查看購物車
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
美國軍用市場—國家分析：按最終用戶、平台類型、組件、預算分配類型和國家/地區分類—分析與預測（2025-2030 年）
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1915213

美國軍用市場—國家分析：按最終用戶、平台類型、組件、預算分配類型和國家/地區分類—分析與預測（2025-2030 年）

U.S. Military Market - A Country Level Analysis: Focus on End User, Platform Type, Component, Appropriation Type, and Country Level Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2025-2030
出版日期: | 出版商: BIS Research | 英文 193 Pages | 商品交期: 1-5個工作天內

價格

到2024年，美國軍工市場規模達到 691.8億美元，預計到2030年將達到 808.5億美元，年複合成長率為 3.03%。

美國國防工業受多種因素影響，這些因素塑造國防費用、創新和戰略重點。這些因素包括地緣政治趨勢、技術進步、預算分配和全球安全挑戰。此外，美國政府的國防預算位居世界前列，為軍事現代化、研發和軍事戰備投入了大量資源。國家安全優先事項和新興軍事戰略（例如《國防戰略》）會週期性地推動國防費用的成長。

關鍵市場統計資料
預測期 2025-2030
截至2025年的評估 696.4億美元
2030年的預測 808.5億美元
年複合成長率 3.03%

戰術無人機（UAV）和情報、監視與偵察（ISR）平台透過平台設計、作戰概念和採購標準塑造了美國軍事工業。強大的工業基礎、大量的國防投資和持續的ISR計畫使美國成為軍用無人機的領導者。在監視、協作和前沿戰術部署方面的關鍵舉措，為效能、互通性和資料利用設定了全球標準。這一核心地位鞏固了美國在ISR飛機和無人機供應鏈中的領導地位，並推動了美國軍事工業市場的發展。

介紹美國軍方市場

BIS Research 的研究表明，美國軍工市場是全球規模最大、技術最先進的國防市場之一，這主要得益於美國在軍事能力、技術和國防基礎設施方面的大量投資。該市場涵蓋許多領域，包括國防技術、軍事製造、網路安全、物流、情報和人事服務。全球安全情勢和國內政策決策都對其產生影響，其中美國國防部在塑造其發展方向和優先事項方面發揮核心作用。本報告重點關注美國國防部對飛機、無人機和航太相關產品的需求。

市場概覽

美國軍工市場是全球規模最大、最具影響力的國防市場之一。美國國防部作為國防政策、採購和軍事戰略的主要促進者，在該市場中發揮非常重要的作用，並維護美國在全球國防領域的領導地位。美國軍工市場受諸多因素影響，包括地緣政治緊張局勢、全球安全格局以及技術進步。美國軍方致力於維持一支技術領先、戰略靈活的部隊，這鞏固了其在國防領域的統治地位。美國軍方始終維持全球最高的國防預算之一，並在現代化、創新和戰略力量投射方面投入大量資金。

對產業的影響

美國軍工市場的影響力遠不止於國防相關企業和軍方本身。其影響波及多個產業，並塑造全球供應鏈、技術創新、經濟成長和國際關係。美國軍方致力於維持技術優勢，這對包括人工智慧（AI）、網路安全、自主系統、先進材料和通訊在內的眾多技術領域產生了直接而深遠的影響。許多透過研發計畫開發的軍事技術，一旦驗證其有效性，往往會在民間領域得到應用。

市場區隔

細分 1：依最終用戶

  • 美國陸軍
  • 美國海軍
  • 美國空軍
  • 其他

美國空軍主導美國軍用市場（依最終用戶）

美國空軍繼續保持其在美國軍事市場領先終端用戶的地位，專注於規模最大、技術最先進的戰鬥機、攻擊機、轟炸機和其他飛機產品組合，並擁有來自主承包商及其分級供應鏈的明確需求。其現代化計畫優先考慮低可探測性設計、感測器融合和開放式任務系統，同時為下一代訓練和測試基礎設施提供資金，以加速能力採納並縮短部署時間。加油機和戰略特遣部隊的機身更新支援多年採購計劃，穩定生產力，並支援在生存能力、網路和戰場管理方面的持續升級。

細分 2：依平台類型

  • 戰鬥機
  • 旋翼機/垂直起降飛行器
  • 軍用無人機
  • 太空活動

戰鬥機主導美國軍用市場（依平台類型）

戰鬥機是美國軍方市場的關鍵平台組成部分，因為空中優勢和進攻性反空作戰仍然是聯合部隊作戰的關鍵驅動力。對戰鬥機的需求主要來自對老舊機隊的更新換代以及持續採購具備低可探測性、融合感測和大規模安全網路連接能力的第五代戰鬥機。投資重點集中在開放式任務系統上，以加速武器系統整合、增強電子戰抗性、進行軟體升級並提高任務適應性。包括推進系統大修、結構延壽和航空電子設備現代化在內的維護投入，帶來了可觀且持續的售後市場收入。協同戰鬥機概念的出現，使戰鬥機成為與消耗性無人系統協同作戰的核心節點，在保持有人駕駛平台優勢的同時，擴展了任務範圍。包括先進模擬器、射擊場儀器和即時虛擬建造環境在內的訓練和測試基礎設施，加快了部署並提高了飛行員的熟練程度。與直升機和軍用無人機相比，戰鬥機在現代化資金中所佔佔有率最大。這是為了提供快速的全球覆蓋範圍、在反防禦態勢下的生存能力以及可擴展的攻擊選項，以支持阻礙力和危機應對。

細分 3：依組件

  • 機體
  • 尾翼
  • 短艙
  • 塔架
  • 主翼零件
  • 門
  • 其他

美國軍工市場的關鍵零件 - 機身扮演著主導角色

機身在美國軍用市場組件架構佔主導地位，它將結構、生存功能和任務系統結構整合到單一的承重外殼中，集中了最高的資金投入。機身內部容納了武器艙、感測器孔徑、燃料電池、環境控制設備和電磁屏蔽裝置，是特徵控制、航程和有效負載靈活性的關鍵決定因素。其模組化的航空電子設備、線束、冷卻迴路和開放式系統機架促進了平台通用和擴展性，實現了技術的快速應用。它為製造經濟性奠定了基礎 - 先進複合材料、自動化纖維鋪放、大型工裝設備和複雜的組裝過程 - 並塑造了整個機身的學習曲線。腐蝕控制、戰損修復、結構健康監測和維修車間改造都圍繞著機身部分展開，導致維護成本佔很大一部分。認證和適航性工作的整合 - 包括疲勞壽命、耐撞性、增壓系統和電磁相容性 - 提高了資格認證門檻，並增加了對供應商的依賴。此外，檢修面板、艙門開口和內部維護性設計會影響物流和周轉時間，因為它們決定了可更換零件的檢查和更換時間。因此，機身部分在經常性和非經常性投資中佔比最大，這使得機身製造商成為主承包商的關鍵合作夥伴，並使該零件成為軍用飛機供應鏈中最具影響力的成本和能力促進因素。

細分4：依預算分配類型

  • 新建工程和採購
  • 運作、維護、修理和大修（MRO）
  • 研究、開發、測試和評估（RDT&E）

需求 - 促進因素、限制因素、機會

市場需求促進因素：競爭與印太地區格局（航空）

實力接近的競爭對手，尤其是中國和俄羅斯的崛起，仍然是影響美國軍事投資優先事項的最重要因素。在印太地區，作戰範圍廣闊，對手能力日益複雜，美國向分佈式、高韌性的空軍轉型，以在高威脅情境下獲得優勢。這項轉型推動美國加大對前沿基地、遠程精確打擊和聯合指揮控制能力的投資。

美國空軍部（DAF）2025會計年度預算申請總額為2,626億美元，較2024會計年度的2,592億美元略微增加1.3%。雖然總額增幅不大，但反映出資金的重大策略性重新分配。2025財政年度運作維護（O&M）預算申請為646億美元（基於OP-32），較2024會計年度增加19億美元，體現了對飛行小時數、武器系統維護和分散式作戰等核心戰備項目的重視。

與此政策密切相關的是太平洋威懾舉措（PDI），這是美國國會設立的一項數十億美元的資金籌措機制，目的是加強亞太地區的威懾力。根據PDI，美國空軍和印太司令部對關島、提尼安島、帛琉和澳洲北部的機場進行現代化改造，增建加固機庫、燃料倉儲設施和維修設施，以支援分散作戰。2025會計年度空軍作戰與維護（O&M）預算申請為756億美元（比2024會計年度增加21億美元），為這些活動提供了作戰基礎，其中包括110萬飛行小時、機隊維護以及一項目的是檢驗大規模機動基地作戰的擴大物流演習。現代太平洋地區的阻礙力也依賴先進的武器系統，以確保可靠的打擊範圍和戰備狀態。2025會計年度採購計畫包括約550枚聯合空對地防區外飛彈增程型（JASSM-ER），價值8億美元；以及另外972枚先進中程空對空飛彈（AMRAAM），累計約11億美元。這些採購計畫體現了從烏克蘭衝突和太平洋軍事演習中汲取的經驗教訓：在高強度戰鬥中，飛彈庫存會迅速消耗殆盡。因此，持續的武器投入既是對戰備能力的投資，也是工業基礎健康的雙重保障。

市場挑戰 - 預算限制與政治不穩定

儘管總預算接近歷史最高水準，美國國防部航太部門仍面臨嚴峻的財政環境。 《2023會計年度財政責任法案》（FRA）規定，國防支出名目成長率在2025會計年度之前不得超過每年1%。空軍部2025會計年度的預算申請約為2,175億美元，較2024會計年度略有成長，但考慮到3%至4%的通貨膨脹率，其實際購買力實際上有所下降。這種溫和的成長率限制了現代化優先事項，迫使空軍只能保障其最關鍵的項目，例如B-21「突襲者」轟炸機、下一代空中優勢（NGAD）計劃（F-47）和核武更新計劃，並減少近期採購F-35A「Lightning II」和F-15EX「鷹II」戰鬥機。

航空項目的預算上限構成了特別嚴峻的限制，因為飛機採購和維護是國防費用中資本密集度最高的類別之一。即使是小幅短缺也會對生產力、供應商合約和交貨前置作業時間長的零件訂單產生連鎖反應。這導致主要項目線被拉長至數年，降低了規模經濟效益，並延緩了機隊更新。

市場機會：大規模現代化專案/一次性聯合飛機

美國空軍的現代化建設為機身、推進系統和任務系統創造數十年的發展機會。2025會計年度國防預算累計，超過610億美元用於以隱形飛機、數位化保障和新型無人平台為核心的空中力量建設。 F-35A「Lightning II」戰鬥機累計最重要的飛機採購項目，2025會計年度採購經費超過53億美元，持續研發投入達17億美元。儘管由於軟體延遲導致生產速度放緩，但其長期規模（計劃生產1763架）確保了持續的維護、航電升級和引擎改進機會。 B-21「突襲者」轟炸機計畫目前正進入早期生產階段，並將在未來幾十年內繼續成為美國轟炸機部隊的核心力量。2025會計年度約47億美元的採購和研發支出將用於支援機身結構、塗層和推進零件的穩定生產擴張和分包。

下一代空中優勢（NGAD）系統系列（包括F-47戰鬥機）帶來了最具變革性的機會。該系統在2025會計年度的研發投入高達33億美元（高於2024會計年度的23億美元），將整合有人駕駛的第六代戰鬥機、自主無人機和分散式感測器網路。 NGAD的「協同作戰飛機（CCA）」概念 - 一種低成本、人工智慧賦能的無人僚機 - 正吸引著許多主要企業和新興參與企業。美國空軍選擇Anduril Industries和General Atomics Aeronautical Systems開發CCA原型機，這標誌著主承包商的多元化趨勢。

這份報告能為組織帶來哪些額外價值？

產品/創新戰略：美國軍方市場的發展動力源自於現代戰爭中對技術優勢、作戰效率和戰略柔軟性的需求。隨著軍事需求的不斷演變，提供軍工產品和服務的公司必須專注於創新解決方案，以應對新的挑戰。

成長與行銷策略：在競爭激烈的美國軍工市場，企業不僅要瞄準傳統的國防承包商，還必須制定與新興技術、永續性和地緣政治挑戰相契合的成長與行銷策略。要提升市場佔有率和實現成長，必須有效執行以創新、策略夥伴關係、成本效益和政府關係為核心的策略。

競爭策略：成功的市場競爭策略需要技術領先、策略關係建構、成本效益和全球市場擴張的綜合運用。能夠預見軍事需求、運用新興技術進行創新並透過永續性和可靠性展現價值的企業，將佔據國防領域的重要地位。透過強調適應性、敏捷性和建立長期客戶關係，企業不僅能夠在這個非常重要且不斷變化的市場中生存下來，而且能夠蓬勃發展。

調查方法

資料預測和建模因素

  • 市場分析的基礎貨幣為美元（USD）。除美元以外的其他貨幣在所有統計計算中均按相關年份的平均外匯轉換為美元。
  • 貨幣兌換率以 Oanda 網站的歷史外匯為準。
  • 本報告中所呈現的資訊是深入的一手訪談、調查和二手分析的結果。
  • 在缺乏相關資訊的情況下，採用替代指標和外推法。
  • 市場估計和預測並未考慮未來的景氣衰退。
  • 除非出現重大技術突破，否則目前使用的技術預計將在整個預測期內繼續沿用。

主要市場參與企業及競爭格局概述

本次報告中介紹的美國軍工市場公司是根據領先專家的意見以及對公司業務覆蓋範圍、產品系列和市場滲透率的分析而選定的。

美國軍工市場的主要企業包括：

美國軍用飛機、無人機和國防航太產品供應商（專注於航空領域）

  • Spirit AeroSystems Inc.
  • GKN Aerospace
  • Qarbon Aerospace
  • Israel Aerospace Industries
  • Sonaca Group
  • Aernnova Aerospace Corporation SA
  • Latecoere
  • CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
  • RTX Corporation

平台開發者

  • The Boeing Company
  • General Atomics
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Textron Aviation Defense LLC.

未納入上述名單的公司將在本報告的各個章節中進行詳細介紹（如適用）。

目錄

執行摘要

範圍和定義

第1章 市場：產業展望

  • 美國軍工產業概論
    • 美國軍用航太產品最終用戶產量，2020-2024年
    • 2020-2024年全球領先的國防承包商（以武器銷售總額計，十億美元）
    • 2024年美國武器的主要接受
  • 美國軍費預算與戰略重點
    • 國防預算概覽
    • 趨勢：現況及未來影響評估
  • 重點計劃：基於積極進行和已規劃的採購計畫的關鍵機會
  • 客戶准入和採購管道
    • 客戶分析
    • 美國軍用航太採購趨勢（2022-2025）
    • 合約類型
  • 供應商層
    • 總承包商/原廠設備製造商
    • 一級和二級供應商
    • 子組件和飛機結構件供應
  • 美國軍用市場TAM和Sonaca Group的可用市場（SAM）分析，2024年
  • 市場動態概述
    • 市場促進因素
    • 市場挑戰
    • 市場機會

第2章 應用

  • 使用情況概述
  • 美國軍工市場（依最終用戶），價值，2024-2030年
    • 美國陸軍
    • 美國海軍
    • 美國空軍
    • 其他（聯合計畫辦公室和國防機構）

第3章 產品

  • 產品概述
  • 美國軍用市場（依平台類型），價值，2024-2030年
    • 戰鬥機
    • 旋翼機/垂直起降飛行器
    • 軍用無人機
    • 太空活動
  • 美國軍工市場（依零件），價值，2024-2030年
    • 飛機
    • 尾巴
    • 短艙
    • 塔架
    • 機翼零件
    • 門
    • 其他
  • 美國軍用市場（依分配類型），價值，2024-2030年
    • 新建設和採購
    • 運作與維護、修理和大修（MRO）
    • 研究、開發、測試和評估（RDT&E）

第4章 市場 - 競爭標竿分析與公司概況

  • 競爭格局（平台製造商）
  • 策略性舉措（夥伴關係、收購、產品發布）
  • 市場進入或擴張成功案例
  • 公司簡介
    • 零件製造商
    • 平台開發者
    • 其他主要企業名單

第5章 採購計劃

  • 採購計劃和交付（2022-2025）
  • F-35採購決策者（美國）
  • F-35「Lightning II」戰鬥機：誰將向誰供貨？

第6章 調查方法

Product Code: DSM3548SA

This report can be delivered within 1 working day.

U.S. Military Market (Focus on Aircraft) Overview

The U.S. military market was valued at $69.18 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3.03%, reaching $80.85 billion by 2030. The U.S. military industry is influenced by a range of driving factors that shape defense spending, innovation, and strategic priorities. These factors include geopolitical dynamics, technological advancements, budget allocations, and global security challenges. Moreover, the U.S. government's defense budget is one of the largest globally, allocating significant resources to military modernization, research and development, and military readiness. Periodic increases in defense spending due to national security priorities or new military strategies (e.g., National Defense Strategy).

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Forecast Period2025 - 2030
2025 Evaluation$69.64 Billion
2030 Forecast$80.85 Billion
CAGR3.03%

The tactical UAV and ISR platforms are shaping the U.S. military industry with platform designs, doctrines, and procurement standards. The U.S. dominance holds one of the top positions in the military UAV sector via superior defense investments and a strong industrial base with enduring ISR programs. Key initiatives in surveillance, teaming, and forward tactical deployments set worldwide benchmarks for performance, interoperability, and data exploitation. This central role cements U.S. leadership in the ISR aircraft and drones supply chain, driving the U.S. military market.

Introduction of U.S. Military Market

The study conducted by BIS Research highlights that the U.S. military market is one of the largest and most advanced defense sectors in the world, driven by the U.S.'s significant investment in its military forces, technology, and defense infrastructure. The market encompasses a wide range of sectors, including defense technology, military equipment manufacturing, cybersecurity, logistics, intelligence, and personnel services. It is influenced by both global security dynamics and domestic policy decisions, with the Department of Defense (DoD) playing a central role in shaping its direction and priorities. The report only focuses on the demand for aircraft, drones, and space-related products in the U.S. Department of Defense.

Market Introduction

The U.S. military market represents one of the largest and most influential defense sectors globally. With the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) as the primary driver of defense policies, procurement, and military strategy, this market plays a crucial role in maintaining the country's global defense leadership. The U.S. military market is shaped by numerous factors, including geopolitical tensions, global security dynamics, and technological advancements. The U.S. military's commitment to maintaining a technologically superior and strategically flexible force ensures its dominance in the defense sector. With a robust defense budget that consistently ranks as one of the highest in the world, the U.S. military invests heavily in modernization, innovation, and strategic power projection.

Industrial Impact

The U.S. military market has far-reaching implications that extend beyond just defense contractors and the military itself. Its influence spreads across multiple industries, shaping global supply chains, technological innovation, economic growth, and international relations. The U.S. military's commitment to maintaining technological superiority has a direct and significant impact on a variety of technological sectors, including artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, autonomous systems, advanced materials, and communications. Many military innovations, developed through research and development (R&D) programs, often find applications in civilian industries once they are proven effective.

Market Segmentation

Segmentation 1: by End User

  • U.S. Army
  • U.S. Navy
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Others

U.S. Air Force to Dominate the U.S. Military Market (by End User)

The U.S. Air Force remains the dominant end user in the U.S. military market because it concentrates the largest, most technologically advanced portfolio across fighter and attack aircraft, bombers, and other aircraft, and visible demand for prime contractors and their tiered supply chains. Its modernization agenda prioritizes low observable designs, sensor fusion, and open mission systems while funding next-generation training and test infrastructure that accelerates capability insertion and shortens time to field. Recapitalization of aerial refueling and strategic mobility fleets anchors multi-year procurement, stabilizes production rates, and supports continuous upgrades in survivability, networking, and battlefield management.

Segmentation 2: by Platform Type

  • Fighter Aircraft
  • Rotary-Wing Aircraft/VTOL
  • Military Drones
  • Space Activities

Fighter Aircraft to Dominate the U.S. Military Market (by Platform Type)

Fighter aircraft constitute the dominant platform segment in the U.S. military market because air superiority and offensive counter air remain the decisive enablers of joint force operations. Demand is anchored by recapitalization of legacy fleets and continued procurement of fifth-generation fighters that deliver low observability, fused sensing, and secure networking at scale. Investment priorities favor weapons system integration, electronic warfare resilience, and open mission systems that accelerate software upgrades and mission adaptability. Sustainment intensity, including propulsion overhauls, structural life extension, and avionics modernization, creates large and recurring aftermarket revenue streams. The emergence of collaborative combat aircraft concepts positions fighters as the lead node for teaming with attritable uncrewed systems, expanding the mission set while preserving the primacy of crewed platforms. Training and test infrastructure for advanced simulators, range instrumentation, and live virtual constructive environments compresses time to field and deepens pilot proficiency. Relative to helicopters and military drones, fighters capture the highest share of modernization funding because they deliver rapid global reach, survivability against contested defenses, and scalable strike options that underpin deterrence and crisis response.

Segmentation 3: by Component

  • Fuselage
  • Empennage
  • Nacelles
  • Pylons
  • Wing Components
  • Doors
  • Others

Fuselage to Dominate the U.S. Military Market (by Component)

Fuselage dominates the U.S. military market component mix because it concentrates the highest value content, integrating structure, survivability features, and mission-system architecture into a single load-bearing shell. It houses weapons bays, sensor apertures, fuel cells, environmental controls, and electromagnetic shielding, making it the primary determinant of signature management, range, and payload flexibility. It drives platform commonality and growth margins by accommodating modular avionics, wiring harnesses, cooling loops, and open systems racks that enable rapid technology insertion. It anchors manufacturing economics through advanced composites, automated fiber placement, large-tooling capital, and complex assembly sequencing that set learning curves for the entire airframe. It commands sustainment spending since corrosion control, battle-damage repair, structural health monitoring, and depot modifications are centered on fuselage sections. It concentrates certification and airworthiness effort, including fatigue life, crashworthiness, pressurization, and electromagnetic compatibility, which elevates qualification barriers and supplier stickiness. It shapes logistics and turnaround time because access panels, door cutouts, and maintainability features in the fuselage dictate crew hours for inspections and line-replaceable unit swaps. It therefore captures the largest share of recurring and non-recurring investment, positioning fuselage producers as critical partners to prime contractors and making this component the most influential cost and capability driver in the military aircraft supply chain.

Segmentation 4: by Appropriation Type

  • New Builds and Procurement
  • Operations and Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO)
  • Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

Demand - Drivers, Limitations, and Opportunities

Market Demand Drivers: Power Competition and Indo-Pacific Posture (Air Domain)

The resurgence of near-peer competition, particularly with China and Russia, remains the single most influential factor shaping U.S. military investment priorities. In the Indo-Pacific, where operational ranges are vast and adversary capabilities increasingly sophisticated, the U.S. is shifting toward distributed, resilient airpower to prevail in high-threat scenarios. This transformation is driving increased investments in forward basing, long-range precision strike, and joint command-and-control capabilities.

The Department of the Air Force (DAF) FY2025 budget request totals $262.6 billion, a modest 1.3% increase from the FY2024 request of $259.2 billion. Although the topline rise is narrow, the strategic reallocation of funds is notable. The Operations & Maintenance (O&M) appropriation request for FY2025 is $64.6 billion (according to OP-32), an increase of $1.9 billion over FY2024's request, reflecting an emphasis on core readiness programs such as flying hours, weapons system sustainment, and distributed operations.

Closely tied to this approach is the Pacific Deterrence Initiative (PDI), a multibillion-dollar funding mechanism created by Congress to strengthen the U.S. deterrence posture in Asia. Under PDI, the Air Force and Indo-Pacific Command are upgrading airfields across Guam, Tinian, Palau, and northern Australia, adding hardened shelters, fuel storage, and maintenance facilities capable of supporting dispersed operations. The FY2025 Air Force Operations & Maintenance (O&M) request of $75.6 billion, which is a $2.1 billion increase from FY2024, provides the operational backbone for these activities. It covers 1.1 million flying hours, fleet sustainment, and expanded logistics exercises designed to test agile basing at scale. Modern deterrence in the Pacific also relies on advanced munitions to ensure credible reach and responsiveness. FY2025 procurement includes approximately 550 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles-Extended Range (JASSM-ER) valued at $0.8 billion, alongside 972 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) worth roughly $1.1 billion. These procurements address lessons from the Ukraine conflict and Pacific wargames, namely, that high-intensity combat would rapidly exhaust missile inventories. Sustained munitions funding thus represents a dual investment in readiness and industrial base health.

Market Challenges: Budget Constraints and Political Uncertainty

The U.S. Military aerospace sector continues to face a challenging fiscal environment despite near-record topline funding. The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA) imposed statutory caps that limit nominal growth of defense spending to roughly 1% per year through FY2025. While the Department of the Air Force's FY2025 request of ~$217.5 billion represents a marginal increase from FY2024, inflation of 3-4% means its real purchasing power has effectively declined. This modest growth rate constrains modernization priorities and forces the Air Force to protect only the most critical programs, i.e., the B-21 Raider bomber, Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) initiative (F-47), and nuclear recapitalization efforts, while reducing near-term procurement of the F-35A Lightning II and F-15EX Eagle II.

Budget ceilings are particularly restrictive for aviation programs because aircraft procurement and sustainment are among the most capital-intensive categories of defense spending. Even small shortfalls have cascading effects on production rates, supplier contracts, and long-lead component orders. As a result, major program lines are being stretched across multiple years, reducing economies of scale and delaying fleet recapitalization.

Market Opportunities: Major Modernization Programs/Attritable Collaborative Aircraft at Scale

Modernization across the Department of the Air Force is generating multi-decade opportunities across airframe, propulsion, and mission system segments. The FY2025 defense budget includes over $61 billion for airpower, primarily focused on stealth aircraft, digital sustainment, and new unmanned platforms. The F-35A Lightning II remains the most significant aircraft procurement line, with over $5.3 billion in FY2025 procurement funding and $1.7 billion for continued R&D. Despite slower production due to software delays, its long-term scale (projected fleet of 1,763 aircraft) ensures enduring opportunities for sustainment, avionics upgrades, and engine improvements. The B-21 Raider program, now transitioning to early production, anchors the U.S. bomber force for decades ahead. FY2025 funding of roughly $4.7 billion across procurement and development supports a steady ramp-up and subcontracting for airframe structures, coatings, and propulsion components.

The Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) family of systems, including F-47, represents the most transformative opportunity. With FY2025 R&D funding of $3.3 billion (up from $2.3 billion in FY2024), NGAD integrates manned sixth-generation fighters, autonomous drones, and distributed sensor networks. NGAD's Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) concept, low-cost, AI-enabled unmanned wingmen, is attracting both primes and new entrants. The Air Force has down-selected Anduril Industries and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems to develop prototype CCAs, signalling a diversification of the prime contractor landscape.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: The U.S. military market has been driven by the need for technological superiority, operational efficiency, and strategic flexibility in modern warfare. As military needs evolve, companies supplying products and services to the military must focus on innovative solutions to address emerging challenges.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: In the highly competitive U.S. military market, companies must adopt a growth and marketing strategy that not only targets traditional defense contractors but also aligns with emerging technologies, sustainability, and geopolitical challenges. A well-executed strategy should focus on innovation, strategic partnerships, cost-effectiveness, and government relations to drive market share and growth.

Competitive Strategy: A competitive strategy in the market requires a combination of technological leadership, strategic relationships, cost efficiency, and global market expansion. Companies that can stay ahead of military needs, innovate in emerging technologies, and demonstrate value through sustainability and reliability will position themselves as key players in the defense sector. By emphasizing adaptability, agility, and long-term customer relationships, businesses can not only compete but thrive in this ever-evolving and critical market.

Research Methodology

Factors for Data Prediction and Modelling

  • The base currency considered for the market analysis is US$. Currencies other than the US$ have been converted to the US$ for all statistical calculations, considering the average conversion rate for that particular year.
  • The currency conversion rate has been taken from the historical exchange rate of the Oanda website.
  • The information rendered in the report is a result of in-depth primary interviews, surveys, and secondary analysis.
  • Where relevant information was not available, proxy indicators and extrapolation were employed.
  • Any economic downturn in the future has not been taken into consideration for the market estimation and forecast.
  • Technologies currently used are expected to persist through the forecast with no major technological breakthroughs.

Market Estimation and Forecast

This research study involves the usage of extensive secondary sources, such as certified publications, articles from recognized authors, white papers, annual reports of companies, directories, and major databases to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the U.S. military market.

The market engineering process involves the calculation of the market statistics, market size estimation, market forecast, market crackdown, and data triangulation (the methodology for such quantitative data processes has been explained in further sections). The primary research study has been undertaken to gather information and validate the market numbers for segmentation types and industry trends of the key players in the market.

Primary Research

The primary sources involve industry experts from the U.S. military market and various stakeholders in the ecosystem. Respondents such as CEOs, vice presidents, marketing directors, and technology and innovation directors have been interviewed to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study.

The key data points taken from primary sources include:

  • validation and triangulation of all the numbers and graphs
  • validation of report segmentations and key qualitative findings
  • understanding the competitive landscape
  • validation of the numbers of various markets for the market type
  • percentage split of individual markets for geographical analysis

Secondary Research

This research study involves the usage of extensive secondary research, directories, company websites, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as Hoovers, Bloomberg, Businessweek, and Factiva, to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the U.S. military market. In addition to the data sources, the study has been undertaken with the help of other data sources and websites.

Secondary research has been done to obtain crucial information about the industry's value chain, revenue models, the market's monetary chain, the total pool of key players, and the current and potential use cases and applications.

The key data points taken from secondary research include:

  • segmentations and percentage shares
  • data for market value
  • key industry trends of the top players in the market
  • qualitative insights into various aspects of the market, key trends, and emerging areas of innovation
  • quantitative data for mathematical and statistical calculations

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies that are profiled in the U.S. military market have been selected based on inputs gathered from primary experts and by analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, and market penetration.

Some of the prominent names in the U.S. military market are:

U.S. Military Aircraft, Drones, and Defense Space Product Provider (Focus on Aircraft)

  • Spirit AeroSystems Inc.
  • GKN Aerospace
  • Qarbon Aerospace
  • Israel Aerospace Industries
  • Sonaca Group
  • Aernnova Aerospace Corporation S.A.
  • Latecoere
  • CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
  • RTX Corporation

Platform Manufacturers

  • The Boeing Company
  • General Atomics
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Textron Aviation Defense LLC.

Companies that are not a part of the aforementioned pool have been well represented across different sections of the report (wherever applicable).

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Scope and Definition

1 Market: Industry Outlook

  • 1.1 Introduction to the U.S. Military Industry
    • 1.1.1 U.S. Military Aerospace Production, Volume (by End User), 2020-2024
    • 1.1.2 Leading Defense Contractor (by Total Arms Sales), 2020-2024, $Billion
    • 1.1.3 Top Recipients of the U.S. Arms, 2024
  • 1.2 U.S. Military Budget and Strategic Priorities
    • 1.2.1 Overview of Defense Budget
      • 1.2.1.1 Historical (FY2019-FY2024)
      • 1.2.1.2 Current Budget (FY2025)
      • 1.2.1.3 Futuristic Budget
    • 1.2.2 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment
  • 1.3 Key Programs: Major Opportunities based on Active and Planned Procurement Programmes
  • 1.4 Customer Access and Procurement Channels
    • 1.4.1 Customer Analysis
      • 1.4.1.1 U.S. Air Force
      • 1.4.1.2 U.S. Army
      • 1.4.1.3 U.S. Navy
    • 1.4.2 Navigating U.S. Military Aerospace Procurement (2022-2025)
      • 1.4.2.1 U.S. Defense Budgets and Key Aerospace Programs (FY2023-FY2024)
      • 1.4.2.2 Major Procurement Contracts and Execution (2022-2025)
    • 1.4.3 Contracting Types
      • 1.4.3.1 Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Contracts
      • 1.4.3.2 Cost-Plus Contracts
      • 1.4.3.3 Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts
      • 1.4.3.4 Multiple Award Contracts (MACs) and Multiple Award Schedule (MAS)
      • 1.4.3.5 Others (Basic Ordering Agreements, Blanket Purchase Agreements, Long-Term Agreements, and OTA Agreements)
      • 1.4.3.6 Summary
  • 1.5 Supplier Tier
    • 1.5.1 Prime Contractors/OEMs
    • 1.5.2 Tier-1 and Tier-2 Suppliers
    • 1.5.3 Subassemblies and Aerostructures Supplies
  • 1.6 U.S. Military Market TAM and Sonaca Group's Serviceable Available market (SAM) Analysis, 2024
  • 1.7 Market Dynamics Overview
    • 1.7.1 Market Drivers
      • 1.7.1.1 Power Competition and Indo-Pacific Posture (Air Domain)
      • 1.7.1.2 Rising Budgets and Air Superiority Modernization (F-35A, B-21, NGAD Family including F-47)
      • 1.7.1.3 Innovation and New Entrants
    • 1.7.2 Market Challenges
      • 1.7.2.1 Budget Constraints and Political Uncertainty
      • 1.7.2.2 Program Delays, Cost Overruns, and Sustainment Burden
      • 1.7.2.3 Industrial Base Constraints and Supply Chain Bottlenecks
    • 1.7.3 Market Opportunities
      • 1.7.3.1 Major Modernization Programs/Attritable Collaborative Aircraft at Scale
      • 1.7.3.2 Munitions Surge and Multi-Year Buys

2 Application

  • 2.1 Application Summary
  • 2.2 U.S. Military Market (by End User), Value, 2024-2030
    • 2.2.1 U.S. Army
    • 2.2.2 U.S. Navy
    • 2.2.3 U.S. Air Force
    • 2.2.4 Others (Joint Program Offices and Defense Agencies)

3 Products

  • 3.1 Product Summary
  • 3.2 U.S. Military Market (by Platform Type), Value, 2024-2030
    • 3.2.1 Fighter Aircraft
      • 3.2.1.1 Fighter and Attack Aircraft
      • 3.2.1.2 Bombers
      • 3.2.1.3 Others (Transport Aircraft and Electronic Warfare)
    • 3.2.2 Rotary-Wing Aircraft/VTOL
    • 3.2.3 Military Drones
      • 3.2.3.1 Medium-Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) Drones
      • 3.2.3.2 High-Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) Drones
      • 3.2.3.3 Small Drones
    • 3.2.4 Space Activities
  • 3.3 U.S. Military Market (by Component), Value, 2024-2030
    • 3.3.1 Fuselage
    • 3.3.2 Empennage
    • 3.3.3 Nacelles
    • 3.3.4 Pylons
    • 3.3.5 Wing Components
    • 3.3.6 Doors
    • 3.3.7 Others
  • 3.4 U.S. Military Market (by Appropriation Type), Value, 2024-2030
    • 3.4.1 New Builds and Procurement
      • 3.4.1.1 U.S. Air Force Procurement
      • 3.4.1.2 U.S. Navy Procurement
      • 3.4.1.3 U.S. Army Procurement
    • 3.4.2 Operations and Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO)
    • 3.4.3 Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

4 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles

  • 4.1 Competitive Landscape (Platform Manufacturers)
  • 4.2 Strategic Initiatives (Partnerships, Acquisitions, and Product Launches)
  • 4.3 Case Studies of Successful Market Entry or Expansion
    • 4.3.1 Case Study 1: BAE Systems Inc. (U.K.-Based, U.S. Subsidiary)
    • 4.3.2 Case Study 2: Safran Electronics & Defense (France-Based, U.S. Subsidiary)
  • 4.4 Company Profiles
    • 4.4.1 Component Manufacturers
      • 4.4.1.1 Spirit AeroSystems Inc.
        • 4.4.1.1.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.1.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.1.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.1.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.1.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.1.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.1.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.1.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.1.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.1.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.1.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.1.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.1.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.1.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.2 GKN AEROSPACE
        • 4.4.1.2.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.2.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.2.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.2.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.2.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.2.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.2.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.2.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.2.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.2.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.2.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.2.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.2.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.2.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.3 Qarbon Aerospace
        • 4.4.1.3.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.3.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.3.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.3.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.3.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.3.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.3.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.3.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.3.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.3.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.3.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.3.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.3.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.3.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.4 Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)
        • 4.4.1.4.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.4.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.4.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.4.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.4.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.4.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.4.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.4.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.4.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.4.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.4.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.4.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.4.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.4.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.5 Sonaca Group
        • 4.4.1.5.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.5.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.5.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.5.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.5.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.5.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.5.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.5.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.5.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.5.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.5.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.5.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.5.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.5.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.6 Aernnova Aerospace Corporation S.A.
        • 4.4.1.6.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.6.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.6.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.6.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.6.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.6.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.6.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.6.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.6.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.6.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.6.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.6.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.6.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.6.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.7 Latecoere
        • 4.4.1.7.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.7.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.7.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.7.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.7.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.7.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.7.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.7.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.7.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.7.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.7.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.7.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.7.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.7.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.8 CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
        • 4.4.1.8.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.8.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.8.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.8.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.8.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.8.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.8.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.8.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.8.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.8.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.8.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.8.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.8.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.8.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.1.9 RTX Corporation
        • 4.4.1.9.1 Overview
        • 4.4.1.9.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.1.9.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.1.9.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.1.9.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.1.9.6 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.1.9.7 Brief History
        • 4.4.1.9.8 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.1.9.9 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.1.9.10 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.1.9.11 Technology Model
        • 4.4.1.9.12 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.1.9.13 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.1.9.14 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
    • 4.4.2 Platform Manufacturers
      • 4.4.2.1 The Boeing Company
        • 4.4.2.1.1 Overview
        • 4.4.2.1.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.2.1.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.2.1.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.2.1.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.2.1.6 Market Share, 2024
        • 4.4.2.1.7 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.2.1.8 Brief History
        • 4.4.2.1.9 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.2.1.10 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.2.1.11 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.2.1.12 Technology Model
        • 4.4.2.1.13 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.2.1.14 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.2.1.15 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.2.2 General Atomics
        • 4.4.2.2.1 Overview
        • 4.4.2.2.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.2.2.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.2.2.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.2.2.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.2.2.6 Market Share, 2024
        • 4.4.2.2.7 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.2.2.8 Brief History
        • 4.4.2.2.9 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.2.2.10 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.2.2.11 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.2.2.12 Technology Model
        • 4.4.2.2.13 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.2.2.14 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.2.2.15 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.2.3 Northrop Grumman Corporation
        • 4.4.2.3.1 Overview
        • 4.4.2.3.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.2.3.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.2.3.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.2.3.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.2.3.6 Market Share, 2024
        • 4.4.2.3.7 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.2.3.8 Brief History
        • 4.4.2.3.9 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.2.3.10 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.2.3.11 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.2.3.12 Technology Model
        • 4.4.2.3.13 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.2.3.14 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.2.3.15 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.2.4 Lockheed Martin Corporation
        • 4.4.2.4.1 Overview
        • 4.4.2.4.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.2.4.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.2.4.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.2.4.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.2.4.6 Market Share, 2024
        • 4.4.2.4.7 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.2.4.8 Brief History
        • 4.4.2.4.9 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.2.4.10 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.2.4.11 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.2.4.12 Technology Model
        • 4.4.2.4.13 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.2.4.14 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.2.4.15 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.2.5 General Dynamics Corporation
        • 4.4.2.5.1 Overview
        • 4.4.2.5.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.2.5.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.2.5.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.2.5.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.2.5.6 Market Share, 2024
        • 4.4.2.5.7 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.2.5.8 Brief History
        • 4.4.2.5.9 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.2.5.10 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.2.5.11 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.2.5.12 Technology Model
        • 4.4.2.5.13 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.2.5.14 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.2.5.15 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
      • 4.4.2.6 Textron Aviation Defense LLC.
        • 4.4.2.6.1 Overview
        • 4.4.2.6.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
        • 4.4.2.6.3 Key Sales Channels
        • 4.4.2.6.4 Top Competitors
        • 4.4.2.6.5 Target Customers
        • 4.4.2.6.6 Market Share, 2024
        • 4.4.2.6.7 Geographic Presence
        • 4.4.2.6.8 Brief History
        • 4.4.2.6.9 Key Personnel
        • 4.4.2.6.10 Business Ambition and Strategy
        • 4.4.2.6.11 Business and Operating Model
        • 4.4.2.6.12 Technology Model
        • 4.4.2.6.13 Analyst's View
        • 4.4.2.6.14 Strengths and Competitive Advantages
        • 4.4.2.6.15 Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities
    • 4.4.3 List of Other Key Companies

5 Procurement Program

  • 5.1 Procurement Programs and Deliveries (2022-2025)
    • 5.1.1 U.S.
      • 5.1.1.1 Introduction
      • 5.1.1.2 Global Procurement Programs of F-35 (by Country), 2022-2025
      • 5.1.1.3 Service and Agency Budget Segmentation (by Year)
      • 5.1.1.4 Budget Category Summaries (RDT&E, Procurement, O&M, Personnel), by Year
      • 5.1.1.5 Procurement Programs and Deliveries, ISR Budget (by Platform Type), 2022-2025
      • 5.1.1.6 Conclusion
  • 5.2 F-35 Procurement Decision Makers (U.S. Focus)
    • 5.2.1 Overview of the F-35 Program
    • 5.2.2 Key U.S. Decision Makers in the F-35 Procurement Process
    • 5.2.3 Procurement Timeline and Decision Process
    • 5.2.4 External Influences on F-35 Procurement Decisions
    • 5.2.5 Conclusion
  • 5.3 F-35 Lightning II: Who Supply Whom

6 Research Methodology

  • 6.1 Data Sources
    • 6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
    • 6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
    • 6.1.3 Data Triangulation
  • 6.2 Market Estimation and Forecast

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: U.S. Military Market (by Scenario), $Billion, 2025, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 2: U.S. Market Snapshot, 2024
  • Figure 3: U.S. Military Market (by End User), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 4: U.S. Military Market (by Platform Type), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 5: U.S. Military Market (by Component), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 6: U.S. Military Market (by Appropriation Type), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 7: U.S. Military Market Segmentation
  • Figure 8: Projected U.S. National Defense Budget, FY2025-FY2029, $Billion
  • Figure 9: FY2025 USAF Budget Breakdown for Munitions, O&M, and Procurement
  • Figure 10: U.S. Military Market (by End User), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 11: U.S. Military Market (U.S. Army), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 12: U.S. Military Market (U.S. Navy), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 13: U.S. Military Market (U.S. Air Force), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 14: U.S. Military Market (Others), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 15: U.S. Military Market (by Platform Type), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 16: U.S. Military Market (by Component), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 17: U.S. Military Market (by Appropriation Type), $Million, 2024, 2027, and 2030
  • Figure 18: U.S. Military Market (by Fighter Aircraft), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 19: U.S. Military Market (Fighter and Attack Aircraft), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 20: U.S. Military Market (Bombers), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 21: U.S. Military Market (Others), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 22: U.S. Military Market (Rotary-Wing Aircraft/VTOL), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 23: U.S. Military Market (by Military Drones), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 24: U.S. Military Market (Medium-Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) Drones), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 25: U.S. Military Market (High-Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) Drones), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 26: U.S. Military Market (Small Drones), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 27: U.S. Military Market (Space Activities), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 28: U.S. Military Market (Fuselage), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 29: U.S. Military Market (Empennage), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 30: U.S. Military Market (Nacelles), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 31: U.S. Military Market (Pylons), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 32: U.S. Military Market (Wing Components), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 33: U.S. Military Market (Doors), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 34: U.S. Military Market (Others), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 35: U.S. Military Market (by New Builds and Procurement), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 36: U.S. Military Market (Operations and Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO)), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 37: U.S. Military Market (Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Figure 38: U.S. National (NIP) and Military (MIP) Intelligence Budgets, FY2022-FY2025, $Billion
  • Figure 39: Data Triangulation
  • Figure 40: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach
  • Figure 41: Assumptions and Limitations

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Market Snapshot
  • Table 2: Competitive Landscape Snapshot
  • Table 3: Major U.S. Aerospace Primes and their Integration Roles
  • Table 4: U.S. Military Aerospace Production, Volume (by End User), 2020-2024
  • Table 5: Top Recipients of the U.S. Arms, 2024
  • Table 6: U.S. National Defense Budget, FY2019-FY2024, $Billion
  • Table 7: FY2025 President's Defense Budget Request, $Billion
  • Table 8: Current Trends Impact Assessment, U.S. Military Industry
  • Table 9: Future Trends Impact Assessment, U.S. Military Industry
  • Table 10: Key Trends in the U.S. Military Ecosystem
  • Table 11: U.S. Military Procurement Program - Active and Planned (Air and Cross-Domain Technologies, FY2025)
  • Table 12: Customer Analysis: U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, and U.S. Navy (including Marine Corps)
  • Table 13: Summarizing Select Aviation Procurement Authorized in Recent Defense Budgets
  • Table 14: Major Procurement Contracts and Execution (2022-2025)
  • Table 15: Key U.S. Defense Contract Types and Agreements - Definitions, Features, and Typical Use Cases
  • Table 16: Leading Prime Contractors in U.S. Aerospace (USAF Scope)
  • Table 17: Leading Tier-1 Suppliers - U.S. Aerospace
  • Table 18: Leading Tier-2 Suppliers - U.S. Aerospace
  • Table 19: Leading Subassemblies and Aerostructures Suppliers
  • Table 20: SAF Platform/Subsystem Supplier Mapping
  • Table 21: FY2025 ACE and PDI Implementation Overview
  • Table 22: Air Superiority Modernization Portfolio (FY2025-FY2026)
  • Table 23: Emerging Innovation Pathways in the Air Domain
  • Table 24: Budget and Political Restraints Affecting Defense Aerospace
  • Table 25: Major Programmatic and Sustainment Restraints
  • Table 26: Industrial and Supply-Chain Constraints
  • Table 27: Major Modernization and Aerospace Opportunities
  • Table 28: Munitions and Export Growth Opportunities
  • Table 29: U.S. Military Market (by End User), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Table 30: U.S. Military Market (by Platform Type), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Table 31: U.S. Military Market (by Component), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Table 32: U.S. Military Market (by Appropriation Type), $Million, 2024-2030
  • Table 33: Procurement - U.S. Air Force
  • Table 34: Procurement - U.S. Navy
  • Table 35: U.S. Navy Aircraft Procurement
  • Table 36: Procurement - U.S. Army
  • Table 37: U.S. Army Aircraft Procurement
  • Table 38: Recent U.S. Military Aircraft MRO Contracts (2018-2025)
  • Table 39: Current Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) Programs in U.S. Military
  • Table 40: Strategic Initiatives (by Leading Companies), 2018-2025
  • Table 41: List of Other Key Companies
  • Table 42: DoD Total (Base + FY2023 Supplement), Budget (by Appropriation Title), $Million
  • Table 43: DoD Total (Base + FY 2023 Supplement), Budget (by Military Department), $Million
  • Table 44: DoD Total (Base + FY 2023 Supplement), Budget (by Appropriation Title)
  • Table 45: Service and Agency Budget Segmentation (by Year), 2022-2025
  • Table 46: Service and Agency Budget Segmentation (by Year), 2022-2025
  • Table 47: Procurement Programs and Deliveries, ISR Budget (by Platform Type), 2022-2025
  • Table 48: Key U.S. Decision Makers in the F-35 Procurement Process
  • Table 49: Procurement Timeline and Decision Process
  • Table 50: External Influences on F-35 Procurement Decisions
  • Table 51: List of F-35 Lightning II Aircraft Component/Material Manufacturers