查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
雲端原生自動化和ETSI NFV MANO:演進，轉移，共存策略
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1789656

雲端原生自動化和ETSI NFV MANO:演進，轉移，共存策略

Cloud-Native Automation and ETSI NFV MANO: Evolution, Migration and Co-Existence Strategies
出版日期: | 出版商: Analysys Mason | 英文 34 Slides | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
簡介目錄

即使是熱衷於採用雲端原生自動化的電信業者，也不願採用 NFV。 MANO 似乎不太可能在短期內完全從網路中淘汰。

電信業者主要依賴歐洲電信標準協會 (ETSI) 網路功能虛擬化 (NFV) 管理和編排 (MANO) 架構來進行虛擬化網路功能 (VNF) 的生命週期管理和相關網路服務的編排。隨著雲端原生網路功能 (CNF) 的日益普及，人們對實施雲端原生自動化 (CNA) 的興趣也日益濃厚，這是一種利用 Kubernetes (K8s) 固有自動化功能的新型自動化範式。營運商期望 CNA 能夠釋放 MANO 一直難以實現的自動化優勢。 ETSI 還計劃改進 MANO，使其更符合 CNA 原則。然而，最佳路徑營運商推進網路自動化的途徑仍不明朗。

本報告探討了營運商可以採取的各種方法，以便從網路自動化中獲得更大的收益：要麼發展其 NFV MANO 實施，要麼將 CNA 解決方案遷移到 NFV。本報告探討了 NFV MANO（與 CNA 協同）的採用以及採用混合自動化方法的影響。報告還討論了營運商如何彌合 NFV MANO 和 CNA 之間的差距，以及網路自動化範式轉移對產業生態系統的影響。

本報告解答的問題

  • 營運商發展其網路自動化方法的關鍵考慮因素是什麼？
  • 營運商可以採用哪些策略來利用 MANO 和 CNA 推進網路自動化？
  • 不斷發展的 MANO 標準和實施對營運商意味著什麼？
  • 營運商如何實施 CNA 方法、從中受益並克服課題？
  • 供應商如何在營運商的自動化之旅中提供支援？
簡介目錄

"Even operators keen to adopt cloud-native automation are unlikely to be able to completely remove NFV MANO from their network anytime soon."

Telecoms operators primarily rely on the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) network functions virtualisation (NFV) management and orchestration (MANO) architecture for managing the lifecycle of virtualised network functions (VNFs) and orchestrating associated network services. The growing adoption of cloud-native network function (CNF) has led to increasing interest in implementing a new automation paradigm - cloud-native automation (CNA) - which uses the inherent automation capabilities of Kubernetes (K8s). Operators hope that CNA can unlock automation benefits that they have struggled to achieve with MANO. Additionally, ETSI plans to evolve MANO to align more closely with CNA principles. However, the best pathways for operators to advance their network automation remain unclear.

This report explores different approaches for operators to unlock greater benefits from their network automation, namely by evolving their NFV MANO implementations or adopting CNA solutions (alongside NFV MANO, thereby adopting a hybrid automation approach). It also discusses how operators can bridge the gap between NFV MANO and CNA and the implications of the changing network automation paradigm on the industry ecosystem.

Questions answered in this report:

  • What are the key considerations for operators that are looking to evolve their approaches to network automation?
  • What strategies can operators adopt to advance their network automation with MANO and CNA?
  • What are the implications of evolving MANO standards and implementations for operators?
  • How can operators implement, benefit from and overcome the challenges of CNA approaches?
  • How can vendors best support operators with advancing their automation?