火箭引擎市場（按推進劑類型、推力等級、引擎循環、級數和應用）—2025-2030 年全球預測

預計火箭引擎市場規模到2024年將達到85.4億美元，到2025年將達到90.6億美元，到2030年將達到122.4億美元，複合年成長率為6.17%。

主要市場統計數據
基準年2024年	85.4億美元
預計2025年	90.6億美元
預測年份 2030	122.4億美元
複合年成長率（%）	6.17%

透過概述技術發展、監管變化和戰略要點，為火箭引擎市場分析提供啟動平台

近幾十年來，在材料科學和系統設計突破的推動下，火箭推進技術經歷了重大變革，實現了前所未有的性能和可靠性。積層製造技術的進步降低了幾何複雜性並縮短了製造前置作業時間，而新型複合材料和金屬合金則提高了推重比和熱阻。同時，數位數位雙胞胎和基於模型的系統工程的出現增強了預測性維護能力，並最佳化了整個飛行剖面的性能，使現代引擎能夠同時滿足嚴格的安全標準和雄心勃勃的任務目標。

下一部分探討技術和政策的關鍵變化，評估近期關稅政策的影響，並深入研究細分、區域概況和競爭格局。

檢驗材料進步、數位整合和地緣政治壓力推動的火箭引擎格局的關鍵轉變

火箭引擎設計的最新趨勢反映了先進材料、數位整合以及不斷變化的地緣政治優先事項，這些因素共同作用，正在重新定義推進領域的格局。高性能陶瓷基質複合材料和高強度合金如今能夠承受極端熱循環，同時減輕系統重量。這些材料創新與先進的感測器和遙測整合相得益彰，實現了即時健康監測和自適應控制策略，從而提高了引擎的可靠性和任務成功率。因此，開發週期和營運成本之間的平衡正朝著數據主導的最佳化方向轉變，並透過設計迭代推動持續改善。

分析美國關稅調整對火箭引擎供應鏈的累積影響：製造成本和戰略採購決策

美國於2025年初啟動的關稅結構審查，對整個火箭引擎供應鏈施加了明顯的壓力，尤其影響到關鍵原料的進口，例如高等級鈦粉和鎳基高溫合金。包含精密加工渦輪幫浦和專用催化劑的零件成本正在上漲，迫使主承包商和子系統供應商重新評估籌資策略。這些課稅的累積效應導致生產成本上升，對研發預算和合約談判都產生了影響。

根據推進劑類型、推力等級、引擎循環、應用和階段配置得出關鍵的市場細分洞察

對推進劑類型的詳細研究揭示了其獨特的性能和應用概況。混合推進劑系統結合了金屬基和聚合物基配方，因其安全性和節流優勢而仍然頗具吸引力，尤其適用於次軌道飛行器和實驗平台。液態推進劑引擎（分為低溫推進劑和自燃推進劑）在重型軌道發射等高能量任務中越來越受歡迎，其中低溫推進劑提供卓越的比衝，而自燃推進劑則以其在軌道機動系統中的可靠性而聞名。同時，複合和雙基固體推進劑結構對於飛彈推力模組和助推級仍然至關重要，因為這些系統注重簡潔性和可包裝性，能夠確保任務的就緒性。

了解美洲、歐洲、中東和非洲以及亞太地區火箭引擎發展的區域動態：需求和創新範式

火箭引擎領域的區域動態呈現出錯綜複雜的發展軌跡和戰略重點。在整個美洲，政府航太機構與私人企業之間的密切合作為快速原型製作和商業化創造了肥沃的土壤。對可重複使用引擎架構和積層製造設施的投資，推動北美公司在降低每公里成本舉措走在前列，而國防導向項目則繼續支撐著高超音速推進和先進導彈系統的技術創新。

領先火箭引擎製造商的概況：他們的戰略方針、技術能力和合作關係。

領先的推進系統製造商正在展示不同的策略方法和創新路徑。成熟的整合商利用其深厚的技術積累，透過先進的渦輪機械和溫度控管系統改進高推力液體引擎。同時，擁有敏捷開發模式的新興企業正在利用積層製造技術生產複雜的噴射器和燃燒室組件，實現快速迭代週期，挑戰傳統的供應模式。

為行業領導者制定可行的建議，以利用新興火箭引擎技術的夥伴關係和供應鏈彈性

尋求在推動市場保持競爭優勢的產業領導者應優先考慮供應鏈多元化，與多家關鍵合金和積層製造夥伴關係的合格供應商合作，減少機會政策主導。投資模組化引擎架構可提高擴充性，並能夠快速適應新的任務概況和產量需求，而無需徹底重新設計。為了加快創新週期，鼓勵各組織整合基於模型的系統工程方法，並利用數位雙胞胎來複製端到端效能指標，並支援在虛擬試驗台上進行迭代檢驗。

火箭引擎市場中專注於數據收集、綜合分析框架和檢驗過程的嚴格調查方法的詳細資訊

我們的調查方法是將二手資料和一手資料進行結構化組合，並輔以嚴格的分析方法和檢驗通訊協定。初始階段包括全面審查已發表的技術論文、公司文件和政策文件，以了解該前沿領域的技術和監管格局。此外，我們還對專利資料庫和技術會議論文集進行了系統性研究，以增強二手資料研究的有效性，從而確保全面了解材料、製造流程和數位整合領域的新興趨勢。

全面總結火箭引擎市場發展軌跡、技術演變以及相關人員和創新者的戰略路徑

總而言之，火箭引擎領域正處於一個十字路口，其特點是重大技術進步、不斷變化的政策格局以及日益激烈的全球競爭。材料創新和數位化整合正在推動引擎性能邁向新的高度，而關稅重組則凸顯了供應鏈韌性和策略採購適應性的必要性。推進劑化學成分、推力等級、循環架構、應用領域和級間配置的市場細分，為相關人員提供了一個細緻的視角，使他們能夠根據特定任務需求客製化產品。

目錄

第1章：前言

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章 市場概述

第5章市場動態

• 為降低發射成本，可重複使用火箭引擎的需求不斷成長
• 增加私人太空探勘和商業化的投資
• 火箭引擎部件3D列印技術的進展
• 綠色推進技術興起，協助環保發射
• 擴大混合推進系統在小型運載火箭的應用
• 用於深空任務的高推力電推進系統的開發
• 用於發射小型衛星的火箭引擎的小型化
• 政府太空計畫激增推動下一代推進技術的創新
• 整合人工智慧和數位雙胞胎用於火箭引擎設計和測試
• 加強航太機構與私人製造商之間的合作

第6章 市場洞察

• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL分析

第7章 2025年美國關稅的累積影響

第 8 章火箭引擎市場（依推進劑類型）

• 混合推進劑
  • 金屬化推進劑
  • 聚合物基推進劑
• 液態推進劑
  • 低溫推進劑
  • 自燃推進劑
• 固體推進劑
  • 複合推進劑
  • 雙基推進劑

第9章 火箭引擎市場：推力等級

• 高推力
• 低推力
• 中等推力

第 10 章 火箭引擎市場（按引擎循環）

• 膨脹機循環
• 燃氣發電機循環
• 泵送週期
• 分級燃燒循環

第 11 章 火箭引擎市場（按級數）

• 3級或以上
• 單級入軌
• 3個階段
• 2個階段

第12章火箭引擎市場（按應用）

• 飛彈推進
• 軌道發射
  • 大型運載火箭
  • 中型運載火箭
  • 小型運載火箭
• 衛星推進
  • 軌道上升推進
  • 駐紮推廣
• 亞軌道發射
  • 科學發射
  • 旅遊啟動

第 13 章：美洲火箭引擎市場

• 美國
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 阿根廷

第14章歐洲、中東和非洲火箭引擎市場

• 英國
• 德國
• 法國
• 俄羅斯
• 義大利
• 西班牙
• 阿拉伯聯合大公國
• 沙烏地阿拉伯
• 南非
• 丹麥
• 荷蘭
• 卡達
• 芬蘭
• 瑞典
• 奈及利亞
• 埃及
• 土耳其
• 以色列
• 挪威
• 波蘭
• 瑞士

第15章：亞太火箭引擎市場

• 中國
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韓國
• 印尼
• 泰國
• 菲律賓
• 馬來西亞
• 新加坡
• 越南
• 台灣

第16章競爭格局

• 2024年市場佔有率分析
• 2024年FPNV定位矩陣
• 競爭分析
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Avio SpA
  • Airbus SAS
  • ArianeGroup SAS
  • IHI Corporation
  • L3Harris Technologies
  • Leidos Holdings, Inc.
  • Moog ISP, Inc.
  • NAMMO AS
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
  • Roketsan AS
  • Sierra Nevada Corporation
  • Sierra Space Corporation
  • Skyrora Limited
  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
  • The Boeing Company
  • URSA MAJOR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • Gilmour Space Technologies Pty Ltd
  • Deep Blue Aerospace Co., Ltd.

第17章 研究人工智慧

第18章 研究統計

第19章 研究聯絡人

第20章 研究報導

第21章 附錄

The Rocket Engine Market was valued at USD 8.54 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 9.06 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.17%, reaching USD 12.24 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024]	USD 8.54 billion
Estimated Year [2025]	USD 9.06 billion
Forecast Year [2030]	USD 12.24 billion
CAGR (%)	6.17%

Unveiling the Launchpad for Rocket Engine Market Analysis by Outlining Technological Evolution Regulatory Shifts and Strategic Imperatives

Rocket propulsion technologies have undergone a profound transformation over recent decades, driven by breakthroughs in materials science and system design that have enabled unprecedented performance and reliability. Advances in additive manufacturing techniques have allowed for geometric complexities and reduced manufacturing lead times, while novel composite and metallic alloys have improved thrust-to-weight ratios and temperature resistance. Concurrently, the emergence of digital twins and model-based systems engineering has enhanced predictive maintenance capabilities and optimized performance across flight profiles, ensuring that modern engines meet both rigorous safety standards and ambitious mission objectives.

Against this backdrop, stakeholders across government agencies, commercial launch providers, and defense contractors seek actionable intelligence to inform strategic decisions. This report offers a holistic examination of current propulsion system trends, regulatory dynamics, and market influences, delivering a structured framework to navigate complexity and identify growth opportunities. By integrating technological, geopolitical, and economic dimensions, the analysis establishes a comprehensive foundation for understanding market pathways and alignment with long-term development goals.

Moving forward, the subsequent sections explore pivotal shifts in technology and policy, assess the implications of recent tariff policies, and delve into segmentation, regional profiles, and competitive landscapes

Examining the Pivotal Transformative Shifts in Rocket Engine Landscape Driven by Material Advancements Digital Integration and Geopolitical Pressures

Recent developments in rocket engine design reflect a convergence of advanced materials, digital integration, and shifting geopolitical priorities, which collectively have redefined the propulsion landscape. High-performance ceramic matrix composites and high-strength alloys now withstand extreme thermal cycles while reducing system mass. These material innovations are complemented by the integration of advanced sensors and telemetry, enabling real-time health monitoring and adaptive control strategies that enhance engine reliability and mission success rates. As a result, the balance between development cycles and operational costs has shifted decisively toward data-driven optimization, fostering continuous improvement across design iterations.

At the same time, the intensification of global space ambitions has amplified competitive pressures, driving national and commercial entities to accelerate development timelines. Strategic investments by emerging space powers and private enterprises have catalyzed rapid prototyping and iterative testing, further compressing innovation cycles. In parallel, sustainability considerations have begun to influence propellant choices and lifecycle assessments, prompting research into more environmentally benign fuel formulations.

Moreover, the rise of digital twin methodologies and high-fidelity simulation platforms has streamlined validation processes, reducing the number of physical prototypes required and accelerating certification cycles. Autonomous control algorithms and machine learning models are being embedded to optimize combustion stability and throttle response, while advanced manufacturing networks provide modular tooling solutions across geographically dispersed facilities. These combined shifts not only reflect a technological renaissance but also signal an industry-wide prioritization of flexibility and rapid scalability.

This landscape transformation underscores the importance of harmonizing technological capability with regulatory frameworks and strategic alliances. The coming phases of propulsion evolution will hinge on collaborative ecosystems that leverage cross-sector expertise, ensuring that the next generation of rocket engines delivers both superior performance and resilience in an increasingly complex operational environment

Analyzing the Cumulative Effects of United States Tariff Adjustments on Rocket Engine Supply Chains Manufacturing Costs and Strategic Sourcing Decisions

Beginning in early 2025, the implementation of revised tariff structures by the United States has exerted discernible pressure across the rocket engine supply chain, particularly affecting the import of critical raw materials such as high-grade titanium powders and nickel-based superalloys. Components including precision-machined turbo pumps and specialized catalysts have seen escalated costs, prompting prime contractors and subsystem suppliers to reassess procurement strategies. The cumulative effect of these levies has been an upward shift in production expenses, influencing both development budgets and contract negotiations.

In response, industry participants have accelerated efforts to diversify sourcing channels, with some establishing strategic partnerships in allied markets to secure unhindered access to necessary feedstock. A growing emphasis on nearshoring initiatives seeks to localize manufacturing capabilities and reduce exposure to tariff volatility, while a subset of vertically integrated firms has opted to expand in-house material refinement processes. These adjustments signify a broader trend toward supply chain resilience and adaptive operational footprints.

Over the medium term, the residual impact of tariff measures is expected to manifest in refined pricing structures and potential design optimizations aimed at reducing material intensity. Collaborative ventures between engine developers and casting specialists promise to pioneer alternative alloy formulations that balance cost and performance. As stakeholders navigate this evolving policy environment, the emphasis on strategic sourcing and supplier ecosystem strength will remain a critical determinant of competitive positioning in the propulsion sector.

Furthermore, this tariff landscape has accelerated investment in material science research, spurring developments in additive manufacturing powders that circumvent traditional import dependencies. By integrating these emerging powders into advanced production workflows, firms aim to maintain performance benchmarks while mitigating supply chain disruptions and preserving long-term program viability.

Deriving Key Market Segmentation Insights from Propellant Types Thrust Classes Engine Cycles Application Verticals and Stage Configurations

An in-depth examination of propellant type segmentation reveals distinct performance and application profiles. Hybrid propellant systems, combining metalized and polymer-based formulations, continue to appeal for their safety and throttleability advantages, finding particular favor in suborbital vehicles and experimental platforms. Liquid propellant engines, subdivided into cryogenic and hypergolic classes, command attention for high-energy missions such as heavy orbital launches, with cryogenic variants delivering superior specific impulse and hypergolic models prized for reliability in orbital maneuvering systems. Meanwhile, composite and double base solid propellant architectures have retained relevance in missile thrust modules and booster stages, where simplicity and storability underscore mission readiness.

Distinct thrust class segmentation further delineates market opportunities, with high-thrust engines driving demand for crewed and heavy-lift missions, medium-thrust modules serving satellite deployment vehicles, and low-thrust units underlying small satellite propulsion and sustained station keeping. The cycle design of engines comprises expander, gas generator, pressure fed, and staged combustion architectures; the latter's full flow and partial flow iterations have gained momentum in pursuit of enhanced efficiency and reduced turbine loading profiles.

Application-based insights underscore that missile propulsion applications remain critical for defense budgets, while orbital launch segments differentiate across heavy, medium, and small launch vehicles, each responding to unique payload and orbit insertion requirements. Satellite propulsion segments divide into orbit raising and station keeping functions, reflecting lifecycle priorities for geostationary and low Earth orbit assets. Suborbital applications, spanning scientific research and tourism, reinforce diverse thrust demands and system specifications.

Finally, stage count segmentation illuminates trade-offs in mission design, with single-stage-to-orbit concepts pushing engineering boundaries, two- and three-stage configurations underpinning established launch architectures, and multi-stage vehicles beyond three stages offering potential for incremental reusability and payload optimization.

Uncovering Regional Dynamics in Rocket Engine Development Across Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific Paradigms in Demand and Innovation

Regional dynamics in the rocket engine domain present a mosaic of developmental trajectories and strategic priorities. Across the Americas, robust collaboration between governmental space agencies and private enterprises has fostered a fertile environment for rapid prototyping and commercialization. Investment in reusable engine architectures and additive manufacturing facilities has propelled North American entities to the forefront of cost-per-kilogram reduction initiatives, while defense-oriented programs continue to underwrite innovations in hypersonic propulsion and advanced missile systems.

In Europe, Middle East, and Africa, a confluence of sovereign space ambitions and multinational consortia has shaped a diverse propulsion ecosystem. European launch systems benefit from the Ariane program's rigorous certification standards, driving demand for solid and liquid stages that adhere to strict environmental and safety guidelines. Concurrently, Middle Eastern nations are channeling sovereign wealth into indigenous engine development to secure strategic autonomy, while African research institutions explore small-scale solid motors for atmospheric and scientific payload deployment.

Asia-Pacific region stakeholders are charting an aggressive expansion of launch capabilities, underpinned by state-led initiatives and burgeoning private-sector ventures. Mainland Asia has prioritized the upscaling of heavy-lift and reusable engine test facilities, with particular emphasis on liquid oxygen and kerosene cycle engines. In parallel, regional supply chains have matured to support specialized component manufacturing, while collaborative frameworks across national borders are accelerating shared R&D efforts. Together, these regional patterns underscore an increasingly multipolar propulsion market characterized by differentiated capabilities and strategic partnerships.

Profiling Leading Rocket Engine Manufacturers Their Strategic Approaches Technological Capabilities Collaborations and Competitive Advantages

Leading propulsion system manufacturers exhibit a spectrum of strategic approaches and innovation pathways. Established integrators have leveraged deep technical legacies to refine high-thrust liquid engines with advanced turbomachinery and thermal management systems, often securing long-term program contracts through demonstrated reliability and performance margins. Concurrently, emergent firms with agile development models are harnessing additive manufacturing to fabricate complex injector and chamber assemblies, achieving rapid iteration cycles that challenge traditional supply paradigms.

Collaborative ventures have emerged as a central theme, with engine developers partnering with materials specialists to co-develop high-temperature composites and metal alloys optimized for extreme cycle parameters. Such alliances extend to academic institutions and national laboratories, where open innovation frameworks accelerate the maturation of novel propellant chemistries and sensor technologies. Moreover, strategic acquisitions have enabled conglomerates to integrate complementary capabilities, from specialized machining operations to digital analytics platforms, reinforcing end-to-end control over development timelines.

In positioning for future growth, companies are diversifying portfolios across thrust classes and application niches, ensuring that both small satellite propulsion and heavy-lift scenarios are addressed within a unified technology roadmap. Emphasis on lifecycle support services, including remote diagnostics and on-orbit maintenance tools, further differentiates providers in a market where service reliability and total cost of ownership increasingly dictate procurement choices.

Formulating Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders to Capitalize on Emerging Rocket Engine Technologies Partnerships and Supply Chain Resilience

Industry leaders seeking to maintain competitive advantage within the propulsion market should prioritize supply chain diversification by forging partnerships with multiple qualified suppliers of critical alloys and additive manufacture powders, reducing exposure to policy-driven constraints. Investments in modular engine architectures will enhance scalability, enabling rapid adaptation to emerging mission profiles and volume requirements without necessitating ground-up redesigns. To accelerate innovation cycles, organizations are advised to integrate model-based systems engineering practices, leveraging digital twins that replicate end-to-end performance metrics and support iterative validation across virtual testbeds.

Collaboration across traditional boundaries can unlock significant efficiencies; co-development agreements with academic research centers and national labs can expedite breakthroughs in materials and propellant chemistry, while public-private consortia enable shared infrastructure for large-scale static and dynamic engine testing. In parallel, establishing a continuous feedback mechanism from field operations to design teams will refine maintenance protocols and inform next-generation engine specifications.

Finally, embedding resilience measures-such as dual-source contracts and regional inventory buffers-will mitigate the impact of future trade policy shifts and logistical disruptions. By coupling these strategic actions with a robust data analytics backbone, companies can derive actionable insights to optimize cost structures, enhance system reliability, and achieve sustainable growth in an increasingly dynamic propulsion landscape.

Detailing a Rigorous Research Methodology Emphasizing Data Collection Synthesis Analytical Frameworks and Validation Processes in Rocket Engine Market

Our research methodology integrates a structured mix of secondary and primary data collection supported by rigorous analytical techniques and validation protocols. The initial phase encompassed an exhaustive review of publicly available technical papers, corporate filings, and policy documents to map the technological and regulatory contours of the propulsion sector. This secondary research was augmented by a systematic examination of patent databases and technical conference proceedings, ensuring that emerging trends in materials, manufacturing processes, and digital integration were comprehensively captured.

Subsequently, primary insights were secured through in-depth interviews with a cross-section of industry stakeholders, including propulsion engineers, supply chain managers, and program directors. These interviews provided firsthand perspectives on strategic priorities, operational challenges, and innovation roadmaps. Data triangulation followed, reconciling secondary findings with primary input to identify consistencies and rectify discrepancies, thereby reinforcing the accuracy and reliability of conclusions.

Analytical frameworks such as scenario analysis and SWOT evaluation underpinned the synthesis of collected data, enabling the assessment of tariff implications, segmentation dynamics, and regional competitive factors. The methodology concluded with a validation workshop, wherein key findings were reviewed by subject matter experts to confirm relevance and refine interpretive statements. This comprehensive approach ensures that the report delivers actionable intelligence aligned with industry imperatives.

Concluding Comprehensive Insights on Rocket Engine Market Trajectories Technological Evolutions and Strategic Pathways for Stakeholders and Innovators

In conclusion, the rocket engine domain is poised at a juncture marked by profound technological advancements, evolving policy landscapes, and intensifying global competition. Material innovations and digital integration are propelling engine performance to new heights, while tariff realignments have underscored the imperative for supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing adaptability. Market segmentation, spanning propellant chemistries, thrust classifications, cycle architectures, application verticals, and stage configurations, offers a nuanced lens through which stakeholders can tailor products to mission-specific demands.

Regional dynamics further complicate the landscape, as North American entities push reusable engine paradigms, EMEA consortiums balance certification rigor with sovereign ambitions, and Asia-Pacific initiatives drive capacity expansion through state-led and private ventures. Within this multifaceted environment, leading companies differentiate themselves via collaborative research alliances, additive manufacturing proficiency, and comprehensive lifecycle support offerings.

Armed with the insights presented, decision-makers can navigate the complexities of design trade-offs, regulatory shifts, and competitive positioning. By embracing flexible development methodologies, strengthening cross-sector partnerships, and maintaining a proactive stance toward emerging market forces, industry participants will be well-equipped to chart sustainable growth pathways and deliver the next generation of propulsion solutions.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Define: Research Objective
• 2.2. Determine: Research Design
• 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
• 2.4. Collect: Data Source
• 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
• 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
• 2.7. Publish: Research Report
• 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

• 5.1. Growing demand for reusable rocket engines to reduce launch costs
• 5.2. Increasing investments in private space exploration and commercialization
• 5.3. Advancements in 3d printing for rocket engine components
• 5.4. Rise of green propulsion technologies for environmentally friendly launches
• 5.5. Expanding use of hybrid propulsion systems in small launch vehicles
• 5.6. Development of high-thrust electric propulsion systems for deep space missions
• 5.7. Miniaturization of rocket engines for small satellite launchers
• 5.8. Surge in government space programs driving next-generation propulsion innovation
• 5.9. Integration of ai and digital twins for rocket engine design and testing
• 5.10. Increasing collaboration between space agencies and private manufacturers

6. Market Insights

• 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Rocket Engine Market, by Propellant Type

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Hybrid Propellant
  • 8.2.1. Metalized Propellant
  • 8.2.2. Polymer Based Propellant
• 8.3. Liquid Propellant
  • 8.3.1. Cryogenic Propellant
  • 8.3.2. Hypergolic Propellant
• 8.4. Solid Propellant
  • 8.4.1. Composite Propellant
  • 8.4.2. Double Base Propellant

9. Rocket Engine Market, by Thrust Class

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. High Thrust
• 9.3. Low Thrust
• 9.4. Medium Thrust

10. Rocket Engine Market, by Engine Cycle

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Expander Cycle
• 10.3. Gas Generator Cycle
• 10.4. Pressure Fed Cycle
• 10.5. Staged Combustion Cycle

11. Rocket Engine Market, by Stage Count

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. More Than Three Stage
• 11.3. Single Stage To Orbit
• 11.4. Three Stage
• 11.5. Two Stage

12. Rocket Engine Market, by Application

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. Missile Propulsion
• 12.3. Orbital Launch
  • 12.3.1. Heavy Launch Vehicle
  • 12.3.2. Medium Launch Vehicle
  • 12.3.3. Small Launch Vehicle
• 12.4. Satellite Propulsion
  • 12.4.1. Orbit Raising Propulsion
  • 12.4.2. Station Keeping Propulsion
• 12.5. Suborbital Launch
  • 12.5.1. Scientific Launch
  • 12.5.2. Tourism Launch

13. Americas Rocket Engine Market

• 13.1. Introduction
• 13.2. United States
• 13.3. Canada
• 13.4. Mexico
• 13.5. Brazil
• 13.6. Argentina

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Rocket Engine Market

• 14.1. Introduction
• 14.2. United Kingdom
• 14.3. Germany
• 14.4. France
• 14.5. Russia
• 14.6. Italy
• 14.7. Spain
• 14.8. United Arab Emirates
• 14.9. Saudi Arabia
• 14.10. South Africa
• 14.11. Denmark
• 14.12. Netherlands
• 14.13. Qatar
• 14.14. Finland
• 14.15. Sweden
• 14.16. Nigeria
• 14.17. Egypt
• 14.18. Turkey
• 14.19. Israel
• 14.20. Norway
• 14.21. Poland
• 14.22. Switzerland

15. Asia-Pacific Rocket Engine Market

• 15.1. Introduction
• 15.2. China
• 15.3. India
• 15.4. Japan
• 15.5. Australia
• 15.6. South Korea
• 15.7. Indonesia
• 15.8. Thailand
• 15.9. Philippines
• 15.10. Malaysia
• 15.11. Singapore
• 15.12. Vietnam
• 15.13. Taiwan

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 16.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 16.3.1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • 16.3.2. Avio S.p.A.
  • 16.3.3. Airbus SAS
  • 16.3.4. ArianeGroup SAS
  • 16.3.5. IHI Corporation
  • 16.3.6. L3Harris Technologies
  • 16.3.7. Leidos Holdings, Inc.
  • 16.3.8. Moog ISP, Inc.
  • 16.3.9. NAMMO AS
  • 16.3.10. Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • 16.3.11. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • 16.3.12. Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
  • 16.3.13. Roketsan A.S.
  • 16.3.14. Sierra Nevada Corporation
  • 16.3.15. Sierra Space Corporation
  • 16.3.16. Skyrora Limited
  • 16.3.17. Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
  • 16.3.18. The Boeing Company
  • 16.3.19. URSA MAJOR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • 16.3.20. Gilmour Space Technologies Pty Ltd
  • 16.3.21. Deep Blue Aerospace Co., Ltd.

17. ResearchAI

18. ResearchStatistics

19. ResearchContacts

20. ResearchArticles

21. Appendix