![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1847179
美國軟組織修復市場:市場規模、佔有率和趨勢分析(2025-2031 年)Soft Tissue Repair Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis | United States | 2025-2031 | Includes: Achilles Tendon Repair Devices, Rotator Cuff Repair Devices, Shoulder Labrum Repair Devices, and 4 more |
||||||
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
2024年,美國整形外科軟組織修復市場價值超過23億美元。預計到2031年,該市場將成長至近34億美元。
本報告涵蓋跟腱修復和重組器材、肩迴旋肌修復和重組器材、肩關節軟骨修復器材、肱二頭肌腱伸展器材、ACL 和 PCL重組產品、半月軟骨修復器材和髖關節鏡器材。
本報告量化了單位銷售額、平均售價、市場價值、成長率和企業市場占有率;分析了醫院、門診手術中心、專科診所和部分住宅及復健機構(這些機構均使用該設備)的手術量、成長促進因素和併購以及產品組合變化。
該框架反映了整形外科和運動醫學團隊如何評估固定結構、移植物、錨釘和關節鏡工具包,從而改善治療效果和手術效率。
市場概覽
在美國,軟組織修復仍然是整形外科和運動醫學的核心重點,需求涵蓋肩膀、膝蓋、髖部和腳踝,這主要是由於活躍的患者群體希望重返運動所致。
儘管肩迴旋肌修復仍然是最大的收入來源,但隨著診斷意識的提高和越來越多的外科醫生採用標準化的入路和縫合技術,髖關節鏡手術正在迅速發展。在膝關節手術中,前十字韌帶(ACL)和後十字韌帶(PCL)重組依賴多種固定方法和移植物選擇,這些都需根據患者的風險和生活方式量身定做。
保留半月軟骨的手術越來越受歡迎,其中半月板切除術半月軟骨仍然是最主要的切除術。與肩迴旋肌相比,肱二頭肩迴旋肌仍然是一種更具選擇性的選擇,但其主要目的是為了達到特定的美容和功能切除術。
在每個領域,市場都反映出轉向無結縫合和全縫合方法以及更廣泛的移植加固選擇。
市場促進因素
體育參與和護理途徑:競技和休閒體育運動有助於保持穩定的手術量,與製造商和專業組織的夥伴關係支持培訓、臨床研究和程序改進。
多用途錨釘和移植物。縫合錨釘和移植物加固產品可用於多個關節和手術,有助於提高採購效率、提升外科醫生技能並實現供應商標準化。
技術和材料的進步。全縫合錨釘和PEEK碳纖維植入的成長反映了在較小的空間內實現牢固固定和可控骨相互作用的需求。選擇性手術,例如雙排肩迴旋肌修復和增強策略,可以改善固定效果,並幫助合適的患者更快康復。
膝關節重組技術不斷發展。可調式環形懸吊鈕扣和新一代隧道內裝置已被廣泛應用。股四頭肌腱自體移植作為一種用途廣泛的選擇,適用於所有年齡層的患者。對於高風險患者,選擇性使用外側關節外腱鞘和內矯正器具旨在降低手術失敗率。
髖關節鏡手術日益普及。影像技術的進步和對髖臼病變認知的加深,促使手術數量不斷增加。髖臼重組和增強手術的早期結果也印證了人們對手術的持續關注。
市場限制
門診病人手術對成本高度敏感。日間手術中心高度重視成本控制和供應穩定性,這可能會限制使用價格較高的移植材料和填充材料,即使它們在臨床上很有吸引力。
報銷和政策限制導致醫療機構傾向於採用較少類型的設備。
非手術治療。許多肌腱和韌帶損傷可以透過物理治療、非類固醇消炎劑和皮質類固醇進行治療。
手術打包。將多種手術合併在一次手術中進行,例如半月軟骨修復和前十字韌帶重組,或肩迴旋肌修復和肱二頭肌腱延長,可以減少每次手術所需的器械數量,並透過套件標準化降低價格。
現有證據不一。雖然生物強化和原發性修復方案正在探索中,但其適應症仍然有限。這些方案的推廣應用取決於明確的療效數據、一致的操作指南和統一的醫保報銷機制。
關注領域和數據覆蓋範圍
定量分析:市場規模、市場佔有率、市場預測、成長率、銷售量、平均售價、手術例數。
定性內容:成長趨勢、市場阻礙因素、主要競爭對手的競爭分析和 SWOT 分析、併購、公司簡介和產品系列、FDA 召回、顛覆性技術、影響需求和手術選擇的疾病概述。
時限:基準年 2024 年,預測年 2025-2031 年,歷史資料 2021-2023 年。
資料來源:對行業領導者的直接訪談、政府醫生和手術資料、監管資料、私人醫院資料、進出口資料、iData Research 內部資料庫。
方法收入模型是透過單位乘以平均售價 (ASP) 來建立的,透過程序和利用率輸入檢驗,並與相關設備和錨點的設定等級和設施等級採用情況相符。
目標市場及區隔
跟腱修復和重組
器械亞型:移植物、縫合錨釘
肩迴旋肌修復與重組
器械類型:移植物,縫合錨釘。
設備子類型。用於單元分析的無結和有結配置。
肩關節軟骨修復
器材類型:PLA、生物複合材料、PEEK、PEEK碳纖維、金屬、全縫合線。
設備子類型。用於單元分析的無結和有結配置。
二頭肌伸肌手術
器械類型:縫合錨釘、螺絲。
前十字韌帶和後十字重組
器械類型。同種異體移植和固定器械類別。
固定方案。可調式環形懸吊鈕扣和隧道式內固定裝置應用廣泛。股四頭肌腱自體移植也是一種選擇。在高風險病例中,會採用關節外肌腱延長和內固定裝置來保護移植腱。
半月軟骨修復
器械亞型:植入、縫合式、混合式。
保守趨勢。儘管修復手術的切除術相對於切除手術的比例正在上升,但半月軟骨仍然很常見。
髖關節鏡檢查
器械類型:射頻探針、香蕉刀片、髖關節入路套件、縫合錨釘、一次性套件、同種異體移植。
採用趨勢:關節唇唇撕裂的檢測和操作工具的改進促進了成長。
舟狀韌帶修復
我們將對這個市場進行定性分析。
競爭分析
2024 年,美國整形外科軟組織和運動醫學市場將由 Arthrex 引領,該公司在旋轉肌群重建、前十字韌帶重組和後十字韌帶重組方面擁有強大的市場地位,並在半月軟骨修復和髖關節鏡手術方面提供廣泛的服務。
史密斯和內普公司憑藉其在半月軟骨修復方面的優勢,在肩部、ACL 或 PCL 以及髖部手術中佔前三名,獲得了第二大的市場佔有率。
DePuy Synthes 在肩迴旋肌和肩關節軟骨方面表現出色,在膝關節和髖關節方面也保持了平衡,因此排名第三。
其他供應商則在特定的區隔市場和環境中競爭。這是一個充滿活力的領域,其可靠的產品系列、培訓支援和高效的套件備受青睞,這些工具包都能幫助團隊以可預測性和更低的變異性執行操作流程。
科技與臨床趨勢
無結全縫線固定。充分利用肩部和髖部,可減少佔地面積並控制張力。
加固和增強。對於某些患者和手術,合成移植物和補片可以增強修復強度。
標準化套件。醫院和門診手術中心將採用標準化套件和一次性用品,以縮短準備時間、管理庫存並統一採購。
關節鏡手術流程。更完善的入路工具、射頻消融管理和縫合方法有助於實現可預測的手術流程。
治療地點
這包括產品在醫院、門診手術中心、專科診所及相關復健機構或家庭環境中的使用或計費情況。向門診病人護理的轉變仍在繼續,這將影響定價、套件設計和供應商服務需求。
地區
本期重點關注美國。
有關術語和建模,請參閱調查方法附錄和簡稱。
美國整形外科軟組織修復領域中成長最快的、最具成長潛力的區隔市場有哪些?肩部、膝部、髖部和跟腱修復領域在預測期內將如何促進成長?
該市場與美國整體經濟以及醫院和門診手術中心的運作(包括招聘、排班、植入標準化和供應鏈)有何關係?
未來哪些因素將影響市場走向,包括報銷方式的變化、ASC 轉型速度、增強和加固的作用,以及向無結縫合和全縫合固定方式的轉變?
在肩迴旋肌、關節唇、ACL/PCL、半月軟骨、肱二頭肌、髖關節和跟腱手術中,哪些技術和材料越來越受歡迎?這些選擇對單位數量、平均服務價格和手術時間有何影響?
ACL 和 PCL重組策略是如何演變的,包括使用可調節環扣、隧道內固定、股四頭肌腱自體移植以及選擇性輔助手段,如外側關節外肌腱延伸和內部支架結構?
半月軟骨保存的發展軌跡是什麼?修復與切除之間的選擇將如何影響產品需求和定價?
隨著影像技術、關節唇修復和重組的進步,髖關節鏡手術在整體發展格局中扮演著怎樣的角色?
商業團隊如何針對成本敏感的門診手術中心環境進行規劃,並使套件設計、價格分佈和服務模式與門診病人限制保持一致?
哪些證據缺口和政策問題正在減緩高階設備和生物增強技術的普及?產品策略應該如何應對這些問題?
供應商應如何定位訓練和教育,以幫助外科醫師和手術室團隊減少差異,並加速安全地採用新的器械和手術流程?
iData Researchの美國整形外科軟部組織修復市場レポートでは、手技を意識したモデル、企業市場占有率分析、価格と単位の詳細、手技の選択肢と装置需要を対応させた調査対象により、これらの疑問にお答えします。
該報告可用於按類別量化機會、規劃產品藍圖、設定定價和合約目標,以及優先考慮可提高不同環境下一致性的培訓和支援計畫。
圖表清單
圖表列表
美國整形外科軟組織修復市場概覽
競爭分析
新興市場與技術
市場趨勢
市場趨勢
流程分段
待調查的程式碼
市場區隔
關鍵分析更新
版本歷史記錄
調查方法
全球關稅的影響
美國整形外科軟組織修復市場概覽
手術次數
跟腱修復與重組市場
肩迴旋肌修復與重組市場
肩關節軟骨修復市場
二頭肌肌腱固定術市場
ACL/PCL重組市場
半月軟骨修復市場
髖關節鏡市場
The U.S. orthopedic soft tissue repair market was valued at over $2.3 billion in 2024. The market is expected to grow to reach nearly $3.4 billion by 2031.
This report covers Achilles tendon repair and reconstruction devices, rotator cuff repair and reconstruction devices, shoulder labrum repair devices, biceps tenodesis devices, ACL and PCL reconstruction products, meniscal repair devices, and hip arthroscopy devices.
It quantifies units, average selling prices, market values, growth rates, and company shares, and analyzes procedure volumes, growth drivers and limiters, mergers and acquisitions, and portfolio changes across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, specialty clinics, and select home or rehab settings where device use applies.
The framework reflects how orthopedic and sports medicine teams evaluate fixation constructs, grafts, anchors, and arthroscopic tool sets that improve outcomes and surgical efficiency.
Market Overview
Soft tissue repair remains a core focus in U.S. orthopedic and sports medicine practice. Demand is broad across shoulder, knee, hip, and foot and ankle procedures and is supported by an active patient population that seeks to return to activity.
Rotator cuff repair remains the largest revenue driver, while hip arthroscopy is growing faster as diagnostic awareness increases and more surgeons adopt consistent access and closure techniques. In knee procedures, ACL and PCL reconstruction continue to rely on diverse fixation methods and graft choices that can be matched to patient risk and lifestyle.
Meniscal preservation is gaining favor, although meniscectomy still accounts for a large share of procedures. Biceps tenodesis remains a more selective choice compared with tenotomy but is supported by specific cosmetic and functional goals.
Across segments, the market reflects ongoing movement toward knotless and all-suture approaches and broader options in graft reinforcement.
Market Drivers
Sports participation and care pathways. Competitive and recreational sports contribute to steady procedure volumes, and partnerships between manufacturers and professional organizations support training, clinical studies, and technique refinement.
Multi-use anchors and grafts. Suture anchors and graft reinforcement products can be used across multiple joints and procedures, which supports procurement efficiency, surgeon familiarity, and vendor standardization.
Technique and material advances. Growth in all-suture anchors and PEEK carbon fiber implants reflects a search for secure fixation with smaller footprints and controlled bone interaction. Technique choices such as double-row rotator cuff repair and augmentation strategies can improve fixation and support faster rehabilitation in appropriate patients.
Evolving knee reconstruction practice. Adjustable-loop suspensory buttons and next-generation intratunnel devices are widely used. Quadriceps tendon autograft has expanded as a versatile option across age groups. In higher-risk patients, selective use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis and internal brace constructs aims to lower failure.
Growing adoption of hip arthroscopy. Improved imaging and better understanding of labral pathology are lifting volumes. Early results from labral reconstruction and augmentation support continued interest.
Market Limiters
Cost sensitivity in outpatient settings. Ambulatory surgery centers place a high priority on cost control and supply predictability. This can limit uptake of higher cost grafts or reinforcement materials even when clinically attractive.
Reimbursement and policy constraints. Payment levels do not always reward the use of advanced devices or combined approaches, which can lead facilities to standardize around fewer device types.
Non-surgical management. Many tendon and ligament injuries can be managed with therapy, NSAIDs, and corticosteroids, which delays or displaces surgery for a portion of patients.
Bundled procedures. Combining procedures in one session, such as meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction or rotator cuff repair with biceps tenodesis, can reduce device units per episode and can put pressure on pricing through kit standardization.
Evidence variability. While biologic augmentation and primary repair solutions are under investigation, they remain limited to narrow indications. Adoption depends on clear outcome data, consistent technique guidance, and aligned reimbursement.
Market Coverage and Data Scope
Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, average selling prices, and procedure numbers.
Qualitative coverage. Growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, FDA recalls, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews that shape demand and procedure selection.
Time frame. Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician and procedure data, regulatory data, hospital private data, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.
Method note. Revenue is modeled from units multiplied by ASP, validated with procedure and utilization inputs, and checked against setting-level and facility-level adoption for the relevant devices and anchors.
Markets Covered and Segmentation
Achilles Tendon Repair and Reconstruction
Device type. Graft, suture anchor.
Rotator Cuff Repair and Reconstruction
Device type. Graft, suture anchor.
Device subtype. Knotless and knotted configurations for unit analysis.
Shoulder Labrum Repair
Device type. PLA, biocomposite, PEEK, PEEK carbon fiber, metal, all-suture.
Device subtype. Knotless and knotted configurations for unit analysis.
Biceps Tenodesis
Device type. Suture anchor, screw.
ACL and PCL Reconstruction
Device type. Allograft and fixation device categories.
Fixation landscape. Adjustable-loop suspensory buttons and intratunnel devices are widely used. Quadriceps tendon autograft is a growing choice. In higher risk cases, extra-articular tenodesis and internal brace constructs may be used to support graft protection.
Meniscal Repair
Device type. Implant, suture, and hybrid.
Preservation trend. Repair rates are increasing relative to removal, but meniscectomy remains common.
Hip Arthroscopy
Device type. Radiofrequency probe, banana blade, hip access kit, suture anchor, disposable kit, allograft.
Adoption trend. Detection of labral tears and refinement of access tools support growth.
Scapholunate Ligament Repair
This market is discussed qualitatively.
Competitive Analysis
Arthrex led the U.S. orthopedic soft tissue and sports medicine market in 2024 with strong presence in rotator cuff and ACL or PCL reconstruction and broad coverage in meniscal repair and hip arthroscopy.
Smith & Nephew held the second-largest share with strength in meniscal repair and top three positions in shoulder, ACL or PCL, and hip segments.
DePuy Synthes ranked third with strong participation in rotator cuff and shoulder labrum and balanced positions in knee and hip.
Other suppliers compete in selected niches or settings. The field is active and rewards dependable portfolios, training support, and efficient kits that help teams run predictable, low-variance procedures.
Technology and Practice Trends
Knotless and all-suture fixation. Wider use across shoulder and hip supports smaller footprints and controlled tensioning.
Reinforcement and augmentation. Synthetic grafts and patches can add repair strength in selected patients and techniques.
Standardized kits. Hospitals and ASCs adopt kits and disposable sets that shorten setup, help control inventory, and align with purchasing.
Arthroscopic workflow. Better access tools, RF management, and closure methods drive predictable case flow.
Care Settings
Coverage includes hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, specialty clinics, and relevant post-acute or home settings where products are used or charged. The shift to outpatient care continues and influences pricing, kit design, and vendor service needs.
Geography
This edition covers the United States.
Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary for terminology and modeling.
Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within U.S. orthopedic soft tissue repair and how do shoulder, knee, hip, and Achilles segments contribute to growth over the forecast period.
How does the market relate to the broader U.S. economy and to hospital and ASC operations, including hiring, scheduling, implant standardization, and supply chain.
What forces will shape the market going forward, including changes in reimbursement, the pace of ASC migration, the role of reinforcement and augmentation, and the shift toward knotless and all-suture fixation.
Which techniques and materials are gaining traction in rotator cuff, labrum, ACL or PCL, meniscal, biceps, hip, and Achilles procedures and how do those choices affect units, ASPs, and procedural time.
How are ACL and PCL reconstruction strategies evolving, including the use of adjustable-loop buttons, intratunnel fixation, quadriceps tendon autograft, and selective adjuncts such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis and internal brace constructs.
What is the trajectory for meniscal preservation, and how might repair versus removal choices shape product demand and pricing.
Where does hip arthroscopy fit within the overall growth picture, given improved imaging, labral repair, and reconstruction practices.
How can commercial teams plan for cost sensitive ASC environments and align kit designs, price points, and service models with outpatient constraints.
What evidence gaps or policy issues slow adoption of premium devices or biologic augmentation and how should product strategy respond.
How should suppliers position training and education so that surgeons and OR teams can reduce variation and speed safe adoption of new devices or techniques.
The U.S. orthopedic soft tissue repair market report from iData Research answers these questions with procedure aware models, company share analysis, pricing and unit detail, and coverage that maps technique choices to device demand.
Use it to quantify opportunity by category, plan product roadmaps, set pricing and contracting targets, and prioritize training and support programs that improve consistency across settings.
Table Of Contents
List Of Figures
List Of Charts
U.S. Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Emerging Markets And Technologies
Market Developments
Market Trends
Procedure Segmentation
Procedure Codes Investigated
Market Segmentation
Key Analysis Updates
Version History
Research Methodology
Impact Of Global Tariffs
U.S. Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Overview
Procedure Numbers
Achilles Tendon Repair & Reconstruction Market
Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Market
Shoulder Labrum Repair Market
Biceps Tenodesis Market
Acl/Pcl Reconstruction Market
Meniscal Repair Market
Hip Arthroscopy Market