全球傳統髖關節螺絲市場：市場規模、佔有率和趨勢分析（2025-2031 年）

2024年全球傳統髖螺絲市場價值為1.6億美元。預計到2031年，該市場將達到1.42億美元，年複合成長率為-1.6%。

本報告涵蓋所有傳統髖螺釘產品，包括鈦合金和不銹鋼材質。報告量化了銷售量、平均售價、市場價值、成長率和企業市場占有率。此外，報告還分析了手術量、市場促進因素和限制因素、近期併購、公司策略和技術趨勢。歷史資料截至2021年，預測資料截至2031年。

市場概覽

傳統髖螺釘仍然是近端股骨骨折的主要且廣泛應用的治療方法。雖然髓內釘是許多股骨粗隆間和粗隆下骨折的首選治療方案，但當解剖結構和骨折類型允許使用鋼板和拉力螺釘進行穩定固定時，傳統的動力髖螺釘固定仍然被廣泛採用。此技術已被骨科醫生廣泛認可，所需器械易於取得，且在骨折粉碎程度較輕的情況下，手術操作相對簡單。

市場下滑反映了關節重建。同時，在手術時間縮短、成本控制或外科醫生熟悉度更為重要的情況下，傳統髖關節螺釘仍然發揮作用。在採用競標或集團合約的醫療系統中，傳統髖螺絲較低的平均售價（ASP）確保了其在價格敏感型藥品清單上的持續存在，尤其是在預算限制導致無法獲得更昂貴設備的情況下。

材料選擇也是一個重要因素。由於不銹鋼的剛度高、易於取得且成本低廉，大多數傳統髖螺絲都採用不銹鋼製成。但在某些情況下，由於鈦合金具有良好的生物相容性和重量優勢，其應用已逐漸增加。雖然這種轉變幅度小於髓內固定裝置，但已對產品組合產生影響，導致庫存的鈦合金鋼板螺絲組合略有價格分佈。

不同地區的使用情況因臨床通訊協定、報銷系統和外科醫生培訓而異。北美和西歐等成熟市場已顯著轉向使用髓內釘和全關節重建某些類型的骨折。同時，拉丁美洲、東歐、中東和非洲部分地區以及亞太部分地區，傳統髖螺釘在醫院的使用率仍然很高，設備可用性、成本和培訓情況是決定治療方案的主要因素。

儘管價值呈下降趨勢，但作為可靠且價格合理的庫存物品，該類別對醫院價值鍊和創傷服務仍然至關重要。供應商在物流、尺寸範圍、服務應對力以及既定產品特性方面展開競爭。在預測期內，市場表現將取決於各地區的手術組合、競標結果以及置換術速度。

市場促進因素

外科醫生常用的技術

由於外科醫生長期以來熟練了這項技術，傳統髖螺釘仍然被廣泛使用。培訓計畫教授這項技術已有數十年之久，許多外科醫生在鋼板和拉力螺絲的植入方面都非常熟練。對於粉碎性骨折程度較輕的病例，特別是穩定的股骨粗隆間骨折，這種技術可能比其他方法更快。手術時間的縮短和器械操作的可預測性，使得傳統系統在特定病例中繼續得到常規應用，即使整體市場萎縮，也仍然維持著基準的需求。

鈦材料

儘管不銹鋼仍然是傳統髖螺釘系統的主要材料，但鈦的應用正逐漸普及。外科醫師可能出於特定病患因素或為了與其他鈦創傷器械實現標準化服務而選擇鈦合金。鈦的生物相容性和輕質特性是其眾所周知的優勢，但其高昂的價格限制了其在注重成本的醫療機構中的應用。雖然這種變化不會扭轉整體市場萎縮的趨勢，但儲備鈦合金產品將有助於維持價格結構，並略微抵消不銹鋼產品的價格壓力。

價格競爭與預算適宜性

與髓內固定裝置相比，傳統髖螺釘在價格上具有競爭力，這在按價格排名競標以及醫院預算緊張的情況下至關重要。由於平均售價低於髓內髖關節螺釘，傳統髖關節螺釘仍然是許多醫療機構產品目錄和急救包中的必備品。產品知名度高且初始植入成本低，即使其用途僅限於某些特定類型的骨折和患者，也促使醫療機構持續採購。

市場限制

平均售價（ASP）下降

在各個地區，集團採購組織、政府採購和基於價值的採購計畫正持續對整形外科植入的平均售價（ASP）施加下行壓力。醫院正在整合採購以降低價格，並實現托盤標準化和物流簡化。始於2021年底的中國國家採購體系改革就是一個強而有力的價格壓縮案例。西歐和北美部分地區也出現了類似的舉措，限制了商品化醫療器材的定價權。對於售價本就低廉的傳統髖螺絲而言，其價格空間有限，難以添加高階功能，平均售價的下降會迅速轉化為價值的降低。

替代療法

兩種替代療法持續推動市場需求。第一種是髓內髖釘，它能提供負荷分擔結構，提高旋轉和軸向穩定性，並能有效治療股骨粗隆間骨折和股骨粗隆下骨折。第二種是全髖置換術。隨著外科醫生在老年患者複雜骨折的部分和全髖置換術累積經驗，以及植入設計的改進，全關節重建正成為越來越常見的選擇。這兩種療法都在減少以往使用傳統螺絲和鋼板治療的病例數。

髖關節置換術的進展

髖關節置換術在耐用性、貼合度、生物相容性和植入便利性方面均取得了顯著進展。對於移位性股骨頸頸部和老年患者的某些不穩定骨折類型，關節置換術可能有助於患者更快恢復功能。隨著關節置換療效和治療方案的改進，外科醫生擴大選擇置換術而非內固定。這種臨床轉變導致符合傳統螺釘內固定指徵的病例減少，從而維持了整體市場的下滑趨勢。

市場覆蓋範圍和數據範圍

• 目標時期：基準年2024年，預測期間2025-2031年，歷史資料2021-2023年
• 醫療機構：醫院和創傷中心，在急診和緊急護理途徑中治療股骨近端骨折。
• 調查方法：收入模型為單位銷售量乘以平均售價（ASP），並根據有關手術量、競標結果和置換手術的假設檢驗。

產品組合按材質分類，並與區域採購模式相符。

市場區隔摘要

• 傳統髖關節螺絲市場－進一步細分為以下幾個部分：

不銹鋼

鈦

• 量化指標：市場規模、市場佔有率、市場預測、成長率、銷售量、平均售價。
• 定性內容：市場成長趨勢、市場限制、主要競爭對手的競爭和 SWOT 分析、併購、公司簡介、產品系列、顛覆性技術、疾病概況。
• 資料來源：對行業領導者的直接訪談、政府和監管資料集、醫院採購資訊、進出口資料以及 iData Research 內部資料庫。

競爭分析

德普合成公司

2024年，DePuy Synthes在傳統髖螺釘市場佔據領先地位。該公司的LCP®動態髖關節螺絲（DHS）刀片及配套鋼板系統應用廣泛，並在創傷領域擁有強大的品牌知名度。 DePuy Synthes的全球規模、廣泛的分銷網路以及在眾多醫院董事會中的良好口碑，為其持續領先地位提供了有力支撐。鑑於該公司在鋼板和螺絲領域的佈局，預計其在傳統髖螺釘市場的地位將在預測期內保持穩定。

史賽克

史賽克憑藉其Omega-3™傳統髖關節螺絲系統，成為第二大競爭對手。該產品系列配備了最新的鋼板軸孔鎖定選項，並與史賽克廣泛的創傷平台整合。強大的品牌、高效率的物流和培訓計畫有助於客戶維繫。儘管史賽克專注於髓內固定裝置等高成長領域，這可能會限制其在這個較小細分市場中的市場佔有率快速成長，但該公司已做好充分準備，保持其市場地位。

Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet以其HipLoc動態加壓螺絲和傳統髖關節螺絲（CHS）產品線位居第三。傳統髖螺絲在該公司整體創傷產品系列中佔比相對較小，預計市場佔有率將保持穩定。 Zimmer Biomet透過可靠的供應和一系列互補的創傷植入產品來保持競爭力，這些產品既可用於競標契約，也可用於私人採購。

其他區域供應商也參與區域競標，提供具有競爭力的價格和基本的板材及螺絲系統。雖然這些公司可能會影響區域價格，但全球市場佔有率仍然集中在符合國際品質標準並擁有廣泛服務網路的跨國公司手中。

科技與臨床趨勢

標準化鋼板系統：傳統的髖螺絲產品組合圍繞可預測的鋼板孔模式和拉力螺絲選項進行組織，以簡化對準和加壓。

鎖定功能選項：用於鋼板軸孔的鎖定螺絲可改善骨質疏鬆骨骼的固定，並在適當時幫助彌合與更現代結構之間的差距。

低輪廓鋼板。更纖薄的鋼板形狀和拋光邊緣可以減少軟組織刺激，並可能降低器械取出率。

熟悉器械。熟悉的鑽頭、導引器和加壓裝置簡化了準備和手術流程，有助於在簡單骨折中持續使用。

材料的選擇取決於病例組合。不銹鋼仍然是成本驅動型採購的標準材料。鈦合金則常用於那些創傷中心採用統一材料或優先考慮生物相容性的醫院。

捆綁策略：供應商通常會將傳統的髖螺絲捆綁成更大的鋼板和螺絲捆綁包，以保護其在競標中的佔有率，並統一創傷治療線的服務水平。

地區

本版提供了涵蓋北美、歐洲、亞太地區、拉丁美洲以及中東和非洲的全球調查結果。

包括調查方法附錄和簡稱表。

目錄

圖表清單

圖表列表

調查方法

全球關稅的影響

傳統髖關節螺絲市場

• 執行摘要
  • 全球傳統髖關節螺絲市場概覽
  • 競爭分析
  • 流程分段
  • 市場區隔
  • 目標區域
• 介紹
• 手術次數
  • 傳統髖關節螺釘手術
• 市場概覽
  • 按細分市場
  • 按地區
• 市場分析與預測
  • 傳統髖關節螺絲市場總規模
  • 不銹鋼常規髖螺絲市場
  • 鈦合金傳統髖螺絲市場
• 駕駛員和約束裝置
• 競爭市佔率分析

簡稱

The global conventional hip screw market was valued at $160 million in 2024. The market is expected to decrease at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -1.6 percent, reaching $142 million by 2031.

This report covers the full suite of products in the conventional hip screw category, including titanium and stainless steel constructs. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares. It analyzes procedure numbers, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, company strategies, and technology trends. Historical data extend to 2021 with forecasts through 2031.

Market Overview

Conventional hip screws remain a familiar workhorse in proximal femoral fracture care. Although intramedullary hip nails have become the preferred choice in many intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric indications, conventional dynamic hip screw constructs continue to be used where anatomy and fracture pattern allow stable fixation with a plate and lag screw. The technique is well known to orthopedic surgeons, instrumentation is widely available, and the procedures are relatively straightforward in less comminuted cases.

The market's decline reflects a steady clinical migration to intramedullary fixation and a rising preference for arthroplasty in older and osteoporotic patients. At the same time, conventional hip screws retain a role in settings where short operating time, cost control, or surgeon familiarity carry more weight. In systems that use tender purchasing and group contracts, the lower ASP of conventional hip screws ensures continued presence on price sensitive formularies, especially when budgets limit access to premium devices.

Material selection is another factor. The majority of conventional hip screws are stainless steel due to stiffness, wide availability, and lower price. There is a gradual shift toward titanium in select settings for biocompatibility and weight related benefits. This shift is modest compared with intramedullary devices, but it influences mix and creates small pockets of premium pricing where titanium plate and screw constructs are stocked.

Across regions, utilization varies with clinical protocols, reimbursement, and surgeon training. Mature markets in North America and Western Europe show the most pronounced shift to intramedullary nails and to arthroplasty for select fracture types. Parts of Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and segments of Asia Pacific continue to use conventional hip screws more often in hospitals where equipment availability, cost, and training guide treatment selection.

Despite the downward value trend, the category remains important to hospital supply chains and to trauma services that need a reliable and affordable option on the shelf. Vendors compete on logistics, breadth of sizes, and service response as much as on product features, which are well established. Over the forecast horizon, market performance depends on procedure mix, tender outcomes, and the relative pace of adoption for intramedullary fixation and hip replacement in each region.

Market Drivers

Surgeon Familiarity

Conventional hip screws persist due to longstanding surgeon familiarity. Training programs have taught this method for decades, and many surgeons are highly efficient with plate and lag screw constructs. In less comminuted fractures, especially stable intertrochanteric patterns, the technique can be faster than alternative options. Shorter operative time and predictable instrumentation keep conventional systems in routine use for selected cases, which supports baseline unit demand even as the market contracts overall.

Titanium Material

While stainless steel is still the dominant material in conventional hip screw systems, there is a gradual increase in titanium use. Surgeons may choose titanium for specific patient factors or for service standardization with other titanium trauma sets. Titanium's biocompatibility and lower weight are known benefits, though the higher price affects adoption in cost sensitive facilities. The shift does not reverse the total market decline, but it can help maintain price mix where titanium options are stocked, creating small offsets to price compression in stainless steel lines.

Price Competition and Budget Fit

Conventional hip screws are price competitive relative to intramedullary devices. This matters where tenders rank offers by price and where hospital budgets are tight. Because the ASP is lower than that of IM hip screws, conventional constructs remain in catalogs and in emergency kits in many institutions. Even as usage narrows to specific fracture types and patient profiles, the combination of familiarity and lower upfront implant costs helps sustain ongoing purchases.

Market Limiters

ASP Decreases

Across regions, group purchasing organizations, government tenders, and value based procurement programs continue to place downward pressure on ASPs for orthopedic implants. Hospitals consolidate purchasing to extract lower prices, standardize trays, and simplify logistics. China's national procurement changes that began at the end of 2021 are a clear example of strong price compression. Similar dynamics in Western Europe and parts of North America limit pricing power for commoditized devices. For conventional hip screws, which already sell at lower prices, the room for premium features is small, so ASP erosion translates quickly into value decline.

Alternative Therapies

Two alternatives continue to limit demand. The first is the intramedullary hip nail, which offers a load sharing construct, better control of rotational and axial stability, and strong outcomes for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. The second is hip arthroplasty. As surgeons gain experience with partial and total hip replacement for complex fractures in older patients, and as implant designs improve, arthroplasty is selected more often. Both options reduce the pool of cases that would otherwise use conventional screws and plates.

Growth of Hip Replacement

Hip replacement has advanced in durability, fit, biocompatibility, and ease of implantation. For displaced femoral neck fractures and for some unstable patterns in elderly patients, arthroplasty may offer faster return to function. As arthroplasty outcomes and pathways improve, surgeons are more likely to select replacement over internal fixation. This clinical shift lowers addressable volume for conventional screws and keeps the overall market on a downward trajectory.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

• Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
• Care settings: Hospitals and trauma centers treating proximal femoral fractures across emergency and urgent pathways.
• Methodology: Revenues modeled as units multiplied by ASP, validated against procedure volumes, tender outcomes, and replacement assumptions.

Unit mix is segmented by material type and mapped to regional procurement patterns.

Market Segmentation Summary

• Conventional Hip Screw Market - Further Segmented Into:

Stainless Steel

Titanium

• Quantitative coverage: Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and average selling prices.
• Qualitative coverage: Market growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
• Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and regulatory datasets, hospital procurement inputs, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.

Competitive Analysis

DePuy Synthes

DePuy Synthes held the leading share of the conventional hip screw market in 2024. The company's LCP(R) Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) Blade and related plate systems are widely used and benefit from strong brand recognition in trauma. DePuy Synthes' global scale, broad sales coverage, and established preference with many hospital committees support sustained leadership. Given the company's footprint in plates and screws, its position in conventional hip screws is expected to remain stable over the forecast period.

Stryker

Stryker was the second leading competitor with the Omega3(TM) conventional hip screw system. The portfolio features current locking options for plate shaft holes and integrates with Stryker's broader trauma platform. Brand strength, efficient logistics, and training programs support account retention. Stryker's focus on higher growth segments, such as intramedullary constructs, may limit aggressive share pursuit in this smaller category, but the company is well placed to maintain its position.

Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet ranked third with the HipLoc Dynamic Compression Screw and Conventional Hip Screw (CHS) lines. Conventional hip screws are a smaller focus within the company's total trauma portfolio, and market share is expected to remain stable. Zimmer Biomet competes through dependable supply and a complementary set of trauma implants that allows the company to serve both tender contracts and private purchasers.

Other regional suppliers participate in local tenders with competitive pricing and basic plate and screw systems. While these companies can influence regional pricing, the global share structure is concentrated among the leading multinationals who meet international quality standards and maintain wide service coverage.

Technology and Practice Trends

Standardized plate systems. Conventional hip screw portfolios continue to center on predictable plate hole patterns and lag screw options that streamline alignment and compression.

Locking options. Locking screws for plate shaft holes provide improved fixation in osteoporotic bone, helping bridge the gap with more modern constructs where appropriate.

Low profile plates. Slimmer plate profiles and polished edges reduce soft tissue irritation and may reduce hardware removal rates.

Instrumentation familiarity. Well known drills, guides, and compression devices keep setup and surgical steps simple, which supports continued use in straightforward fractures.

Material choice by case mix. Stainless steel remains the default for cost sensitive procurement. Titanium is stocked where hospitals want one material standard across trauma sets or where biocompatibility is prioritized.

Bundle strategies. Vendors often position conventional hip screws within larger plate and screw bundles to protect share in tenders and to align service levels across trauma lines.

Geography

This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary included.

Why This Report

Where the largest and fastest changing opportunities exist within conventional hip screws by material and region through 2031.

How the shift to intramedullary fixation and arthroplasty is reshaping procedure mix and implant demand.

What pricing dynamics result from GPOs, government tendering, and value based procurement programs, and how these dynamics differ by region.

Which competitors are best positioned to defend share in this mature category and how portfolio depth, logistics, and training influence account retention.

How material selection and bundle strategies can help maintain price mix and service levels in cost constrained contracts.

What clinical scenarios still favor conventional constructs and how hospitals can optimize stocking to support urgent care while managing costs.

The Global Conventional Hip Screw Market Report from iData Research answers these questions with device level sizing, company share analysis, and pricing detail.

Use it to quantify demand, plan product and pricing strategy, benchmark against competitors, and align tender responses to regional buying patterns.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Conventional Hip Screw Market

• 9.1 Executive Summary
  • 9.1.1 Global Conventional Hip Screw Market Overview
  • 9.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 9.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 9.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 9.1.5 Regions Included
• 9.2 Introduction
• 9.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 9.3.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Procedures
• 9.4 Market Overview
  • 9.4.1 By Segment
  • 9.4.2 By Region
• 9.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 9.5.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Market
  • 9.5.2 Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market
  • 9.5.3 Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market
• 9.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 9.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 9.6.2 Market Limiters
• 9.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 9-1: Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2024 & 2031
• Chart 9-2: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures, Global, 2024
• Chart 9-3: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 9-4: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Segment, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 9-5: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 9-6: Leading Competitors, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 9-1: Conventional Hip Screw Procedure Segmentation
• Figure 9-2: Conventional Hip Screw Market Segmentation
• Figure 9-3: Conventional Hip Screw Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2)
• Figure 9-4: Conventional Hip Screw Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2)
• Figure 9-5: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-6: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, North America, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-7: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2021 - 2031 (1 of 2)
• Figure 9-8: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2021 - 2031 (2 of 2)
• Figure 9-9: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-10: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2021 - 2031 (1 of 2)
• Figure 9-11: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2021 - 2031 (2 of 2)
• Figure 9-12: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-13: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2021 - 2031 (1 of 3)
• Figure 9-14: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2021 - 2031 (2 of 3)
• Figure 9-15: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2021 - 2031 (3 of 3)
• Figure 9-16: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Africa, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-17: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Segment, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-18: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-19: Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-20: Units Sold by Region, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-21: Average Selling Price by Region, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 9-22: Market Value by Region, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-23: Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-24: Units Sold by Region, Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-25: Average Selling Price by Region, Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 9-26: Market Value by Region, Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-27: Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-28: Units Sold by Region, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-29: Average Selling Price by Region, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 9-30: Market Value by Region, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-31: Leading Competitors, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2024