美國與歐洲實驗室產品採購趨勢，2025-2026年

Laboratory Product Purchasing Trends, United States and Europe, 2025-2026

出版日期: 2026年08月07日 | 出版商:

Frost & Sullivan | 英文 62 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

簡介目錄

Frost & Sullivan公司邀請受訪者參與線上調查，以了解其2025年的產品採購流程以及對2026年的預期。自2012年以來，Frost & Sullivan公司一直針對同一目標群體進行類似的調查。該調查為企業提供檢查室專家的實用趨勢分析，以幫助其製定業務策略和成長預測。在適用情況下，調查會提供年比資料，以顯示檢查室預算趨勢。Frost & Sullivan直接招募受訪者，並在2026年8月和9月進行了電話訪談。參與調查的公司代表了參與實驗室採購流程、熟悉自身實驗室產品預算，並且使用或計劃使用以下七個實驗室產品類型中一個或多個類別的產品的實驗室：儀器、設備、化學品、試劑和試劑盒、通用實驗室用品、塑膠製品和玻璃器皿。

共有201位決策者參與了此次調查，回答了有關採購、預算、採購行為和採購偏好的問題。受訪者依實驗室類型（學術/政府機構、生物製藥機構、工業機構和醫院/臨床機構）進行分類。在本分析中，製造、環境檢測、化學/石油化學以及食品/飲料/農業相關實驗室被歸類為工業實驗室。生物技術、製藥和合約研究組織（CRO）被歸類為生物製藥實驗室。州和聯邦實驗室被歸為政府實驗室。醫院檢查室和臨床檢測實驗室被納入醫院/臨床組。

受訪者職位廣泛，包括研究人員、科學家、調查員、主管、經理和工程師。資料包含定量和定性回饋，涵蓋最終用戶趨勢，例如預算預測、採購流程的各個階段、產品評估和採購、近期和未來的設備及設施採購計劃、價格比較頻率、資金籌措趨勢、未滿足的需求、產品採購偏好、人工智慧使用情況、會議參與情況以及關稅對研究機構採購的影響。

主要發現
實驗室產品資訊來源
最常用的資訊來源
以往購買實驗室產品的經驗
採購實驗室產品的經驗
產品功能的重要性
產品特性重要性：原產國
製造商功能的重要性
與訂購和配送相關的功能的重要性
價格比較頻率
購買管道
最常用的購買管道

採購體驗：機會分析

主要發現
購買體驗中每個要素的重要性
改進測試產品的採購和採購
購買體驗評估
購買體驗中還有進步的空間

產業面臨的挑戰

主要發現
與供應商的關係
人工智慧的當前和未來應用
關稅對實驗室產品採購活動的影響
出席會議
未參加會議的原因

附錄

成長機會推動Growth Pipeline Engine（TM）。
為什麼經濟成長變得越來越困難？
The Strategic Imperative 8（TM）

未來計劃

成長機會的益處和影響
後續步驟
附件清單
免責聲明

簡介目錄

Product Code: KC8F-55

Qualified respondents to this Frost & Sullivan survey were invited to participate in an online survey examining their laboratory’s product purchasing process in 2025 and expectations for 2026. Frost & Sullivan has conducted similar studies among the same target respondent groups since 2012. The survey provides companies with actionable trend insights from laboratory professionals to help drive business strategies and inform growth expectations. The study presents year-over-year data to illustrate laboratory budget trends, where applicable. Frost & Sullivan directly recruited professionals for telephone interviews conducted during August and September 2026. Survey participants were involved in their laboratory’s purchasing process, were familiar with their laboratories’ product budgets, and represented laboratories that used or planned to use products in one or more of the seven laboratory product categories: instruments, equipment, chemicals, reagents and kits, general lab supplies, plasticware, and glassware.

A total of 201 decision-makers participated, answering questions on purchases, budgets, buying behaviors, and purchasing preferences. Respondents were segmented by laboratory type: academic/government, biopharmaceutical, industrial, and hospital/clinical. Manufacturing; environmental testing; chemical or petrochemical; and food, beverage, or agricultural laboratories were classified as industrial laboratories for this analysis. Biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and contract research organizations were categorized as biopharmaceutical laboratories. State and federal government laboratories were grouped as government laboratories. Hospital laboratories and clinical reference laboratories were included in the hospital/clinical group.

Respondents held various job titles, including researcher, scientist, investigator, director, manager, and technician. Data included both quantitative and qualitative responses covering end-user trends, including budget expectations, purchasing process steps, product evaluation and sourcing, recent and expected instrument and equipment purchases, frequency of price comparisons, funding trends, unmet needs, product purchasing preferences, AI usage, conference attendance, and the effects of tariffs on laboratory purchasing.