首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 材料

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1448008

土壤穩定市場 - 2023-2030

Soil Stabilization Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: 2024年03月08日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 247 Pages | 商品交期: 約2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

概述

2022年，全球土壤穩定市場達到208.9億美元，預計2030年將達到313億美元，2023-2030年預測期間CAGR為5.2%。

對永續性和環保建築實踐的日益關注正在推動土壤穩定技術的採用。這些方法有助於最大限度地減少對環境的影響，減少水土流失，促進土地的有效利用，與全球實現更永續的基礎設施發展的努力保持一致。

已開發經濟體和發展中經濟體對道路、高速公路、機場和港口等基礎設施項目的投資推動了對土壤穩定解決方案的需求。這些項目通常需要堅固而穩定的地基，因此土壤穩定是一個重要組成部分。根據美國農業部 (USDA) 統計，美國 90% 以上的建設項目都涉及土壤穩定，而 USGS（美國地質調查局）預計土壤穩定技術可降低建設成本高達 20%。

持續的研究和開發工作正在推動先進土壤穩定材料和添加劑的開發。地工合成材料、生物聚合物和其他專用添加劑的創新正在提高穩定技術的有效性並擴大其應用。根據 Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani、Hamed Niroumand 和 Lech Balachowski 所做的研究，使用微米級和奈米級膨潤土作為土壤穩定劑來提高黏土砂的強度。

動力學

提高對土壤穩定益處的認知

土壤穩定技術有助於防止水土流失，這對於維護生態系統、農田和建築工地的良好健康至關重要。根據全球農業統計，預計每年有 240 億噸的肥沃土壤因侵蝕而流失。聯合國糧農組織稱，農業土壤侵蝕導致農業產量減少 50%。土壤穩定可以增強土壤的物理、化學和生物特性，進而提高保水性、養分利用率和整體土壤健康。這進一步改善了植物生長並提高了作物產量。

土壤穩定技術有助於防止水土流失，使土壤不易被風或水帶走。這對於維護農地的完整性、防止表土流失和確保永續的土地利用至關重要。穩定的土壤更能抵抗乾旱或大雨等惡劣天氣條件。這種適應性可以幫助農民減少氣候變遷對其作物和農業產量的影響。

基礎建設發展

道路、高速公路、橋樑、機場、港口和鐵路等基礎設施項目需要穩定而堅固的地基，以確保其長期耐用性和功能性。土壤穩定技術在準備施工場地和解決這些項目期間可能出現的與土壤相關的挑戰方面發揮著至關重要的作用。根據美國農業部 (USDA) 統計，美國 90% 以上的建設項目都涉及土壤固化，而 USGS（美國地質調查局）預計，土壤固化技術可降低高達 20% 的建築成本，具體取決於項目類型和其他因素。

基礎設施項目通常涉及重型和複雜結構的建設。適當的土壤穩定可確保地基能夠支撐這些結構的重量和承載要求，以防止沉降、不均勻沉降和結構破壞。

土壤穩定添加劑和技術成本高

土壤穩定技術的實施可能涉及大量的前期成本，包括與設備、材料和熟練勞動力相關的費用。例如，根據《國際工程技術研究期刊》(IRJET) 的報告，要穩定 10 立方公尺的土壤，水泥穩定的平均成本為 10,912 盧比。這些成本可能會阻止一些建設項目或土地開發計劃採用土壤穩定方法，特別是在預算緊張的情況下。

農民可能不完全了解土壤穩定的好處或潛在的投資回報。高昂的前期成本可能會阻礙他們探索或採取這些做法，特別是如果他們不知道長期優勢的話。

Increasing focus on sustainability and environmentally friendly construction practices is driving the adoption of soil stabilization techniques. These methods help minimize environmental impact, reduce soil erosion, and promote efficient land use, aligning with global efforts to achieve more sustainable infrastructure development.

Investments in infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, airports, and ports, in both developed and developing economies drive the demand for soil stabilization solutions. These projects often require strong and stable foundations, making soil stabilization an essential component. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%.

Ongoing research and development efforts are leading to the development of advanced soil stabilization materials and additives. Innovations in geosynthetics, biopolymers, and other specialized additives are enhancing the effectiveness of stabilization techniques and expanding their applications. As per the research done by Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani, Hamed Niroumand & Lech Balachowski, micro- and nano-size bentonite as soil stabilizers are used to improve the strength of clayey sand.

Dynamics

Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion, which is essential for preserving the good health of ecosystems, agricultural fields, and construction sites. According to Global Agriculture, every year an expected 24 billion tons of fertile soil are lost due to erosion. FAO claims that soil erosion in agriculture reduces agricultural production by 50%. Soil stabilization can enhance the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil, resulting in better water retention, nutrient availability, and overall soil health. This further leads to improved plant growth and increased crop yields.

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion making the soil less susceptible to being carried away by wind or water. This is crucial in maintaining the integrity of agricultural fields, preventing loss of topsoil, and ensuring sustainable land use. Stabilized soils are more r resistant to adverse weather conditions like drought or heavy rain. This adaptability can assist farmers in reducing the impact of climate change on their crops and agricultural output.

Infrastructure Development

Infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, bridges, airports, ports, and railways, require stable and strong foundations to ensure their long-term durability and functionality. Soil stabilization techniques play a crucial role in preparing construction sites and addressing soil-related challenges that can arise during these projects. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%, depending on the type of project and other factors.

Infrastructure projects often involve the construction of heavy and complex structures. Proper soil stabilization ensures that the foundation can support the weight and load-bearing requirements of these structures, preventing settlement, uneven subsidence, and structural failure.

High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques

The implementation of soil stabilization techniques can involve significant upfront costs, including expenses related to equipment, materials, and skilled labor. For instance, according to the International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), for 10 m3 volume of soil to be stabilized, average cost of cement stabilization is Rs 10,912. These costs can deter some construction projects or land development initiatives from adopting soil stabilization methods, especially in cases where budget constraints are a concern.

Farmers might not fully understand the benefits of soil stabilization or the potential return on investment. High upfront costs can discourage them from exploring or adopting these practices, especially if they are unaware of the long-term advantages.

Segment Analysis

The global soil stabilization market is segmented based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region.

Efficient Result Achieved by Mechanical Method

The mechanical method involves physically altering the soil's structure and properties to achieve stabilization. In February 2023, Bobcat introduced a new light compaction product range. These Light compactors increase soil strength and improve stability and load-bearing capacity by removing voids and interlocking soil particles. Mechanical methods often provide relatively rapid results in terms of soil loosening and compaction reduction. Farmers and land managers can see immediate improvements in soil structure and tilth after using mechanical equipment.

Some mechanical methods, such as reduced tillage or no-till practices, are also associated with improved soil conservation and reduced erosion. These practices align with sustainable farming principles and may receive support from agricultural policies and programs.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Geographical Penetration

Asia-Pacific's Growing Soil Erosion

Many areas in Asia-Pacific are experiencing significant soil erosion problems which leads to crop loss in that region. For instance, the annual loss in output of main crops in India because of soil erosion has been estimated to be 7.2 million tonnes which is about 4 to 6.3 percent of the annual agricultural production of the country. Soil stabilization is crucial for preventing erosion and maintaining soil health enhancing crop productivity in that region.

In June 2022, InnoCSR, a South Korean material technology company and member of the Born2Global Centre, introduced Good Road System (GRS), its soil-stabilized road technology, in Nepal. The technology follows the success of the Good Bricks System, where InnoCSR's soil stabilizers are used to make non-fired bricks. This type of development in the Asia-Pacific region also leads to soil stabilization market growth in that region.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Caterpillar, AB Volvo, FAYAT GROUP, WIRTGEN GROUP, CARMEUSE, Global Road Technology International Holdings, SNF, Aggrebind, Inc., Iridan and Tensar

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic led to disruptions in global supply chains, affecting the availability of materials and equipment needed for soil stabilization projects. This might have resulted in delays or increased costs for agricultural operations.

Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures impacted labor availability and mobility. This could have affected the implementation of soil stabilization techniques that require manual labor or specialized expertise.

By Method

Mechanical Method
Chemical Method

By Additives

Polymer
- Synthetic Polymers
- Biopolymers
Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
- Portland Cement
- Lime
- Fly Ash
- Others
Other Additives
- Agricultural waste
- Sludge
- Chelates & Salts

By Distribution Channel

Company-Owned Shops
Specialty Stores
E-Commerce
Others

By Application

Industrial
- Roads
- Landfills/Contaminated Land
- Others
Agriculture
- Open-Field Application
- Greenhouse
Non-Agriculture
- Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
- Residential
- Others

By Region

North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In April 2022, Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mandi developed sustainable techniques for soil stabilization using a harmless bacteria called S. Pasteurii.
In August 2020, Corteva introduced the Instinct NEXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer. The Optinyte technology in Instinct NXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer promotes 28% greater soil nitrogen retention.
In June 2021, Lafarge Western Canada Introduced EcoPlanet Ultra Low Carbon Cement. EcoPlanet is suitable for mining and soil stabilization.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global soil stabilization market segmentation based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of soil stabilization market-level with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global soil stabilization market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 67 figures and 247 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1.Methodology and Scope

1.1.Research Methodology
1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

3.1.Snippet by Method
3.2.Snippet by Additives
3.3.Snippet by Distribution Channel
3.4.Snippet by Application
3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

4.1.Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1.Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1.Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization
  - 4.1.1.2.Infrastructure Development
- 4.1.2.Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1.High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques
- 4.1.3.Opportunity
- 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
5.3.Pricing Analysis
5.4.Regulatory Analysis

6.COVID-19 Analysis

6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
- 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
- 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6.Conclusion

7.By Method

7.1.Introduction
- 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Method
7.2.Mechanical Method*
- 7.2.1.Introduction
- 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3.Chemical Method

8.By Additive

8.1.Introduction
- 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additive
- 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Additive
8.2.Polymer*
- 8.2.1.Introduction
- 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
- 8.2.3.Synthetic Polymers
- 8.2.4.Biopolymers
8.3.Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
- 8.3.1.Portland Cement
- 8.3.2.Lime
- 8.3.3.Fly Ash
- 8.3.4.Others
8.4.Other Additives
- 8.4.1.Agricultural waste
- 8.4.2.Sludge
- 8.4.3.Chelates & Salts

9.By Distribution Channel

9.1.Introduction
- 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Distribution Channel
9.2.Company-Owned Shops*
- 9.2.1.Introduction
- 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3.Specialty Stores
9.4.E-Commerce
9.5.Others

10.By Application

10.1.Introduction
- 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
10.2.Industrial*
- 10.2.1.Introduction
- 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
- 10.2.3.Roads
- 10.2.4.Landfills/Contaminated Land
- 10.2.5.Others
10.3.Agriculture
- 10.3.1.Open-Field Application
- 10.3.2.Greenhouse
- 10.3.3.Non-Agriculture
- 10.3.4.Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
- 10.3.5.Residential
- 10.3.6.Others

11.By Region

11.1.Introduction
- 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
11.2.North America
- 11.2.1.Introduction
- 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.2.7.1.U.S.
  - 11.2.7.2.Canada
  - 11.2.7.3.Mexico
11.3.Europe
- 11.3.1.Introduction
- 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.3.7.1.Germany
  - 11.3.7.2.UK
  - 11.3.7.3.France
  - 11.3.7.4.Italy
  - 11.3.7.5.Russia
  - 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
11.4.South America
- 11.4.1.Introduction
- 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.4.7.1.Brazil
  - 11.4.7.2.Argentina
  - 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
11.5.Asia-Pacific
- 11.5.1.Introduction
- 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.5.7.1.China
  - 11.5.7.2.India
  - 11.5.7.3.Japan
  - 11.5.7.4.Australia
  - 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.6.Middle East and Africa
- 11.6.1.Introduction
- 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

12.Competitive Landscape

12.1.Competitive Scenario
12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

13.1.Caterpillar*
- 13.1.1.Company Overview
- 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
- 13.1.3.Financial Overview
- 13.1.4.Recent Developments
13.2.AB Volvo
13.3.FAYAT GROUP
13.4.WIRTGEN GROUP
13.5.CARMEUSE
13.6.Global Road Technology International Holdings (HK) Limited
13.7.SNF
13.8.Aggrebind, Inc.
13.9.Iridan
13.10.Tensar LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE