![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1847183
美國牙科材料市場:市場規模、佔有率和趨勢分析(2025-2032 年)Dental Materials Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis | United States | 2025-2032 | Includes: Dental Cements, Dental Impression Materials, Direct Restorative Materials, and 5 more |
||||||
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
2025年美國牙科材料市場價值超過17億美元,預計2032年將成長到超過23億美元。
本報告涵蓋牙科黏固劑、牙科印模材料、直接修復材料、臨時修復材料、牙科黏合劑、牙科核心建立材料和牙科麻醉劑。
量化目標包括銷售量、平均售價、市場規模、成長率和企業市場占有率。
定性資訊包括私人診所、集團診所、牙科服務機構和學術診所的手術量、成長促進因素和阻礙因素、併購、產品系列、顛覆性技術和競爭定位。
市場概覽
美國的牙醫都在積極採用能夠支持微創牙科手術和加快工作流程的材料。
簡化操作步驟和技巧的選擇方案,例如自酸蝕黏合劑、流動複合樹脂、高填充樹脂和通用黏接系統,正日益受到歡迎。這些產品價格較高,因為它們可以節省時間、改善操作性,並在牙面預備量有限的情況下提供可靠的黏合強度。
同時,人們對美觀的需求持續推動牙色修復體和全瓷修復體美觀黏合技術的發展。大塊填充複合樹脂和雙重固化技術的進步,使得樹脂能夠更深層地固化,形成更可靠的邊緣,從而促進了直接修復技術在多種適應症中的應用。
同時,數位化正在改變某些類別:口內掃描儀的普及減少了傳統印模材料的使用,診室內的銑床減少了某些牙冠修復病例對臨時修復材料的依賴。
隨著臨床醫生尋求能夠支持再礦化並減少細菌負荷,同時保持實用物料輸送的材料,生物活性和抗菌特性在整個產品組合中越來越受到關注。
市場促進因素
美容牙科領域,患者更傾向於自然美觀的修復效果。牙色修復體和全瓷修復的需求不斷成長,帶動了對美觀樹脂黏接劑和高級複合樹脂的需求。在核心建立和直接修復方面,複合材料正在蠶食傳統材料(如銀汞合金)的市場佔有率。
產品創新。能夠減少浪費、節省時間並改善治療效果的新材料正穩步獲得市場認可。雙重固化系統、簡化的給藥方式以及能夠釋放氟離子和鈣離子的生物活性成分,都有助於提高平均售價並促進銷售成長。
大塊充填修復技術。高填充複合樹脂和現代固化技術可實現單層充填,最大深度可達 4 毫米。這縮短了就診時間,減少了操作步驟,在適當的適應症下,相比傳統的間接治療方法,可實現更優的直接治療效果。
微創牙科治療。自酸蝕黏接劑、流動性複合樹脂和高填充樹脂使得牙齒預備更加保守。縮短就診時間和簡化操作流程,提高了患者對優質材料的支付意願,從而減少牙齒敏感和返工。
生物活性和抗菌趨勢。人們越來越意識到,某些材料能夠釋放離子,促進琺瑯質再礦化,並減少琺瑯質邊緣的細菌活性。隨著持續教育的普及,越來越多的臨床醫生將這些方法應用於日常診療實踐。
不斷發展的實踐模式。牙科服務機構 (DSO) 可以規範產品處方和採購,從而加速簡化系統的普及。接受過最新黏合劑和複合樹脂培訓的新畢業生會將這些偏好帶入他們的私人診所和聯合診所。
市場限制
缺乏保險覆蓋。許多患者需要自費支付義肢治療費用。保險覆蓋範圍的限制未能跟上實驗室檢測和診療時間成本的上漲。這限制了治療方案的組合,並減緩了對價格敏感的診所向高階材料的過渡。
改善口腔健康。預防在牙科診療活動中扮演越來越重要的角色。早期療育和更好的居家護理可以減少嚴重齲齒,從而降低對牙冠和牙橋修復中使用的核心建立材料和黏固劑的需求。
數位化。牙科診所採用口內掃描儀後,通常會顯著減少傳統印模材料的使用。基於CAD/CAM的工作流程也減少了對臨時牙齒的需求。掃描儀成本的下降及其在牙科院校的普及預計將進一步推動這一趨勢。
預製牙冠。預製牙冠可在一次就診中完成製作,減少就診次數和臨時修復體或臨時黏固劑的使用。治療時間和成本的降低限制了臨時修復體和黏固劑市場的成長。
遠距牙科的影響:直接面對消費者的隱形矯正器模式將支出從手術室轉移出去。自費購買隱形矯正器的患者可以推遲其他診室治療,從而減少麻醉劑、黏合劑和修復材料的使用。
目標市場和數據範圍
定量分析:市場規模、市場佔有率、市場預測、成長率、銷售量、平均售價、手術例數。
定性通報:成長趨勢、市場阻礙因素、主要競爭對手的競爭分析和 SWOT 分析、併購、公司簡介和產品系列、FDA 批准和召回(如適用)、顛覆性技術以及影響需求的疾病概況。
時段:基準年 2025 年,預測期間 2026-2032 年,歷史資料 2021-2024 年。
資料來源:主要來源包括產業領導者、政府和學術資訊來源、監管資料庫、實務和DSO投入、進出口記錄、iData Research內部資料庫。
方法收入以單位乘以平均售價 (ASP) 來建模,並根據程序趨勢、材料組合、掃描儀採用率以及診所形成和合併模式檢驗。
目標市場及區隔
牙科水泥市場
按產品類型:永久性和臨時性。
依材料類型分析單元:複合樹脂、玻璃離子和樹脂改良玻璃離子、聚羧酸鋅、磷酸鋅。
依給藥方式分析單位:粉末或液體、自動混合注射器、2 膏劑或注射器、膠囊。
依固化方法進行單元分析:光固化、自固化、雙重固化。
依應用類型分類:牙冠和牙橋、樁核、嵌體、高嵌體、貼面、植入冠。
依生物活性分類:有生物活性,無生物活性。
牙科印模材料市場
依產品類型:乙烯基聚矽氧烷、聚醚、藻酸鹽、其他。
依輸送方式分析單位:藥筒或注射器或加蘭特槍、手動混合、動態攪拌機等。
直接修復材料市場
依產品類型:複合材料、玻璃或樹脂離子、汞合金。
依給藥方式進行單位分析:粉末或液體,2 膏劑或注射器,單劑量膠囊,自動混合注射器。
依固化方式進行單元分析:光固化、自固化、雙重固化。
依黏度進行單位分析:低黏度、正常黏度、高黏度。
臨時修復材料市場
依材料進行單元分析:丙烯酸樹脂、複合材料及其他。
依固化方式進行單元分析:光固化、自固化、雙重固化。
依交付類型進行單位分析:刷子和瓶子、1:1 自動混合墨盒、10:1 自動混合墨盒。
牙科黏合劑市場
依產品類型:全蝕刻、自蝕刻、通用。
依給藥方式分析單位:2 膏劑或注射器,刷子形式(如單劑量、膠囊、管瓶或瓶子)、自動混合。
牙科核心建立材料市場
依產品類型:複合樹脂、GI 或 RMGI、其他。
依應用程式類型:直接應用、間接應用。
依輸送類型進行單位分析:自動混合注射器、手動混合粉末和液體以及預混合料。
依固化方法分析單元:光固化、自固化、雙重固化。
牙科麻醉市場
依產品類型分類:局部麻醉劑、局部注射劑。
依藥物類型分類:Lidocaine、Articaine、Mepivacaine、Bupivacaine、Prilocaine。
牙齒美白和預防。最終用戶包括牙科診所。僅作為附錄列出,不包含競爭分析。
競爭分析
Solventum 在 2025 年引領了整個牙科材料市場。該公司在牙科麻醉劑以外的每個區隔市場都佔了領先地位,並且在牙科黏固劑領域表現尤為出色。
登士柏西諾德位居第二,在所有區隔市場都表現強勁,並在牙科印模材料和直接修復領域佔最強地位。
Kerr公司總體排名第三,除牙科麻醉劑和牙核心建立外,參與了所有區隔市場。該公司市佔率最大的領域是直接修復體區隔市場。
其他供應商專注於特定的材料系列和交付系統,而競爭排名則反映了產品組合的廣度、一致的處理、教育計劃和經銷商覆蓋範圍。
科技與臨床趨勢
自蝕刻和通用黏合劑簡化了製程,降低了對濕度控制的敏感性,從而減少了返工,並支持可預測的結果。
流動性好、填充性高的複合樹脂可用於進入狹窄的齲洞,並能以較少的堆積完成大塊填充修復。
釋放氟離子和鈣離子的生物活性功能因其對牙齒的長期支持作用而備受關注。
輸送和固化選擇也多種多樣:自動混合注射器、膠囊和雙重固化系統可幫助您選擇與病例複雜性和椅旁治療時間目標相符的材料。
隨著 CAD 和 CAM 技術的採用,傳統印模材料和臨時牙齒的使用量減少,因為診所正在向數位化掃描和當天完成牙冠修復的方向發展。
護理機構
這適用於私人診所、團體診所、牙科協會以及隸屬於大學和公共醫療機構的診所。
臨床環境的差異會影響材料選擇、處方管理、試劑套件標準化和培訓實施。
DSO 和集團診所通常有核准的材料清單並協商價格,而私人診所則專注於物料輸送和病例組合。
到 2032 年,美國牙科材料市場中最大、成長最快的機會是什麼?黏固劑、印模材料、直接臨時修復材料、黏合材料、核心建立材料和麻醉劑將如何各自創造價值?
牙科材料市場與美國整體經濟和牙科診所管理(包括人員配備、診療時間以及牙科服務機構在規範處方和採購方面的作用)有何關係?
未來哪些因素會影響市場格局?例如微創牙科手術的興起、生物活性和抗菌功效的提升,以及數位化對印模和臨時牙科領域的影響?
自蝕刻通用黏合劑、流動性複合樹脂、雙重固化系統和單劑量膠囊如何改變治療時間和一致性?
牙科診所應如何規劃美學修復病例的材料選擇,包括全瓷修復的黏合劑選擇以及減少敏感和復診的黏合策略?
隨著大塊填充複合樹脂和更好的固化性能為日常病例中的直接修復提供了更多選擇,您認為直接修復和間接修復之間的平衡會是什麼樣的?
CAD/CAM 和口內掃描技術的引入將如何影響市場需求?隨著掃描器在更多診所和學校的普及,印模材料和臨時牙的使用又將發生怎樣的變化?一個合理的時間表是什麼?
牙醫如何評估物料輸送和長期效果的離子釋放和再礦化作用?
保險限額和免賠額如何影響產品組合?供應商可以採取哪些策略來支持價值的實現,同時又不損害利潤率?
哪些風險可能會減緩成長,例如預防性措施的改進以減少嚴重的齲齒、預製牙冠帶來的壓力以及美學支出轉向直接面對消費者的矯正器?
iDataResearch 的「美國牙科材料市場報告」透過區隔和配置模型、企業市場占有率分析、程序和定價詳情以及將臨床選擇與材料需求聯繫起來的研究覆蓋範圍來回答這些問題。
利用這份報告來拓展覽類機會、規劃產品藍圖、協調經銷商和DSO計劃,並設定定價、合約和庫存目標。
圖表清單
圖表列表
美國牙科材料市場概覽
競爭分析
市場趨勢
市場趨勢
流程分段
市場區隔
重要報告更新
版本歷史記錄
調查方法
全球關稅的影響
美國牙科材料市場概覽
手術次數
牙科水泥市場
牙科印模材料市場
直接修復材料市場
臨時維修材料市場
牙科黏合劑市場
牙科核心建立材料市場
牙科麻醉劑市場
The U.S. dental materials market was valued at over $1.7 billion in 2025. The market is expected to grow to reach over $2.3 billion by 2032.
This report covers dental cements, dental impression materials, direct restorative materials, temporary restorative materials, dental bonding agents, dental core build-up materials, and dental anesthetics.
Quantitative coverage includes unit sales, average selling prices, market size, growth rates, and company shares.
Qualitative coverage includes procedure numbers, growth drivers and limiters, mergers and acquisitions, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and competitive positioning across private practices, group practices, DSOs, and academic clinics.
Market Overview
Dentists in the United States are adopting materials that support minimally invasive dentistry and faster workflows.
There is steady movement toward self-etch adhesives, flowable composites, highly filled resins, and universal bonding systems that reduce steps and technique sensitivity. These products command higher prices because they save time, improve handling, and provide reliable bond strength with limited tooth preparation.
In parallel, cosmetic demand continues to favor tooth-colored restorations and esthetic cementation for all-ceramic cases. Direct restoration methods are gaining use in many indications due to improvements in bulk-fill composites and dual-cure chemistry that allow deeper cures and dependable margins.
At the same time, digitization is changing specific categories. Adoption of intraoral scanners reduces the use of traditional impression materials, and in-office milling lowers reliance on temporary restorative materials for some crown cases.
Across the portfolio, bioactive and antibacterial features are becoming more visible as clinicians look for materials that support remineralization and reduce bacterial load while maintaining practical handling.
Market Drivers
Cosmetic dentistry. Patients prefer natural-looking results. Tooth-colored restorations and all-ceramic cases support higher demand for esthetic resin cements and advanced composites. In core build-up and direct restorative segments, composite materials are taking share from legacy options such as amalgam.
Product innovation. New materials that reduce waste, save time, and improve outcomes are seeing consistent uptake. Dual-cure systems, simplified delivery formats, and bioactive claims that release fluoride or calcium ions support higher ASPs and unit growth.
Bulk-fill restoration techniques. Highly filled composites and modern curing allow restoration of cavities up to 4 mm in a single layer. This saves chair time, reduces steps, and strengthens the case for direct approaches over traditional indirect work in appropriate indications.
Minimally invasive dentistry. Self-etch adhesives, flowable composites, and highly filled resins enable conservative preparation. Shorter chair time and easier application raise willingness to pay for premium materials that lower technique sensitivity and rework.
Bioactive and antibacterial trends. Awareness is growing for materials that release ions to support remineralization and that reduce bacterial activity at the margin. As continuing education expands, more clinicians add these options to daily practice.
Practice model evolution. DSOs standardize product formularies and purchasing, which can accelerate adoption of simplified systems. New graduates trained on modern adhesives and composites bring these preferences into private practice and group settings.
Market Limiters
Lack of insurance coverage. Many patients pay out of pocket for restorative care. Coverage limits have not kept pace with rising costs for lab work and chair time. This constrains procedure mix and slows the move to premium materials in price-sensitive clinics.
Improved dental health. Prevention is a larger share of office activity. Earlier intervention and better home care reduce severe decay, which limits demand for core build-up materials and cements used in crown and bridge procedures.
Digitization. After an office installs an intraoral scanner, use of traditional impression materials often drops significantly. Same-day CAD or CAM workflows reduce the need for temporary materials. Falling scanner prices and dental school adoption will reinforce this trend.
Prefabricated crowns. Single-visit prefabricated crowns reduce the number of appointments and the need for temporization and provisional cements. Lower procedural time and cost limit growth in temporary restorative and cement segments.
Teledentistry impacts. Direct-to-consumer aligner models shift spend outside the operatory. Patients who pay out of pocket for aligners may defer other in-office treatments, which reduces the use of anesthetics, bonding agents, and restorative materials in those episodes.
Market Coverage and Data Scope
Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, average selling prices, and procedure numbers.
Qualitative coverage. Growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, FDA clearances and recalls where relevant, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews that shape demand.
Time frame. Base year 2025, forecasts 2026 to 2032, historical data 2021 to 2024.
Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and academic sources, regulatory databases, practice and DSO inputs, import and export records, and the iData Research internal database.
Method note. Revenue is modeled from units multiplied by ASP and validated against procedure trends, material mix, scanner adoption rates, and practice formation and consolidation patterns.
Markets Covered and Segmentation
Dental Cement Market
By product type. Permanent and temporary.
Unit analysis by material type. Composite resin, glass ionomer and RMGI, zinc polycarboxylate, zinc phosphate.
Unit analysis by delivery type. Powder or liquid, auto-mix syringe, two-paste or syringe, capsule.
Unit analysis by curing method. Light-cure, self-cure, dual-cure.
By application type. Crowns and bridges, posts, inlays, onlays and veneers, implant crowns.
By bioactivity. Bioactive and non-bioactive.
Dental Impression Material Market
By product type. Vinyl polysiloxane, polyether, alginate, other.
Unit analysis by delivery type. Cartridge or syringe or Garant gun, hand-mix, dynamic mixer, other.
Direct Restorative Material Market
By product type. Composite, glass or resin ionomer, amalgam.
Unit analysis by delivery type. Powder or liquid, two-paste or syringe, unit dose capsule, auto-mix syringe.
Unit analysis by curing method. Light-cure, self-cure, dual-cure.
Unit analysis by viscosity. Low, regular, high.
Temporary Restorative Material Market
Unit analysis by material. Acrylic, composite, other.
Unit analysis by curing method. Light-cure, self-cure, dual-cure.
Unit analysis by delivery type. Brush and bottle, auto-mix cartridge 1 to 1, auto-mix cartridge 10 to 1.
Dental Bonding Agent Market
By product type. Total-etch, self-etch, universal.
Unit analysis by delivery type. Two-paste or syringe, brush formats such as unit dose or capsule or vial or bottle, auto-mix.
Dental Core Build-Up Material Market
By product type. Composite resin, GI or RMGI, other.
By application type. Direct and indirect.
Unit analysis by delivery type. Auto-mix syringe, hand-mix powder and liquid, pre-mix.
Unit analysis by curing method. Light-cure, self-cure, dual-cure.
Dental Anesthetic Market
By product type. Topical and local injection.
By drug type. Lidocaine, articaine, mepivacaine, bupivacaine, prilocaine.
Dental whitening and prophylaxis. End users include dental clinics and other settings. Included as appendix only without competitive analysis.
Competitive Analysis
Solventum led the overall dental materials market in 2025. The company held the top position in every segment except dental anesthetics and had particularly strong performance in dental cements.
Dentsply Sirona ranked second and was active across all segments, with its strongest presence in dental impression and direct restorative materials.
Kerr ranked third overall, participating in every segment except dental anesthetics and dental core build-up. The company's strongest share was in the direct restorative segment.
Other suppliers focus on selected material lines and delivery systems. Competitive placement reflects breadth of portfolio, consistency of handling, education programs, and dealer reach.
Technology and Practice Trends
Self-etch and universal adhesives simplify steps and reduce sensitivity to moisture control, which limits rework and supports predictable outcomes.
Flowable and highly filled composites are used to access narrow cavities and to complete bulk-fill restorations with fewer increments.
Bioactive features that release fluoride or calcium ions are gaining attention for long term tooth support.
Delivery and curing options are more varied. Auto-mix syringes, capsules, and dual-cure systems help match material choice to case complexity and chair time targets.
CAD or CAM adoption reduces use of traditional impression and temporary materials in practices that shift to digital scans and same-day crowns.
Care Settings
Coverage includes private practices, group practices, DSOs, and academic or public health clinics.
Site differences affect material selection, formulary control, kit standardization, and training practices.
DSOs and group practices often set approved material lists and negotiate pricing, while solo practices focus on handling preference and case mix.
Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within the U.S. dental materials market and how do cements, impression materials, direct and temporary restoratives, bonding agents, core build-up materials, and anesthetics each contribute to value through 2032.
How does the dental materials market relate to the broader U.S. economy and to practice operations, including staffing, chair time, and the role of DSOs in standardizing formularies and purchasing.
What forces will shape the market going forward, including the spread of minimally invasive dentistry, the rise of bioactive and antibacterial claims, and the effect of digitization on impression and temporary segments.
Which material classes and delivery systems are gaining traction, and how do self-etch and universal adhesives, flowable composites, dual-cure systems, and unit dose capsules change procedure time and consistency.
How should practices plan for material selection in esthetic cases, including cement choices for all-ceramic restorations and bonding strategies that reduce sensitivity and callbacks.
What is the expected balance between direct and indirect restorations, as bulk-fill composites and better curing widen the range of direct options in everyday cases.
How will CAD or CAM and intraoral scanning adoption affect demand, and what are realistic timelines for shifts in impression and temporary material use as scanners spread to more clinics and schools.
Where do bioactive and antibacterial materials fit in daily workflows, and how can dentists evaluate claims about ion release and remineralization against handling and long term results.
How do insurance limits and out-of-pocket costs influence product mix, and what strategies can suppliers use to support value adoption without eroding margins.
What risks could slow growth, including improved prevention that reduces severe decay, pressure from prefabricated crowns, and the diversion of cosmetic spend to direct-to-consumer aligners.
The U.S. dental materials market report from iData Research answers these questions with segment and setting models, company share analysis, procedure and pricing detail, and coverage that links clinical choices to material demand.
Use it to size opportunities by category, plan product roadmaps, align dealer and DSO programs, and set targets for pricing, contracting, and inventory.
Table Of Contents
List Of Figures
List Of Charts
U.S. Dental Materials Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Procedure Segmentation
Market Segmentation
Key Report Updates
Version History
Research Methodology
Impact Of Global Tariffs
U.S. Dental Materials Market Overview
Procedure Numbers
Dental Cement Market
Dental Impression Material Market
Direct Restorative Material Market
Temporary Restorative Material Market
Dental Bonding Agent Market
Dental Core Build-Up Material Market
Dental Anesthetic Market