building resilient supply chains through regional manufacturing partnerships and dual-sourcing agreements can mitigate exposure to trade policy fluctuations. Organizations should also establish cross-functional teams that unite regulatory, commercial, and scientific experts to streamline product approvals and reimbursement negotiations. Collaborative initiatives with payers and healthcare providers will strengthen the value proposition by demonstrating real-world clinical utility and cost savings.
Digital transformation should remain a strategic priority, with investments in cloud-native analytics, artificial intelligence-driven variant interpretation, and telehealth-enabled sample collection. These technologies will support decentralized testing models and personalized patient engagement. Finally, fostering open innovation through consortiums and public-private partnerships will accelerate the validation of novel analytes and drive the harmonization of reporting standards, reinforcing liquid biopsy's role in precision medicine.
This report's methodology integrates a rigorous blend of secondary and primary research to ensure robustness and credibility. Initially, extensive secondary research was conducted, encompassing peer-reviewed journals, clinical trial registries, patent filings, regulatory publications, and white papers to establish a comprehensive foundation of technical and clinical understanding.
Primary research was conducted through in-depth interviews with senior executives, laboratory directors, and key opinion leaders across diagnostics, pharmaceutical, and academic sectors. These expert dialogues provided nuanced perspectives on assay development, regulatory strategy, and commercialization challenges. Data triangulation techniques validated qualitative insights against proprietary databases and financial disclosures to reinforce accuracy.
Quantitative analysis involved mapping product pipelines, technology adoption metrics, and regional deployment patterns. Key variables were cross-referenced with public health statistics and reimbursement schedules to contextualize application potential. Validation workshops with external advisors and technical specialists were organized to resolve discrepancies and refine assumptions.
Collectively, this multi-layered approach delivers a holistic view of the liquid biopsy domain, balancing empirical evidence with expert interpretation to guide strategic decision-making.
Liquid biopsy has emerged as a cornerstone of modern diagnostic practice, bridging the gap between molecular insights and personalized patient management. Its capacity to detect and monitor disease through noninvasive sampling unlocks new avenues for early intervention, treatment optimization, and long-term surveillance. As technology platforms mature, liquid biopsy is transitioning from niche research applications to mainstream clinical adoption.
Strategically, stakeholders who align their portfolios with the evolving landscape-incorporating flexible assay designs, resilient supply chains, and digital innovation-will be best positioned to capitalize on market opportunities. Continued collaboration across industry, academia, and regulatory bodies will drive the standardization of workflows and reimbursement frameworks, further reducing barriers to implementation.
Looking ahead, the integration of liquid biopsy with complementary diagnostics and therapeutic modalities promises to accelerate the shift toward truly individualized medicine. By embracing a data-driven, patient-centered approach, industry leaders can unlock significant clinical and commercial value, reinforcing liquid biopsy's role as a transformative force in healthcare.