全球骨釘市場：市場規模、佔有率和趨勢分析（2025-2031年）

2024年全球骨釘市場價值為1.55億美元。預計到2031年，該市場將達到1.92億美元，年複合成長率為3.1%。

本報告涵蓋骨釘，骨釘用於在手術中穩定骨碎片和固定骨折。報告量化了銷售量、平均售價 (ASP)、市場規模、成長率和企業市場占有率。此外，報告還分析了手術趨勢、市場促進因素和限制因素、近期併購以及技術變革。歷史資料截至 2021 年，預測資料截至 2031 年。

市場概覽

骨釘是整形外科創傷治療中的基礎器械。其結構簡單、尺寸齊全，且與標準器械相容，使其成為臨時固定和許多最終固定病例的主要選擇。外科醫生使用克氏針（K-wire）和斯坦曼氏針進行臨時骨折碎片控制、牽引、骨骼穩定以及小骨的最終固定。

儘管骨釘的平均售價較低，但由於手術量的增加以及外科醫生將骨釘與其他固定裝置聯合使用，其市場正在成長。一個關鍵因素是骨釘與鋼板螺絲手術流程的緊密聯繫。骨釘有助於在最終鋼板固定前復位和穩定骨折碎片，並在影像學檢查確認復位的同時，支撐骨折對位。隨著鋼板螺絲使用量的增加，骨釘的使用量也隨之增加。

在指骨、掌骨、蹠骨、肱骨近端和腕部等需要微創手術和較短手術時間的部位，永久性鋼針固定術的應用也日益增加。在這些適應症中，螺紋或光滑表面的鋼針可在減少組織剝離和植入體積的情況下提供穩定性。其低輪廓設計可減少對軟組織的干擾，並在臨床需要時便於取出。

不同地區的採用模式反映了培訓、成本和庫存取得。在成熟市場，無論是急診、門診或擇期手術，鋼釘都被廣泛應用於整體。在許多新興市場，由於鋼釘易於儲存、保存期限長且消毒簡便，因此為各種骨折提供了經濟有效的解決方案。因此，即使在醫院預算緊張的情況下，鋼釘的使用量也保持著穩定成長的趨勢。

全球骨釘市場細分摘要

骨釘市場

• 定量覆蓋範圍：市場規模、企業市場占有率、預測、成長率、銷售量、平均售價（ASP）。
• 定性內容：市場成長趨勢、阻礙因素、主要競爭對手的競爭和 SWOT 分析、併購、公司簡介、產品系列、顛覆性技術、疾病概況。
• 資料來源：對行業領導者的直接訪談、政府醫生和監管資料、醫院和私人採購資料、進出口記錄以及 iData Research 的內部資料庫。

市場促進因素

人口統計因素

人口結構變化導致手術需求持續成長。隨著人口老化，骨質疏鬆性脆性骨折的發生率不斷上升，而肥胖和糖尿病則進一步增加骨折風險並延緩癒合。大約十分之一的25歲以上成年人患有糖尿病。骨量和骨質下降，加上骨形成延遲，導致骨折發生率增加，需要內固定手術。

老年人髖部、腕部及踝部低能量創傷較常見。許多此類病例需要快速固定和復位。骨釘可作為臨時固定的即時可靠選擇，並有助於細骨的最終固定。隨著全球老年人口比例的增加，骨折手術的數量預計也會增加，這將推動骨釘市場的基本需求成長。

板材和螺絲市場的成長

骨釘與鋼板螺絲手術密切相關。外科醫生使用骨釘來復位骨碎片、維持骨骼對位並引導鋼板固定。隨著鋼板螺絲在上下肢手術適應症的應用日益廣泛，骨釘的需求也隨之成長。

這種關係是結構性的。鋼板技術的進步並未改變對臨時性骨折碎片固定的需求。在多段骨折或骨質疏鬆性骨折中，可能需要使用多枚鋼針來維持復位，以便在影像診斷和鑽孔導引器/鋼板定位過程中進行固定。由於鋼針價格低廉，醫院通常會儲備充足的數量，如果額外的鋼針有助於實現解剖復位，外科醫生也樂於使用。因此，隨著鋼板螺絲手術的普及，預計鋼針使用量將穩定成長。

擴大應用範圍至根治性固定手術

除了臨時固定外，鋼針的應用範圍正在不斷擴大，尤其是在手足手術中，可用於永久性固定。在指骨和掌骨骨折中，經皮鋼針固定可在最大限度減少軟組織損傷的同時，有效控制骨折碎片。在蹠骨損傷和某些腕部病例中，鋼針可在最大限度減少手術時間和植入體積的同時，提供足夠的穩定性。

這項變化是由微創技術、手術時間縮短以及早期復健目標所驅動的。當手術效果相當且再次手術率可接受時，外科醫師傾向於選擇切口較小、成本較低的手術方法。隨著培訓項目的不斷完善，預計永久性鋼針固定術的需求將會增加。

市場限制

成本敏感性

醫院和門診中心正在推行成本控制策略，尤其是在日用藥品方面。以骨釘為例，這體現在現貨採購量的增加、負責人輔助訂購量的減少以及對總價合約的依賴性增強。採購團隊會根據單價、無菌保證水準和前置作業時間來比較骨釘，對那些不會影響治療效果的額外功能則不太接受度。積極的定價策略是贏得競標的關鍵，而這種以成本為中心的做法正在限制市場價值的成長。

商品化

骨釘易於製造且使用歷史悠久。因此，它們被視為一種大宗商品，平均售價較低。不同品牌之間存在標籤差異，但只要符合品質標準，其性能大致相同。由於非專利的興起限制了定價權，降低了產品微調的收益，骨釘的價值成長落後於手術量的成長。

平均售價（ASP）下降

產業整體定價趨勢也影響骨釘市場。集團採購組織 (GPO)、政府競標和基於價值的採購模式正日益拉低北美、西歐、中國及其他地區的平均售價 (ASP)。 2021年底中國政策的轉變加速了許多整形外科細分市場的平均售價下降。在骨釘等低平均售價細分市場，即使銷售量穩定成長，小幅的價格下降也會對整體市場價值造成影響。

市場和數據覆蓋範圍

• 目標時期：基準年2024年，預測期間2025-2031年，歷史資料2021-2023年
• 醫療機構：醫院、整形外科創傷中心、門診手術中心和專門的手足診所。
• 調查方法：收入模型為銷售量乘以平均售價（ASP），並與手術量、購買記錄和進出口資料檢驗。產品組合反映了不同地區和機構對直徑、長度、螺紋和尖端類型的偏好。

競爭分析

2024年，DePuy Synthes在全球骨釘市場佔據領先地位。該公司在創傷領域的卓越表現使其產品在醫院和門診中心獲得了極高的採用率。其豐富的產品組合、穩定的供應以及一體化的托盤系統，使其成為外科醫生和供應鏈團隊的首選供應商。預計這一領先地位將在預測期內持續。

史賽克在全球市佔率排名第二。史賽克提供全系列的克氏針和斯坦曼氏釘，這些產品通常與鋼板、螺絲和髓內器械一同訂購。作為此類大宗訂單的配套產品，它們的存在鞏固了史賽克的市場地位，並隨著公司在其他創傷領域的業務成長，進一步推動了市場佔有率的逐步擴大。

Zimmer Biomet 保持第三的位置，提供直徑從 2.0 毫米到 4.8 毫米的標準 Steinmann 釘（包括帶套管針或鑽石尖端的普通型和螺紋型）。儘管 Zimmer Biomet 仍然是一家主要的跨國供應商，但它再次面臨來自區域製造商日益激烈的競爭，這些製造商正積極降低競標。這種趨勢可能會導致該公司未來幾年在某些市場的佔有率略有下降。

規模較小的區域性公司參與政府競標和私人管道，通常在價格、交貨時間和基本品質合規性方面競爭。雖然這些公司本身不會改變全球市場佔有率結構，但它們確實加劇了區域市場的價格競爭，加速了該品類的商品化進程。

技術與實務的趨勢

• 可選擇光滑型或螺紋型：光滑型克氏針是暫時固定的標準選擇。螺紋型克氏針則用於需要減少移位和提高固位力的永久性固定。
• 針尖形狀的選擇：套管針和鑽石針尖可滿足不同的插入偏好和骨質需求。外科醫師可根據皮質骨密度和手術路徑選擇合適的針尖形狀，從而減少刮傷並提高首次穿刺成功率。
• 無菌一次性包裝：預滅菌針可減輕再處理負擔，並有助於門診手術中心實現庫存標準化。無菌大包裝仍然是高通量手術中心的首選。
• 滲透性：在透視下清晰可見對於在小骨和關節周圍區域準確放置鋼針至關重要。供應商保持滲透性及表面光潔度的一致性，以輔助診斷成像。
• 固位和移位控制：止動針帽、外部夾鉗和彎曲技術有助於減少根治性手術期間的針頭移位和軟組織刺激。
• 工作流程整合：將插銷、插銷驅動器和導線器組合在一起的托盤和推車簡化了創傷室的設置，縮短了周轉時間。

地區

本版內容涵蓋全球，包括北美、歐洲、亞太地區、拉丁美洲以及中東和非洲。

調查方法附錄與簡稱

目錄

圖表清單

圖表列表

調查方法

全球關稅的影響

骨釘市場

• 執行摘要
  • 全球骨釘市場概覽
  • 競爭分析
  • 目標區域
• 介紹
• 市場分析與預測
• 駕駛員和約束裝置
• 競爭市佔率分析

簡稱

The global bone pin market was valued at $155 million in 2024. The market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.1 percent, reaching $192 million by 2031.

This report covers bone pins used to stabilize bone fragments and to fixate fractures during surgery. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares, and it analyzes procedure trends, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, and technology shifts. Historical data extend to 2021, with forecasts through 2031.

Market Overview

Bone pins are a foundational tool in orthopedic trauma. Their simplicity, broad size range, and compatibility with standard instrumentation make them a mainstay for provisional fixation and for many definitive fixation use cases. Surgeons rely on Kirschner wires (K-wires) and Steinmann pins for temporary fragment control, traction, skeletal stabilization, and final fixation in smaller bones.

Although bone pins are commodity items with low ASPs, the market grows as procedure volumes expand and as surgeons use pins in combination with other fixation hardware. A key dynamic is the strong link between bone pins and plate-and-screw workflows. Pins help reduce and hold fragments before definitive plating, and they support alignment while imaging confirms reduction. As plate and screw usage rises, bone pin units follow.

Definitive fixation with pins is also increasing in phalanges, metacarpals, metatarsals, the proximal humerus, and the wrist, where minimally invasive approaches and shorter procedures are preferred. In these indications, threaded and smooth pins provide stability with limited dissection and limited implant bulk. Their low profile reduces soft-tissue conflict, and removal is straightforward if clinically indicated.

Across regions, adoption patterns reflect training, cost, and inventory access. Mature markets use pins across emergency, outpatient, and elective hand and foot cases. In many emerging markets, pins are a cost-effective solution for a wide range of fractures due to ease of storage, long shelf life, and straightforward sterilization. As a result, unit growth tends to be steady even when hospital budgets are tight.

Global Bone Pin Market Segmentation Summary

Bone Pins Market

• Quantitative coverage: Market size, company shares, forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and ASPs.
• Qualitative coverage: Market growth trends, limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
• Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician and regulatory data, hospital and private purchasing inputs, import and export records, and iData Research's internal database.

Market Drivers

Demographic Factors

Demographic change underpins steady procedural demand. Aging populations experience higher rates of fragility fractures due to osteoporosis, and obesity and diabetes further increase fracture risk and slow healing. About 1 in 10 adults over 25 live with diabetes. Lower bone mass and reduced bone quality, combined with delayed bone formation, translate into more fractures and more fixation events.

In the elderly, low-energy trauma to the hip, wrist, and ankle is common. Many of these cases require rapid stabilization and reduction. Bone pins provide an immediate, reliable option for temporary fixation and assist in definitive fixation for smaller bones. As the share of seniors rises across the world, the volume of fracture procedures is expected to grow, supporting baseline unit growth for pins.

Growth of the Plate and Screw Market

Bone pins are closely integrated with plate-and-screw workflows. Surgeons use pins to reduce fragments, hold alignment, and guide plating. As plate and screw usage expands across upper and lower extremity indications, demand for pins rises in tandem.

This relationship is structural. Even when plate technology advances, the need to temporarily stabilize fragments does not change. In multi-fragment fractures or osteoporotic bone, multiple pins can be used to maintain reduction during imaging and while drill guides and plates are positioned. Because pins are low cost, hospitals stock ample quantities, and surgeons do not hesitate to use extra pins if it helps achieve anatomic reduction. The net effect is stable unit growth aligned with plate-and-screw procedure trends.

Increased Definitive Fixation Application

Beyond provisional use, pins are seeing greater application in definitive fixation, especially in hand and foot surgery. In phalangeal and metacarpal fractures, percutaneous pinning provides fragment control with limited soft-tissue disruption. In metatarsal injuries and select wrist cases, pins offer adequate stability while minimizing operative time and implant bulk.

This shift is driven by minimally invasive techniques, shorter surgeries, and fast rehabilitation goals. When outcomes are comparable and reoperation rates are acceptable, surgeons favor methods that reduce incision size and cost. As training programs reinforce these techniques, definitive pin fixation is expected to add to total unit demand.

Market Limiters

Cost Sensitivity

Hospitals and ambulatory centers pursue cost containment strategies, particularly for commodity items. In bone pins, this translates into off-the-shelf purchases, fewer rep-supported orders, and increased reliance on bulk contracts. Procurement teams compare pins on unit price, sterility assurance level, and lead time, with low tolerance for premium features that do not change outcomes. Aggressive pricing is essential to win tenders, and this emphasis on cost limits market value growth.

Commoditization

Bone pins are simple to manufacture and have a long history of use. As a result, they are treated as commodity products with low ASPs. Label differences exist across brands, but performance is largely comparable when quality standards are met. Growth in generic versions caps pricing power and reduces the payoff for incremental product tweaks, which keeps value growth below procedure growth.

ASP Decreases

Broader industry pricing trends affect bone pins as well. Group purchasing organizations (GPOs), government tenders, and value-based procurement models push ASPs down in North America, Western Europe, China, and increasingly in other regions. China's policy shift at the end of 2021 accelerated ASP declines across many orthopedic categories. In a low-ASP segment like bone pins, even small price reductions can weigh on total market value despite steady unit growth.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

• Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
• Care settings: Hospitals, orthopedic trauma centers, ambulatory surgical centers, and specialty hand and foot clinics.
• Methodology: Revenues modeled as units X ASP, validated against procedure volumes, purchasing records, and import/export data. Unit mix reflects diameter, length, thread, and tip preferences by region and care setting.

Competitive Analysis

DePuy Synthes held the leading share of the global bone pin market in 2024. The company's dominance across trauma categories enables high penetration in hospitals and ambulatory centers. Its broad catalog, consistent availability, and integrated trays keep DePuy Synthes top of mind for surgeons and supply chain teams. Leadership is expected to continue through the forecast period.

Stryker ranked second in global share. Stryker markets a full line of K-wires and Steinmann pins that are often ordered alongside plates, screws, and intramedullary devices. This attachment to larger orders strengthens Stryker's position and supports incremental share gains as the company grows in other trauma segments.

Zimmer Biomet held the third position with Steinmann pins available in standard diameters from 2.0 mm to 4.8 mm, including regular and threaded versions with trocar or diamond points. While Zimmer Biomet remains a key multinational supplier, the company faces renewed competition from regional manufacturers with aggressive pricing in tenders. This dynamic could result in modest share erosion in selected markets over the next few years.

Smaller regional firms participate in government tenders and private channels, typically competing on price, delivery times, and basic quality compliance. These companies do not shift global share structure on their own, but they increase price pressure in local markets and reinforce the category's commoditized nature.

Technology and Practice Trends

• Smooth and threaded options: Smooth K-wires remain standard for provisional fixation. Threaded variants are used when the goal is to reduce migration and improve hold in definitive applications.
• Tip geometry choice: Trocar and diamond points support different insertion preferences and bone qualities. Surgeons match tip design to cortical density and access path to reduce skiving and improve first-pass accuracy.
• Sterile, single-use packaging: Pre-sterilized pins reduce reprocessing burden and help ASCs standardize inventory. Bulk sterile packs remain preferred for high-throughput centers.
• Radiographic visibility: Clear under-fluoro visibility is essential for precise pin placement in small bones and periarticular regions. Vendors maintain consistent radiopacity and surface finish to support imaging.
• Retention and migration control: Stop-pin caps, external clamps, and bend-over techniques help reduce pin migration and soft-tissue irritation in definitive cases.
• Workflow integration: Trays and caddies that pair pins, pin drivers, and wire guides streamline setup and reduce turnover time in trauma rooms.

Geography

This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary

Why This Report

Quantify demand for bone pins by region and care setting through 2031, with unit and ASP splits aligned to procurement patterns.

Benchmark competitors and understand how portfolio breadth, logistics, and attachment to larger trauma orders shape share stability.

Track procedure links between bone pins and plate-and-screw cases to plan inventory, trays, and rep coverage.

Assess pricing pressure from GPOs, tenders, and value-based procurement, and model its impact on realized ASPs.

Identify growth pockets in definitive fixation across hand and foot indications where pins can replace larger implants.

Plan channel strategy for ASCs and outpatient trauma centers where sterile, single-use packaging and fast turnover matter most.

The Global Bone Pin Market Report from iData Research delivers device-level sizing, pricing benchmarks, and company share analysis that commercial teams can use to set price corridors, align tender responses, and forecast attachment rates with plates and screws.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Bone Pin Market

• 11.1 Executive Summary
  • 11.1.1 Global Bone Pin Market Overview
  • 11.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 11.1.3 Regions Included
• 11.2 Introduction
• 11.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
• 11.4 Drivers And Limiters
  • 11.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 11.4.2 Market Limiters
• 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 11-1: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024 & 2031
• Chart 11-2: Bone Pin Units Sold, Global, 2024
• Chart 11-3: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 11-4: Leading Competitors, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 11-1: Bone Pin Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2)
• Figure 11-2: Bone Pin Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2)
• Figure 11-3: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 11-4: Units Sold by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 11-5: Average Selling Price by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 11-6: Market Value by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 11-7: Leading Competitors, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024