日本牙科植入市場：市場規模、佔有率和趨勢分析（2025-2031年）

2024年日本人工植牙和最終支台齒市場價值超過2.52億美元，預計到2031年將成長到超過3.07億美元。

本報告涵蓋植入、最終支台齒、治療計畫軟體和手術範本。

量化目標包括銷售量、平均售價、市場規模、成長率和企業市場占有率。

定性部分涵蓋市場促進因素和阻礙因素、近期併購、公司簡介、產品系列以及在私人診所、集團診所、大學醫院和實驗室中的競爭定位。

日本的一個關鍵趨勢是不斷向數位化轉型。

錐狀射束CT、口內掃描、設計軟體以及內部或外包銑床的廣泛應用，推動了 CAD 或 CAM支台齒的強勁成長。

隨著掃描器和銑床的成本持續下降，工作流程也日益標準化，越來越多的牙科診所和實驗室可能會採用這些工具。

預計這種可及性的提高將在整個預測期內推動對 CAD/CAM支台齒的需求，從而重塑常規植入治療中的修復選擇。

市場概覽

日本植入市場正處於人口老化、對功能性和美觀性的高期望以及對數位化工作流程的濃厚興趣的十字路口。

核心產品是植入和連接植體與牙冠或義齒的最終支台齒。圍繞著這個核心產品，一套數位化解決方案正在不斷擴展，以支持治療方案的發展和實施。診所依賴基於錐狀束CT（CBCT）的治療方案來可視化骨質和神經位置，許多病例也使用手術範本將方案轉化為精準的植入。這些工具能夠減少診療時間，提高首次植入的準確性，並減少後續調整，因此在專科醫生和全科醫生中都得到了廣泛應用。

需求依價格分佈和病例複雜程度進行區隔：高階植入在全牙弓和複雜適應症中仍然很重要，因為廣泛的假體目錄、先進的表面處理和悠久的臨床歷史都受到重視。

經濟型植入通常用於單顆牙齒或短跨度病例，增加植體的數量，但降低整體平均植體費用。

同時，CAD 或 CAM支台齒越來越受歡迎，診所和實驗室透過數位化設計和銑床，需要精確的牙齦輪廓和組織控制。

市場促進因素

輔助技術的進步。植入技術的蓬勃發展促使錐形束CT掃描儀和規劃軟體得到廣泛應用。高解析度3D模型使臨床醫生能夠評估骨骼密度和結構，並根據關鍵解剖結構規劃植入位置。電腦輔助手術有助於將規劃轉化為手術範本，從而控制角度、深度和入路點。這些措施提高了可靠性，減少了變異性，並擴大了植入治療方案的選擇範圍。

人們對美觀性的需求日益成長。植入被廣泛認為是單顆牙齒缺失的最佳美觀解決方案，因為它可以保護鄰牙，並維持牙齦乳頭和軟組織的輪廓。人們對美觀牙科的日益關注，促使更多人選擇植入而非牙橋。在適當的病例中，諸如單階段或即時負重等快速治療方案，能夠縮短治療時間，進一步提升患者的就醫體驗。

人工植牙技術和培訓的進步 過去，全科醫生面臨的障礙包括認為植牙手術複雜且需要大量培訓。如今，供應商正致力於開發使用者友善的系統、清晰的工作流程以及能夠縮短手術時間和學習曲線的培訓專案。植入設計的進步和標準化套件的普及，也促成了過去十年平均成功率的提高。

數位化帶來的推動作用。隨著掃描和銑床成本的下降，以及越來越多的診所與數位化實驗室合作，CAD/CAM支台齒正成為可行的選擇，並被廣泛應用。即使植入ASP面臨低價和折扣品牌的壓力，這一趨勢仍將支撐支台齒收入的成長。

市場限制

口腔健康狀況的改善。口腔健康狀況的改善減少了需要複雜修復的患者人數。這種改善或許能夠緩解人口老化所帶來的需求，尤其對於需要進行全面全口修復的無牙顎患者而言更是如此。

價格敏感度和平均售價壓縮。在某些適應症中，高階植入正被性價比更高的品牌和折扣品牌蠶食市場佔有率。這種轉變雖然提高了銷量，但卻降低了整體平均售價。即使是高階品牌也開始提供針對性的折扣，以適應當地的預算。

假冒產品。一些廉價品牌冒充高階產品，聲稱其生物等效性與優質產品相當，雖然顧客群規模不大，但卻十分忠誠。這些假冒產品在價格上競爭，導致採購和零件相容性問題更加複雜，並加劇了價格壓力。

目標市場及區隔

人工植牙市場

類型：高級、超值、折扣。

形狀：平行壁，錐形。

材質：鈦、陶瓷或氧化鋯。

手術類型：單階段、雙階段、即時負重。

連接類型：內部連接、外部連接、整合。

用途（數量分析）：單顆牙齒修復、多牙橋部分牙弓固定、多牙橋全牙弓固定、義齒固定。

終末支台齒市場

區隔市場：庫存鑄件、客製化鑄件、CAD 或 CAM。

材質：鈦、陶瓷或氧化鋯、黃金。

類型：黏接式、螺絲固位式、義齒固位式。

儀器套件

治療計畫軟體

手術範本

目標市場和數據範圍

量化指標：市場規模、市場佔有率、市場預測、成長率、銷售量、平均售價。

定性通報：成長促進因素和阻礙因素、主要競爭對手的競爭分析和 SWOT 分析、併購、公司簡介和產品系列、相關監管更新、顛覆性技術、人口統計資料。

時限：基準年 2024 年，預測年 2025-2031 年，歷史資料 2021-2024 年。

資料來源：與產業領導者的直接訪談、政府和監管資料、診所和實驗室的輸入、進出口資料、iData Research 內部資料庫。

方法論：收入模型為單位 x 平均售價，並根據手術量、數位化採用率以及高階、經濟和折扣區隔市場的價格等級檢驗。

競爭分析

2024年，士卓曼集團在植入和支台齒領域佔絕對優勢。該公司的優勢在於其品牌知名度、悠久的臨床經驗和豐富的修復產品目錄。士卓曼旗下子公司Neodent在經濟型市場也表現出色，透過涵蓋價格分佈和經濟型價格分佈，進一步鞏固了集團的整體市場地位。持續的策略性收購拓展了數位化規劃和修復組件的業務範圍。

Envista在Nobel Biocare和植入 Direct的綜合排名中排名第二。 Envista整體銷售植入、支台齒和治療計畫軟體，但並非任何區隔市場的絕對領導者。該公司策略性地實現了差異化和多元化發展，其中約40%的收入來自植入，這得益於人口老化、數位化和集團診所的成長。

京瓷（原名JMM）在2024年排名第三，專注於具成本效益市場。公司產品組合包括錐形和平行式Phinesia Relios、Phinesia、EMINEO、POI和POI EX系統，以及適用於黏合式、螺絲固位式、覆蓋式義齒和CAD/CAM修復體的各種支台齒選擇。 2025年5月，公司宣布將於2025年10月1日將醫療業務分拆為京瓷醫療株式會社，以加強其在牙科和醫療保健領域的專注。此舉可望加快植入和器械領域的決策和產品組合開發。

其他供應商則在特定區隔市場中競爭，專注於特定幾何形狀、氧化鋯材質、簡易套件和強大的在地化服務。成功因素包括種類齊全的義肢組件、數位整合、教育培訓計畫以及可靠的供應鏈。

科技與臨床趨勢

引導式果凍和數位化工作流程。錐形束CT（CBCT）、規劃軟體和導板製作減少了計畫與實際植入位置之間的差異。診所正在採用掃描體並與實驗室合作，以設計牙齦輪廓和咬合關係。這推動了對與軟組織輪廓和植入路徑相匹配的CAD或CAM支台齒的需求。

內連接和錐形設計。內連接和錐形體在日本很受歡迎，因為它們具有良好的穩定性和修復體的靈活性。這些設計在合適的病例中支持即時或早期負重，並且與現代支台齒系統相容。

材料選擇。鈦因其強度高和骨整合性好而成為主流材料。氧化鋯植入和支台齒則滿足前牙美學需求和對無金屬材料的偏好。

即時負重方案。如果初期穩定性良好且咬合設計合理，即時負重可以縮短修復期。規劃軟體在選擇負重方向、植入位置和支台齒發揮核心作用。

標準支台齒和CAD/CAM支台齒。標準支台齒適用於成本較低的常規病例。當軟組織處理、角度和牙齦排列至關重要，且診所和技工室已使用掃描器和銑床時，CAD/CAM支台齒可擴大市場佔有率。

採購和定價

臨床評估將評估設備的成本、椅位使用時間、重複使用率和病患滿意度。

經濟型植入已取得顯著成效，並在預算有限的常規單顆牙齒修復和短跨度修復中佔越來越大的市場佔有率。而高階種植系統則更適用於複雜病例、全口種植方案以及需要深度修復覆蓋和較長臨床病史的情況。

支台齒的選擇取決於修復目標。黏接式修復體成本可能較低，但需要精心管理黏合劑。螺絲固位式支台齒具有極佳的可拆卸性，是許多數位化工作流程的首選。

雖然 CAD 或 CAM支台齒的單價更高，但它們可以減少調整和返工，從而在整個治療過程中提高整體經濟效益。

由於具有競爭力的價值體系數量不斷增加以及模仿品牌的出現，ASP 正面臨持續的壓縮。

高階和具成本效益品牌透過提供針對性的折扣、教育培訓以及將植體與規劃許可、掃描體和支台齒台庫捆綁植入的套餐來應對市場。最終結果是，市場競爭更加激烈，治療總成本和治療結果的可預測性成為消費者決策的關鍵因素。

治療環境與工作流程

在日本，大多數植入治療都在私人牙科診所進行，複雜的病例會被轉診給專家或大學中心。

實驗室在支台齒的選擇和最終修復體的品質方面起著至關重要的作用。隨著數位化工具的興起，牙科診所開始在診所內進行掃描，並將文件共用給使用CAD或CAM技術設計和製作支台齒和牙冠的實驗室。

雖然有些椅旁銑床是可行的，但大多數客製化支台齒都是透過合作實驗室製作的，在那裡控制材料、牙齦設計和表面處理，以獲得一致的軟組織效果。

依類別分類的市場動態

人工植牙。常規病例的治療方案正逐漸轉向價值導向型。對於複雜或全口種植病例，高階植入仍佔主導地位。鈦金屬植體佔主導地位，而氧化鋯植體則主要應用於美學領域。

最終支台齒：在簡單的病例中，鈦合金標準支台齒仍然很受歡迎。對於舊有系統或需要傾斜角度的病例，客製化鑄造基台仍然是一種可行的選擇。隨著掃描和銑床的進步，CAD 或 CAM支台齒越來越受歡迎，尤其是在組織準備和牙齦控制至關重要的情況下。

治療計劃軟體。越來越多的診所採用錐形束CT（CBCT）進行治療計劃，以尋求更清晰的工作流程和更低的治療差異性。該軟體的許可可以與植入線和導板製造服務捆綁銷售。

手術範本的需求隨著手術規劃軟體的普及而成長。導板可以縮短手術時間，並實現標準化的治療效果，因此在全科醫療中越來越受歡迎。

地區

本期聚焦日本。

一份 Excel 資料補充文件，依區隔市場列出了市場價格、銷售和平均售價。

為什麼要寫這份報告？

日本植入和最終支台齒市場中最大、成長最快的機會在哪裡？到 2031 年，高階、價值和折扣系統的組合將如何影響收入？

數位化將如何改變您的日常工作流程？隨著CBCT和掃描技術的普及，CAD/CAM支台齒、手術範本和規劃授權將如何變得更普遍？

哪些支台齒形式將獲得市場佔有率？標準型、客製化鑄造型、CAD 或 CAM 型基地台如何平衡成本、緊急控制和可回收性？

口腔衛生改善將如何影響手術量的成長？哪些患者群體會因美觀和長期價值的需求而受到抵銷？

考慮到價值型產品的獲利能力以及折扣產品中仿冒品牌的存在，植入和支台齒的合理價格分佈是多少？

牙醫診所應該如何制定修復策略，包括黏接固位和螺絲固位設計、前牙美觀和後牙負重的材料選擇，以及掃描體和資料庫的作用？

可以採取哪些措施來減少返工和就診時間，包括掃描通訊協定、導板設計、支台齒選擇以及數位化病例的實驗室協調？

iDataResearch 的「日本人工植牙和最終支台齒牙市場」報告透過對區隔市場和價格分佈模型、企業市場占有率分析以及數位化和手術工作流程的實用分析，回答了這些問題。

利用這份報告，您可以了解各類別的需求，規劃產品藍圖，使定價符合當地預期，並制定培訓和服務計劃，以減少差異和返工。

目錄

圖表清單

圖表列表

調查方法

全球關稅的影響

日本人工植牙和最終支台齒市場

• 摘要整理
  • 日本人工植牙和最終支台齒市場概覽
  • 競爭分析
  • 市場趨勢
  • 終端用戶分析
  • 市場區隔
• 介紹
  • 人工植牙
  • 終點碼頭
  • 人工植牙器械套件
  • 治療計劃軟體市場
  • 手術導板
• 數量分析和最終用戶分析
  • 人工植牙最終用戶
  • 人工植牙數量分析
• 外匯
• 市場概覽
• 市場分析與預測
  • 人工植牙市場
  • 最終碼頭市場
  • 人工植牙植牙器材套件市場
  • 治療計劃軟體市場
  • 手術導板市場
• 推動和阻礙因素
• 競爭市佔率分析
  • 人工植牙市場競爭市場佔有率分析
  • 終末支台齒市場競爭市佔率分析
  • 人工植牙植牙套件市場競爭市佔率分析
  • 治療計畫軟體市場競爭格局分析
  • 手術範本市場競爭格局分析

簡稱

The Japan dental implant and final abutment market was valued at over 252 million dollars in 2024. The market is projected to grow to over 307 million dollars by 2031.

This report suite covers dental implants, final abutments, treatment planning software, and surgical guides.

Quantitative coverage includes unit sales, average selling prices, market size, growth rates, and company shares.

Qualitative coverage includes market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, and competitive positioning across private clinics, group practices, university hospitals, and laboratories.

A key trend in Japan is the ongoing shift toward digitization.

The spread of cone beam CT, intraoral scanning, design software, and in-house or outsourced milling is fueling strong growth in CAD or CAM abutments.

As scanner and mill costs continue to decline and as workflows standardize, more clinics and labs will adopt these tools.

This wider access is expected to lift demand for CAD or CAM abutments throughout the forecast period and to reshape prosthetic choices in everyday implant care.

Market Overview

Japan's implant market sits at the intersection of aging demographics, high expectations for function and aesthetics, and strong interest in digital workflows.

The core products are the implant fixture and the final abutment that links the fixture to the crown or denture. Around this core, a growing digital stack supports planning and delivery. Clinics rely on CBCT-based treatment planning to visualize bone quality and nerve position, and many cases use surgical guides to translate the plan into accurate placement. These tools shorten chair time, improve confidence in first-time accuracy, and reduce downstream adjustments, which supports adoption at both specialist and general practice levels.

Demand is segmented by price tier and by case complexity. Premium implants remain important in full arch and complex indications, where a wide prosthetic catalogue, advanced surface treatments, and long clinical histories are valued.

Value implants are used more frequently in straightforward single-tooth and short span cases, which pushes unit volume but pressures overall ASPs.

On the abutment side, stock titanium remains common in routine procedures, while CAD or CAM abutments gain share where clinics and labs run digital design and milling and need precise emergence profiles and tissue management.

Market Drivers

Improved supporting technology. The growth of implant dentistry has driven adoption of CBCT scanners and planning software. High-resolution 3D models allow clinicians to assess bone density and structure and to plan implant position relative to critical anatomy. Computer-guided surgery converts plans into surgical guides that help control angulation, depth, and entry points. Together these steps increase confidence, reduce variability, and support broader indications for implant therapy.

Demand for improved aesthetics. Implants are widely regarded as the best aesthetic solution for single-tooth replacement, since they preserve adjacent teeth and can maintain papillae and soft tissue contours. Rising interest in cosmetic dentistry supports implant selection over bridges. Fast protocols, such as one-stage or immediate loading in suitable cases, further improve the patient experience by reducing elapsed treatment time.

Improved dental implant technology and training. Historical barriers for general practitioners included perceptions of complexity and the need for extensive training. Vendors now focus on user-friendly systems, clearer workflows, and training programs that reduce procedure time and learning curves. Implant design advances and standardized kits have contributed to higher average success rates over the last decade.

Digitization pull-through. As scanning and milling costs decline and as more clinics partner with digital labs, CAD or CAM abutments become a practical daily choice. This trend supports growth in abutment revenue even when implant ASPs face pressure from value and discount brands.

Market Limiters

Improvements in dental health. Better oral health reduces the pool of complex restorative candidates. This improvement can offset the demand linked to an aging population, especially in edentulous cases that would otherwise support large full-arch treatments.

Price sensitivity and ASP compression. Premium implants are losing share to value and discount brands in certain indications. The shift raises unit volumes but lowers overall ASPs. Even premium brands use targeted discounting to match local budgets.

Imitation products. Discount brands that present themselves as bioequivalent to premium systems attract a modest but persistent customer base. These imitation products compete on price and complicate procurement and part compatibility, reinforcing downward pressure on pricing.

Markets Covered and Segmentation

Dental Implant Market

Type. Premium, value, discount.

Shape. Parallel wall, tapered.

Material. Titanium, ceramic or zirconia.

Procedure type. One-stage surgery, two-stage surgery, immediate loading.

Connection type. Internal connection, external connection, one-piece.

Application (unit analysis). Single-tooth replacement, multi-tooth bridge partial arch securement, multi-tooth bridge full arch securement, denture securement.

Final Abutment Market

Segment. Stock, custom cast, CAD or CAM.

Material. Titanium, ceramic or zirconia, gold.

Type. Cement-retained, screw-retained, denture retaining.

Instrument Kit

Treatment Planning Software

Surgical Guide

Market Coverage and Data Scope

Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and average selling prices.

Qualitative coverage. Growth drivers and limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, regulatory updates where relevant, disruptive technologies, and demographic context.

Time frame. Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2024.

Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and regulatory data, clinic and laboratory inputs, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.

Method note. Revenues are modeled as units X ASP, validated against procedure volumes, digital adoption rates, and price tiers across premium, value, and discount segments.

Competitive Analysis

Straumann Group was the strongest competitor in 2024 across implants and abutments. The company benefits from brand recognition, a long clinical track record, and a broad prosthetic catalogue. Neodent, a Straumann subsidiary, has also outperformed the market in the value segment, which strengthens the group's overall position by covering both premium and value price points. Ongoing strategic acquisitions support reach across digital planning and restorative components.

Envista ranked second overall through Nobel Biocare and Implant Direct. Envista sells across implants, abutments, and treatment planning software, but is not the clear leader in any single category. The company is strategically differentiated and well diversified, with about 40 percent of revenue from implants, reinforced by aging demographics, digitization, and growth in group practices.

KYOCERA (formerly JMM) ranked third in 2024 and focuses on the value segment. Its portfolio includes FINESIA Relios, FINESIA, EMINEO, POI, and POI EX systems in tapered and parallel forms, along with broad abutment options for cement-retained, screw-retained, overdenture, and CAD or CAM restorations. The company announced in May 2025 the spin-off of its medical business into Kyocera Medical Corporation, effective October 1, 2025, to sharpen its focus on dental and healthcare. This structure is expected to support faster decision-making and portfolio development in implants and instruments.

Other suppliers compete in selected niches, with emphasis on specific geometries, zirconia options, simplified kits, and strong local service. Success factors include breadth of prosthetic parts, digital integrations, education programs, and reliable supply chains.

Technology and Practice Trends

Guided surgery and digital workflows. CBCT, planning software, and guide production reduce deviation between plan and placement. Clinics adopt scan bodies and integrate with labs to design emergence profiles and occlusion. This raises demand for CAD or CAM abutments that match soft tissue contours and path of insertion.

Internal connections and tapered designs. Internal connections and tapered bodies are common in Japan due to primary stability and prosthetic flexibility. These designs support immediate or early loading in appropriate cases and fit well with modern abutment systems.

Material choices. Titanium dominates for strength and osseointegration. Zirconia implants and abutments serve an anterior aesthetics niche and metal-free preferences.

Immediate loading protocols. When primary stability is achieved and occlusion is designed carefully, immediate loading shortens the restorative timeline. Planning software plays a central role in load direction, implant position, and abutment selection.

Stock versus CAD or CAM abutments. Stock abutments support routine cases at lower cost. CAD or CAM abutments gain share where soft tissue management, angulation, and emergence alignment are critical, and where clinics and labs already use scanners and mills.

Procurement and Pricing Dynamics

Clinics evaluate device price, chair time, remake rates, and patient satisfaction.

Value implants win share in routine single-tooth and short span indications where outcomes are proven and budgets are tight. Premium systems dominate in complex cases, full arch protocols, and settings that need a deep prosthetic range and long clinical histories.

Abutment choice depends on restoration goals. Cement-retained designs can lower cost but require careful cement control. Screw-retained designs support retrievability and are preferred in many digital workflows.

CAD or CAM abutments carry higher unit prices but can reduce adjustments and remakes, which improves total economics over the course of care.

ASPs face steady compression due to the larger number of capable value systems and the presence of imitation brands.

Premium and value leaders respond with focused discounting, education, and bundles that link implants to planning licences, scan bodies, and abutment libraries. The net effect is a more competitive corridor where total cost of treatment and predictability of outcomes drive decisions.

Care Settings and Workflows

Most implant procedures in Japan take place in private dental clinics, with referrals to specialists and university centers for complex cases.

Laboratories are central to abutment selection and final restoration quality. As digital tools spread, clinics scan in-house and share files with labs that design and mill CAD or CAM abutments and crowns.

Some chairside milling exists, but most custom abutments run through partner labs that manage materials, emergence design, and finishing for consistent soft tissue outcomes.

Market Dynamics by Category

Dental implants. Unit growth is steady, with mix moving toward value systems in routine cases. Premium implants remain strong in complex and full arch indications. Titanium dominates, while zirconia serves a smaller aesthetics-driven niche.

Final abutments. Stock titanium abutments remain common for simple cases. Custom cast is stable where legacy systems and angulations require it. CAD or CAM abutments are expanding with the spread of scanning and milling, especially where tissue shaping and emergence control matter.

Treatment planning software. Adoption tracks with CBCT use and with clinics that want guided workflows and lower variability. Licences can be bundled with implant lines or guide production services.

Surgical guides. Demand grows with planning software. Guides lower chair time and help standardize outcomes, which supports wider adoption at the general practice level.

Geography

This edition covers Japan.

Excel Data Supplement with market values, units, and ASPs by segment.

Why This Report

Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within Japan's implant and final abutment market, and how will the mix of premium, value, and discount systems shape revenue through 2031.

How will digitization change everyday workflows, and what is the expected pull-through for CAD or CAM abutments, surgical guides, and planning licences as CBCT and scanning spread.

Which abutment formats will gain share, and how will stock, custom cast, and CAD or CAM options balance cost, emergence control, and retrievability.

How will improvements in oral health affect procedure growth, and which patient segments will offset that effect through demand for aesthetics and long-term value.

What price corridors are realistic for implants and abutments given value segment gains and the presence of imitation brands in the discount tier.

How should clinics plan restoration strategies, including cement-retained versus screw-retained designs, material choice for anterior aesthetics versus posterior loading, and the role of scan bodies and libraries.

What steps reduce remakes and chair time, including scanning protocols, guide design, abutment selection, and lab coordination in digital cases.

The Japan Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market report from iData Research answers these questions with segment and price-tier models, company share analysis, and practical coverage of digital and surgical workflows.

Use it to size demand by category, plan product roadmaps, align pricing with local expectations, and build training and service programs that reduce variability and remakes.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Japan Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market

• 5.1 Executive Summary
  • 5.1.1 Japan Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Overview
  • 5.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 5.1.3 Market Trends
  • 5.1.4 End User Analysis
  • 5.1.5 Market Segmentation
• 5.2 Introduction
  • 5.2.1 Dental Implants
  • 5.2.2 Final Abutments
  • 5.2.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kits
    • 5.2.3.1 Instrument Kit Bundling
  • 5.2.4 Treatment Planning Software Market
  • 5.2.5 Surgical Guides
• 5.3 Unit and End User Analysis
  • 5.3.1 End Users of Dental Implants
  • 5.3.2 Dental Implant Unit Analysis
    • 5.3.2.1 Dental Implant Unit Sales by Application
    • 5.3.2.1.1 Single-Tooth Replacement
    • 5.3.2.1.2 Multi-Tooth Bridge Partial and Full Arch Securement
    • 5.3.2.1.3 Denture Securement
    • 5.3.2.2 Dental Implant Secured Dentures Unit Sales by Type
• 5.4 Currency Exchange Rate
• 5.5 Market Overview
• 5.6 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 5.6.1 Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.1 Dental Implant Market by Segment
    • 5.6.1.1.1 Premium Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.1.2 Value Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.1.3 Discount Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.2 Dental Implant Market by Material
    • 5.6.1.2.1 Titanium Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.2.2 Ceramic/Zirconia Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.3 Dental Implant Market by Shape
    • 5.6.1.3.1 Parallel-Wall Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.3.2 Tapered Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.4 Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type
    • 5.6.1.4.1 One-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.4.2 Two-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.4.3 Immediate Loading Procedure Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.5 Dental Implant Market by Connection Type
    • 5.6.1.5.1 Internal Connection
    • 5.6.1.5.2 External Connection
    • 5.6.1.5.3 One-Piece
  • 5.6.2 Final Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.1 Final Abutment Market by Segment
    • 5.6.2.1.1 Stock Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.1.2 Custom Cast Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.1.3 CAD/CAM Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.2 Final Abutment Market by Material
    • 5.6.2.2.1 Titanium Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.2.2 Ceramic/Zirconia Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.2.3 Gold Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.3 Final Abutment by Type
    • 5.6.2.3.1 Cement-Retained Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.3.2 Screw-Retained Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.3.3 Denture Retaining Abutment Market
  • 5.6.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market
  • 5.6.4 Treatment Planning Software Market
    • 5.6.4.1 Treatment Planning Software Market Installed Base Analysis
  • 5.6.5 Surgical Guide Market
• 5.7 Drivers and Limiters
  • 5.7.1 Market Drivers
  • 5.7.2 Market Limiters
• 5.8 Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.1 Dental Implant Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.2 Final Abutment Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.4 Treatment Planning Software Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.5 Surgical Guide Market Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 5-1: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024 - 2031
• Chart 5-2: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024 & 2031
• Chart 5-3: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-4: Dental Implant Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-5: Dental Implant Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-6: Dental Implant Market by Shape, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-7: Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-8: Dental Implant Market by Connection Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-9: Final Abutment Market by Segment Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-10: Final Abutment Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-11: Final Abutment Market by Type, South Korea, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-12: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 5-1: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Share Ranking by Segment, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-2: Factors Impacting the Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan
• Figure 5-3: Dental Implant and Final Abutment End User Analysis
• Figure 5-4: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Segmentation (1 of 2)
• Figure 5-5: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Segmentation (2 of 2)
• Figure 5-6: Dental Implants Placed by End User Specialization, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-7: General Practitioner Implant Placement and Restoration Penetration, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-8: Specialist Implant Placement and Restoration Penetration, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-9: Dental Implant Units Sold by Application, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-10: Dental Implant Secured Dentures Units Sold by Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-11: Currency Exchange Rate, 2024
• Figure 5-12: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-13: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-14: Total Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-15: Dental Implant Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-16: Dental Implant Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-17: Premium Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-18: Value Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-19: Discount Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-20: Dental Implant Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-21: Dental Implant Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-22: Titanium Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-23: Ceramic/Zirconia Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-24: Dental Implant Market by Shape, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-25: Dental Implant Market by Shape, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-26: Parallel-Wall Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-27: Tapered Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-28: Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-29: Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-30: One-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-31: Two-Stage Surgery Procedure Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-32: Immediate Loading Procedure Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-33: Dental Implant Market by Connection Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-34: Dental Implant Market by Connection Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-35: Internal Connection Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-36: External Connection Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-37: One-Piece Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-38: Total Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-39: Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-40: Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-41: Stock Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-42: Custom Cast Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-43: CAD/CAM Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-44: Final Abutment Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-45: Final Abutment Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-46: Titanium Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-47: Ceramic/Zirconia Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-48: Gold Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-49: Final Abutment Market by Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-50: Final Abutment Market by Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (SKWM)
• Figure 5-51: Cement-Retained Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-52: Screw-Retained Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-53: Denture Retaining Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-54: Total Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-55: Total Treatment Planning Software Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-56: Treatment Planning Software Market Units Installed Analysis, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-57: Total Surgical Guide Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-58: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-59: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-60: Leading Competitors, Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-61: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-62: Leading Competitors, Treatment Planning Software Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-63: Leading Competitors, Surgical Guide Market, Japan, 2024