合規自動化（2025年）：Frost Radar

Frost Radar: Compliance Automation, 2025

出版日期: 2025年07月31日 | 出版商:

Frost & Sullivan | 英文 23 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

簡介目錄

推動公司採取行動的基準化分析系統 - 推動新交易流程和成長管道的創新

複雜的全球監管環境使合規性管理成為一項持續的挑戰，因為組織只是試圖跟上廣泛認可的標準的擴散，例如《加州隱私權法案》、歐盟（EU）一般資料保護規則（GDPR）和即將訂定的人工智慧立法。

合規性自動化平台簡化並擴展了合規性管理流程，標誌著從定期審核向更主動、更持續、優先考慮審核準備的模式的廣泛轉變。合規性也正成為軟體開發生命週期的一部分，以便在程式碼投入生產之前降低風險。這種「左移」方法能夠及早發現並緩解合規性問題，提高產品安全性和開發效率。

超過20 家供應商提供各種方法的解決方案，包括合規優先平台、風險驅動的自動化工具，以及已擴展功能以支援合規自動化的傳統管治、風險和合規平台。本報告評估了九家符合特定標準的公司，這些公司可納入 Frost Radar™ 分析。

該公司還分析其行業內的眾多公司，評估它們的領導力和其他顯著特徵。選定需要進一步分析的公司，將根據10項成長和創新標準進行基準測試，以確定其在Frost Radar™上的排名。上市公司會在Frost Radar™上為每家公司提供一份競爭概況，分析每家公司的優勢以及與這些優勢最契合的機會。

Frost Radar自動化合規

合規自動化市場仍處於早期階段。目前有超過20家供應商提供解決方案，但本次Frost Radar™分析評估了其中的9家。每家供應商均符合以下標準：
提供的解決方案可透過自動化、即時監控和集中管理來簡化並維持對法規和框架的遵守。
2024年年銷售額至少為 100萬美元，市場佔有率至少 1%。
為了確保公平的評分和比較，排除了符合納入標準但無法共用其解決方案詳細資訊的供應商。
供應商大致可分為三類：
合規優先的供應商致力於自動化合規工作流程，包括證據收集、控制映射、審核準備和框架協調。一些供應商還添加了風險管理模組，以更全面地了解組織的安全狀況。本分析中提到的供應商包括 Drata、Thoropass、Scytale、Strike Graph、Sprinto 和 Vanta。
風險主導供應商將合規自動化整合到更廣泛的風險管理框架中。他們提供先進的風險識別、評估和緩解功能，並將這些功能直接對應到合規性要求，使組織能夠根據即時風險敞口確定工作優先順序。本分析重點介紹了兩家供應商：Centrallies 和 CyberSaint。
進軍合規自動化領域的GRC 平台供應商為其平台添加專用的合規自動化功能，以支援複雜的跨組織合規自動化。這些模組嵌入到更廣泛的管治和風險框架中，實現策略管理、審核追蹤和風險控制的無縫整合。 LogicGate 就屬於此類。

最佳實踐和成長機會

在評估合規自動化工具時，CISO 應優先考慮與其組織的技術堆疊無縫整合的平台，以提高效率、增強可見度、減少手動工作並擴展合規維護。

有效的合規自動化工具應超越營運效率，將合規工作與更廣泛的業務風險結合。這些平台應使資訊安全長能夠量化合規活動，評估其對風險狀況的影響，並將這些洞察轉化為與業務相關的術語。

為了確保長期價值，CISO 應優先考慮具有強大企業級功能的合規自動化工具，透過使平台能夠隨著組織的發展（無論是透過合併、收購還是擴展到新市場）進行擴展，以確保其投資的未來發展。

The world's complex regulatory landscape makes compliance management a constant challenge. Organizations are simply trying to keep pace with the proliferation of widely recognized standards, such as the California Privacy Rights Act and the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and upcoming AI Act.

Compliance automation platforms streamline and scale the compliance management process, marking a broader transition from periodic audits to a more proactive, continuous approach that prioritizes audit readiness. Compliance is also becoming part of the software development lifecycle to reduce risks before code reaches production. This shift-left approach enables earlier identification and mitigation of compliance issues, improving both product security and development efficiency.

More than 20 vendors offer solutions across a range of approaches, including compliance-first platforms, risk-driven automation tools, and traditional governance, risk, and compliance platforms that have extended their capabilities to support compliance automation. Frost & Sullivan evaluated nine companies that met specific criteria for inclusion in this Frost Radar™ analysis.

Frost & Sullivan analyzes numerous companies in an industry. Those selected for further analysis based on their leadership or other distinctions are benchmarked across 10 Growth and Innovation criteria to generate their position on the Frost Radar™. The publication presents competitive profiles of each company on the Frost Radar™, considering their strengths and the opportunities that best fit those strengths.

Frost Radar: Compliance Automation

The compliance automation market remains in its early stages. More than 20 vendors offer solutions today; of those, Frost & Sullivan evaluated nine vendors in this Frost Radar™ analysis. Each met the following criteria:
Offers a solution that streamlines and maintains adherence to regulations and frameworks through automation, real-time monitoring, and centralized control management.
Achieved annual revenue of at least $1 million and a market share of 1% in calendar year 2024.
Vendors that met the inclusion criteria but could not share detailed insight into their solution were excluded to ensure fair scoring and comparison.
Vendors can broadly be categorized into three main groups:
Compliance-first vendors primarily focus on automating compliance workflows, such as evidence collection, control mapping, audit readiness, and framework alignment. Some are adding risk management modules to provide a more holistic view of an organization's security posture. Those featured in this analysis include Drata, Thoropass, Scytale, Strike Graph, Sprinto, and Vanta.
Risk-driven vendors integrate compliance automation into a broader risk management framework. They offer advanced capabilities for risk identification, assessment, and mitigation and map these directly to compliance requirements to help organizations prioritize efforts based on real-time risk exposure. Two, Centrallyes and CyberSaint, are included in this analysis.
GRC platform vendors expanding into compliance automation support complex, multi-entity organizations by adding purpose-built compliance automation to their platforms. Their modules are embedded in broader governance and risk frameworks, enabling seamless integration across policy management, audit trails, and risk controls. LogicGate falls into this category.

Best Practices & Growth Opportunities

1 When evaluating compliance automation tools, CISOs should prioritize a platform that integrates seamlessly with an organization's technology stack to improve efficiency, enhance visibility, reduce manual effort, and maintain compliance at scale.

2 Effective compliance automation tools should go beyond operational efficiency by aligning compliance efforts with broader business risk. These platforms need to equip CISOs with the ability to quantify compliance activities, assess their impact on risk posture, and translate those insights into business-relevant terms.

3 To ensure long-term value, CISOs should prioritize compliance automation tools with robust, enterprise-grade capabilities. These features future-proof investments by allowing the platform to scale with organizational growth, including mergers, acquisitions, and expansion into new markets.